Moderator: Andrew
Don wrote:http://now.msn.com/hindenburg-disaster-explained-by-static-electricity
Talk about a cold case. More than 75 years after the famous Hindenburg passenger airship exploded into a ball of fire over a Navy air station, scientists have finally figured out what went wrong, by blowing up scale models of the blimp. They say static electricity was the dirty culprit in the 1937 disaster that killed 35 people and permanently crumbled the era of passenger zeppelins. After the Hindenburg hit a thunderstorm, it became charged with static, and a broken wire or a stuck gas valve leaked hydrogen into the ventilation shafts. When crews on the ground ran to take the landing ropes they "grounded" the craft, causing a spark and igniting the built-up hydrogen.
JRNYMAN wrote:I'm confused.... Isn't that what they thought the cause was all along? That's what I remember reading/learning via documentaries and books over the years.
What's even more surprising is the fact that the original movie, "The Hindenburg" which came out in 1975 with George C. Scott and Ann Bancroft was a compendium of the facts which were used as merely a loose foundation to write the mostly fictitious storyline around - including the zeppelin's demise which was due to sabotage in the movie. I agree, it does in fact seem like one of those historical events which society has kept at the forefront of all things historically epic which Hollywood usually sees as a money machine. Interesting that they have settled on the 1975 film as being the definitive screenplay about the event.The Sushi Hunter wrote:What's more amazing is only 30 some odd people were killed in all. From how it's been kept in the news for 75 years, you'd think it were hundreds or over a thoussand like the Titanic or something. Interesting how they've not made a movie about this blimp like they did the Titanic, over and over and over and over and over and over again, each time adding a new "love story" to it.
There have been stories over the years about some of the components that made up the silver skin are the ingredients for Thermite and that's why it burned so quickly - not only the skin but the metal structure as well. The story goes on to state that its sister ship the LZ-129 was quietly taken out of service and re-skinned after the disaster.Rick wrote:You can see people running out of it. That thing went up quick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgWHbpMVQ1U
JRNYMAN wrote:There have been stories over the years about some of the components that made up the silver skin are the ingredients for Thermite and that's why it burned so quickly - not only the skin but the metal structure as well. The story goes on to state that its sister ship the LZ-129 was quietly taken out of service and re-skinned after the disaster.Rick wrote:You can see people running out of it. That thing went up quick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgWHbpMVQ1U
The Sushi Hunter wrote:Speaking of caught on film disaster, here's one and many more people died on it. Watch this clip and you can see all these little things that look like ants streaming off the hull of the ship into the water, those are people running off the boat.
Unquestionably the biggest money maker of any disaster ever! Its theater run alone surpassed everything ever released prior - something like 19 months! ET was the closest at just over 12 months but when it came out, the mega-multi-plex wasn't the norm yet. It played at mostly single and double screen venues. Over 1/3 of the US population saw Titanic its opening weekend in the US alone! When you look at the box office and rental sales figures for it, the numbers are almost surreal - and I mean that literally. NOTHING begins to come close to the money that movie has generated. Nothing!The Sushi Hunter wrote:The Titanic disaster wasn't caught on film yet it's been the biggest money making disaster that I can think of.
JRNYMAN wrote:There have been stories over the years about some of the components that made up the silver skin are the ingredients for Thermite and that's why it burned so quickly - not only the skin but the metal structure as well. The story goes on to state that its sister ship the LZ-129 was quietly taken out of service and re-skinned after the disaster.Rick wrote:You can see people running out of it. That thing went up quick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgWHbpMVQ1U
{{Spoken like Butthead...}} Uh...huh huh... that was cool!!Monker wrote:JRNYMAN wrote:There have been stories over the years about some of the components that made up the silver skin are the ingredients for Thermite and that's why it burned so quickly - not only the skin but the metal structure as well. The story goes on to state that its sister ship the LZ-129 was quietly taken out of service and re-skinned after the disaster.Rick wrote:You can see people running out of it. That thing went up quick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgWHbpMVQ1U
Mythbusters did an episode on this and busted the Thermite theory. It was the hydrogen gas, not the paint.
Tho burning it with pure thermite does look pretty cool:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEQ6xvjvvE0
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests