Boomchild wrote:Seven Wishes wrote:Boomchild wrote:Personal attack. You mean like telling someone that their "part of the problem". I see. Your right I'm wrong, feel better now????
It wasn't. You simply didn't like being called out that you were flat-out wrong - and that your position, lacking completely in fact, cannot be reduced to an "opinion". You could put a Holocaust denier on a panel with an Auschwitz survivor, and give them both equal time to present their stories, but the cold, hard truth will ALWAYS be that there WAS a Holocaust and that millions of innocent Jews died as a consequence of it. Just because someone has chosen to "believe" it was all a hoax, does not give that idea any validity - because it's indefensible.
Your daft. At the end of his lecture he stated "
YOUR part of the problem". By the use of the English word "your" it was directed at me personally. He made it personal.
your plural of your (Adjective)
Adjective
Belonging to or associated with the person or people that the speaker is addressing: "what is your name?".
Belonging to or associated with any person in general: "the sight is enough to break your heart".
Except I didn't use "your" as a reference to you directly... I used "your" as a reference to the first "you"... which was PLURAL in use, within the context of the sentence... you just read it as singular (meaning you)...
Here's the quote form the actual post.
slucero wrote:If you are only willing to invest enough of your time to the point you think things are fucked up, but aren't willing to invest enough of your time to KNOW why things are are fucked up, then you are part of the problem.
and as I posted when I was done (and assumed you were too) with this.. I'll quote (so there are no contextual errors) what I asked you:
.. for you to consider it "personal" then you must also agree that you are part of the problem...
Which means you agree with me.
Which is it?
