Moderator: Andrew
Tito wrote:BTW, as far as people working and not be able to vote. In Illinois, an employee is allowed to take up to 2 hours of paid leave to vote. So, can't vote because of work is out the window.
Or in Obama's case, 56 others.Enigma869 wrote:This might be a good time to remind you that there are 49 other states!
Enigma869 wrote:Tito wrote:BTW, as far as people working and not be able to vote. In Illinois, an employee is allowed to take up to 2 hours of paid leave to vote. So, can't vote because of work is out the window.
This might be a good time to remind you that there are 49 other states!
John from Boston
Tito wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Tito wrote:BTW, as far as people working and not be able to vote. In Illinois, an employee is allowed to take up to 2 hours of paid leave to vote. So, can't vote because of work is out the window.
This might be a good time to remind you that there are 49 other states!
John from Boston
I'm sure we're not the only state that does that. I wouldn't have a problem making that the federal law either.
AlteredDNA wrote:Tito wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Tito wrote:BTW, as far as people working and not be able to vote. In Illinois, an employee is allowed to take up to 2 hours of paid leave to vote. So, can't vote because of work is out the window.
This might be a good time to remind you that there are 49 other states!
John from Boston
I'm sure we're not the only state that does that. I wouldn't have a problem making that the federal law either.
Two years old, but a roundup of state time off to vote laws:
http://www.toolkit.com/news/newsDetail. ... -075voting
Here's a better, more recent one:
http://employmentlawpost.com/theword/20 ... -survey-2/
Tito wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Tito wrote:BTW, as far as people working and not be able to vote. In Illinois, an employee is allowed to take up to 2 hours of paid leave to vote. So, can't vote because of work is out the window.
This might be a good time to remind you that there are 49 other states!
John from Boston
I'm sure we're not the only state that does that. I wouldn't have a problem making that the federal law either.
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Tito wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Tito wrote:BTW, as far as people working and not be able to vote. In Illinois, an employee is allowed to take up to 2 hours of paid leave to vote. So, can't vote because of work is out the window.
This might be a good time to remind you that there are 49 other states!
John from Boston
I'm sure we're not the only state that does that. I wouldn't have a problem making that the federal law either.
Neither would I. More people might vote if this were the case in all states.
Lula wrote:not able to catch up on the reading here, sorry. i just gotta say the whole frad, stolen votes theory is becoming a damn talking point with no substance. the results aren't even in. i know polls are not the most reliable source, but they are relative. obama has had consistent growth and now real clear has him with 311 to mccain's 157 electoral votes. it appears some of you are setting up the stolen election theory so as not to shock us if we do indeed elect obama to be our 44th president and those that did not support him can cry foul.
let us be honest and admit that fraud is unavoidable cuz there are those dumb asses that just have to cheat- and they exist on both sides of the aisle.
Lula wrote:not able to catch up on the reading here, sorry. i just gotta say the whole frad, stolen votes theory is becoming a damn talking point with no substance. the results aren't even in. i know polls are not the most reliable source, but they are relative. obama has had consistent growth and now real clear has him with 311 to mccain's 157 electoral votes. it appears some of you are setting up the stolen election theory so as not to shock us if we do indeed elect obama to be our 44th president and those that did not support him can cry foul.
let us be honest and admit that fraud is unavoidable cuz there are those dumb asses that just have to cheat- and they exist on both sides of the aisle.
Gunbot wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Tito wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Tito wrote:BTW, as far as people working and not be able to vote. In Illinois, an employee is allowed to take up to 2 hours of paid leave to vote. So, can't vote because of work is out the window.
This might be a good time to remind you that there are 49 other states!
John from Boston
I'm sure we're not the only state that does that. I wouldn't have a problem making that the federal law either.
Neither would I. More people might vote if this were the case in all states.
With voting, if people care, they'll find the time. It comes along so rarely. My son, some of his college mates and myself voted last Friday.
Tito wrote: But cheating is cheating and it's wrong. Also, if Obama blows McCain out of the water, which is very possible, there still may be fraud and we need to correct that
bluejeangirl76 wrote:lights1961 wrote:GO MCCAIN. pick him to win with 285 electorial college votes...
Its "electoral". Uh oh... you can't spell. No vote for you.![]()
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Tito wrote: But cheating is cheating and it's wrong. Also, if Obama blows McCain out of the water, which is very possible, there still may be fraud and we need to correct that
Why bother. It wasn't corrected for the last two elections.![]()
lights1961 wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:lights1961 wrote:GO MCCAIN. pick him to win with 285 electorial college votes...
Its "electoral". Uh oh... you can't spell. No vote for you.![]()
damn it all... speling doent mater.![]()
oh and BJG... you are a fine classic lady in my book....
bluejeangirl76 wrote:lights1961 wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:lights1961 wrote:GO MCCAIN. pick him to win with 285 electorial college votes...
Its "electoral". Uh oh... you can't spell. No vote for you.![]()
damn it all... speling doent mater.![]()
oh and BJG... you are a fine classic lady in my book....
Thank you, sir.![]()
![]()
I have an awesome quote for that, which I patted myself on the back for when I said it, but it would immediately make me not a lady to repeat it..![]()
(the men would laugh, the women would hate me...LOL)
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman Charles Schumer of New York today argued that in the current climate a politically divided government is a bad thing. He was seeking to counter a closing GOP argument that voters should not give Democrats control of the White House, the House and a potentially filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. “They can’t win on domestic policy; they can’t win on foreign policy; they can’t win on sort of trying to tag our candidates; so the latest theme is, ‘Oh, let’s have some balance in government. Let’s have divided government,’ ” Schumer said at a press briefing. “Our view is very simple, and that is Republican senators, Republican incumbents aren’t for checks and balances. They’re for blocking change and backing [President] Bush.”
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress ... 9_4975.php
conversationpc wrote:Gotta love Chuck Schumer...What a dolt...Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman Charles Schumer of New York today argued that in the current climate a politically divided government is a bad thing. He was seeking to counter a closing GOP argument that voters should not give Democrats control of the White House, the House and a potentially filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. “They can’t win on domestic policy; they can’t win on foreign policy; they can’t win on sort of trying to tag our candidates; so the latest theme is, ‘Oh, let’s have some balance in government. Let’s have divided government,’ ” Schumer said at a press briefing. “Our view is very simple, and that is Republican senators, Republican incumbents aren’t for checks and balances. They’re for blocking change and backing [President] Bush.”
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress ... 9_4975.php
conversationpc wrote:Gotta love Chuck Schumer...What a dolt...Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman Charles Schumer of New York today argued that in the current climate a politically divided government is a bad thing. He was seeking to counter a closing GOP argument that voters should not give Democrats control of the White House, the House and a potentially filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. “They can’t win on domestic policy; they can’t win on foreign policy; they can’t win on sort of trying to tag our candidates; so the latest theme is, ‘Oh, let’s have some balance in government. Let’s have divided government,’ ” Schumer said at a press briefing. “Our view is very simple, and that is Republican senators, Republican incumbents aren’t for checks and balances. They’re for blocking change and backing [President] Bush.”
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress ... 9_4975.php
strangegrey wrote:Schumer's a cvntbag. I remember the day he won his seat in office, during election day...he was out shaking hands by the subway station near my apartment in manhattan. I couldn't get around the crowd around him, so I had to walk through it. I come face to face with the loser, as I'm trying to get to the other side of the crowd to go home...he thrusts his hand in my direction, as if to shake mine...I had to fight the urge to spit in his face. Instead, I was able to muster up a calm 'fuck off' before I started walking away....he had the predictable response as I walked away..."He must be a republican"......I turned around and went "wow, all those brains, and you're only running for senate!"
Fact Finder wrote:On Drudge...
Obama's Kenyan aunt found in a Boston slum... Developing...
bluejeangirl76 wrote:If you're gonna stir the soup, at least give us the crackers....![]()
Link:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 042571.ece
I'll vote for him if he promises to move Aunt Zenuti or whatever and Uncle Omar into the White House when he wins.
Fact Finder wrote:On Drudge...
Obama's Kenyan aunt found in a Boston slum... Developing...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest