Moderator: Andrew
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama

slucero wrote:What ails this government has less to do with its form and more to do with its loss of morality...
Changing the form of government will not repair that... it will in fact, "give the mob the gavel"... who will further strip individual rights away, that rights the current one in its original and intended form, would protect..
Monker wrote:slucero wrote:What ails this government has less to do with its form and more to do with its loss of morality...
Changing the form of government will not repair that... it will in fact, "give the mob the gavel"... who will further strip individual rights away, that rights the current one in its original and intended form, would protect..
The people have the power to make this change...In the end, they whine, bitch, moan, listen to their leaders and protest whatever they are asked to, and then vote for the candidates who speak loudest and most convincingly that their opponents are the next Hitler. They do not educate themselves on the issues. They do not educate themselves on where the candidates REALLY stand. Instead they assume others have done that for them and take for granted that what they say is factual and unbiased and vote as they are told.
In short, people are the problem. They are uneducated, naive, and too easily influenced to vote against their own interests...or too lazy to vote at all.Until that changes, no form of republic or democratic government will be any different then the one we currently have.
slucero wrote:What ails this government has less to do with its form and more to do with its loss of morality...
Fact Finder wrote:That has been ruled unconstitutional as well it should be. We the people have control over these terms every 2, 4, or 6 years. It's our own damned fault for voting in the same scumbags time after time. We can vote them out if we want to. Apparently some people like their politicians just as they are. Sad but true.
Fact Finder wrote:That has been ruled unconstitutional as well it should be. We the people have control over these terms every 2, 4, or 6 years. It's our own damned fault for voting in the same scumbags time after time. We can vote them out if we want to. Apparently some people like their politicians just as they are. Sad but true.

