Worst damn nut-shot EVER!!!!!!!

by **Blueskies** » Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:49 am

Arianddu wrote:
Blueskies wrote:
Arianddu wrote:I never understood why men ride horses astride and women (used to) ride side-saddle. The other way around makes much more sense to me
Riding a horse side saddle was never practical for either sex..but women wore dresses all the time...hard to sit astride in a dress..that and because it was considered unlady-like for women to sit with legs open...still is when sitting...particularly in a dress. Good thing women finally were able to start wearing pants...especially for horse back riding.

I didn't really need a history lesson; I did know all that already. It was meant to be light-hearted humour

Sorry, I didn't see the funny and I don't have any telepathy powers. Didn't mean to offend or insinuate you might not know something.

by **yulog** » Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:27 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:Alright Ken, try this nutshot on for size...

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/80585733/

Ok, I am sorry... but if you're a guy and you are doing things like THAT, you absolutely deserve getting whacked in the nuts. Here's a tip... quit doing dumb shit that puts your boys in the line of fire!

You mean like dating woman?

by **yulog** » Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:31 am

Arianddu wrote:
Blueskies wrote:
Arianddu wrote:I never understood why men ride horses astride and women (used to) ride side-saddle. The other way around makes much more sense to me
Riding a horse side saddle was never practical for either sex..but women wore dresses all the time...hard to sit astride in a dress..that and because it was considered unlady-like for women to sit with legs open...still is when sitting...particularly in a dress. Good thing women finally were able to start wearing pants...especially for horse back riding.

I didn't really need a history lesson; I did know all that already. It was meant to be light-hearted humour

are you really surprised?