Moderator: Andrew
brandonpfn wrote:I liked some of the DVD, and didn't mind venturing into the most ghetto Walmart I have ever been to (Pittsburg, CA) to pick it up.
- Brandon
Ehwmatt wrote:I think the crowd has to do with Asian culture, which is usually polite to the point of fault, more than not being into the show. They just generally don't get all loud and boisterous like others do.
kgdjpubs wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:I think the crowd has to do with Asian culture, which is usually polite to the point of fault, more than not being into the show. They just generally don't get all loud and boisterous like others do.
They are louder than you think they are. They are just mixed down to the point of barely being heard. Listen to the youtube videos.
Gunbot wrote:The youtube videos should have louder crowd sound. That's where they're being recorded from. I don't consider it a reliable gauge on crowd noise.
Ehwmatt wrote:Gunbot wrote:The youtube videos should have louder crowd sound. That's where they're being recorded from. I don't consider it a reliable gauge on crowd noise.
Maybe, maybe not. But the point is, crowd noise can always be mixed louder or softer in a live recording. If you're listening to a bootleg, it's one thing, but a polished final product, it can be impossible to tell how loud/quiet they really were.
Gunbot wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Gunbot wrote:The youtube videos should have louder crowd sound. That's where they're being recorded from. I don't consider it a reliable gauge on crowd noise.
Maybe, maybe not. But the point is, crowd noise can always be mixed louder or softer in a live recording. If you're listening to a bootleg, it's one thing, but a polished final product, it can be impossible to tell how loud/quiet they really were.
I agree with the mix issue. I'm saying I can't sit here and honestly say the crowd was raucous or quiet based on the youtube videos.The first few rows, sure. But from a lot of the pictures and reviews right after the concert, many people from 10to 20 rows back and beyond were pretty muted during a lot of the show. and there were tons of empty lawn chairs in the back also which won't be noticeable on the DVD either. It was a 90,000 Seat venue cut in half and even then, the crowd was only half of the 45k available seats. A lot of open space to try and fill with noise.
Ehwmatt wrote:Gunbot wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Gunbot wrote:The youtube videos should have louder crowd sound. That's where they're being recorded from. I don't consider it a reliable gauge on crowd noise.
Maybe, maybe not. But the point is, crowd noise can always be mixed louder or softer in a live recording. If you're listening to a bootleg, it's one thing, but a polished final product, it can be impossible to tell how loud/quiet they really were.
I agree with the mix issue. I'm saying I can't sit here and honestly say the crowd was raucous or quiet based on the youtube videos.The first few rows, sure. But from a lot of the pictures and reviews right after the concert, many people from 10to 20 rows back and beyond were pretty muted during a lot of the show. and there were tons of empty lawn chairs in the back also which won't be noticeable on the DVD either. It was a 90,000 Seat venue cut in half and even then, the crowd was only half of the 45k available seats. A lot of open space to try and fill with noise.
Yep, I couldn't tell you either. I do hate when producers/mixers mix the crowd nearly completely out of a live recording - I want to hear the crowd going nuts at some points. Now, too much can be bad too, but I'd always rather err on the side of having a little noise on a genuine live document that had a lot of energy.
The overall strength of the crowd at Manila is open to debate unless you were there, which I know some here were. Rip?
Ehwmatt wrote:
Yep, I couldn't tell you either. I do hate when producers/mixers mix the crowd nearly completely out of a live recording - I want to hear the crowd going nuts at some points. Now, too much can be bad too, but I'd always rather err on the side of having a little noise on a genuine live document that had a lot of energy.
Gunbot wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Gunbot wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Gunbot wrote:The youtube videos should have louder crowd sound. That's where they're being recorded from. I don't consider it a reliable gauge on crowd noise.
Maybe, maybe not. But the point is, crowd noise can always be mixed louder or softer in a live recording. If you're listening to a bootleg, it's one thing, but a polished final product, it can be impossible to tell how loud/quiet they really were.
I agree with the mix issue. I'm saying I can't sit here and honestly say the crowd was raucous or quiet based on the youtube videos.The first few rows, sure. But from a lot of the pictures and reviews right after the concert, many people from 10to 20 rows back and beyond were pretty muted during a lot of the show. and there were tons of empty lawn chairs in the back also which won't be noticeable on the DVD either. It was a 90,000 Seat venue cut in half and even then, the crowd was only half of the 45k available seats. A lot of open space to try and fill with noise.
Yep, I couldn't tell you either. I do hate when producers/mixers mix the crowd nearly completely out of a live recording - I want to hear the crowd going nuts at some points. Now, too much can be bad too, but I'd always rather err on the side of having a little noise on a genuine live document that had a lot of energy.