strangegrey wrote:Fact Finder wrote:That has been ruled unconstitutional as well it should be. We the people have control over these terms every 2, 4, or 6 years. It's our own damned fault for voting in the same scumbags time after time. We can vote them out if we want to. Apparently some people like their politicians just as they are. Sad but true.
Probably the first and last time I will disagree with you.
While I agree with you that we should be throwing these bums ourselves as soon as they get too comfortable....the very INTENT of the framers of the constitution regarding terms were such that someone would be elected, serve a term and return home to their lives. They never anticipated the 'professional politician'
The fact of the matter is that Incumbents enjoy some advantages over challengers that make it easier for an incumbent to enjoy re-election.
Hell, an incumbent can royally fuck up in biblical proportions and still get reelected.
A challenger has to kick, scream and claw to get press...and often times, the incumbents gets allies in press, government and interest groups to smack down the challenger or worse, vilify them.
The framers of the constitution never anticipated the political climate that we live in right now......
forcing term limits would actually be a fantastic thing for our government in it's current makeup, because the very problem with congress and the POTUS is that they are dreadfully detached from the needs of the regular joe.
Monker wrote:You TeaPartiers really know how to pick the crazies:
http://abcnews.go.com/News/bill-maher-a ... d=11674862
I used to watch Politicaly Incorrect as an addiction...I remember seeing this chick now..She always came across as completely out of touch with reality. This is going to be very interesting to see any other unreleased clips. There is no way she is going to win DE.
Fact Finder wrote:conversationpc wrote:Monker wrote:You TeaPartiers really know how to pick the crazies:
http://abcnews.go.com/News/bill-maher-a ... d=11674862
I used to watch Politicaly Incorrect as an addiction...I remember seeing this chick now..She always came across as completely out of touch with reality. This is going to be very interesting to see any other unreleased clips. There is no way she is going to win DE.
She has some serious issues...That being said, the Dems pick some doozies also. What was the guy's name that just resigned? The guy having the tickle fights with his staffers?
Hillary and her White House seances with Elanore Roosevelt.
Fact Finder wrote:conversationpc wrote:Monker wrote:You TeaPartiers really know how to pick the crazies:
http://abcnews.go.com/News/bill-maher-a ... d=11674862
I used to watch Politicaly Incorrect as an addiction...I remember seeing this chick now..She always came across as completely out of touch with reality. This is going to be very interesting to see any other unreleased clips. There is no way she is going to win DE.
She has some serious issues...That being said, the Dems pick some doozies also. What was the guy's name that just resigned? The guy having the tickle fights with his staffers?
Hillary and her White House seances with Elanore Roosevelt.
Monker wrote:Fact Finder wrote:conversationpc wrote:Monker wrote:You TeaPartiers really know how to pick the crazies:
http://abcnews.go.com/News/bill-maher-a ... d=11674862
I used to watch Politicaly Incorrect as an addiction...I remember seeing this chick now..She always came across as completely out of touch with reality. This is going to be very interesting to see any other unreleased clips. There is no way she is going to win DE.
She has some serious issues...That being said, the Dems pick some doozies also. What was the guy's name that just resigned? The guy having the tickle fights with his staffers?
Hillary and her White House seances with Elanore Roosevelt.
That was Nancy Reagan.
conversationpc wrote:Monker wrote:You TeaPartiers really know how to pick the crazies:
http://abcnews.go.com/News/bill-maher-a ... d=11674862
I used to watch Politicaly Incorrect as an addiction...I remember seeing this chick now..She always came across as completely out of touch with reality. This is going to be very interesting to see any other unreleased clips. There is no way she is going to win DE.
She has some serious issues...That being said, the Dems pick some doozies also. What was the guy's name that just resigned? The guy having the tickle fights with his staffers?
conversationpc wrote:Monker wrote:Fact Finder wrote:conversationpc wrote:Monker wrote:You TeaPartiers really know how to pick the crazies:
http://abcnews.go.com/News/bill-maher-a ... d=11674862
I used to watch Politicaly Incorrect as an addiction...I remember seeing this chick now..She always came across as completely out of touch with reality. This is going to be very interesting to see any other unreleased clips. There is no way she is going to win DE.
She has some serious issues...That being said, the Dems pick some doozies also. What was the guy's name that just resigned? The guy having the tickle fights with his staffers?
Hillary and her White House seances with Elanore Roosevelt.
That was Nancy Reagan.
It was Hillary Clinton... http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bake ... ance-gaffe
Nancy Reagan did consult astrologists, though.
Monker wrote:conversationpc wrote:Monker wrote:Fact Finder wrote:conversationpc wrote:Monker wrote:You TeaPartiers really know how to pick the crazies:
http://abcnews.go.com/News/bill-maher-a ... d=11674862
I used to watch Politicaly Incorrect as an addiction...I remember seeing this chick now..She always came across as completely out of touch with reality. This is going to be very interesting to see any other unreleased clips. There is no way she is going to win DE.
She has some serious issues...That being said, the Dems pick some doozies also. What was the guy's name that just resigned? The guy having the tickle fights with his staffers?
Hillary and her White House seances with Elanore Roosevelt.
That was Nancy Reagan.
It was Hillary Clinton... http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bake ... ance-gaffe
Nancy Reagan did consult astrologists, though.
Doesn't matter anyway. O'Donnell is way beyond all of that. If you have seen her on Politically Incorrect, you would know how out of touch she is. At least Hillary and Nancy Reagan can speak as if they are living on this Earth and among its people...and not like she's on Mars sharing a giant telescope with Marvin Martian as he plans the Earth's destruction with his Illudium PU-36 Space Modulator She is out there, way out there.
Monker wrote:You TeaPartiers really know how to pick the crazies:
http://abcnews.go.com/News/bill-maher-a ... d=11674862
I used to watch Politicaly Incorrect as an addiction...I remember seeing this chick now..She always came across as completely out of touch with reality. This is going to be very interesting to see any other unreleased clips. There is no way she is going to win DE.
Fact Finder wrote:Say it ain't so Joe.....Fifty-two percent (52%) of Likely U.S. Voters say their own views are closer to Sarah Palin’s than they are to President Obama’s, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.
Just 40% say their views are closer to Obama's than to those of the former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential candidate.
8% aren't sure.
Palin 52
Obama 40
FF..![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Monker wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Say it ain't so Joe.....Fifty-two percent (52%) of Likely U.S. Voters say their own views are closer to Sarah Palin’s than they are to President Obama’s, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.
Just 40% say their views are closer to Obama's than to those of the former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential candidate.
8% aren't sure.
Palin 52
Obama 40
FF..![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, lots of laughs, since you pick and choose what to quote. From the same report:
Voters think Hillary Clinton is more qualified to be president than Obama, but most believe that both Democrats are more fit for the White House than three top Republicans interested in the job, including Palin.
What that tells me is that many people are not willing to vote for Palin even if they agree with what is coming out of her mouth.
Here's is the entire report...and it is really a mixed bag with neither party with a clear advantage.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... an_obama_s
And, this is basically saying that voters overwhelmingly feel Palin is not qualified to be President, and neither is Gingrich:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... rich_palin
According to this poll, the only Republican that has a chance is Romney...and he is behind.
The bottom line is that Republicans have a lot of work to do to take the White House...especially if they nominate Palin or Gingrich.

Fact Finder wrote:
REPUBLICANS 'PLEDGE TO AMERICA
Fact Finder wrote:http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20017335-503544.html
"Pledge to America" Unveiled by Republicans
CBS News has obtained a final draft of House Republicans' legislative agenda for the next Congress, a 21-page "Pledge to America" that they will formally unveil Thursday morning at a Virginia hardware store...
Fact Finder wrote:A republican President will take his huge dick
What if it's a woman..what will she use...

Monker wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Say it ain't so Joe.....Fifty-two percent (52%) of Likely U.S. Voters say their own views are closer to Sarah Palin’s than they are to President Obama’s, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.
Just 40% say their views are closer to Obama's than to those of the former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential candidate.
8% aren't sure.
Palin 52
Obama 40
FF..![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, lots of laughs, since you pick and choose what to quote. From the same report:
Voters think Hillary Clinton is more qualified to be president than Obama, but most believe that both Democrats are more fit for the White House than three top Republicans interested in the job, including Palin.
What that tells me is that many people are not willing to vote for Palin even if they agree with what is coming out of her mouth.
Here's is the entire report...and it is really a mixed bag with neither party with a clear advantage.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... an_obama_s
And, this is basically saying that voters overwhelmingly feel Palin is not qualified to be President, and neither is Gingrich:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... rich_palin
According to this poll, the only Republican that has a chance is Romney...and he is behind.
The bottom line is that Republicans have a lot of work to do to take the White House...especially if they nominate Palin or Gingrich.

Jana wrote:Monker wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Say it ain't so Joe.....Fifty-two percent (52%) of Likely U.S. Voters say their own views are closer to Sarah Palin’s than they are to President Obama’s, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.
Just 40% say their views are closer to Obama's than to those of the former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential candidate.
8% aren't sure.
Palin 52
Obama 40
FF..![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, lots of laughs, since you pick and choose what to quote. From the same report:
Voters think Hillary Clinton is more qualified to be president than Obama, but most believe that both Democrats are more fit for the White House than three top Republicans interested in the job, including Palin.
What that tells me is that many people are not willing to vote for Palin even if they agree with what is coming out of her mouth.
Here's is the entire report...and it is really a mixed bag with neither party with a clear advantage.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... an_obama_s
And, this is basically saying that voters overwhelmingly feel Palin is not qualified to be President, and neither is Gingrich:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... rich_palin
According to this poll, the only Republican that has a chance is Romney...and he is behind.
The bottom line is that Republicans have a lot of work to do to take the White House...especially if they nominate Palin or Gingrich.
LOL Making sure all the facts are there, Monker.
Romney is by far the best qualified and Republicans won't pick him because he's a Mormon and he was never conservative enough in the far right's eyes, even though he is trying to fit that mold now.
Stewart 'saddened' by Obama
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... ma/?hpt=T2
By: CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney
(CNN) – Count Jon Stewart among the legion of frustrated supporters of President Obama.
Appearing on Fox News' The Bill O'Reilly show Wednesday, the liberal comedian said he thought Obama would do a better job when he voted for him in the 2008 presidential election.
"I think people feel a disappointment in that there was a sense that Jesus will walk on water and no you are looking at it like, 'Oh look at that, he's just treading water' … I thought he'd do a better job," said Stewart.
Stewart, who maintains he ultimately does not regret his vote for Obama, said he is "saddened" the president hasn't done more to change the structure of Washington.
"I thought we were in such a place [in 2008], much like the Tea Party feels now, that the country … needed a more drastic reconstruction – I have been saddened to see that someone who ran on the idea that you can't expect to get different results with the same people and the same system has kept in place so much of the same system and same people," he said.

Fact Finder wrote:And now we hear that this stunt with Colbert on Capital Hill cost us taxpayers close to $125,000 dollars.
Good fucking grief....hope someone learned to wash their genitals at least.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests