The_Noble_Cause wrote: The lack of collusion indictments also disproves the dossier.
That's just fanciful.
Moderator: Andrew
The_Noble_Cause wrote: The lack of collusion indictments also disproves the dossier.
Monker wrote:Mueller has stayed out of the politics of this.
Andrew wrote:That's just fanciful.
Andrew wrote:Such passionate blowback from people not wanting a report that “clears” Trump released!
The_Noble_Cause wrote:I don't really care either way. I just think it's hypocritical of you to be demanding the full report. It was always known that the report would go to the AG. Now that you disagree with its findings, you are implying there is a cover-up at work.
Andrew wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:I don't really care either way. I just think it's hypocritical of you to be demanding the full report. It was always known that the report would go to the AG. Now that you disagree with its findings, you are implying there is a cover-up at work.
Sigh. I don't disagree with the findings. I don't know what they are. Nor does anyone else.
Monker wrote:And, Schiff's rebuttal to the Republicans in his committee asking him to resign laid out specifically all of the collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. All of which is public knowledge and FACT. It is an outright LIE to say there was no collusion. Even Napaliano on FOX said he agreed with Schiff, and there was just not enough evidence to be "beyond a reasonable doubt".
I agree with Schiff that none of those action by the Trump campaign are OK...and it is HIS job, and the COMMITTEE's job to investigate it. The Republicans FAILED in their obligation as committee members to do that...and they are the ones who should resign. Not just from the committee, but from congress itself.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:Mueller has stayed out of the politics of this.
I never mentioned politics. I said that if Barr was distorting Mueller's findings, Mueller would correct the record. When Buzzfeed lied about Mueller's findings, his spokesperson quickly corrected the record. According to your logic, Mueller cares more about Buzzfeed than the Attorney General? Get real.
Monker wrote:
That's Buzzfeed, so what.
Mueller accusing the AG of 'distortion' is something completely different. THAT is getting involved int he politics of this...and I doubt - very much - that he will get into the fray. He did his job, now it is into a political battle...congress, the AG, Trump, and the American people will need to decide what to do next.
Andrew wrote:https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1111419775601635330?s=21
Aren’t you Drumpf supporters embarrassed every time he opens his mouth?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Andrew wrote:https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1111419775601635330?s=21
Aren’t you Drumpf supporters embarrassed every time he opens his mouth?
Seems like you're trying to change the subject. After falling for the greatest disinformation campaign of all time, I can't blame you. Say, any updates on that BS article you posted about Manafort visiting Assange?
Andrew wrote:
Believe it or not, but I am quite capable of carrying on 2 topics at the same time! Shock, I know.
The second gives us almost daily evidence at what a supersonic moron this guy is. I mean, seriously retarded.
So, on the point of changing the subject....aren't you embarrassed by what this idiot says?
Andrew wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/trumps-businesses-are-full-of-dirty-russian-money-the-scandal-is-thats-legal/2019/03/29/11b812da-5171-11e9-88a1-ed346f0ec94f_story.html
The_Noble_Cause wrote:No, not really. The stream-of-consciousness rambling is a very New York thing and it is also a very raw and unfiltered. Every time he says something stupid it just further proves that he's not a blow-dried poll-tested career politician.
verslibre wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:No, not really. The stream-of-consciousness rambling is a very New York thing and it is also a very raw and unfiltered. Every time he says something stupid it just further proves that he's not a blow-dried poll-tested career politician.
I'm pretty sure there are some New Yorkers who prefer to think before they speak.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:verslibre wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:No, not really. The stream-of-consciousness rambling is a very New York thing and it is also a very raw and unfiltered. Every time he says something stupid it just further proves that he's not a blow-dried poll-tested career politician.
I'm pretty sure there are some New Yorkers who prefer to think before they speak.
I never generalized about every single living New Yorker. Everything you guys are now focusing on, like 45's discursive colloquial way of speaking, just proves you have nothing. That's what happens when you pin your hopes on a Mccarthyite fairy tale. You are left with meaningless crap. By promoting a false and easily debunked narrative, all of you on here played a small role in ensuring he gets re-elected in 2020. Nice job!
S2M wrote:Oh...and btw - my vote's for Pete Buttigieg in 2020.
S2M wrote:FFS!!! Forget the Russia angle...go for the TAX stuff. That's an impeachable offense. It's how they got Capone. Smarten up.
Oh...and btw - my vote's for Pete Buttigieg in 2020.
Memorex wrote:S2M wrote:FFS!!! Forget the Russia angle...go for the TAX stuff. That's an impeachable offense. It's how they got Capone. Smarten up.
Oh...and btw - my vote's for Pete Buttigieg in 2020.
So you think the American way is just to go after someone until they got them? Do you really want to live in a country where someone can be investigated and accused all day every day. Or would you maybe want the congress and the president work together to actually get some shit done?
Andrew wrote:Bingo. So release the report - and away everyone goes.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests