Joe Vana wrote:
Politics is a very very difficult topic...Hell, the guy who wins usually wins with a 50 to 55% share of the votes....what about the other 50 or 45%?? They feel their candidate was better, smarter, stronger....yet they lost....it is a lose lose conversation...Slander is very quick to state his opinion and views, alot of people are on this board, but he is in the minority alot of times and it becomes a pile on situation...he even has threads dedicated to trashing him...that is not my version of a good use of free speech...
If he says something that you find absurd, and then 20 people comment right back at him, you end up with a post 100 deep....it gives alot of power to one comment...
IMO......JV
Ad hominem attacks and blatant disrespect for the people you're debating against does you no favors. Referring to people as "guy," telling people to "get a grip," and implying that the entire white race belongs to the KKK? Small wonder he's getting "trashed."
In one way, debating politics is pointless... I'm not going to change Slander's mind any more than he's going to change mine. But, if done respectfully, it does give each person a chance to hone/refine his own views. Slander is rarely respectful, so he reaps what he sows a lot of the time.