OT-Paul McCartney has lost it!

by **Angiekay** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:18 am

WTF...leave the bitch at home!

Paul McCartney is planning on having his soon-to-be ex-wife Heather Mills join him on his upcoming 14-month world tour so that they both can be with the couple's four year-old-daughter Beatrice, according to several reports.

London tabloid The News Of The World reported a McCartney aided saying, "Paul is desperate to keep Bea close by him. If he just heads off around the world he will get upset at not seeing her. He realizes he has to do some kind of deal with Heather, and to keep disruption to a minimum he has come up with this idea. He feels that letting Heather fly to him where they are touring could be the best way. Many of those close to him are not sure this plan will work. Heather is so unpredictable that anything could happen."

by **NealIsGod** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:49 am

Not THAT'S a reality show I would watch!

by **bluejeangirl76** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:53 am

NealIsGod wrote:Not THAT'S a reality show I would watch!

No kidding. That would bring in some cashola.

How much you all wanna bet that greedy bitch demands compensation for whatever time she is inconvenienced to spend bring the child to her father. Maybe I missed something (admittedly I stopped following this because it pissed me off), but I thought they shared custody, so why does Heather have to be there the whole time? In any case, this sounds like a recipe for sheer disaster.

by **youkeepmewaiting** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:55 am

A parent will do alot to be able to see their children I assume.

by **Angiekay** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:00 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
NealIsGod wrote:Not THAT'S a reality show I would watch!

No kidding. That would bring in some cashola.

How much you all wanna bet that greedy bitch demands compensation for whatever time she is inconvenienced to spend bring the child to her father. Maybe I missed something (admittedly I stopped following this because it pissed me off), but I thought they shared custody, so why does Heather have to be there the whole time? In any case, this sounds like a recipe for sheer disaster.

Obviously on a tour, he is going to have to have a nanny, the kid is four and I'm sure quite a handfull, especially on a tour schedule. However, if *I* was in his shoes, it would be a lot less headache to hire a nanny!

by **Michigan Girl** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:41 am

youkeepmewaiting wrote:A parent will do alot to be able to see their children I assume.

YOU GOT IT!!!! :wink:

by **Marabelle** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:14 am

Oh I'm sure he knows exactly what he's doing. Keep your enemies close! He has to know she's not thinking on all cylinders and this will provide him with more evidence of how fit a mother or not she is to their daughter.

by **bluejeangirl76** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:25 am

Isn't that the truth. Its always ovbious (to everyone but the one in question, at least...) when people aren't playing with a full deck, and she definitely fits that. No doubt he's got her number. :lol:

by **mistiejourney** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:51 am

Paul's a good guy. He wants his daughter with him, and he's willing to work with the gold digger to do it. There is no way in hell Heather would give up Bea for fourteen months while she was cared for by a nanny.

Beatrice McCartney is Heather's meal ticket for the next fourteen years. I know I'm horrible, but I can't help it. I've seen nothing or heard nothing that makes me think otherwise.

by **bluejeangirl76** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:58 am

mistiejourney wrote:Beatrice McCartney is Heather's meal ticket for the next fourteen years. I know I'm horrible, but I can't help it. I've seen nothing or heard nothing that makes me think otherwise.

You're 100% right.

by **Marabelle** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:07 am

Just goes to prove that what...3 years ago..and nine months or what have you...the old adage...when you got to have it; you have to have it and now he's reaping what was sown.
Great musician but like a lot of men out there; not always a critical thinker!

by **annie89509** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:59 am

omg, I have loved Paul since Beatlemania days. He is such a pushover, sometimes. Always wanting to do the "right" thing.

by **Rick** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:37 am

Beatrice? They named their kid Beatrice? :lol:

by **mistiejourney** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:09 am

Rick wrote:Beatrice? They named their kid Beatrice?

It's an English name - Prince Andrew and Sarah, Duchess of York named their daughter (Princess) Beatrice.

Maybe it's an old name on Heather's side - don't know of any "Beatrice" on Paul's side.

An OT for an OT - just came home with new DVDs for Help and Hard Days Night!

Favorite HDN moment - when Paul's grandfather is called a "clean old man"!

by **mikemarrs** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:44 am

Rick wrote:Beatrice? They named their kid Beatrice?

when i was younger i pronounced it beat-rice,lol.yeah i wouldn't dare name my child that.thats as bad as gertrude or something,lol

by **Ehwmatt** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:52 am

Paul's not being a pushover here - he ain't doin it for Heather. He's being a good father. Good for him. Fuck Heather Mills

Website · by **FishinMagician** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:58 am

i guess they dont get along?
my parents did stuff TOGETHER with me even though they are divorced, and they still do. its called being a good parent and not a selfish dumbfuck like most divorced parents

by tj » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:09 am

Paul is a "normal" guy. He raised his other children with Linda, sending them to state schools, with little or no extra security. The kids were certainly privileged, but not spoiled and allowed to behave like someone owed them something.

That's his philosophy of parenting. Heather's is one of the Paris Hilton mode. Everything should be about her and she should get everything she wants.

I will take Paul's method any day.

by **Moon Beam** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:16 am

Rick wrote:Beatrice? They named their kid Beatrice?

I am a manic McCartney maniac and I can't figure it well.
Still trying to let Stella sink in my think tank.....he has poor choices in female names.
Mary and James he did ok.
Stella & Beatrice......come on.

by tj » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:27 am

Moon Beam wrote:
Rick wrote:Beatrice? They named their kid Beatrice?

I am a manic McCartney maniac and I can't figure it well.
Still trying to let Stella sink in my think tank.....he has poor choices in female names.
Mary and James he did ok.
Stella & Beatrice......come on.

When I was a kid, my mom used to go bowling on Wednesday nights. She would put my little brother and I in the nursery at the bowling alley. It was run by a lady named "Miss Stella". Scraggly toothed, black haired woman with very little interest in personal hygiene. I still have nightmares about that.

by **Moon Beam** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:50 am

tj sorry about your up brung luck......Stella is a stick in the mud kinda name ain't it?
I like it well enough for a pet name or a poking fun nick knack name but as a childs birth right..nope, naw awww.

by **Michigan Girl** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:32 pm

tj wrote:
Moon Beam wrote:
Rick wrote:Beatrice? They named their kid Beatrice?

I am a manic McCartney maniac and I can't figure it well.
Still trying to let Stella sink in my think tank.....he has poor choices in female names.
Mary and James he did ok.
Stella & Beatrice......come on.

When I was a kid, my mom used to go bowling on Wednesday nights. She would put my little brother and I in the nursery at the bowling alley. It was run by a lady named "Miss Stella". Scraggly toothed, black haired woman with very little interest in personal hygiene. I still have nightmares about that.

Sorry to laugh at your childhood horror, but this is funny!!! :wink:

MR

OT-Paul McCartney has lost it!

OT-Paul McCartney has lost it!

Who is online