The overall strength of the crowd at Manila is open to debate unless you were there, which I know some here were. Rip?
I vote for mixing the crowd at a higher setting. it's supposed to be a live concert, not an MTV video.
kgdjpubs wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:
Yep, I couldn't tell you either. I do hate when producers/mixers mix the crowd nearly completely out of a live recording - I want to hear the crowd going nuts at some points. Now, too much can be bad too, but I'd always rather err on the side of having a little noise on a genuine live document that had a lot of energy.
That seems to be a Kevin Shirley thing. He apparently doesn't like crowd noise. The Greatest Hits Live release suffered from the same problem. There comes a point where it can be too much of a good thing, but if I wanted it to sound like the studio recording, I'd buy the studio recording!
steveo777 wrote:Gunbot wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Gunbot wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Gunbot wrote:The youtube videos should have louder crowd sound. That's where they're being recorded from. I don't consider it a reliable gauge on crowd noise.
Maybe, maybe not. But the point is, crowd noise can always be mixed louder or softer in a live recording. If you're listening to a bootleg, it's one thing, but a polished final product, it can be impossible to tell how loud/quiet they really were.
I agree with the mix issue. I'm saying I can't sit here and honestly say the crowd was raucous or quiet based on the youtube videos.The first few rows, sure. But from a lot of the pictures and reviews right after the concert, many people from 10to 20 rows back and beyond were pretty muted during a lot of the show. and there were tons of empty lawn chairs in the back also which won't be noticeable on the DVD either. It was a 90,000 Seat venue cut in half and even then, the crowd was only half of the 45k available seats. A lot of open space to try and fill with noise.
Yep, I couldn't tell you either. I do hate when producers/mixers mix the crowd nearly completely out of a live recording - I want to hear the crowd going nuts at some points. Now, too much can be bad too, but I'd always rather err on the side of having a little noise on a genuine live document that had a lot of energy.
The overall strength of the crowd at Manila is open to debate unless you were there, which I know some here were. Rip?
I vote for mixing the crowd at a higher setting. it's supposed to be a live concert, not an MTV video.
Maybe they will fix that for you when they're ready with your blue ray disc.
Carlitto H@kk wrote:I finally bought it. The Walmart near me still had them all in
the storeroom; thought they couldn't be sold until Oct 6.
Not a bad deal at all for $10. Like most, I don't see anyhting
spectacular with the video (I have it upconverted to 1080I on a 71" screen)
but from what I have watched, it looks like a really good show.
Besides, for $10 and my ripping software, I got a pretty good concert DVD
and another Cool Live Show ripped to MP3 on my iPod so I can listen to
it everywhereQuite the bargain, I'd say.
Carlitto H@kk wrote:I downloaded a free version of FairUse to rip DVDs. During the rip, I copy&paste
the WAV audio track and then splice it/tweak it with Audacity.
Or you can use freeware like AOA Audio Extractor to shred video to MP3 and do it that way...
So many options.
Gunbot wrote:On a different note, am I the only one who prefers the old stage setups where the crowd completely encircled the stage? I was behind the stage when I saw them at the Spectrum but they had a catwalk that ran around the circumference of the stage so we got to see plenty of Perry and Neal regardless.
weatherman90 wrote:Where is this thing at? I guess North Dakota Wal-Marts are a bit BEHIND!
Carlitto H@kk wrote:weatherman90 wrote:Where is this thing at? I guess North Dakota Wal-Marts are a bit BEHIND!
If they are like some of the WalMarts here in UTARD,
then they are probably still sitting in a box in the
storeroom, waiting for that one fan with a mullet to ask for it
Esc wrote:someone just uploaded the whole thing in youtube.
watching it right now.
i guess i had high expectations from it because of the 4xHD hype.
but judging by the camera work, its turning out to be a disappointment for me.
the transition between camera shots seem too random.
ok, i think i need to shut up and wait until i have my own copy and watch it on a big screen.
Ehwmatt wrote:I think the crowd has to do with Asian culture, which is usually polite to the point of fault, more than not being into the show. They just generally don't get all loud and boisterous like others do.
Jana wrote:Agree with YoungJRNY, until I watch the whole DVD it may change on best songs, but Arnel real does a beautiful job on WYLAW in Manila. Background vocals aren't very strong. But it may just be the sound on the youtube copy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WSpaS1pqEY
Rick wrote:Jana wrote:Agree with YoungJRNY, until I watch the whole DVD it may change on best songs, but Arnel real does a beautiful job on WYLAW in Manila. Background vocals aren't very strong. But it may just be the sound on the youtube copy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WSpaS1pqEY
I agree the backing vocals were down in the mix, but he sang the shit out of that one.
I haven't gotten the DVD yet, but I sure liked this one.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests