President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:55 pm

separate_wayz wrote:
If this is even credible, the GOP was right to walk away from it. Obama can't even deliver his own party on major issues -- how could he possibly ensure that ANY deal he makes with Republicans will find its way into a final bill that passes?? And who's to say that Obama's word is worth anything any way? As Jay Rockefeller (D-W. Va.) said: "He's beginning to not be believable to me." There should be no need to require GOP congressmen regardless -- the Democrats run the show, by big majorities. If they can't wrangle enough votes to pass this thing, that's more of a commentary on their own misguided, overreaching monstrosity than it is on alleged GOP "obstructionism".

Even if a meager tort reform proposal could find its way into a supplemental bill, this is all about the White House trying to blur the lines between the two parties so the Democrats don't take all the heat for this godawful bill in the midterm elections. The bottom line is: the polls show that this health care debacle is a turd. Putting a little bonnet on it doesn't make it any less of a turd.

What Obama and the Democrats forget is that voters have stated that they're turned off as much by the PROCESS of this bill coming together as they are the PRODUCT itself. Ramrodding this piece of garbage through Congress isn't going to win over any independents whatsover, and that's where the Democrats are getting killed. I predict the bill will ultimately fail, and that Obama was lose even more credibility and favorability than he has already. If it does pass along the lines of 51-49 in the Senate, and 217-216 in the House (with at least two vacancies), Democrats will suffer even more egregiously at the polls this autumn.

Republicans have managed to "make book" with this health care bill -- heads they win, tails the Democrats lose. If the bill is defeated, the GOP can claim that they sided with the American people and stopped a very unpopular piece of legislation. If the bill passes, the GOP can run against it this autumn and will make huge inroads in the House and Senate by defeating Democrat incumbents.

As Charlie Cook pointed out recently, it's getting very, very difficult to see how the Democrats don't lose control of the House -- largely thanks to this health care legislative disaster of their own making.


That's sort of a zero-sum nihilist approach, SW.
If neither party is willing to find common cause on anything, even when the terms are mutually agreeable, what’s the point?
You might as well dissolve Congress as a legislative body.
At every turn, Obama has sought Republican input (within reason, of course) – healthcare is no different.
You can attribute ulterior motives to this; I think it’s what he truly, and foolishly, believes.
Let’s not forget, he first ascended to political stardom giving a flowery speech in 2004 about “not red states or blue states, but the United States.”
Unfortunately, in today’s modern political landscape, one party views ANY government activity, no matter how benign, as a hostile encroachment on liberty and the slippery slope toward communism.
Good luck negotiating with THAT.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16058
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Memorex » Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:34 pm

Saint John wrote:
Memorex wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Memorex wrote: Like a black man is articulate and so everyone is so shocked and happy.


He's just as much white as he is black. I see you've been trained to see him solely as black, too. Now what was it that you were saying? :lol:


Yes, he is a black man. I don't have to assign white to him because in America, it is simply enough to be human.


If you wanna "assign" black to him ... more power to ya. :lol:


:?
User avatar
Memorex
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby AlteredDNA » Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:58 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
AlteredDNA wrote:Source?


http://www.time.com/time/politics/artic ... 06,00.html

This is most likely what Obama was referencing when he told the House Republicans:
“From the start, I sought out and supported ideas from Republicans. I even talked about an issue which has been a holy grail for a lot of you, which was tort reform, and said that I’d be willing to work together as part of a comprehensive package to deal with it. I just didn’t get a lot of nibbles.”


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/0 ... 53398.html
I Love Pineapple!!!
User avatar
AlteredDNA
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2171
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:48 pm

AlteredDNA wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
AlteredDNA wrote:Source?


http://www.time.com/time/politics/artic ... 06,00.html

This is most likely what Obama was referencing when he told the House Republicans:
“From the start, I sought out and supported ideas from Republicans. I even talked about an issue which has been a holy grail for a lot of you, which was tort reform, and said that I’d be willing to work together as part of a comprehensive package to deal with it. I just didn’t get a lot of nibbles.”


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/0 ... 53398.html


Ok. Great.
Now let me go fishing for a link to refute the link you just posted disproving my earlier link - or not.
This could go on forever...
As I already said, Obama is likely to play the tort reform card at the televised health summit on Thursday.
Should the Repubs wish to avoid a re-do of the one man asskicking that took place in Baltimore, and having their bluff called live in primetime, they may want to bring something to the table beyond the same old right wing dogma.

Not quite sure what the fascination with malpractice reform is anyway...
In the states it’s been tried, costs have not gone down, and most junk lawsuits get thrown out anyway.
We'll see how Thursday goes...
Tho I have a hunch Frank Luntz is furiously scribbling bullshit talking points as we speak.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16058
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby separate_wayz » Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:27 am

As if the Democrats in the House didn't have enough to worry about, now Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) has been formally chastised by the House Ethics Committee in a report that asserts he knowingly violated ethics rules by accepting trips to the Caribbean. This report will almost assure that he steps down from his chairmanship of the House Ways and Means Committee.

The importance of this problem is summarized by Marc Ambinder in The Atlantic:

The Atlantic wrote:One Democratic House strategist, who consults with the leadership and works directly with several candidates, said that the Rangel news "loses us the House" because it provides Republicans with an effective talking point. This strategist has complained for months that the longer it took Pelosi to lance the boil, the shakier the House majority would become.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... rdy/36661/



The Democratic House majority: going, going .....
User avatar
separate_wayz
LP
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:14 am
Location: USA

Postby 7 Wishes » Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:48 am

Right. No Republican has been caught up in a scandal in the past five years.

The GOP is even more crooked than the Dems.
But around town, it was well known...when they got home at night
Their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
User avatar
7 Wishes
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4305
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:28 pm

Postby Rockindeano » Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:06 am

separate_wayz wrote:As if the Democrats in the House didn't have enough to worry about, now Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) has been formally chastised by the House Ethics Committee in a report that asserts he knowingly violated ethics rules by accepting trips to the Caribbean. This report will almost assure that he steps down from his chairmanship of the House Ways and Means Committee.

The importance of this problem is summarized by Marc Ambinder in The Atlantic:

The Atlantic wrote:One Democratic House strategist, who consults with the leadership and works directly with several candidates, said that the Rangel news "loses us the House" because it provides Republicans with an effective talking point. This strategist has complained for months that the longer it took Pelosi to lance the boil, the shakier the House majority would become.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... rdy/36661/



The Democratic House majority: going, going .....


Hey SW, they deserve to lose. The Dems have definitely earned it. Fuck them. Spineless.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby separate_wayz » Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:34 am

7 Wishes wrote:Right. No Republican has been caught up in a scandal in the past five years.

The GOP is even more crooked than the Dems.


Someone could argue that, sure. Everyone's entitled to their opinion. But for Democrats, the relevant point is: they're in the majority, their chairman of the Ways & Means Committee got slapped publicly with this report, and their Speaker of House is refusing to call for his ouster.

Puts Democrat rank-and-file in Congress in a pickle. The ones in swing districts in red states (of which there are quite a few) have to go back home and explain this stuff to voters. It makes holding onto a Democratic majority one notch more difficult.

(FYI .... in a scant 7 months, early voting starts in some states.)
User avatar
separate_wayz
LP
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:14 am
Location: USA

Postby RossValoryRocks » Sat Feb 27, 2010 7:51 am

7 Wishes wrote:Right. No Republican has been caught up in a scandal in the past five years.

The GOP is even more crooked than the Dems.


Did you get picked on a lot as a kid on the play ground??? Seriously...you, TNC, and Monker constantly cry, "But they did it first!" whenever some Democrat fucks up...I mean really think about it. You are using a tactic best left on the playground in about 4th grade as defense for an unethical act committed by someone. That is seriously fucked up thinking. (I am liking the word fuck today, so I am using it a lot!)

Sure Republicans have fucked up, hell I would go as far to say that if you are a politician and you DON'T fuck up something is wrong with you based on the evident standards of ethics and morality that pervade our government.

That a Republican or Independent or Green Party or whatever has done something fucked up in the past in does NOT absovle the current person from the fact they fucked up.

Besides when the leader of your caucus and Speaker of the House says she is going to "drain the swamp" and be the most ethic Congress in history you have to expect to be under the microscope. And Rangel got busted by his own party, not the Republicans.

How about we focus on the present and leave the past out of it. Rangel screwed up big, next month some republican shithead is going to screw up. And you know what? It is OUR fault...we keep electing these boobs. OVER. AND OVER. AND OVER AGAIN.

We will never get term limits on Congress as law, but maybe we should start to think about term limiting these idiots ourselves? How long is too long to serve as a politician? 2 terms?? 12 years total?

Rangel has been in Congress since 1971!!!!!

Vote them all out and replace them with good hard working men and women who the interest of the PEOPLE and will leave after a couple of terms and see how fast all the ethics problems go away.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Ehwmatt » Sat Feb 27, 2010 7:58 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:
7 Wishes wrote:Right. No Republican has been caught up in a scandal in the past five years.

The GOP is even more crooked than the Dems.


Did you get picked on a lot as a kid on the play ground??? Seriously...you, TNC, and Monker constantly cry, "But they did it first!" whenever some Democrat fucks up...I mean really think about it. You are using a tactic best left on the playground in about 4th grade as defense for an unethical act committed by someone. That is seriously fucked up thinking. (I am liking the word fuck today, so I am using it a lot!)

Sure Republicans have fucked up, hell I would go as far to say that if you are a politician and you DON'T fuck up something is wrong with you based on the evident standards of ethics and morality that pervade our government.

That a Republican or Independent or Green Party or whatever has done something fucked up in the past in does NOT absovle the current person from the fact they fucked up.

Besides when the leader of your caucus and Speaker of the House says she is going to "drain the swamp" and be the most ethic Congress in history you have to expect to be under the microscope. And Rangel got busted by his own party, not the Republicans.

How about we focus on the present and leave the past out of it. Rangel screwed up big, next month some republican shithead is going to screw up. And you know what? It is OUR fault...we keep electing these boobs. OVER. AND OVER. AND OVER AGAIN.

We will never get term limits on Congress as law, but maybe we should start to think about term limiting these idiots ourselves? How long is too long to serve as a politician? 2 terms?? 12 years total?

Rangel has been in Congress since 1971!!!!!

Vote them all out and replace them with good hard working men and women who the interest of the PEOPLE and will leave after a couple of terms and see how fast all the ethics problems go away.


Part of the problem is that even those who enter with the best of intentions find they have to pay to play and get sucked in by all the perks of power. I've heard a couple of one-term politicians say stuff along these lines. Not hard to believe either.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:03 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:Did you get picked on a lot as a kid on the play ground??? Seriously...you, TNC, and Monker constantly cry, "But they did it first!" whenever some Democrat fucks up...I mean really think about it.

Back to your usual double standard I see.
As if you are somehow a profile in forward-thinking? :roll:
Not so fast...

RossValoryRocks wrote:Clinton did the same thing...and no one said a word...remember that little aspirin factory in the Sudan?


RossValoryRocks wrote:I should remind you that Clinton started that particular Haliburton bid thing..but I won't...


RossValoryRocks wrote:Clinton "knew" Iraq had WMD's...in the days PRIOR to the invasion...he went on TV and said HE KNEW. But you ignore that completely. Because he is a democrat.


RossValoryRocks wrote:You would think that after the FIRST attack on the World Trade Center by Radical Muslims that Clinton would have done SOMETHING...ANYTHING...but know...he hung in the Oral Office and got a good BJ and blew up an aspirin factory in Sudan! Yay Willie! Good for you.

RossValoryRocks wrote:So wait...Bill Clinton was wrong then??? Hillary, Kerry et al, we all off their rockers too?

RossValoryRocks wrote:Oh like..."But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never." January 26th, 1998 William Jefferson Clinton


Naw, no looking back and pointing fingers there AT ALL. :roll:
It seems pretty clear that the only reason you want people to stop bringing up the past now is because it’s YOUR party whose ass is being weighed in judgment.
You can drop the non-partisan fronting, Stu.
At the end of the day, you, FF, and RedWing will be rooting for your team, and I’ll be rooting for mine.
That’s just the way it is.

Also, you’re damn right I have repeatedly pointed out Bush’s failures, most notably his appointments to regulatory bodies, whose failures continue to be a pox on this great nation.
Why shouldn’t I?
Tell me, what sensible American wouldn’t be banging that drum right about now?
Not every president manages to re-create both Vietnam and the Great Depression on their watch.
One or the other? Perhaps. But both?
The chances of such a historical anomaly occurring are so infinitesimally slim that a President would have to be a) the unluckiest man alive, b) an evil genius, or c) dangerously incompetent.
I already know which standardized test bubble I’m filling in.

And please don’t say I’ve quoted you out of context.
At least I included examples of your hypocrisy, a courtesy you couldn’t extend to Monker or me before starting in with your usual bullshit generalizations.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16058
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby 7 Wishes » Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:31 pm

Obama made the GOP look like fools at the health care summit. The party of NO has NO ideas, except the rehashing of bullshit talking points endorsing colossal GOP policy and ideaology failures of the past

This will catch up to the Republicans come election time. Mark my words.
But around town, it was well known...when they got home at night
Their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
User avatar
7 Wishes
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4305
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:28 pm

Postby RossValoryRocks » Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:10 pm

7 Wishes wrote:Obama made the GOP look like fools at the health care summit. The party of NO has NO ideas, except the rehashing of bullshit talking points endorsing colossal GOP policy and ideaology failures of the past

This will catch up to the Republicans come election time. Mark my words.


You've been wrong about EVERYTHING so far? Why should we mark your words?
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby RossValoryRocks » Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:24 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
And please don’t say I’ve quoted you out of context.
At least I included examples of your hypocrisy, a courtesy you couldn’t extend to Monker or me before starting in with your usual bullshit generalizations.


You did quote me out of context...what was I responding to? Ahhhh yes...that puts in perspective...but you won't post all of that will you? Why not??? Oh wait...it would show that YOU or someone else brought up the past and I was responding to it. Context is EVERYTHING.

You're a dickhead...we ALL know it...fuck off and die...how's that for non-partisan? Deano is as rabidly liberal as you are, but he is a lovable character...same with 7 for the most part...you on the otherhand just need to be sterilized so you can't contaminate the world with your seed. Yes...you need your balls cut off, fed to you and then have you dumped into a ditch somewhere. You are about as American as Stalin, and you are a STAIN on the honor of the people who gave and still give freedom to this country. And if I EVER EVER meet you in person I will literally piss on you...no matter the venue...

Now, on to politics...

I actually think the President made some valid points yesterday...and so did the Republicans.

They have been locked out of everything, and prior to losing Mass. the Dems had a filibuster proof majority in the Senate...and a lock in the house...and still couldn't pass healthcare...why??? Not because of the failing of ANY past President...because they KNOW people don't want the bullshit they are trying to foist on us...yes we all want SOME kind of reform...but smart reform...that we can AFORD. We CANNOT have any more entitlement programs that push us into more debt. PERIOD.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Rockindeano » Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:26 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
7 Wishes wrote:Obama made the GOP look like fools at the health care summit. The party of NO has NO ideas, except the rehashing of bullshit talking points endorsing colossal GOP policy and ideaology failures of the past

This will catch up to the Republicans come election time. Mark my words.


You've been wrong about EVERYTHING so far? Why should we mark your words?


Actually Stu, Obama was brilliant in he Summit. Where has that guy been? If he stays on message, the Dems don't lose.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby RossValoryRocks » Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:41 pm

Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
7 Wishes wrote:Obama made the GOP look like fools at the health care summit. The party of NO has NO ideas, except the rehashing of bullshit talking points endorsing colossal GOP policy and ideaology failures of the past

This will catch up to the Republicans come election time. Mark my words.


You've been wrong about EVERYTHING so far? Why should we mark your words?


Actually Stu, Obama was brilliant in he Summit. Where has that guy been? If he stays on message, the Dems don't lose.


He made some valid points...so did the Republicans...the problem is they just cannot or will not work together...we need reform absolutely...but not one that will bankrupt this country further...
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby separate_wayz » Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:44 pm

7 Wishes wrote:Obama made the GOP look like fools at the health care summit. The party of NO has NO ideas, except the rehashing of bullshit talking points endorsing colossal GOP policy and ideaology failures of the past

This will catch up to the Republicans come election time. Mark my words.


The health care debacle is not going to bite the Republicans in the butt. By all poll results, that would be the Democrats.

Obama did okay at the summit -- give him a couple of points (even if he did come across as a condescending boor, hardly a turn-on to independent voters). The congressional Republicans likewise did sufficiently -- give them a few points. The congressional Democrats, in contrast, fell on their face -- zero points. And that's a problem.

This was not a gamechanger by any means, and that's what Obama and the Democrats needed.

The best that could come out of the so-called summit was a slight rallying of Democrat partisans (probably marginal and temporary at best) and the setting-up of the justification for using a reconcilation process. But it didn't substantially change the herculean obstacles that the Democrats have to overcome to pass this bill. Those obstacles are more-so in the House than the Senate, by my take.

The political environment has horribly deteriorated three ways since December: (1) the health care bill is even less popular now than then, (2) Obama is less popular now than then, and (3) the Democrats have even more tenuous support in the House now than then for this bill. Three Democrats will be gone for one reason or another (Wexler, Abercrombie, and Murtha), and the lone GOP vote (Gao) has pledged not to vote for it this time around. So we're starting off 216-216. One of the Democrats who voted 'no' (Parker Griffith, D-Al.) has since switched parties to the Republicans. So we're now talking about 38 Democrats. Why would any of the remaining 38 Democrat defectors who voted 'no' (with the GOP) now vote 'yes' for a bill that's now more unpopular? How will they explain that one to voters back home? By my count, 20 of those 38 votes came from congressmen south of the Mason-Dixon line .... hardly pro-Obama territory. Charlie Cook rates 31 of these 38 districts as competitive. And this entire analysis assumes there won't be further Democrat defections from their 216 votes. Every single one of these Democrat congressmen is thinking "Scott Brown" in the back of his mind .... no congressional district is safe when Barney Frank's district in Massachusetts goes for the GOP candidate for senator.

This isn't looking good for the Democrats .....
Last edited by separate_wayz on Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
separate_wayz
LP
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:14 am
Location: USA

Postby Rockindeano » Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:51 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
7 Wishes wrote:Obama made the GOP look like fools at the health care summit. The party of NO has NO ideas, except the rehashing of bullshit talking points endorsing colossal GOP policy and ideaology failures of the past

This will catch up to the Republicans come election time. Mark my words.


You've been wrong about EVERYTHING so far? Why should we mark your words?


Actually Stu, Obama was brilliant in he Summit. Where has that guy been? If he stays on message, the Dems don't lose.


He made some valid points...so did the Republicans...the problem is they just cannot or will not work together...we need reform absolutely...but not one that will bankrupt this country further...


Ok Hannity. :roll: :wink: For the record, the CBO, the official scorekeeper of this clusterfuck, says the Obama reform bill will SAVE money. Not the OMB, but the CBO.

Owned. :lol:

What Obama did was get these lying stiffs, these "just say no" motherfuckers on camera, obstructing government. The GOP should be so proud of themselves...no really, just a proud group of morons. Boehner needs another coat of spray tan. He looks refuckindiculous.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby RossValoryRocks » Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:56 pm

Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
7 Wishes wrote:Obama made the GOP look like fools at the health care summit. The party of NO has NO ideas, except the rehashing of bullshit talking points endorsing colossal GOP policy and ideaology failures of the past

This will catch up to the Republicans come election time. Mark my words.


You've been wrong about EVERYTHING so far? Why should we mark your words?


Actually Stu, Obama was brilliant in he Summit. Where has that guy been? If he stays on message, the Dems don't lose.


He made some valid points...so did the Republicans...the problem is they just cannot or will not work together...we need reform absolutely...but not one that will bankrupt this country further...


Ok Hannity. :roll: :wink: For the record, the CBO, the official scorekeeper of this clusterfuck, says the Obama reform bill will SAVE money. Not the OMB, but the CBO.

Owned. :lol:

What Obama did was get these lying stiffs, these "just say no" motherfuckers on camera, obstructing government. The GOP should be so proud of themselves...no really, just a proud group of morons. Boehner needs another coat of spray tan. He looks refuckindiculous.


Really??? Deano you don't OWN shit...and certainly not me...The CBO is basing the projection on what the Democrats SAY they are going to do...in the FUTURE...namely cut 400 BILLION out of Medicare/Medicade...which they WILL NOT DO...it would be political SUICIDE. You know it...so quit with the rah rah bullshit for the Dems and open your eyes...The Dems are in BIG trouble...and again you know it...drop the bluster...and face reality...

You have been wrong on EVERYTHING except the part about Obama being elected...I will give you that...but since you have been off by miles...even in Hockey...you said the US wouldn't medal...tsk tsk...
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby 7 Wishes » Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:52 pm

Seriously, Stu...what a juvenile statement. I have proven my assertions with fact more often than not - if you choose to ignore the truth, so be it. It doesn't change anything, and your dittohead opinions are actually entirely predicated on Limbaugh-esque factoids.

You might want to look up the definition of "factoids" before you respond.
But around town, it was well known...when they got home at night
Their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
User avatar
7 Wishes
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4305
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:28 pm

Postby RossValoryRocks » Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:54 am

7 Wishes wrote:Seriously, Stu...what a juvenile statement. I have proven my assertions with fact more often than not - if you choose to ignore the truth, so be it. It doesn't change anything, and your dittohead opinions are actually entirely predicated on Limbaugh-esque factoids.

You might want to look up the definition of "factoids" before you respond.


Are they like hemorrhoids? You my friend use factoids as much or more than anyone. You tend to call them "facts" but they are not.

I actually WATCHED the whole thing...from start to finish. Did you?

My FACTS in this case are drawn straight from my experience, yours from the liberal blog of the day (How is that subscription to the Huffington Post by the way?).

Unlike you and TNC and Monker my anger is at the whole establishment. I gave up on the Republicans as a party long ago, right about the time they started spending like fools and taking away liberties.

I do defend them at times from the spurious liberal attacks you mount but only if they are right. I will happily thrash them with you, as well as the Democrats.

If you guys can't see that they whole of our Government is a broken thing that no longer works, and that you have myopia in regards to it because of your disdain for the Republicans then that is your problem.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:58 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:Unlike you and TNC and Monker my anger is at the whole establishment. I gave up on the Republicans as a party long ago, right about the time they started spending like fools and taking away liberties.


Is that why you were spinning like a dervish from hell as recently as last year defending domestic surveillance?
Ultimately saying that Bush under his “magic wartime powers” can flout any law he wants?
Sorry.
That’s not Conservative or Libertarian - that’s pure beltway establishment GOP.
Not sure why anyone gives you the time of day...
You are solely interested in promoting yourself as “Mister Independent”, the truth and facts be fucked.
7, Monker, Deano, could bitch about Obama as the day is long, (and in many cases, we have), and you would still write us off as George Soros’ personal cabana boys.
Look around – who here is still loyally defending the GOP, posting right wing op-eds day after day, even as the country lies in smoldering ruins as a result of failed GOP leadership?
Here’s a clue, it ain’t the liberals.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16058
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:08 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:...The CBO is basing the projection on what the Democrats SAY they are going to do...in the FUTURE...namely cut 400 BILLION out of Medicare/Medicade...which they WILL NOT DO...it would be political SUICIDE...


It's only political suicide if the Republicans dishonestly portray the elimination of Medicare waste as "pulling the plug on granny" - which they have.
The same party that stopped government in the 90s to cut Medicare, and decried its creation in the 60s, is now masquerading as the socialist program's most loyal defender.
All the while they continue to talk about putting social security into the hands of the same fund managers that just made the economy go tits up.
To anyone with more than a petri dish of brain cells, there is NO ideological consistency AT ALL. None.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16058
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:22 am

separate_wayz wrote:This was not a gamechanger by any means, and that's what Obama and the Democrats needed.


The thing was 6-hours long during the day.
It's main competition was Maury Povich and reruns of Gunsmoke, and I'm sure they both won quite handedly.
Nobody watches this crap.
Ultimately, Obama gets bragging rights that they held a debate on-camera.
At the very least, nobody unplugged the C-Span cameras during the whole process.
Can't say the same for the debates over Bush's Medicare Part D expansion, which cost more than this bill, was completely deficit financed, and earned little-to-no scorn from the the 9-12 Mutual Teabag Admiration Society.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16058
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Saint John » Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:26 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:The thing was 6-hours long during the day.
It's main competition was Maury Povich and reruns of Gunsmoke


:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby 7 Wishes » Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:48 am

Two weeks ago, Tom DeLay said it was "tradition" and "just accepted" that GOP-sponsored legislation would be passed (via reconciliation) even though it couldn't be paid for in the budget (i.e. it added to the defecit) under Dubbya.

So - why the change of approach? Why does every single piece of Democratic legislation have to be part of a balanced budget (which is NOT the way to get out of this, Dubbya's second recession)? Plus, this Dem sponsored legislation usually has, at least in theory, a way to cover its costs in the long term. The GOP exercised no such restraint, yet - hmmm. come election time - they are preaching the same old worn out talking points? Hypocritical assholes who don't know shit about economics.

And I love Bunning filibustering the emergency unemployment bill.
But around town, it was well known...when they got home at night
Their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
User avatar
7 Wishes
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4305
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:28 pm

Postby separate_wayz » Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:10 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
separate_wayz wrote:This was not a gamechanger by any means, and that's what Obama and the Democrats needed.


The thing was 6-hours long during the day.

Agreed.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:It's main competition was Maury Povich and reruns of Gunsmoke, and I'm sure they both won quite handedly.

Agreed.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Nobody watches this crap.

Agreed.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Ultimately, Obama gets bragging rights that they held a debate on-camera.

Slim pickins', these are. What a lot of Obama supporters fail to realize is: the rest of us don't fawn all over every word that Obama says. We really don't. In fact, he's begun often to seem to us a lot like a condescending ass when he opens his mouth. That schtick is wearing thin, very quickly. The White House apparently doesn't think that diminishing marginal utility and decreasing returns to scale apply to Obama's speeches and televised press events. They do.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:At the very least, nobody unplugged the C-Span cameras during the whole process.

Are you sure about this? I was watching Gunsmoke.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Can't say the same for the debates over Bush's Medicare Part D expansion, which cost more than this bill, was completely deficit financed, and earned little-to-no scorn from the the 9-12 Mutual Teabag Admiration Society.

Agreed. I think the Bush administration's Medicare Part D expansion was a deficit-busting piece of entitlement garbage. The process under which it was passed was gross, and it will ultimately contribute to exploding the federal debt.
User avatar
separate_wayz
LP
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:14 am
Location: USA

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:34 am

separate_wayz wrote:Slim pickins', these are. What a lot of Obama supporters fail to realize is: the rest of us don't fawn all over every word that Obama says. We really don't. In fact, he's begun often to seem to us a lot like a condescending ass when he opens his mouth. That schtick is wearing thin, very quickly. The White House apparently doesn't think that diminishing marginal utility and decreasing returns to scale apply to Obama's speeches and televised press events. They do.

Agree 100%.
You’ll note they have cut back on the number of primetime press conferences, which were a good idea if Obama was half the engaging speaker the media made him out to be.
But he’s not - very professorial, dry, with a start-and-stutter cadence that falls somewhere between George W. Bush and Elmer Fudd.
I’m at a loss to why people are just catching on now to his teleprompter crutch, when he could barely formulate a sentence worth a damn in the primaries.
Just really a horrible debater.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16058
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby RossValoryRocks » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:25 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:Unlike you and TNC and Monker my anger is at the whole establishment. I gave up on the Republicans as a party long ago, right about the time they started spending like fools and taking away liberties.


Is that why you were spinning like a dervish from hell as recently as last year defending domestic surveillance?
Ultimately saying that Bush under his “magic wartime powers” can flout any law he wants?
Sorry.
That’s not Conservative or Libertarian - that’s pure beltway establishment GOP.
Not sure why anyone gives you the time of day...
You are solely interested in promoting yourself as “Mister Independent”, the truth and facts be fucked.
7, Monker, Deano, could bitch about Obama as the day is long, (and in many cases, we have), and you would still write us off as George Soros’ personal cabana boys.
Look around – who here is still loyally defending the GOP, posting right wing op-eds day after day, even as the country lies in smoldering ruins as a result of failed GOP leadership?
Here’s a clue, it ain’t the liberals.


