Michelle Duggar miscarries 20th child

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Michelle Duggar miscarries 20th child

Postby Rip Rokken » Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:33 am

Sad for this to happen to anyone.

http://tv.yahoo.com/news/michelle-dugga ... 38891.html

Michelle Duggar Miscarries: 'I Feel Like My Heart Broke Telling My Children'

The Duggars were given heartbreaking news on Thursday.

According to People, during a routine check-up where Jim Bob and Michelle were supposed to find out the sex of their 20th child, their doctor was unable to find the baby's heartbeat. Michelle was told that she had miscarried in her second trimester.

"After the appointment, we came back home and told the children," the 45-year-old mother of 19 told the mag. "We had just been talking about baby names last night and they were getting excited about naming a boy or a girl. It has been a real sad disappointment."

Jim Bob also released a statment confirming the tragic news to Access Hollywood , saying, "Earlier today at a routine doctor's appointment, Michelle and I received the sad news that we lost the baby. Michelle is resting comfortably at home with the support of the entire family. We are grateful for all the thoughts and prayers, but ask for privacy during this difficult time."

The Duggar matriarch said they will still name the baby after they find out of it was a boy or a girl and they plan to hold a funeral service.

"I feel like my heart broke telling my children," she continued. "They have all been so excited about this baby and looking forward to April coming around and having a new little one in our arms. That was the most difficult. The Lord is the giver of life and he can choose when that life is ready to go on and be with Him."

This is Michelle's second miscarriage. She previously lost a baby during her second pregnancy, when she was reportedly taking oral birth control. According to the mag, this incident caused the couple to let the number of children they have be "up to God."
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Ehwmatt » Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:34 am

Who?
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby brandonx76 » Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:40 am

The sad mother of 19? Are you friggin kidding me? No doubt a miscarrage is a sad event, but she should've stopped at 2!!
User avatar
brandonx76
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 11:16 am
Location: Beyond the Sun

Postby conversationpc » Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:18 am

brandonx76 wrote:The sad mother of 19? Are you friggin kidding me? No doubt a miscarrage is a sad event, but she should've stopped at 2!!


Bullcrap...As long as they can take care of them, it's no one's business to tell them otherwise. By all accounts, their children are all pretty well adjusted, well-behaved, and educated and they are not taking government assistance to accomplish it. They're a good example of what an American family should be doing to raise their own children.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby artist4perry » Sat Dec 10, 2011 8:38 am

conversationpc wrote:
brandonx76 wrote:The sad mother of 19? Are you friggin kidding me? No doubt a miscarrage is a sad event, but she should've stopped at 2!!


Bullcrap...As long as they can take care of them, it's no one's business to tell them otherwise. By all accounts, their children are all pretty well adjusted, well-behaved, and educated and they are not taking government assistance to accomplish it. They're a good example of what an American family should be doing to raise their own children.


Sorry to hear their loss. And I am glad they are such a great family. They will have each other to hold through it. :D
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby Rick » Sat Dec 10, 2011 8:46 am

I guess they finally wore that thing out. :shock:

My ex and I lost a baby to a miscarriage. It's just a terrible feeling. Sorry to hear that.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby scarygirl » Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:43 am

I am sorry that happened. The only thing that disturbs me is the girls are not encouraged to go out on their own. The older girls are well of age to hold a job, go to college, etc, but instead they are being used as baby sitters.The only way they'll ever get to leave the house is if they marry and i don't even them being encouraged to even do that. Not that you should have to get married to leave the house.
User avatar
scarygirl
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: NC

Postby Duncan » Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:04 pm

Probably religous nutjobs.
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear. - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Duncan
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:57 am
Location: Sadly Broke, South Glos

Postby majik » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:16 pm

Duncan wrote:Probably religous nutjobs.



Seconds away............

Ding Ding!!!!

Round 2. :lol: :wink:
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

Postby Rip Rokken » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:29 pm

I'm really trying to behave myself in this thread, but it's not easy... ScaryGirl makes great points, and I've seen a special on TV describing how young ladies in their movement find mates. They don't really date - they do something called "courting", where they are basically chaperoned and can't even hold hands or kiss until the wedding day.

Also, there is also that whole issue about letting God decide how many kids they'll have. Is a miscarriage his rough way of telling people to stop, and will they even accept that as a sign?
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Rick » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:41 pm

The Duggars don't have shit on this family. :lol: ;)

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-ne ... ndchildren
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Rip Rokken » Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:53 pm

Rick wrote:The Duggars don't have shit on this family. :lol: ;)

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-ne ... ndchildren


Dang... and all that came from one sperm sac... Imagine if every family bred like this. The global population would be unsustainable by the second generation.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby brandonx76 » Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:34 pm

conversationpc wrote:
brandonx76 wrote:The sad mother of 19? Are you friggin kidding me? No doubt a miscarrage is a sad event, but she should've stopped at 2!!

and they are not taking government assistance to accomplish it. They're a good example of what an American family should be doing to raise their own children.


Way to attempt to turn this into a political discussion...if you are even being remotely serious...I'll just say that there's no need to have that many children...I would question the sanity of a couple that had any more than 5 kids in this day in age..You know the saying don't be greedy? I think that applies here.
User avatar
brandonx76
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 11:16 am
Location: Beyond the Sun

Postby majik » Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:35 pm

It is written, He who dips his wick must pay for the oil.

I'm wondering though, when is the individual soul/spirit created as by the seventh day God had completed all his work.
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

Postby donnaplease » Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:34 am

Rip Rokken wrote:I'm really trying to behave myself in this thread, but it's not easy... ScaryGirl makes great points, and I've seen a special on TV describing how young ladies in their movement find mates. They don't really date - they do something called "courting", where they are basically chaperoned and can't even hold hands or kiss until the wedding day.

Also, there is also that whole issue about letting God decide how many kids they'll have. Is a miscarriage his rough way of telling people to stop, and will they even accept that as a sign?


Have you never heard that expression... courting... before this situation? My mom used it often as a synonym for dating. I think it's an older term for the same thing, it's just that the rules were a little (or a lot, depending on the couple) different back in the 40's when she was doing it.
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby AR » Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:38 am

I'm just imagining how stretched out her pussy is.
User avatar
AR
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8530
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:21 am

Postby artist4perry » Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:57 am

These conversations are hysterical. Without knowing all the facts this poor family who has just lost a child has been accused of all kinds of things. If they want a large family and can afford it who are you to judge? Now if she is unable to have more that is for them and their doctor to decide. I personally cannot afford to have more than two, so two is all I had. I really don't want to care for more. But some moms love to raise lots of kids. Religious or not. By the way, that faith might just help them through the loss, regardless of what YOU think.

Seriously who died and made us the family size police? :roll:

Now I can see if it is Octomom who is expecting the world to pay for her children, but a happy family who can afford it? No, we have to make fun and run them down. :roll:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby Rip Rokken » Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:24 am

donnaplease wrote:Have you never heard that expression... courting... before this situation? My mom used it often as a synonym for dating. I think it's an older term for the same thing, it's just that the rules were a little (or a lot, depending on the couple) different back in the 40's when she was doing it.


Of course, but like you mention, things were different back in the 40's. I think people who force such an out of date lifestyle only set their children up for failure in the real world. They won't be able to relate to anyone outside their tight-knit little sect. And not holding hands or kissing is sexual repression to the extreme. There is NO WAY those boys aren't jacking off somewhere... I don't think the body can handle the build up of reproductive fluids without some kind of regular release. If they actually could, I'm suspicious that there would be long term negative health repercussions.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Rip Rokken » Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:35 am

artist4perry wrote:If they want a large family and can afford it who are you to judge? Now if she is unable to have more that is for them and their doctor to decide.


I thought they said it was for God to decide. Now they've lost two, and my prediction is within a few months they'll be eagerly announcing to the press that she's pregnant again. They are obviously addicted to this...

artist4perry wrote:Seriously who died and made us the family size police? :roll:

Now I can see if it is Octomom who is expecting the world to pay for her children, but a happy family who can afford it? No, we have to make fun and run them down. :roll:


First, it's out of concern that they are raising Stepford kids - and that seems to be the case. If this was mainstream practice, especially in Christian circles, that might be different. But their Quiver Full movement is just another odd offshoot of the faith, and it isolates them. The 'celebrity' aspect gives them some social viability, which goes for Octomom, too. Both families pay for their huge families by exploiting the spectacle of them with reality shows, etc. Is that a healthy environment for kids to be raised in, with cameras in front of their faces all the time? If anything, it just helps them become better actors.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby artist4perry » Sun Dec 11, 2011 5:14 am

Rip Rokken wrote:
artist4perry wrote:If they want a large family and can afford it who are you to judge? Now if she is unable to have more that is for them and their doctor to decide.


I thought they said it was for God to decide. Now they've lost two, and my prediction is within a few months they'll be eagerly announcing to the press that she's pregnant again. They are obviously addicted to this...

artist4perry wrote:Seriously who died and made us the family size police? :roll:

Now I can see if it is Octomom who is expecting the world to pay for her children, but a happy family who can afford it? No, we have to make fun and run them down. :roll:


First, it's out of concern that they are raising Stepford kids - and that seems to be the case. If this was mainstream practice, especially in Christian circles, that might be different. But their Quiver Full movement is just another odd offshoot of the faith, and it isolates them. The 'celebrity' aspect gives them some social viability, which goes for Octomom, too. Both families pay for their huge families by exploiting the spectacle of them with reality shows, etc. Is that a healthy environment for kids to be raised in, with cameras in front of their faces all the time? If anything, it just helps them become better actors.


I was not aware at the time it was a family that had a show. I first think that is bad for any family, I have not seen one who has not been affected by the constant scrutiny of the public. People are cruel and say mean things all the time because it has become the pass time of our nation.

I thought you were just talking about a large family. So you can see what I was saying about it not really mattering to us how large a family is.

I don't watch crap like that because it is crap and it does harm the families involved. But we do these kids no kindness by tearing their family apart like we were speculating on a sports team.

Turn off the show, and let the ratings drop so the family can go back to real reality.
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby S2M » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:26 am

Ginger, your new signature is a travesty.

And quite pathetic. Most places aren't saying no one can't say 'Chrsitmas'...they just aren't sanctioning it. Like the government not financing(sanctioning) abortions. You can STILL get one, but you must pay for your own.

Christmas has been corporate/commercial for 40 years....according to the constellations that were referenced in The Greatest Fairy Tale never Told, 'Jesus' wasn't born anywhere near December.

In a related story, I can't make fart noises with my hand/armpit anymore - I guess 'god' thought it was time that skill was taken from me....
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby artist4perry » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:47 am

S2M wrote:Ginger, your new signature is a travesty.

And quite pathetic. Most places aren't saying no one can't say 'Chrsitmas'...they just aren't sanctioning it. Like the government not financing(sanctioning) abortions. You can STILL get one, but you must pay for your own.

Christmas has been corporate/commercial for 40 years....according to the constellations that were referenced in The Greatest Fairy Tale never Told, 'Jesus' wasn't born anywhere near December.

In a related story, I can't make fart noises with my hand/armpit anymore - I guess 'god' thought it was time that skill was taken from me....


It was cute, I liked it, and you can stick it. I don't celebrate Christmas as a religious holiday you putz. 8)

It is funny. :D Take you PC stupidity elsewhere. 8)
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby majik » Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:37 am

S2M wrote:
In a related story, I can't make fart noises with my hand/armpit anymore - I guess 'god' thought it was time that skill was taken from me....


Na, he reckons your mouth made up for the shortfall :lol:
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

Postby majik » Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:45 am

artist4perry wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote:
artist4perry wrote:If they want a large family and can afford it who are you to judge? Now if she is unable to have more that is for them and their doctor to decide.


I thought they said it was for God to decide. Now they've lost two, and my prediction is within a few months they'll be eagerly announcing to the press that she's pregnant again. They are obviously addicted to this...

artist4perry wrote:Seriously who died and made us the family size police? :roll:

Now I can see if it is Octomom who is expecting the world to pay for her children, but a happy family who can afford it? No, we have to make fun and run them down. :roll:


First, it's out of concern that they are raising Stepford kids - and that seems to be the case. If this was mainstream practice, especially in Christian circles, that might be different. But their Quiver Full movement is just another odd offshoot of the faith, and it isolates them. The 'celebrity' aspect gives them some social viability, which goes for Octomom, too. Both families pay for their huge families by exploiting the spectacle of them with reality shows, etc. Is that a healthy environment for kids to be raised in, with cameras in front of their faces all the time? If anything, it just helps them become better actors.


I was not aware at the time it was a family that had a show. I first think that is bad for any family, I have not seen one who has not been affected by the constant scrutiny of the public. People are cruel and say mean things all the time because it has become the pass time of our nation.

I thought you were just talking about a large family. So you can see what I was saying about it not really mattering to us how large a family is.

I don't watch crap like that because it is crap and it does harm the families involved. But we do these kids no kindness by tearing their family apart like we were speculating on a sports team.

Turn off the show, and let the ratings drop so the family can go back to real reality.



Real reality, really :wink:
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

Postby Rip Rokken » Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:51 am

S2M wrote:In a related story, I can't make fart noises with my hand/armpit anymore - I guess 'god' thought it was time that skill was taken from me....


I noticed the same thing a few years back. Was really disappointed!
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Rip Rokken » Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:57 am

artist4perry wrote:I was not aware at the time it was a family that had a show. I first think that is bad for any family, I have not seen one who has not been affected by the constant scrutiny of the public. People are cruel and say mean things all the time because it has become the pass time of our nation.


The name of the show is "19 Kids (and Counting)", and just the name seems to be a set-up for popping out more kids. Her last live one was in Children's Hospital for a long time, and they made the cover of a major mag over her statement that they'd consider trying again. It's a sickness.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby JH'sTXfan » Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:56 am

Rip Rokken wrote:Of course, but like you mention, things were different back in the 40's. I think people who force such an out of date lifestyle only set their children up for failure in the real world. They won't be able to relate to anyone outside their tight-knit little sect. And not holding hands or kissing is sexual repression to the extreme. There is NO WAY those boys aren't jacking off somewhere... I don't think the body can handle the build up of reproductive fluids without some kind of regular release.

They could go blind!

Rip Rokken wrote: If they actually could, I'm suspicious that there would be long term negative health repercussions.


:lol: :lol: :lol:
JH'sTXfan
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2176
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: sleepy little town down around San Antone

Postby verslibre » Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:59 am

Rip Rokken wrote:The name of the show is "19 Kids (and Counting)", and just the name seems to be a set-up for popping out more kids. Her last live one was in Children's Hospital for a long time, and they made the cover of a major mag over her statement that they'd consider trying again. It's a sickness.


D-D-D-Down with the sickness!!!!
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Postby conversationpc » Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:12 pm

brandonx76 wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
brandonx76 wrote:The sad mother of 19? Are you friggin kidding me? No doubt a miscarrage is a sad event, but she should've stopped at 2!!

and they are not taking government assistance to accomplish it. They're a good example of what an American family should be doing to raise their own children.


Way to attempt to turn this into a political discussion...if you are even being remotely serious...I'll just say that there's no need to have that many children...I would question the sanity of a couple that had any more than 5 kids in this day in age..You know the saying don't be greedy? I think that applies here.


Umm...You're the one that turned this into what you think they should or shouldn't do. No one gives a flying crap what you think they need to have. My point is if they can through their own efforts take care of however many children they have, it doesn't really matter how many they have.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby artist4perry » Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:24 pm

majik wrote:
artist4perry wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote:
artist4perry wrote:If they want a large family and can afford it who are you to judge? Now if she is unable to have more that is for them and their doctor to decide.


I thought they said it was for God to decide. Now they've lost two, and my prediction is within a few months they'll be eagerly announcing to the press that she's pregnant again. They are obviously addicted to this...

artist4perry wrote:Seriously who died and made us the family size police? :roll:

Now I can see if it is Octomom who is expecting the world to pay for her children, but a happy family who can afford it? No, we have to make fun and run them down. :roll:


First, it's out of concern that they are raising Stepford kids - and that seems to be the case. If this was mainstream practice, especially in Christian circles, that might be different. But their Quiver Full movement is just another odd offshoot of the faith, and it isolates them. The 'celebrity' aspect gives them some social viability, which goes for Octomom, too. Both families pay for their huge families by exploiting the spectacle of them with reality shows, etc. Is that a healthy environment for kids to be raised in, with cameras in front of their faces all the time? If anything, it just helps them become better actors.


I was not aware at the time it was a family that had a show. I first think that is bad for any family, I have not seen one who has not been affected by the constant scrutiny of the public. People are cruel and say mean things all the time because it has become the pass time of our nation.

I thought you were just talking about a large family. So you can see what I was saying about it not really mattering to us how large a family is.

I don't watch crap like that because it is crap and it does harm the families involved. But we do these kids no kindness by tearing their family apart like we were speculating on a sports team.

Turn off the show, and let the ratings drop so the family can go back to real reality.



Real reality, really :wink:


As opposed to the so called fake reality that they refer to as reality. Not to be confused with realty. :wink: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Next

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests