Just playing devils advocate here...
Would it shock anyone if Schon suggested to the band they should do a tribute to Aretha and they were not interested... and then he incorporated it into his solo and then "overreacted" when credit is given to the band? It's just a thought. But their setlist is so stale it sure as shit wouldn't shock me if they refused to go off cruise control. I mean - on here we've always wanted a more diverse setlist, but
relatively speaking they did do a pretty good job '98-'12. It's become atrocious the last few years.
They did this AS A BAND when BB King passed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcwGfrW7bp0Not for nothing... but creating no new music seems to have an affect on their being creative AT ALL.
Anyone else think maybe Schon used to have Arnel and Deen's vote on stuff and that dynamic changed when Deen left?
For me? Journey is more interesting when Schon is in control and hungry to show folks the entirety of Journey. This greatest hits tour with no music is what the critics mistakenly attributed to Journey when they reformed in '98... and it was incorrect THEN.. but is now correct. They were a band that wasn't afraid to make mistakes and were interesting. Now? Blaaaaah.
I also find it really interesting how much Perry loves and respects Schon in all these interviews without mentioning anyone else (other than the shout-outs to Arnel). It's very telling in my opinion.
Do I like the way Schon conducts things on social media? No.
Do I get it? Yes.
Whose version of Journey do I want? Schon's