OT-Woman injured by thong, sues Victoria's Secret

by **Natalie** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:52 am

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,368206,00.html

:shock:

by **bluejeangirl76** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:59 am

Excuse me? :shock:

No, I'm sorry but this is ridiculous.
A piece of her underwear flew off and hit her in the eye?
Then she's a dumbass. Court adjourned.

The Smoking Gun reported that, prior to the lawsuit, officials from Victoria's Secret had asked to see the offending underwear but were refused by Patterson's lawyer.

Bullshit. You're not gonna produce the ONLY piece of evidence in your case?
Then fuck you, you're entitled to 100% of nothing.

by **NealIsGod** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:00 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:Excuse me? No, I'm sorry but this is ridiculous.
A piece of her underwear flew off and hit her in the eye?
Then she's a dumbass. Court adjourned.

The Smoking Gun reported that, prior to the lawsuit, officials from Victoria's Secret had asked to see the offending underwear but were refused by Patterson's lawyer.

Bullshit. You're not gonna produce the ONLY piece of evidence in your case?
Then fuck you, you're entitled to 100% of nothing.

Maybe she can't get the skid marks out? :lol:

by **Angiekay** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:10 am

I read this yesterday and was going to post it and never got around to it! What a dumb bitch...and really, who the hell wants to see a 52 year-old in a thong!? :shock:

Blech

by **Sassie** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:14 am

I don't have any underwear with metal on them. Aren't those called chastity belts?

by **conversationpc** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:22 am

I don't see how this lady is a "dumb bitch" if, through no fault of her own, a "decorative metal piece" came off and hit her in the eye. How is she a "dumb bitch" for that. Now, if the story is made up or she's suing for thousands of dollars, that's another story altogether.

by **bluejeangirl76** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:24 am

Sassie wrote:I don't have any underwear with metal on them.

...and even if I did, I'm reasonably sure I could get them on without anything flying into my eye. If I were Vic's Secret attorney, not only would I demand to see the allegedly uncooperative panties, I'd make her demonstrate in court just how the hell she was trying to put them on. Kind of like OJ with the glove.

by **Michigan Girl** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:31 am

conversationpc wrote:I don't see how this lady is a "dumb bitch" if, through no fault of her own, a "decorative metal piece" came off and hit her in the eye. How is she a "dumb bitch" for that. Now, if the story is made up or she's suing for thousands of dollars, that's another story altogether.

Do you think she's hired an attorney to guarantee replacement of the product? :wink:

by **conversationpc** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:49 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
conversationpc wrote:I don't see how this lady is a "dumb bitch" if, through no fault of her own, a "decorative metal piece" came off and hit her in the eye. How is she a "dumb bitch" for that. Now, if the story is made up or she's suing for thousands of dollars, that's another story altogether.

Do you think she's hired an attorney to guarantee replacement of the product?

Probably not but if she really did sustain an injury, she's as least due some medical costs. Who knows. On the surface, yes, this does sound rather frivolous.

by **Sassie** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:01 am

I just saw on TV that she is suing for $25,000. the metal piece did permanent damage to her cornia. Don't know if I spelled that right or not. All I can say is she must have been in a big hurry because that metal piece must have been flying to do permanent damage.

by **Angiekay** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:02 am

conversationpc wrote:I don't see how this lady is a "dumb bitch" if, through no fault of her own, a "decorative metal piece" came off and hit her in the eye. How is she a "dumb bitch" for that. Now, if the story is made up or she's suing for thousands of dollars, that's another story altogether.

Please....how much intelligence does it take to put on a pair of UNDERWEAR?! Even if it did have some kind of decorative thing on it, what kind of position do you have to be in for it to hit you in the EYE?! Was she doubled over to get the string in the correct position? Come on...

by **NealIsGod** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:09 am

I'll bet your undergarments sport all sorts of contraptions, eh, Ang? :twisted:

by **Marabelle** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:12 am

Unless of course if it had an elastic band which once released served as the projectile to launch that metal into her eye...could have been pulled a wee bit too tight!

by **conversationpc** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:12 am

Angiekay wrote:
conversationpc wrote:I don't see how this lady is a "dumb bitch" if, through no fault of her own, a "decorative metal piece" came off and hit her in the eye. How is she a "dumb bitch" for that. Now, if the story is made up or she's suing for thousands of dollars, that's another story altogether.

Please....how much intelligence does it take to put on a pair of UNDERWEAR?! Even if it did have some kind of decorative thing on it, what kind of position do you have to be in for it to hit you in the EYE?! Was she doubled over to get the string in the correct position? Come on...

Um....Since I've never actually worn a thong, I would have NO clue. :lol:

by **larryfromnextdoor** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:19 am

i might buy it is she puts it on ebay...

by **conversationpc** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:19 am

larryfromnextdoor wrote:i might buy it is she puts it on ebay...

by **Angiekay** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:35 am

conversationpc wrote:
Angiekay wrote:
conversationpc wrote:I don't see how this lady is a "dumb bitch" if, through no fault of her own, a "decorative metal piece" came off and hit her in the eye. How is she a "dumb bitch" for that. Now, if the story is made up or she's suing for thousands of dollars, that's another story altogether.

Please....how much intelligence does it take to put on a pair of UNDERWEAR?! Even if it did have some kind of decorative thing on it, what kind of position do you have to be in for it to hit you in the EYE?! Was she doubled over to get the string in the correct position? Come on...

Um....Since I've never actually worn a thong, I would have NO clue.

Then I reserve the right to call her a dumb bitch for not being able to figure out how to put on underwear without maiming herself! :wink:

by **Angiekay** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:36 am

NealIsGod wrote:I'll bet your undergarments sport all sorts of contraptions, eh, Ang?

Heh Heh...and I've never blinded myself putting any of it on, either.

by **conversationpc** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:37 am

Angiekay wrote:Then I reserve the right to call her a dumb bitch for not being able to figure out how to put on underwear without maiming herself! [/color][/size] [/b]

She was probably distracted by a bad Kansas tune at the time. Give her a break! :lol:

by **Angiekay** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:38 am

conversationpc wrote:
Angiekay wrote:Then I reserve the right to call her a dumb bitch for not being able to figure out how to put on underwear without maiming herself! [/color][/size] [/b]

She was probably distracted by a bad Kansas tune at the time. Give her a break!

Well, what's his name wore that eye patch for years, maybe he had the same problem putting on underwear.....

by **conversationpc** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:39 am

Angiekay wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
Angiekay wrote:Then I reserve the right to call her a dumb bitch for not being able to figure out how to put on underwear without maiming herself! [/color][/size] [/b]

She was probably distracted by a bad Kansas tune at the time. Give her a break!

Well, what's his name wore that eye patch for years, maybe he had the same problem putting on underwear.....

That's Rich Williams...He blew out an eye with a firecracker as a teenager. :lol:

by **Angiekay** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:41 am

conversationpc wrote:That's Rich Williams...He blew out an eye with a firecracker as a teenager.

So he says...probably a VS test model....shoulda stuck with that instead of being in a crappy band. :wink:

by **conversationpc** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:42 am

Angiekay wrote:
conversationpc wrote:That's Rich Williams...He blew out an eye with a firecracker as a teenager.

So he says...probably a VS test model....shoulda stuck with that instead of being in a crappy band.

Was VS even around in the 60s? It was probably one of those long, frilly bathing suits the models used to wear back in the OLD days. :lol:

by **yulog** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:59 am

conversationpc wrote:
Angiekay wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
Angiekay wrote:Then I reserve the right to call her a dumb bitch for not being able to figure out how to put on underwear without maiming herself! [/color][/size] [/b]

She was probably distracted by a bad Kansas tune at the time. Give her a break!

Well, what's his name wore that eye patch for years, maybe he had the same problem putting on underwear.....

That's Rich Williams...He blew out an eye with a firecracker as a teenager.

By chance ,was it attached to his underwear?

by **Michigan Girl** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:00 am

by **bluejeangirl76** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:01 am

conversationpc wrote:
Angiekay wrote:Then I reserve the right to call her a dumb bitch for not being able to figure out how to put on underwear without maiming herself! [/color][/size] [/b]

She was probably distracted by a bad Kansas tune at the time. Give her a break!

Or possibly Revelation disc 2. :evil:

"What the shit is THAT? How in the wor... *sproing* OW!"

Seriously I'm with angie on this... how in the world do you fuck up putting on panties?

Now, if it was her man who got poinked in the eye with panty bling while sliding them off with his teeth, I'd be a little more accepting of such a possibility. BUt this is just stupid. :lol:

by **Just Mindy** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:06 am

The only way I can see her fucking this up is if she was trying to squeeze a size 22 ass into a size 5 thong. Elastic doesn't stretch that much. :lol:

by **Indyjoe** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:09 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:Or possibly Revelation disc 2.

"What the shit is THAT? How in the wor... *sproing* OW!"

...

I have so much fun reading your posts!!

by **marco17** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:09 am

Just Mindy wrote:The only way I can see her fucking this up is if she was trying to squeeze a size 22 ass into a size 5 thong. Elastic doesn't stretch that much.

Ya, that was my thought too. She better be one hellava MILF to be 52 and running around in a thong.

by **nikki** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:50 am

She was on the Today show Thursday morning. Judge for yourselves :shock:

. Scroll down to the list of Thursday's videos for the interview.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/12065856/

MR

OT-Woman injured by thong, sues Victoria's Secret

OT-Woman injured by thong, sues Victoria's Secret

Who is online