by Gideon » Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:47 am
I'm going to have to echo Saint John's sentiments, though I realize quite well that Jeff Scott Soto is extremely well regarded here. In my honest opinion, classic bands like Journey have certain sounds to them; it's not necessarily a formula, but it is a certain style of music. It's not just about the singer or the guitarist but the entire band generating output. I saw Jeff Scott Soto with Journey once in late August of '06. Was I impressed? Sure. Soto has a prolific charisma to him; the consummate frontman. He also has a powerful voice and, though he is nowhere near the likes of Pineda or Perry in range, when he did get in his baritone groove, he did very well. On songs like "I'll Be Alright Without You", he shines. But anything above that? I really was unimpressed. He's simply not fit enough to tackle early-80s or even "Why Can't This Night Go On Forever"-era Perry. At least from what I have heard, which (again) is relatively limited. If anyone has clips of Soto tackling high end notes, I'd really like to hear it, because I don't want to discuss or debate out of ignorance.
As far as Steve Augeri goes, I really like him. He's not as powerful as Perry, Soto, or Arnel, but I find his tone and application of what he's packing to be very enjoyable. I loved the Tall Stories material I have heard far more than either Soto's output or Perry's solo albums and he demonstrated some incredible pipes in the early '90s. I've listened to clips of the new album, and I'm almost as excited for it as I was for Revelations. That said, the man's pushing 50, and his stamina doesn't seem to be that impressive; then again, that could be because of Journey's rigorous touring schedule and the ridiculous vocal demands that their catalogue requires.
And, lastly, I think Arnel Pineda is phenomenal. When I saw him live, he hit the high notes in a way that Augeri and Soto never did, and he didn't sound contrived. He imbued the songs with his own energy, his delight to be fronting Journey. Contrary to some of the commentary made earlier this year, there is a great reservoir of passion to the man. And while his stage presence isn't as refined as any of his predecessors, he does remind me of early-80s Perry. He is keeping the crowd's attention, able to juggle both the notes as well as the tiring stagework. And, he's doing this at 40. Not even Perry did that.
The long and short of it is that I don't think the other two would have done as well. Could Perry's name have brought more success? I'm sure. But how much more? As another user posted previously, time goes on and the collective music taste of the masses change too. But keep in mind (and again, I mean no disrespect to the Great Man), but I don't want Perry back to front Journey if he can't sing like he used to. Journey is a rock band, and though a one-time event would be nice, I loathe the idea of "Journey: Unplugged," muting the rock flavor of Neal and the boys to compensate for Perry's withering vocal strength. Revelation was great, but I have several criticisms for it and I hope the next album is bereft of them; they need to turn Pineda down a little and crank up the backing vocals, for one. And we need a better rock to ballad ratio!
'Nothing was bigger for Journey than 1981’s “Escape” album. “I have to attribute that to Jonathan coming in and joining the writing team,” Steve Perry (Feb 2012).'