Domestic surveillance ahh yes...in this case I don't think that is giving up liberties...that is just common sense. And a bunch of Democrats agree with me...including GASP...Obama...and most the democrat controlled congress: The Patriot Act extension last week????

The liberties I am refering to are the ones of choice. Choice of healthcare...choice of where to live and how to live...to own and firearm...the choice of how to spend MY money as I wish...not have the government do it for me.

I am far more independent than you or Monker or 7 (though 7 is just misguided a bit, we are going to have some beers at MR2 and I am going to straighten him out a bit)...the only think you and the other libs criticize Obama and the rest of the Dems on is not moving fast enough, far enough. Deano calls them SPINELESS because they won't.

So why don't you come to MR2 too??? Then we can debate in person. I know you aren't man enough to do it...and you probably don't want to be urinated on...you hide behind your words...and the twisting of other peoples...to make yourself into some kind of...hell I don't know what...but I do know this...you are a coward, plain and simple. A liberal coward...without a shred of real insight into the world. You really should re-examine your core beliefs and see what those beliefs (since they are right out of the Obama-mania playbook) are about to do to this country.

Yes yes...I know...where was I when Bush and the Republicans were fucking us...please spare us...They did a good job, I agree on that, but what the Democrats are about to do will make Bush look like the greatest President EVER.

So come to MR2 and face me in person or show everyone here what a tool and a coward you are.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:15 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:Domestic surveillance ahh yes...in this case I don't think that is giving up liberties...that is just common sense.

Not when there are already established laws on the books permitting secret wiretaps for national security, and retroactive warrants, and Bush ignored them.
That's called making up the law - period.
REAL independents, of all political stripes, know this, and were rightfully alarmed.
RossValoryRocks wrote:The liberties I am referring to are the ones of choice. Choice of healthcare...choice of where to live and how to live...to own and firearm...the choice of how to spend MY money as I wish...not have the government do it for me.

And how, exactly, did the Republican party take away any of those liberties (your words, not mine)?
You just finished saying that you left the GOP when they started “taking away liberties.”
Now you are mentioning healthcare, property, and gun laws, none of which have anything to do with the Republicans.
RossValoryRocks wrote:I am far more independent than you or Monker or 7 (though 7 is just misguided a bit, we are going to have some beers at MR2 and I am going to straighten him out a bit)....

No, you're not.
You're one of the biggest partisan hacks on here.
In fact, you’re worse.
At least FF and RedWing don’t run and hide behind the label of "independent" as they march in blind lockstep with their party.
RossValoryRocks wrote:So why don't you come to MR2 too??? Then we can debate in person. I know you aren't man enough to do it...and you probably don't want to be urinated on...you hide behind your words...and the twisting of other peoples...to make yourself into some kind of...hell I don't know what...but I do know this...you are a coward, plain and simple. A liberal coward...without a shred of real insight into the world. You really should re-examine your core beliefs and see what those beliefs (since they are right out of the Obama-mania playbook) are about to do to this country.

Considering that you can’t go a single post without making some not-so-thinly-veiled death threat, I would watch who you’re calling a coward.
Only insecure chickenfucks like you feel the need to talk smack from the confines of their basement.
Any threat I make in return would be a) illegal and b) deleted by Drew, so it’s simply not worth it.

RossValoryRocks wrote:Yes yes...I know...where was I when Bush and the Republicans were fucking us...please spare us...

Too late.
Should’ve spoken up when it actually meant something.
The same way 7, Deano, or myself, and the party base continue to hold Obama’s feet to the fire.
You simply have no credibility.

RossValoryRocks wrote:So come to MR2 and face me in person or show everyone here what a tool and a coward you are.

This is the equivalent of saying “meet me in the school yard after recess”.
Once again, real hardasses who've served time, or at least had run-ins with the law don’t talk like this.
Grow up dude.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16058
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests