They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[Monker]

That is because the ODNI report writers were idiots and did not know that Russia dates are in DD/MM/YYYY format and reported them as MM/DD/YYYY format. So a date of 3/7/2016 is REALLY July 3, 2017...but was reported as March 7, 2017.

WRONG. We are talking about shows from YEARS AGO. Not a matter of months. One show named in the ODNI report, Breaking the Set, ended in 2015. That somehow impacted the 2016 election? Give me a break. Occupy Wall Street TV coverage was also cited - back from 2011. As usual, you are either misinformed or lying.

So, if things from four years prior to an election can not affect things, why is Trump campaigning for reelection already?

I was not misinformed, etc, your question was simply not very specific. The report goes into a rant to discredit RT and blame them for a long term trend of trying to influence American politics. So what?

They didn't. If you go to their site today they still blame Russia.

You’re splitting hairs. Crowdstrike attributed hacks of a Ukrainian artillery app to the Russians. Crowdstrike’s flawed report was then used in support of the DNC hacking theory. They claimed it was the same (or similar) Russian malware used to hack the DNC. The Crowdstrike Ukraine report was found to be based on total BS.

I am NOT splitting hairs. YOU said Crowdstrike backed off on their claims of Russia hacking elections. They didn't. They revised some of their claims about the incident you describe above. They are two different topics.

Ukraine Ministry of Defense denies the Russia hack. The makers of the artillery app disputed the report. Think tank, IISS, says Crowdstrike misused their data and disavowed the report. Crowdstike had to retract and revise. This intel is soo flawed that even George Tenet wouldn’t call it a “slam dunk.”

So what? That is NOT the same incident. They made ONE claim that linked the two incidents....that malware by Fancy Bear was used in both. That does not mean they were banded together where faults in one faulted the other. That, again, is just making shit up and putting it into a conspiracy theory.

And, BTW, the hacked howitzers are exactly how I say voting machines can be hacked...the malware is part of the software being loaded....either the targeting software, or the voting software, or the vote counting software. It's the exact same thing.

Who cares? The developer of the allegedly Russian hacked Ukranian app says he was never contacted by Crowdstrike and the entire hack is a farce. If you think US voting booths were hacked, then man up and just say it already.

Quit lying about what I am saying. I have NEVER claimed "voting booths" were hacked. I am saying the software in voting machines, and the software in the voting counters, can be hacked.....and it would happen in the same way as was claimed in this incident.

I would guess Crowd Strike already put in the same work that the FBI would have done and since Crowd Strike has been open with the info, there is no need to see the servers....unless you are a conspiracy theorist.

Crowdstrike is a private for-profit firm hired by the DNC. DNC is paying them millions. Conflict of interest much?

I'm just giving one example. If you want to know the actual reason, ask the FBI.

*ALL* of these points are bullshit by you - and you should know that. But, you are a Trump zombie and ditto head who would rather distract the world by focusing on bullshit then the very real issues that are out there.

LOL. Been posting here as a socialist liberal/independent since 2002 and I'm a “ditto head.” Riiiight. At the end of the day, you are a DNC mouthpiece. You lied for Hillary (“she had permission to use a private server!”) and you are still lying today.

Yes, you are. You are CONSTANTLY repeating arguments that are on FOX and other conservative media. That is what all of this is in this list - bullshit propaganda.

[Boomchild]

That is NOT globalism. First of all, the US picks and chooses what to get involved in depending on how it affects the US. The middle east has oil that we desperately need....so we get involved. Countries in Africa or South America hardly ever have our true national interests so we don't get involved. So, the idea that we focus on the world's problems and what is best for other countries, I don't think it completely true.

Let's take the middle east. I would agree...let's remove all of our troops and let them kill each other as that is what they want to do anyway, we are just in the way. BUT, that could cause the price of oil to skyrocket, so we CAN'T do that...at least until we end our oil addiction. This is not 'globalist' thinking, it is strategic thinking that not everybody agrees with.

I see you may have missed a question that I was looking for an answer on, so I will repeat it for you:

Do you know what Agenda 21 is and how it has effected Federal, state and local laws?

BTW, a little more about Soros and how he manipulates things.

Forbes Flashback: How George Soros Broke The British Pound And Why Hedge Funds Probably Can't Crack The Euro

https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveschae ... 2ddfc66131

Here's how George Soros broke the Bank of Thailand

http://www.businessinsider.com/how-geor ... and-2016-9

How Beijing and Hong Kong sent billionaire George Soros packing the last time he attacked Asian markets

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/ ... os-packing

[Boomchild]

I asked for OTHERS here to define globalism. I read an article that said most Trump voters do not know what globalism is and apply it incorrectly to a variety of issues, mostly promoted by Trump. That article was completely correct...people here could not define it in their own words...having to use others to define it for them.

That is a lie. I responded with my own words and did not use links or quotes from anyone. You even acknowledged my response. Furthermore many political commentators (i.e. Mark Levin, Micheal Savage) have been talking about globalists long before the 2016 election and their views and explanations of it haven't changed since. So they are not just repeating what the Trump has been saying about it now.

[Monker]

I asked for OTHERS here to define globalism. I read an article that said most Trump voters do not know what globalism is and apply it incorrectly to a variety of issues, mostly promoted by Trump. That article was completely correct...people here could not define it in their own words...having to use others to define it for them.

That is a lie. I responded with my own words and did not use links or quotes from anyone. You even acknowledged my response. Furthermore many political commentators (i.e. Mark Levin, Micheal Savage) have been talking about globalists long before the 2016 election and their views and explanations of it haven't changed since. So they are not just repeating what the Trump has been saying about it now.

You are correct, I should not have implied that nobody could reply that request.

[Monker]

That is NOT globalism. First of all, the US picks and chooses what to get involved in depending on how it affects the US. The middle east has oil that we desperately need....so we get involved. Countries in Africa or South America hardly ever have our true national interests so we don't get involved. So, the idea that we focus on the world's problems and what is best for other countries, I don't think it completely true.

Let's take the middle east. I would agree...let's remove all of our troops and let them kill each other as that is what they want to do anyway, we are just in the way. BUT, that could cause the price of oil to skyrocket, so we CAN'T do that...at least until we end our oil addiction. This is not 'globalist' thinking, it is strategic thinking that not everybody agrees with.

I see you may have missed a question that I was looking for an answer on, so I will repeat it for you:

Do you know what Agenda 21 is and how it has effected Federal, state and local laws?

BTW, a little more about Soros and how he manipulates things.

I replied to it...the quotes just did not make it very obvious:

From the brief bit I read it is a UN set of guidelines to help government combat poverty and promote conservation and reduce pollution.

If federal, state, or local governments are enacting these suggestions and they are failing in some way or the people simply do not like using UN guidelines, then they can vote and force change. That is how democracy works. The UN does NOT and CAN NOT affect the sovereignty of the US, or any other country with SUGGESTIONS.

Forbes Flashback: How George Soros Broke The British Pound And Why Hedge Funds Probably Can't Crack The Euro

https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveschae ... 2ddfc66131

Here's how George Soros broke the Bank of Thailand

http://www.businessinsider.com/how-geor ... and-2016-9

How Beijing and Hong Kong sent billionaire George Soros packing the last time he attacked Asian markets

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/ ... os-packing

[/quote]

[Boomchild]

From the brief bit I read it is a UN set of guidelines to help government combat poverty and promote conservation and reduce pollution.

If federal, state, or local governments are enacting these suggestions and they are failing in some way or the people simply do not like using UN guidelines, then they can vote and force change. That is how democracy works. The UN does NOT and CAN NOT affect the sovereignty of the US, or any other country with SUGGESTIONS.

You need to dig deep into the actual document. Bill Clinton signed onto it and what it entails is far more then what you are stating here.

[Boomchild]

How dangerous Monker supports many things Soros finances and he doesn't seem to have a clue. Boomchild, Soros is not welcome or allowed in the Countries you mentioned, he also is not welcome in Ukraine, Moldova, and is wanted in Russia. Al for the same reason. Trying to bankrupt the country and take control. I myself believe he had a huge part in our 2008 crash and was the reason the FED had to shut down the banks and Wall Street, takinf=g advantage of Freddie and Fannie to strike. It fit his MO to a tee.

TNC, the book I have recomended to you covers these things in detail.

I am well aware of these things. I was reading about Soros long before he became a fixture of the post 2016 elections. Some are not even aware that Soros is on the board of directors of the parent company that was contracted to tally federal election votes. My nickname for this piece of shit is The Spawn of Satan.

[Boomchild]

[The_Noble_Cause]

Well, you lie so much that you really should not be commenting on this forum at all.

Such as....? No specifics. That's what I thought.

I never said I did not know what globalism is nor did I say I have never heard of it. You are just making shit up and lying again.

If you knew what it was, you wouldn't be asking questions about it. It's really that simple.

I asked for OTHERS here to define globalism. I read an article that said most Trump voters do not know what globalism is and apply it incorrectly to a variety of issues, mostly promoted by Trump.

Just like how you also read on the internet that "Hillary had permission to use a private server." There's a pattern emerging here. You are easily manipulated by what you read/watch. Who is the zombie again?

[The_Noble_Cause]

So, if things from four years prior to an election can not affect things, why is Trump campaigning for reelection already?

When I said that the ODNI report cited Russia Today shows that were long off the air, you blamed the report writers and said the following: "So a date of 3/7/2016 is REALLY July 3, 2017...but was reported as March 7, 2017."

That's a complete lie and now you have changed the subject entirely. You have no idea what you’re even discussing. Your only purpose here is to defend the Democratic Party and Hillary.

I am NOT splitting hairs. YOU said Crowdstrike backed off on their claims of Russia hacking elections. They didn't. They revised some of their claims about the incident you describe above. They are two different topics.

Hmm. If it’s two separate topics, why did the Crowdstrike founder says that the Ukranian app report proved the DNC hack "wasn’t a 400-pound guy in his bed."

Does that sound separate to you?

Crowdstrike’s Ukraine app report later had to be rewritten and revised. In other words, the smoking gun connecting Russia to the DNC server malware has completely collapsed.

So what? That is NOT the same incident. They made ONE claim that linked the two incidents....that malware by Fancy Bear was used in both. That does not mean they were banded together where faults in one faulted the other. That, again, is just making shit up and putting it into a conspiracy theory.

Again, if it’s two separate incidents why did the Crowdstrike founder say: “So, what we just did is said that it looks exactly as the same to the evidence we’ve already uncovered from the DNC, linking the two together.”

He also said: “Ukraine’s artillery men were targeted by the same hackers, that we call Fancy Bear, that targeted DNC.”

These are the words of the Crowdstrike founder linking the two incidents together. Clearly, he doesn’t think they are separate AT ALL.

Yes, you are. You are CONSTANTLY repeating arguments that are on FOX and other conservative media. That is what all of this is in this list - bullshit propaganda.

That’s too funny considering the strongest voices against the Russia hacking myth were either non-partisan or liberals.
These include journalist, Robert Parry, who exposed Iran Contra; VIPS, an anti-war group who also exposed bad intel in the lead up to Iraq; and Stephen Cohen, a writer for liberal rag, The Nation.
Again, you are simply uninformed.

[The_Noble_Cause]

That is a lie.

That is all this fetid sack of shit does.

Furthermore many political commentators (i.e. Mark Levin, Micheal Savage) have been talking about globalists long before the 2016 election and their views and explanations of it haven't changed since. So they are not just repeating what the Trump has been saying about it now.

Of course. In addition to numerous economists, public figures like Nader, Buchanan, and Perot have discussed these issues for decades.

[Monker]

So, if things from four years prior to an election can not affect things, why is Trump campaigning for reelection already?

When I said that the ODNI report cited Russia Today shows that were long off the air, you blamed the report writers and said the following: "So a date of 3/7/2016 is REALLY July 3, 2017...but was reported as March 7, 2017."

That's a complete lie and now you have changed the subject entirely. You have no idea what you’re even discussing. Your only purpose here is to defend the Democratic Party and Hillary.

It's not a lie....it happened in the DNI report - look it up. That is what I thought you were talking about. The ODNI report messed up the dates.

The rest of your post is repetitive bullshit trying to connect the Ukraine and DNC hacks as if they were the same thing. They are not...THAT IS A FACT. They have ONE connection, Fancy Bear wrote the malware. That is where the connection begins and ends. Crowdstrike backed off some of the rhetoric involved the Ukraine report - that is true. But, they have NEVER backed off anything regarding the DNC report. Those are the facts. EOL.

[Monker]

Well, you lie so much that you really should not be commenting on this forum at all.

Such as....? No specifics. That's what I thought.

I point out at least one lie in every post you write...go back and check.

I never said I did not know what globalism is nor did I say I have never heard of it. You are just making shit up and lying again.

If you knew what it was, you wouldn't be asking questions about it. It's really that simple.

I asked for OTHERS here to define globalism. I read an article that said most Trump voters do not know what globalism is and apply it incorrectly to a variety of issues, mostly promoted by Trump.

Just like how you also read on the internet that "Hillary had permission to use a private server." There's a pattern emerging here. You are easily manipulated by what you read/watch. Who is the zombie again?

[/quote]

It has nothing to do with being manipulated...I found it interesting and wanted to see how well it applied here. You alll (except Boomchild) PROVED IT TRUE. It's just a slur that now has little meaning other than an attempted insult.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/8024/why- ... n-shapiro#

[The_Noble_Cause]

It's not a lie....it happened in the DNI report - look it up.

It is a lie. I said the RT shows that were cited influencing the 2016 election had been off the air. That is 100% accurate. You claimed it was simply a reporting error.

That is what I thought you were talking about. The ODNI report messed up the dates.

I've been discussing the flawed ODNI report since it was first declassified. Back then, you were still regurgitating the 17 intel consensus lie and telling posters: "If you want to argue against it, you are arguing against the: FBI, CIA, NSA, Homeland Security...and on and on"

You know nothing. All you do is run to Google and Snopes. You are a total liberal hack pretender.

The rest of your post is repetitive bullshit trying to connect the Ukraine and DNC hacks as if they were the same thing. They are not...THAT IS A FACT.

Better take it up with the Crowdstrike founder. He made that very connection himself saying -

"So, what we just did is said that it looks exactly as the same to the evidence we’ve already uncovered from the DNC, linking the two together."

"Ukraine’s artillery men were targeted by the same hackers, that we call Fancy Bear, that targeted DNC."

They have ONE connection, Fancy Bear wrote the malware. That is where the connection begins and ends.

Except cyber forensics have proven that the malware was not exclusively developed by Fancy Bear. The source code was widely available. So the entire DNC hacking is predicated on a lie. You are simply uninformed.

[The_Noble_Cause]

I point out at least one lie in every post you write...go back and check.

As predicted, you have ZERO specifics. I can name several of yours - not the least of which is "Hillary had permission to use a private server."

You all (except Boomchild) PROVED IT TRUE. It's just a slur that now has little meaning other than an attempted insult.

That's funny. Because, like Boomchild, I provided a definition of globalism in my own words and you acknowledged it. You should be thankful posters even gave you a response considering how you've nonsensically labeled Trump voters "communist sympathizers." Nobody ever asks you to explain your usage of such terms because -

A) we know you are just brainlessly following the lead of the Democratic Party and B) we also know you are dumber than a pile of shit.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/8024/why- ... n-shapiro#

You are quoting the former editor of Breitbart here. A site which you have railed against as fake news. Can't have it both ways. Sorry.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Opening Statement yesterday.

https://www.scribd.com/document/3598991 ... -Statement

Thanks for posting. Roger's innocuous conversations with Guccifer 2.0 are a big nothing. The Left has simply lost their mind.

[Boomchild]

Opening Statement yesterday.

https://www.scribd.com/document/3598991 ... -Statement

Good for Stone for setting the record straight. But you know they are just going to keep on playing the same dirty tricks.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Another day, another Russia hacking story retracted. Is it coincidental that this keeps happening?

https://www.apnews.com/10a0080e8fcb4908ae4a852e8c03194d

[Monker]

Monker wrote:
You all (except Boomchild) PROVED IT TRUE. It's just a slur that now has little meaning other than an attempted insult.


That's funny. Because, like Boomchild, I provided a definition of globalism in my own words and you acknowledged it.

Not true. I was replying to Boomchild's post in which HE was replying to one of yours. It was not directed to you.

Your post was written as if copy/pasted from an online dictionary. Maybe you did it for sarcasm, I took it as you simply went to something like dictionary.com, looked it up, and copy/pasted it.

You should be thankful posters even gave you a response considering how you've nonsensically labeled Trump voters "communist sympathizers.

I think I did that one time. I consistantly label you Trump Zombies because you brainlessly follow your fuhrer.

" Nobody ever asks you to explain your usage of such terms because -

A) we know you are just brainlessly following the lead of the Democratic Party and B) we also know you are dumber than a pile of shit.

A) I don't think the Democrats have a leader, or a real message, or a real consistant response to Trump...so if I were doing this, I wouldn't be posting anything.

B) Don't care how smart people think I am.

Monker wrote:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/8024/why- ... n-shapiro#

You are quoting the former editor of Breitbart here.

I didn't quote anybody. You compared this to me saying that I read the Email chain of Clinton having permission for her server. Well, you're wrong. There is the article I read. It's not something I can't find. It's not something you can claim being Democrat propaganda, since it is a conservative site. It's a simple article that claims most Trump Zombies don't know what globalism is and it has become a slur/insult. I didn't quite believe it (maybe because it is from the former editor of Briet Bart) so I asked the forum for a definition...and it is correct, "globalist" has lost its meaning to most Trump zombies and is just a word used to attempt an insult.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Not true. I was replying to Boomchild's post in which HE was replying to one of yours. It was not directed to you.

Boomchild provided a definition of "globalism" after I provided a definition. If you only meant to reply to one of the definitions, you should have edited the post to not include mine.

Your post was written as if copy/pasted from an online dictionary. Maybe you did it for sarcasm, I took it as you simply went to something like dictionary.com, looked it up, and copy/pasted it.

Umm, you asked for a definition in under fifty words. Shouldn't a definition be written in dictionary style? Where else are definitions found? As for copying/pasting....you would know something about that. After all, you brainlessly copied "Hillary had permission to use a private server" from an email. Congratulations. You have officially surpassed FF as the reigning MR king of copying/pasting.

I think I did that one time. I consistantly label you Trump Zombies because you brainlessly follow your fuhrer.

If Trump supporters are zombies, why did they just vote against the Trump-endorsed candidate in Alabama? Meanwhile, Hillary deadenders like you continue to uncritically regurgitate talking point after failed talking point (see 17 intel agencies, see private server permission, see Trump is a nazi, See Trump can't win, see DNC did no wrong etc.)

A) I don't think the Democrats have a leader, or a real message, or a real consistant response to Trump...so if I were doing this, I wouldn't be posting anything.

If that's truly the case, you would have a record of discussing Russian election interference prior to the 2016 election. It took Hillary losing for you to give a damn. It's obvious that without DNC-approved talking points, you have nothing to say.

I didn't quote anybody.

You posted a link to an article written by an ex-editor of Breitbart. Now right wing sources like Breitbart are OK to use? Make up your mind.

You compared this to me saying that I read the Email chain of Clinton having permission for her server. Well, you're wrong. There is the article I read. It's not something I can't find.

Who cares? Either way, it proves you are incapable of thinking for yourself. You are reading things (emails, articles) and then pawning this stuff off as your own intellectual property. You are an empty husk.

It's not something you can claim being Democrat propaganda, since it is a conservative site.

The author, Ben Shapiro, didn't even support Trump. Globalist issues, like trade deals, have never been exclusively a conservative or liberal issue.

It's a simple article that claims most Trump Zombies don't know what globalism is and it has become a slur/insult. I didn't quite believe it (maybe because it is from the former editor of Briet Bart) so I asked the forum for a definition...and it is correct, "globalist" has lost its meaning to most Trump zombies and is just a word used to attempt an insult.

You could say the same thing about socialist, corporatist, nationalist, sovereignty, states rights, or any number of politically-charged terms that get thrown around. If you are demanding definitions of carelessly thrown-around slurs, start with yourself. You have repeatedly called Trump and Trump voters communists (quotes below). Care to define that? Or are you just insulting people? Hypocritical shitloaf.

Monker: "Oh, General Flynn...who knew that you would be the first communist sympathizer to take the fall for Donald Judas Trump."

Monker: "Irrelevant. Trump is a communist sympathisor. The administration puts Iran "on notice" for launching a missile, but Russia gets nothing."

Monker: "He's already screwed up relations with Mexico, Germany, and Australia. Isn't obvious Trump is a communist sympathizer?"

Monker: "Republicans - the new Communist party of the United States. A vote for us is a vote for our Russian comrades. Pathetic."

[Monker]

Not true. I was replying to Boomchild's post in which HE was replying to one of yours. It was not directed to you.

Boomchild provided a definition of "globalism" after I provided a definition. If you only meant to reply to one of the definitions, you should have edited the post to not include mine.

LOL. You can keep inventing things all you want, but I replied to BC's post. That's the bottom line.

Your post was written as if copy/pasted from an online dictionary. Maybe you did it for sarcasm, I took it as you simply went to something like dictionary.com, looked it up, and copy/pasted it.

Umm, you asked for a definition in under fifty words. Shouldn't a definition be written in dictionary style? Where else are definitions found? As for copying/pasting....FF used to be the reigning MR king of that, but you have easily surpassed him.

I told you what I thought. It looked like you copy/pasted it from dictionary.com, or something similar. That's how it looked, that's how I took it...end of story.

I think I did that one time. I consistantly label you Trump Zombies because you brainlessly follow your fuhrer.

If Trump supporters are zombies, why did they just vote against the Trump-endorsed candidate in Alabama?

Gee, maybe there are not as many Trump supporters as you think...and those you assume are Trump supporters really are not. Or, maybe both candidates suck and they split the "we suck vote" and the other guy got the traditional republican vote. Or, maybe it was a North Korean hack. I really don't care.

Meanwhile, Hillary deadenders like you continue to uncritically regurgitate talking point after failed talking point (see 17 intel agencies, see private server permission, see Trump is a nazi, See Trump can't win, see DNC did no wrong etc.)

LOL....the ONLY person regurgitating this stuff is YOU. YOU are the one looking to argue this stuff...and you can't find any takers, except me once in a while when I want a laugh.

A) I don't think the Democrats have a leader, or a real message, or a real consistant response to Trump...so if I were doing this, I wouldn't be posting anything.

If that's truly the case, you would have a record of discussing Russian election interference prior to the 2016 election. It took Hillary losing for you to give a damn. It's obvious that without DNC-approved talking points, you have nothing to say.

Actually, it took the firing of Comey and the REAL possibility of Trump being impeached for me to give a damn...and since then, it has only gotten worse for Trump the Tyrant.

I didn't quote anybody.

You posted a link to an article written by an ex-editor of Breitbart. Now right wing sources like Breitbart are OK to use? Make up your mind.

Use for what? I said I DIDN'T BELIEVE THE ARTICLE. You fucking illiterate moron! Can you not read? I have said it over and over again. I am not quoting it for evidence like dipshit KC. I'm just pointing to THAT ARTICLE as the reason I asked this forum what they believe globalism is.

You compared this to me saying that I read the Email chain of Clinton having permission for her server. Well, you're wrong. There is the article I read. It's not something I can't find.

Who cares?

YOU DO! You said something about spotting a trend, or whatever. You are only on this path now because YOU ARE DEAD WRONG. It's not the same thing AT ALL.

Either way, it proves you are incapable of thinking for yourself.

LOL...that is BULLSHIT. I said I DID NOT BELIEVE IT. So, I asked this forum of Trump zombies to post their definition...and almost ALL of you couldn't do it...proving the article is absolutely correct. In today's world when a Trump zombie like KC says somebody is a globalist, all it means is that person is anti-Trump in some way that KC didn't like. It's a slur and an attempted insult...That is what YOU ALL proved - not the article.

You are reading things (emails

I do not get propaganda as Email. So, you are wrong there.

, articles)

Very rarely do I take articles that seriously. The only times I have passed them on here is if they agree with my opinion...and so and so is saying the same thing.

and then pawning this stuff off as your own intellectual property.

Well, there is your lie for this post. I have NEVER done that.

It's not something you can claim being Democrat propaganda, since it is a conservative site.

The author, Ben Shapiro, didn't even support Trump. Globalist issues, like trade deals, have never been exclusively a conservative or liberal issue.

Blah, blah, blah. It's not Democrat or liberal propaganda - which you are constantly accuses me of.

It's a simple article that claims most Trump Zombies don't know what globalism is and it has become a slur/insult. I didn't quite believe it (maybe because it is from the former editor of Briet Bart) so I asked the forum for a definition...and it is correct, "globalist" has lost its meaning to most Trump zombies and is just a word used to attempt an insult.

You could say the same thing about socialist, corporatist, nationalist, sovereignty, states rights, or any number of politically-charged terms that get thrown around.[/quote]

No I can't....because I don't care.

If you are demanding definitions of carelessly thrown-around slurs, start with yourself. You have repeatedly called Trump and Trump voters communists (quotes below). Care to define that? Or are you just insulting people? Hypocritical shitloaf.

Ok!

Monker: "Oh, General Flynn...who knew that you would be the first communist sympathizer to take the fall for Donald Judas Trump."

I believe at that time the news was the Flynn lied on his security clearance forms about his ties to Russia and the money he had received from them. So, he was communist sympathizer.

Monker: "Irrelevant. Trump is a communist sympathisor. The administration puts Iran "on notice" for launching a missile, but Russia gets nothing."

Oh, please, it's right there in the quote. He attempts to punish Iran (or North Korea, nowadays) but wants to remove sanctions and kiss Putin's ass. He is a communist sympathizer, "Oh, poor Putin and Russia...they are treated so badly. All they want to do is give you hugs like big Russia bear."

Monker: "He's already screwed up relations with Mexico, Germany, and Australia. Isn't obvious Trump is a communist sympathizer?"

Yep, Trump throws his hate around to all of our allies but feels sorry for Russia so he gives them a pass.

Monker: "Republicans - the new Communist party of the United States. A vote for us is a vote for our Russian comrades. Pathetic."

LOL...great quote.

Yep...because Republicans are PUSSIES who let Trump do all of this shit to baby Russia instead of holding him accountable for his communist sympathizer action. And, I thought Democrats were pussies for how they never fight for what they truly believe in...Republicans do the exact same thing...under different circumstances.

[The_Noble_Cause]

LOL. You can keep inventing things all you want, but I replied to BC's post. That's the bottom line.

There's no reason to have my quote embeded in a reply only intended for Boomchild. Learn how to post, retard.

Gee, maybe there are not as many Trump supporters as you think...and those you assume are Trump supporters really are not. Or, maybe both candidates suck and they split the "we suck vote" and the other guy got the traditional republican vote.

If Trump supporters are a mindless voting bloc as you portray, then they all should have went for Strange. Especially in a deep red state like AL. So what happened?

Or, maybe it was a North Korean hack. I really don't care.

Of course not. Because it discredits your portrayal of Trump voters as being motivated only by cult of personality. There are anti-establishment/populist headwinds driving voters that you fail to comprehend. For this same reason, you thought Hillary was a shoo-in.

LOL....the ONLY person regurgitating this stuff is YOU. YOU are the one looking to argue this stuff...and you can't find any takers, except me once in a while when I want a laugh.

Nothing to argue. I repost these quotes (“Hillary had permission to use a private server”) simply because they are testaments to your consistent wrongness. Posters like me got the largest belly laugh of all because we told you Hillary was unelectable. And I’m still laughing my ass off.

Actually, it took the firing of Comey and the REAL possibility of Trump being impeached for me to give a damn...and since then, it has only gotten worse for Trump the Tyrant.

What a joke. You posted that Trump was going to be impeached on January 23rd (quote below). A mere THREE days after he was sworn in. You are just a sore ass loser.

“But, regardless, IMO, Trump is going to be impeached for treason by conspiring with Russia to win the election.”

Use for what? I said I DIDN'T BELIEVE THE ARTICLE. You fucking illiterate moron! Can you not read? I have said it over and over again.

You only said you didn’t believe the Shapiro article after you had already posted it. The bottom line is, you are posting links to the very types of sources you would otherwise criticize. You are a hypocritical fraud.

LOL...that is BULLSHIT. I said I DID NOT BELIEVE IT. So, I asked this forum of Trump zombies to post their definition...and almost ALL of you couldn't do it...proving the article is absolutely correct.

Again, you only said you did not believe the article after you had already posted it. Nice cover up and nice try.

Blah, blah, blah. It's not Democrat or liberal propaganda - which you are constantly accuses me of.

There is nothing remotely novel or surprising that a conservative like Shapiro takes issue with Trump on some matters. Trump was largely opposed by establishment GOP. He is embattled to this day by his own party. If anything, you are again proving that Trump supporters are the opposite of mindless hordes.

I believe at that time the news was the Flynn lied on his security clearance forms about his ties to Russia and the money he had received from them. So, he was communist sympathizer.

I asked you to define the word communist. This is not a definition. Can't you do it? Why would someone use a word they don't understand. Are you some kind of zombie? Also, Russia is a capitalist oligarchy.

Oh, please, it's right there in the quote. He attempts to punish Iran (or North Korea, nowadays) but wants to remove sanctions and kiss Putin's ass. He is a communist sympathizer, "Oh, poor Putin and Russia...they are treated so badly. All they want to do is give you hugs like big Russia bear."

I asked for a definition of the word communist in your own words. Seems you can't do it. Thanks for proving my point that you are just using the word without knowing what it is. Why is it so hard for you to post what a communist is?

Yep, Trump throws his hate around to all of our allies but feels sorry for Russia so he gives them a pass.

Not what I asked. I asked for a definition of communist. It's very telling that you go about freely using the term "communist" but cannot define it.

Yep...because Republicans are PUSSIES who let Trump do all of this shit to baby Russia instead of holding him accountable for his communist sympathizer action. And, I thought Democrats were pussies for how they never fight for what they truly believe in...Republicans do the exact same thing...under different circumstances.

Again, no definition. Thanks for proving that you are utterly incapable of defining the term. Seems to me that "communist" is just used by bitter Hillary voters and they have NO CLUE what it means. Truly sad that you have surrendered your brain to the DNC. It's like you are a mindless Hillary zombie.

[Boomchild]

LOL...that is BULLSHIT. I said I DID NOT BELIEVE IT. So, I asked this forum of Trump zombies to post their definition...and almost ALL of you couldn't do it...proving the article is absolutely correct.

Again, you only said you did not believe the article after you had already posted it. Nice cover up and nice try.

I find all this talk about Trump's mindless or "zombie" followers interesting. What about the "zombies" for the democrats? The people in the inner cities who have been promised all kinds of things by their democratic controlled legislature (for decades) and have gotten nothing but STILL continue to vote for them.

I asked you to define the word communist. This is not a definition. Can't you do it? Why would someone use a word they don't understand. Are you some kind of zombie? Also, Russia is a capitalist oligarchy.

I asked for a definition of the word communist in your own words. Seems you can't do it. Thanks for proving my point that you are just using the word without knowing what it is. Why is it so hard for you to post what a communist is?

Not what I asked. I asked for a definition of communist. It's very telling that you go about freely using the term "communist" but cannot define it.

Again, no definition. Thanks for proving that you are utterly incapable of defining the term. Seems to me that "communist" is just used by bitter Hillary voters and they have NO CLUE what it means. Truly sad that you have surrendered your brain to the DNC. It's like you are a mindless Hillary zombie.

I think TNC is making a reasonable request here. After all Monker, you asked people to define things in their own words.

[Boomchild]

[Memorex]

They had a perfect opportunity to show a Dallas player on one knee with his hand on his back and a pained look on his face. The Brokeback Cowboys.

[Monker]

Monker wrote:
LOL. You can keep inventing things all you want, but I replied to BC's post. That's the bottom line.

There's no reason to have my quote embeded in a reply only intended for Boomchild. Learn how to post, retard.

There is a very good reason: I am lazy and did not delete your bit.

Monker wrote:
Gee, maybe there are not as many Trump supporters as you think...and those you assume are Trump supporters really are not. Or, maybe both candidates suck and they split the "we suck vote" and the other guy got the traditional republican vote.


If Trump supporters are a mindless voting bloc as you portray, then they all should have went for Strange. Especially in a deep red state like AL. So what happened?

Maybe they all did vote for Doctor Strange and there are not as many of them as you think.

Monker wrote:
Or, maybe it was a North Korean hack. I really don't care.

Of course not. Because it discredits your portrayal of Trump voters as being motivated only by cult of personality. There are anti-establishment/populist headwinds driving voters that you fail to comprehend. For this same reason, you thought Hillary was a shoo-in.

Maybe North Korea hacked the vote so it did not go Donald Jung Trump's way.

Monker wrote:
Actually, it took the firing of Comey and the REAL possibility of Trump being impeached for me to give a damn...and since then, it has only gotten worse for Trump the Tyrant.


What a joke. You posted that Trump was going to be impeached on January 23rd (quote below). A mere THREE days after he was sworn in.

And, then Comey was fired which meant that it was a real possiblity, not just pure speculation.

You are just a sore ass loser.

Nope.

Monker wrote:
Use for what? I said I DIDN'T BELIEVE THE ARTICLE. You fucking illiterate moron! Can you not read? I have said it over and over again.


You only said you didn’t believe the Shapiro article after you had already posted it.

And, I only posted it after you essentially said it didn't exist. You move the goal posts so often and change your argument that you make it impossible to provide and explanation for everything. You want so badly to prove me wrong at every turn that this stuff is no longer a discussion.

The bottom line is, you are posting links to the very types of sources you would otherwise criticize. You are a hypocritical fraud.

It doesn't make any difference. If I had not posted it, you would say it didn't exist. I post it and you say I am using it as a "source" for "whatever". You are doing nothing but making shit up just to argue.

Monker wrote:
Blah, blah, blah. It's not Democrat or liberal propaganda - which you are constantly accuses me of.


There is nothing remotely novel or surprising that a conservative like Shapiro takes issue with Trump on some matters. Trump was largely opposed by establishment GOP. He is embattled to this day by his own party. If anything, you are again proving that Trump supporters are the opposite of mindless hordes.

Now you have moved the goalposts so far that you are not even on the field. This has nothing to do with what I posted. Again, you are just making up some argument...and one I have no interest in.

Monker wrote:
I believe at that time the news was the Flynn lied on his security clearance forms about his ties to Russia and the money he had received from them. So, he was communist sympathizer.


I asked you to define the word communist. This is not a definition. Can't you do it? Why would someone use a word they don't understand. Are you some kind of zombie? Also, Russia is a capitalist oligarchy.

Monker wrote:
Oh, please, it's right there in the quote. He attempts to punish Iran (or North Korea, nowadays) but wants to remove sanctions and kiss Putin's ass. He is a communist sympathizer, "Oh, poor Putin and Russia...they are treated so badly. All they want to do is give you hugs like big Russia bear."


I asked for a definition of the word communist in your own words. Seems you can't do it. Thanks for proving my point that you are just using the word without knowing what it is. Why is it so hard for you to post what a communist is?

Monker wrote:
Yep, Trump throws his hate around to all of our allies but feels sorry for Russia so he gives them a pass.


Not what I asked. I asked for a definition of communist. It's very telling that you go about freely using the term "communist" but cannot define it.

Monker wrote:
Yep...because Republicans are PUSSIES who let Trump do all of this shit to baby Russia instead of holding him accountable for his communist sympathizer action. And, I thought Democrats were pussies for how they never fight for what they truly believe in...Republicans do the exact same thing...under different circumstances.


Again, no definition. Thanks for proving that you are utterly incapable of defining the term. Seems to me that "communist" is just used by bitter Hillary voters and they have NO CLUE what it means.

LOL...I really don't care. This was a good trip remembering those awesome posts. Too funny...thanks for taking the time to look them up and quote them. I'm so awesome.

Yes, I was using "communist" and "communist sympathiser" as a slur and insult. The Republican party went for nearly 75yrs being anti-communist. Now you get Trump in office who is buddies with Putin and can't say enough nice things about him. The party reaction is to be a bunch of pussies and be silent on the entire matter. So, yeah, I'll say the Republican party is the new communist party of the US just to attach the two together as an insult. That is the way it should be, IMO, because of their rhetoric in the past, and their current actions/non-action.

Truly sad that you have surrendered your brain to the DNC. It's like you are a mindless Hillary zombie.

Oh, yes, because we all know that this past year Hillary has been very vocal about calling Republicans communists. I'm sure you can provide plenty of Hillary quotes calling Trump and his supporters communists. If you can't, it obviously means you are lying yet again.

[JBlake]

They had a perfect opportunity to show a Dallas player on one knee with his hand on his back and a pained look on his face. The Brokeback Cowboys.

Gee whiz, are they really all that bad?

[Monker]

So, what are you saying? You don't believe these "sons of bitches", should kneel during the anthem? Why do YOU care what some "son of a bitch" does?

Or, perhaps Donald Jong Trump would rather we focus on stupid shit like this than on his failure to pass health reform, or the threats from his brother in North Korea, or how the Russia probe expanded into personal email.

[Boomchild]

From Wikileaks....

Did Faceboook COO Sheryl Sandberg influence the 2016 US election?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... GAA2AGJAI2

[Boomchild]

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ice-raids-sanctuary-20170928-story.html

Immigration officials on Thursday announced hundreds of arrests in an operation targeting communities where police and elected officials have refused to fully cooperate on enforcing federal immigration laws.

ICE said it arrested 167 people in and around Los Angeles, a region in which several cities and counties have been tagged by justice officials as being so-called sanctuaries — a loosely defined term used to describe local governments that restrict police from assisting immigration authorities in identifying and detaining people suspected of being in the country illegally.


Arrests were also made in San Francisco and San Jose. Overall, ICE said it arrested nearly 500 people across the country over the last few days.

The surge of arrests was similar in size to several past operations ICE has carried out in recent years. But the focus on places deemed by justice officials to be soft on illegal immigration served to ratchet up an already tense standoff.

Glad to see we are enforcing our immigration laws.