Moderator: Andrew
kipthekid wrote:"Zan" trotting out a "dead horse" caricature is EXACTLY the kind of thing I'm talking about. You don't like the conversation about the past - even though that's what Styx ultimately is about - fine, don't respond or take part. What you referred to is absolutely an example of being "sanctimonious."
We have few choices when it comes to Styx conversation - the past or whether Styx and/or Dennis are going to be performing at the next "game feed" or local "Tractor Pull"
styxfanNH wrote:kipthekid wrote:what's that short for? Suzanne? Xanadu? Zanzabar? Just "curious"
Despite the fact you could have simply gone back a message or two, I'm happy to oblige - here's Stabbim's quote:
"Sure, go nuts. This is all idle chat anyway, one topic's about as meaningful as another. But there's no point in being surprised &/or offended that some folks who've had their fill of "woulda coulda shoulda" over the past decade or so choose to roll their eyes when it comes to infest yet another thread."
Now - about the word "Sanctimony" - I'm afraid you may wish to reconsider your interpretation of the definition, which is as follows:
"Feigned piety or righteousness; hypocritical devoutness or high-mindedness."
Now, you may not AGREE with my assessment of Stabbim's choice of words - but my use of the word in this context is appropriate in this context.
By the way, in all seriousness, your baby is BEAUTIFUL. Congratulations.
31 posts in and we are being told how this BB should go about it's business.![]()
kipthekid
Still Green
Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 31
And what does it matter what Zan stands for??? Everyone knows it stands for "Queen"
Not quite the word I would have thought of...
kipthekid wrote:what's that short for? Suzanne? Xanadu? Zanzabar? Just "curious"
Now - about the word "Sanctimony" - I'm afraid you may wish to reconsider your interpretation of the definition, which is as follows:
"Feigned piety or righteousness; hypocritical devoutness or high-mindedness."
Now, you may not AGREE with my assessment of Stabbim's choice of words - but my use of the word in this context is appropriate in this context.
By the way, in all seriousness, your baby is BEAUTIFUL. Congratulations.
styxfanNH wrote:31 posts in and we are being told how this BB should go about it's business.![]()
And what does it matter what Zan stands for??? Everyone knows it stands for "Queen"
StyxCollector wrote:kipthekid wrote:"Zan" trotting out a "dead horse" caricature is EXACTLY the kind of thing I'm talking about. You don't like the conversation about the past - even though that's what Styx ultimately is about - fine, don't respond or take part. What you referred to is absolutely an example of being "sanctimonious."
We have few choices when it comes to Styx conversation - the past or whether Styx and/or Dennis are going to be performing at the next "game feed" or local "Tractor Pull"
styxfanNH just summed it up - stick around here long enough and you'll see how this board works. If anyone is being "sanctimonious", it's you. We're not acting holier-than-thou.
rajah2165 wrote:Not quite the word I would have thought of...
cinj wrote:I've been around this board since it's inception - and only started posting maybe a few months ago. I find that most people here are friendly - but I do find some people rather bitchy every time someoe disagrees with them. I also find some people downright rude and immature.
StyxCollector wrote:cinj wrote:I've been around this board since it's inception - and only started posting maybe a few months ago. I find that most people here are friendly - but I do find some people rather bitchy every time someoe disagrees with them. I also find some people downright rude and immature.
<sarcasm>Stop dissing froy and ChicagoStyx among others ... it may be immature, but sometimes it is fun.</sarcasm>
There's room for everyone in the pool.
styxfanNH wrote:You do realize it is shark week.....(Discovery Channel)
Blue Falcon wrote:I think I would agree with you if Dennis had been with Styx all these years - as you said 1997 was a bit of a dip from 96. But the fact that, ten years later, they <I>haven't</I> toured with Dennis, I think a reunion <B>would</B> be big stuff. At least for awhile. I think if Steve Perry got back in Journey - the same thing would happen. People want to go see the same bands they grew up with. This isn't a slam on the "current" Styx - let them tour if they want. I just think that any band that gets back with the classic lineup after being gone for awhile will reap more $$$$ awards.
Cinj
Yup, just look at the crowds the Police are getting on their reunion tour this year. Sting certainly wasn't getting those crowds with his boring solo shows, and if Sting formed a bogus Police with some studio guy on guitar and another wanker on drums, no one would care because they want to see the musicians that they are FAMILIAR with.
Styx stinks now because it took a few years for people to realize that DDY was no longer in the band...JY and company didn't exactly advertise this fact over the years, but one of my friends saw them a few years ago and said it was a ripoff for them to use false advertising when DDY was nowhere in sight. Maybe that's why Styx crowds have been dwindling over the years.
What New Styx should have done is form a band called the Shaw/Young/Blades Project. That way they could tour and do Styx/DY/Night Ranger/solo songs without pi$$ing people off.
Think about this: what if Led Zep reunited and toured tomorrow, but when you got to the show you found out that Jimmy Page wasn't on guitar, or Robert Plant wasn't singing...and LZ didn't tell you this beforehand? That's why when Plant and Page toured they didn't use the Zep name, because Jones and Bonham weren't there.
gr8dane wrote:What about Genesis.
StyxCollector wrote:gr8dane wrote:What about Genesis.
Genesis is touring with the popular lineup that toured from 1978 - 1992. The three man lineup is just fine. Saw the reunion in the UK - it was a good show. I'm also seeing it here.
StyxCollector wrote:Remember that Gabriel and Hackett left. They were not fired, and there wasn't any of this churning about the "proper" lineup. YOu have fans wanting to see the Banks/Collins/Gabriel/Hackett/Rutherford lineup who are waxing nostalgic, and you do have some of the "the only real Genesis is the <insert people here> lineup" now, but you didn't really hear about it then.
At the time of EOTC, TS was in Damn Yankees - fairly well known unless you were living under a rock. I don't think anyone was misled. Now, I don't remember the radio ads, and it's possible they used a TS song.
stabbim wrote:kipthekid wrote:If they reunited with Dennis now, for a short period, they could perhaps win back a little of the dignity that was "lost" over the past 8 years. No, Styx isn't Aerosmith, but you're dead wrong about them not being able to be at the same level as Journey - in '96 and '97, they were at or above the level that Journey is now. Could they get that back? Not all the way...but, in certain cities, they could headline major venues again. There IS a sizeable # of fans that will not see the "new" Styx.
Sorry, but I just don't see "dignity" and "headlining major venues" as being analogous.
When I saw Styx play a 1500-seater in my hometown earlier this year, I saw a group of working musicians in great form enjoying what they do, putting every bit of energy and care into a performance that they have when playing to 10 times as many fans, and the crowd went nuts for them.
To me, that level of pride, craftsmanship and professionalism is what constitutes an artist's dignity, not all of this "brand" and "legacy" nonsense.
brywool wrote:stabbim wrote:bugsymalone wrote:As to Current Styx and no album (for now). Sounds like no one is much interested in financing, or promoting, an album of new music from them. Just my interpretation of his comment on this as well.
Maybe, maybe not. But the idea of "the state of the music industry" factoring into their decision on whether to produce new music at all is ...disheartening.
yeah, that's more of a statement on the industry, NOT the band. There are a lot of 'classic rock' bands not releasing new product? WHY because labels aren't interested. They just want to sell to kids. I'm not sure why that's a death sentence for Styx or any classic rock band. They just need to go right to the source, their core, older fans.
In my neck of the woods, Goo Goo Dolls aren't on the radio too much. However, I hear them in nearly every store I go into (speaking of their last album by the way- Iris and Slide from Dizzy were everywhere). I also heard new Paul McCartney in a store and haven't heard a thing on the radio. Same with the stones' last album.
It's annoying that people will paint that it's the current Styx lineup that's killing their sales. It's not. It's the present music environment. Styx and others need to reinvent how they're selling their music like Paul did with Starbucks, like Prince did with his recent CD giveaways in the Daily Mail. Has nothing to do with the band. Good music is good music and there was plenty on Cyclo to sell. There's plenty on DeYoung's album to sell, but not to the general KID CD buyers. They need to market to an older generation. John Mellencamp put his song in a Chevy add. A NEW song. He said "that was the best record company I ever had".
Styx and others need to do reinvent the marketing wheel.
Jazz wrote:kipthekid wrote: While Dennis isn't "big" in the states, he's a minor star in Canada - in fact, he's a bigger star than Styx OR Lawrence Gowan - in Canada.
What do you base that statement on?
kipthekid wrote:I think the fact that Dennis recently had a platinum+ album in Canada may have a LITTLE bit to do with it. That and, when shows like Canadian Idol and Star Acadamie are looking for guests, they're not exactly knocking on "New Styx" or Lawrence Gowan's door.
So THIS is the accepted "m.o." of this "group?" If Dennis happens to be more popular/"bigger" at the moment in a particular part of the world than new Styx - and it's supported emperically - it's all "DeYoungian" b.s. Ok...got it.
kipthekid wrote:So THIS is the accepted "m.o." of this "group?" If Dennis happens to be more popular/"bigger" at the moment in a particular part of the world than new Styx - and it's supported emperically - it's all "DeYoungian" b.s. Ok...got it.
kipthekid wrote:although I don't see LG being asked to appear on "Canadian Idol" - and shows like that are all about ratings as opposed to "artistic merit."
I have to acquiesce, however, - LG must be more of a "name" across ALL of Canada while Dennis' popularity MAY be "limited" to certain areas of our northern Neighbor.
So was Dennis on CI because he gets good ratings or has talent? I am confused....kipthekid wrote:although I don't see LG being asked to appear on "Canadian Idol" - and shows like that are all about ratings as opposed to "artistic merit."
I have to acquiesce, however, - LG must be more of a "name" across ALL of Canada while Dennis' popularity MAY be "limited" to certain areas of our northern Neighbor.
kipthekid wrote:First, your supposed "confusion" about my statement re: Dennis and Canadia Idol didn't make alot of sense. My comments about Dennis and his populariy in Canada have nothing to do with making a statement on Dennis' talent. It was a statement about his popularity - which, when it comes to ratings, will always trump talent.
Second, your "Geography" statement made even LESS sense. My statement in no way gave undue "significance" to Quebec. So I called it an "area" versus a "Provence" or WHATEVER -who cares? Either way, I was acknowledging that the strength of Dennis' popularity is concentrated in a specific part of Canada.
Please - take a shot @ me when it makes sense...but this was just silly.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests