OT GRAMMYS 08

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby xflajrnylvr » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:04 am

WTF cares the music today sucks to high heaven
User avatar
xflajrnylvr
8 Track
 
Posts: 645
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:19 am
Location: USA

Postby ohsherrie » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:40 am

The ONLY thing I liked about what I saw of that show was Josh Grobin and Andrea Bocelli and that absolutely brought tears to my eyes.

Foo Fighters? OMFG, Image
User avatar
ohsherrie
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:42 pm

Postby Barb » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:50 am

Natlie Cole definitely has an opinion on Amy Winehouse! She makes a great point too!

“I'm going on record as an artist who is able to critique [Amy Winehouse]. I think she has a great talent, but I don't agree with the Grammys giving her those nods. I think it sends the wrong message, that even in the midst of her stupor of drugs she can get nominated for all these awards. It's a slap in the face to musicians and artists who work very hard that they turn around and give it to someone who really obviously doesn't have a grasp of what she has. I've been in this business over 25 years and I sacrificed five years of my own life on drugs and almost lost my life because of it. So I take great offense to almost see someone getting glory out of being in the position that they're in – she needs to get her life together and embrace her craft, she will lose it if she doesn't get it together.”

- Natalie Cole
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby ohsherrie » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:54 am

Barb wrote:Natlie Cole definitely has an opinion on Amy Winehouse! She makes a great point too!

“I'm going on record as an artist who is able to critique [Amy Winehouse]. I think she has a great talent, but I don't agree with the Grammys giving her those nods. I think it sends the wrong message, that even in the midst of her stupor of drugs she can get nominated for all these awards. It's a slap in the face to musicians and artists who work very hard that they turn around and give it to someone who really obviously doesn't have a grasp of what she has. I've been in this business over 25 years and I sacrificed five years of my own life on drugs and almost lost my life because of it. So I take great offense to almost see someone getting glory out of being in the position that they're in – she needs to get her life together and embrace her craft, she will lose it if she doesn't get it together.”

- Natalie Cole


And she is so very right.
User avatar
ohsherrie
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:42 pm

Postby *Laura » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:03 am

Barb wrote:Natlie Cole definitely has an opinion on Amy Winehouse! She makes a great point too!

“I'm going on record as an artist who is able to critique [Amy Winehouse]. I think she has a great talent, but I don't agree with the Grammys giving her those nods. I think it sends the wrong message, that even in the midst of her stupor of drugs she can get nominated for all these awards. It's a slap in the face to musicians and artists who work very hard that they turn around and give it to someone who really obviously doesn't have a grasp of what she has. I've been in this business over 25 years and I sacrificed five years of my own life on drugs and almost lost my life because of it. So I take great offense to almost see someone getting glory out of being in the position that they're in – she needs to get her life together and embrace her craft, she will lose it if she doesn't get it together.”

- Natalie Cole

Bravo to Natalie Cole!I'm glad she spoke up.
Amy W. is a disgrace.Can't ever forget seeing that Youtube where she was absolutely wasted on stage...Is that a way to treat the people who buy albums and tickets?
No one should get a Grammy (not even a nomination) for something like that. :x
Image Available @ LuluBooks.com
User avatar
*Laura
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3978
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:51 pm
Location: Zen, SoCal

Postby lights1961 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:21 am

*Laura wrote:
Barb wrote:Natlie Cole definitely has an opinion on Amy Winehouse! She makes a great point too!

“I'm going on record as an artist who is able to critique [Amy Winehouse]. I think she has a great talent, but I don't agree with the Grammys giving her those nods. I think it sends the wrong message, that even in the midst of her stupor of drugs she can get nominated for all these awards. It's a slap in the face to musicians and artists who work very hard that they turn around and give it to someone who really obviously doesn't have a grasp of what she has. I've been in this business over 25 years and I sacrificed five years of my own life on drugs and almost lost my life because of it. So I take great offense to almost see someone getting glory out of being in the position that they're in – she needs to get her life together and embrace her craft, she will lose it if she doesn't get it together.”

- Natalie Cole

Bravo to Natalie Cole!I'm glad she spoke up.
Amy W. is a disgrace.Can't ever forget seeing that Youtube where she was absolutely wasted on stage...Is that a way to treat the people who buy albums and tickets?
No one should get a Grammy (not even a nomination) for something like that. :x


think of all the hair bands that were wasted or drugged up during the 80s whil on tour... def lep comes to mind..... and we still bought the music.
she is nto the first last or only...
lights1961
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5362
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:33 am

Postby Barb » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:24 am

lights1961 wrote:
*Laura wrote:
Barb wrote:Natlie Cole definitely has an opinion on Amy Winehouse! She makes a great point too!

“I'm going on record as an artist who is able to critique [Amy Winehouse]. I think she has a great talent, but I don't agree with the Grammys giving her those nods. I think it sends the wrong message, that even in the midst of her stupor of drugs she can get nominated for all these awards. It's a slap in the face to musicians and artists who work very hard that they turn around and give it to someone who really obviously doesn't have a grasp of what she has. I've been in this business over 25 years and I sacrificed five years of my own life on drugs and almost lost my life because of it. So I take great offense to almost see someone getting glory out of being in the position that they're in – she needs to get her life together and embrace her craft, she will lose it if she doesn't get it together.”

- Natalie Cole

Bravo to Natalie Cole!I'm glad she spoke up.
Amy W. is a disgrace.Can't ever forget seeing that Youtube where she was absolutely wasted on stage...Is that a way to treat the people who buy albums and tickets?
No one should get a Grammy (not even a nomination) for something like that. :x


think of all the hair bands that were wasted or drugged up during the 80s whil on tour... def lep comes to mind..... and we still bought the music.
she is nto the first last or only...


This chick is so fucked up half the time, she can't even perform. That is not professional and unworthy of receiving the highest award in the music industry. I guess I'm not cool enough to like her.
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby T-TIME » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:26 am

NealIsGod wrote:
Barb wrote:I can't believe they gave they heroin addict/crack whore 5 grammys. That song is the most annoying song on earth!


Yeah, I don't think the music biz has ever been in worse shape than it is today. WTF happened?


The fucking problem is todays artist are sampling all the artist that was present last night. Todays music is horrible. Thats just fine by me. I'll listen to Journey, Prince, VH, Velvet Revolver, Goo Goo etc... All Fucking Day. Let todays new artist burn themselves out and make way for all real music artist.
User avatar
T-TIME
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:52 am

Postby lights1961 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:27 am

Barb wrote:
lights1961 wrote:
*Laura wrote:
Barb wrote:Natlie Cole definitely has an opinion on Amy Winehouse! She makes a great point too!

“I'm going on record as an artist who is able to critique [Amy Winehouse]. I think she has a great talent, but I don't agree with the Grammys giving her those nods. I think it sends the wrong message, that even in the midst of her stupor of drugs she can get nominated for all these awards. It's a slap in the face to musicians and artists who work very hard that they turn around and give it to someone who really obviously doesn't have a grasp of what she has. I've been in this business over 25 years and I sacrificed five years of my own life on drugs and almost lost my life because of it. So I take great offense to almost see someone getting glory out of being in the position that they're in – she needs to get her life together and embrace her craft, she will lose it if she doesn't get it together.”

- Natalie Cole

Bravo to Natalie Cole!I'm glad she spoke up.
Amy W. is a disgrace.Can't ever forget seeing that Youtube where she was absolutely wasted on stage...Is that a way to treat the people who buy albums and tickets?
No one should get a Grammy (not even a nomination) for something like that. :x


think of all the hair bands that were wasted or drugged up during the 80s whil on tour... def lep comes to mind..... and we still bought the music.
she is nto the first last or only...


one of the DJ's on a indie radio station put it this way... i am glad that the grammys put her art before her personal behavior... and if you think about it that way...she is talanted and deserves the award.
otherwise... think of all the artist who behaved badly including the beattles during their heyday--that they never said boo before---- i think for her its been a double standard...

Rick

This chick is so fucked up half the time, she can't even perform. That is not professional and unworthy of receiving the highest award in the music industry. I guess I'm not cool enough to like her.
lights1961
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5362
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:33 am

Postby T-TIME » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:32 am

lights1961 wrote:you guys gotta admit TINA at 65-70 is HOT HOT HOT!!!

Rick


She looked like the " Tin Man " before they found the can.
User avatar
T-TIME
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:52 am

Postby Arkansas » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:35 am

*Laura wrote:... Can't ever forget seeing that Youtube where she was absolutely wasted on stage...Is that a way to treat the people who buy albums and tickets?
No one should get a Grammy (not even a nomination) for something like that. :x


She didn't win any Grammies for that. Her awards were for an album recorded over a year ago, and the popularity it generated last year. Her behaviour since then has nothing to do with it.

Btw, I'm trying to think of all the great entertainers that we've seen 'wasted' on stage. Hhhmmm...yep, just about ALL of them.


later~
Arkansas
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2565
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:23 am
Location: duh?

Postby ohsherrie » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:35 am

T-TIME wrote:
lights1961 wrote:you guys gotta admit TINA at 65-70 is HOT HOT HOT!!!

Rick


She looked like the " Tin Man " before they found the can.


Image

True, but I hope I have the energy to even move that much when I'm her age. :wink:
User avatar
ohsherrie
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:42 pm

Postby T-TIME » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:36 am

Arkansas wrote:
*Laura wrote:... Can't ever forget seeing that Youtube where she was absolutely wasted on stage...Is that a way to treat the people who buy albums and tickets?
No one should get a Grammy (not even a nomination) for something like that. :x


She didn't win any Grammies for that. Her awards were for an album recorded over a year ago, and the popularity it generated last year. Her behaviour since then has nothing to do with it.

Btw, I'm trying to think of all the great entertainers that we've seen 'wasted' on stage. Hhhmmm...yep, just about ALL of them.


later~


Nicely done!
User avatar
T-TIME
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:52 am

Postby T-TIME » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:37 am

ohsherrie wrote:
T-TIME wrote:
lights1961 wrote:you guys gotta admit TINA at 65-70 is HOT HOT HOT!!!

Rick


She looked like the " Tin Man " before they found the can.


Image

True, but I hope I have the energy to even move that much when I'm her age. :wink:


No doubt
User avatar
T-TIME
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:52 am

Postby ProgRocker53 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:38 am

The best artists and releases of 2007 were largely unrecognized and untouched.
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby *Laura » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:45 am

Arkansas wrote:
*Laura wrote:... Can't ever forget seeing that Youtube where she was absolutely wasted on stage...Is that a way to treat the people who buy albums and tickets?
No one should get a Grammy (not even a nomination) for something like that. :x


She didn't win any Grammies for that. Her awards were for an album recorded over a year ago, and the popularity it generated last year. Her behaviour since then has nothing to do with it.

Btw, I'm trying to think of all the great entertainers that we've seen 'wasted' on stage. Hhhmmm...yep, just about ALL of them.


later~

Too bad I can't find that Youtube right now...Maybe you haven't seen it.I'm not talking about just simply being drunk,it was worse than that...Stopping in the middle of the song,cussing the audience,stumbling on stage,etc...is not a way to present yourself in front of an audience.I don't care how many wonderful albums she has,that kind of a stage presence is disgusting.She's a woman - that makes it even more disgusting.
She should get some help,then resume her career.

Not sure she can get a free pass just because the hair bands from the '80s used to get on stage high & wasted.They carried their shows until the end.
The only story I know is that of Steven Tyler who fall flat on his face during a show and went straight to rehab from there.
Amy should do the same until she gets her shit together.
Image Available @ LuluBooks.com
User avatar
*Laura
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3978
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:51 pm
Location: Zen, SoCal

Postby Arkansas » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:08 am

*Laura wrote:
Arkansas wrote:
*Laura wrote:... Can't ever forget seeing that Youtube where she was absolutely wasted on stage...Is that a way to treat the people who buy albums and tickets?
No one should get a Grammy (not even a nomination) for something like that. :x


She didn't win any Grammies for that. Her awards were for an album recorded over a year ago, and the popularity it generated last year. Her behaviour since then has nothing to do with it.

Btw, I'm trying to think of all the great entertainers that we've seen 'wasted' on stage. Hhhmmm...yep, just about ALL of them.


later~

Too bad I can't find that Youtube right now...Maybe you haven't seen it.I'm not talking about just simply being drunk,it was worse than that...Stopping in the middle of the song,cussing the audience,stumbling on stage,etc...is not a way to present yourself in front of an audience.I don't care how many wonderful albums she has,that kind of a stage presence is disgusting.She's a woman - that makes it even more disgusting.
She should get some help,then resume her career.

Not sure she can get a free pass just because the hair bands from the '80s used to get on stage high & wasted.They carried their shows until the end.
The only story I know is that of Steven Tyler who fall flat on his face during a show and went straight to rehab from there.
Amy should do the same until she gets her shit together.


Oh I've seen the vid. I know exactly what you're talking about. It's flat out wrong...no doubt. But the awards last night weren't for 'best stage presence' or 'most professional appearance' or 'best sunday school teacher wannabe'. The awards were for songs and an album. They have nothing to do with current or recent behaviour.

And being under the influence on stage wasn't just for 80's hair bands, it's been an industry norm from the Grand Ole Opry 50 yrs ago, through Sinatra, Hendrix, Stones, Doors, Elvis, Zepp, Van Halen, Styx, Nirvana, etc, up to today. But again, stage antics have nothing to do with the Grammy Awards.

I'm glad she won. Her music deserved it.


later~
Arkansas
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2565
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:23 am
Location: duh?

Postby BobbyinTN » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:12 am

ohsherrie wrote:The ONLY thing I liked about what I saw of that show was Josh Grobin and Andrea Bocelli and that absolutely brought tears to my eyes.

Foo Fighters? OMFG, Image


That was AWESOME!!
User avatar
BobbyinTN
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1431
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:12 am

Postby *Laura » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:41 am

Arkansas wrote:
*Laura wrote:
Arkansas wrote:
*Laura wrote:... Can't ever forget seeing that Youtube where she was absolutely wasted on stage...Is that a way to treat the people who buy albums and tickets?
No one should get a Grammy (not even a nomination) for something like that. :x


She didn't win any Grammies for that. Her awards were for an album recorded over a year ago, and the popularity it generated last year. Her behaviour since then has nothing to do with it.

Btw, I'm trying to think of all the great entertainers that we've seen 'wasted' on stage. Hhhmmm...yep, just about ALL of them.


later~

Too bad I can't find that Youtube right now...Maybe you haven't seen it.I'm not talking about just simply being drunk,it was worse than that...Stopping in the middle of the song,cussing the audience,stumbling on stage,etc...is not a way to present yourself in front of an audience.I don't care how many wonderful albums she has,that kind of a stage presence is disgusting.She's a woman - that makes it even more disgusting.
She should get some help,then resume her career.

Not sure she can get a free pass just because the hair bands from the '80s used to get on stage high & wasted.They carried their shows until the end.
The only story I know is that of Steven Tyler who fall flat on his face during a show and went straight to rehab from there.
Amy should do the same until she gets her shit together.


Oh I've seen the vid. I know exactly what you're talking about. It's flat out wrong...no doubt. But the awards last night weren't for 'best stage presence' or 'most professional appearance' or 'best sunday school teacher wannabe'. The awards were for songs and an album. They have nothing to do with current or recent behaviour.

And being under the influence on stage wasn't just for 80's hair bands, it's been an industry norm from the Grand Ole Opry 50 yrs ago, through Sinatra, Hendrix, Stones, Doors, Elvis, Zepp, Van Halen, Styx, Nirvana, etc, up to today. But again, stage antics have nothing to do with the Grammy Awards.

I'm glad she won. Her music deserved it.


later~

Well,for me it matters the way the artist presents his/her work on stage...It's part of the "package" if you will.I'm not impressed by a woman who's got talent and makes an ass of herself on stage.
But you're right - the Grammys don't take that into consideration.Too bad.
Image Available @ LuluBooks.com
User avatar
*Laura
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3978
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:51 pm
Location: Zen, SoCal

Postby tammy » Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:26 am

BobbyinTN wrote:I haven't watched the Grammy's in YEARS AND YEARS, but I did last night and I see a return to actual music, music of substance.

Say what you will about Amy Winehouse, but she is crazy talented and yes, she's got some problems, but her music alone is bringing back something we all need a return to rhythm and lyrics and meaning.

I'm sure people called Janis Joplin worse names than "crack whore" but her talent is still appreciated.


True. When I first heard Amy Winehouse's songs I really liked what I heard...a very retro sound, 40s-50s...hope she can get her personal stuff together & not blow it. Cyndi Lauper was really excited Amy won.

I didn't know who the Foo fighters were until a week ago when I caught their funny 70s spoof video, wearing polyester & wigs - it cracked me up...now, after seeing them on the Grammys - well, that goofy singer is actually CUTE!

I zipped through a lot of the show, like the Rap, but the end of Kanye's song, the non-rap part, sounded really nice- the melody...something about seeing his mother in a dream.

Carole King looks great! Although, she & so many others seemed to be wearing Hefty & space bags. I like Alicia Keys, but is she trying to be another Beyonce type (she was wearing a silver space bag)? I like her better not strutting around on the stage - she has such a beautiful face. Beyonce has one of the best bodies in the business.
Cher? She's looking like a wax museum.

Actually, I like a lot of the music played today...


I
tammy
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2338
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:17 am
Location: leftside

Postby sadie65 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:33 am

I think the Grammys lost their relevance years ago. I stopped watching them a long, long time ago.
Sadie
sadie65
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3037
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 4:08 am

Postby X factor » Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:35 pm

Rockindeano wrote:Adams song wins Grammy


Aretha Franklin & Mary J. Blige (Featuring The Harlem Boys Choir) won a Grammy singing BA's "Never Gonna Break My Faith" at the 2008 awards ceremony last night.


Let's not forget the BOSS racking up three wins!
User avatar
X factor
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: KY

Great but for winning best rock instrumental

Postby Lerxst101 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:44 pm

X factor wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:Adams song wins Grammy


Aretha Franklin & Mary J. Blige (Featuring The Harlem Boys Choir) won a Grammy singing BA's "Never Gonna Break My Faith" at the 2008 awards ceremony last night.


Let's not forget the BOSS racking up three wins!


I still cannot believe he won over Rush, though why that particular Rush instrumental track was nominated over a much better one (The Main Monkey Business), I don't understand. And to think he also beat out Satriani, Vai and Metallica, is a joke, too.

I am a big fan of Springsteen, but winning this category just once again affirmed my frustration with the Grammy Awards.
Lerxst101
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 1:24 am

Re: Great but for winning best rock instrumental

Postby X factor » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:59 am

Lerxst101 wrote:
X factor wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:Adams song wins Grammy


Aretha Franklin & Mary J. Blige (Featuring The Harlem Boys Choir) won a Grammy singing BA's "Never Gonna Break My Faith" at the 2008 awards ceremony last night.


Let's not forget the BOSS racking up three wins!


I still cannot believe he won over Rush, though why that particular Rush instrumental track was nominated over a much better one (The Main Monkey Business), I don't understand. And to think he also beat out Satriani, Vai and Metallica, is a joke, too.

I am a big fan of Springsteen, but winning this category just once again affirmed my frustration with the Grammy Awards.


I'll buy that...I'm just so happy when Bruce gets any kind of a win!
User avatar
X factor
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: KY

Postby SusieP » Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:58 am

I'm just watching highlights of The Alicia Keyes show, oh sorry, The Grammy's now.:lol:

So Tina moves her legs a fraction of an inch and everyone goes crazy! :roll:
I do like the woman though. A true legend. But go and enjoy your retirement, honey.

I have Amy Winehouse's 'Back To Black' album, and I have enjoyed listening to her voice & songs on it. A pleasant throwback to the 50's and 60's singers, I think.
But there is no way I would ever pay any of my hard earned money to see her live. Unprofessional nightmare! I don't know which would be worse, buying a ticket and her not showing up, or buying a ticket and her doing the show.
Nice of her to shout her performance, too, I thought. :roll:

Nice to see Bonnie Raitt presenting. A class act to follow a most unprofessional Amy.
I'm just watching Jerry Lee and - to my shame, I thought he had passed on. :oops:



What did Natalie Cole say about Winehouse? I missed that.
User avatar
SusieP
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:13 am
Location: up to no good in rainy Nottinghamshire, England

Postby Rockindeano » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:12 am

All you fuckheads who slam my boy Bruce, you notice he won 3 Grammys?

Yes he still kicks ass.


Congratulations to Bruce Springsteen for his three Grammy Awards:

Best Rock Song and Best Solo Rock Vocal Performance (for "Radio Nowhere"), and Best Rock Instrumental Performance (for "Once Upon A Time In The West", a track from We All Love
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby conversationpc » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:30 am

Rockindeano wrote:All you fuckheads who slam my boy Bruce, you notice he won 3 Grammys?

Yes he still kicks ass.


Congratulations to Bruce Springsteen for his three Grammy Awards:

Best Rock Song and Best Solo Rock Vocal Performance (for "Radio Nowhere"), and Best Rock Instrumental Performance (for "Once Upon A Time In The West", a track from We All Love


Best rock vocal performance? I love Bruce's music but a great singer he surely isn't.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Rockindeano » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:44 am

conversationpc wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:All you fuckheads who slam my boy Bruce, you notice he won 3 Grammys?

Yes he still kicks ass.


Congratulations to Bruce Springsteen for his three Grammy Awards:

Best Rock Song and Best Solo Rock Vocal Performance (for "Radio Nowhere"), and Best Rock Instrumental Performance (for "Once Upon A Time In The West", a track from We All Love


Best rock vocal performance? I love Bruce's music but a great singer he surely isn't.


aww, you're wrong. He is a great singer. maybe not a great voice, but great singer. You can say that about BA, and others as well. Voice and singer are two totally different things.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby ohsherrie » Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:15 am

Rockindeano wrote:
aww, you're wrong. He is a great singer. maybe not a great voice, but great singer. You can say that about BA, and others as well. Voice and singer are two totally different things.


Yep, if having a great voice was a requirement for making a great rock record there wouldn't be that many of them.
User avatar
ohsherrie
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 12:42 pm

Postby treetopovskaya » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:03 pm

my favs:

alicia keys... amazing voice this girl has... john mayer... plus!! }:C))
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEcCY9egtHc

andrea bocelli & josh groban...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPxOuUL98cc
User avatar
treetopovskaya
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3071
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 4:58 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests