Revelation - MelodicRock Review

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Aaron » Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:45 am

I understand your view and agree with your points. However, I think it will be very hard to follow the best vocalist ever. If Arnel can top Perry on the classics, then I'll retract my crap statement. I'm heading to Walfart now to see if it's out early here. It wasn't last night.

finalfight wrote:
Aaron wrote:Mac,

Thanks for the review man. I haven't read it in detail yet but I do have one question. Why not review the new material separately from the rehash crap? I don't think most folks give a crap about the re-make of the old material. What do you think?

Thanks,

Aaron


Thats quite an insular view when the review clearly explains that the redux versions were recorded primarily for licensing purposes (although I don't doubt there is a one fingered salute to Perry in there somewhere). The fact that they have done this might mean that Journey's music finds a larger audience through possible future ventures and initiatives. More recognition for the band can only be a good thing and therefore to me at least the re-recorded classics could never simply dismissed as crap and I look forward to hearing them in their entirety.
Taking life a quarter mile at a time .... [img]
User avatar
Aaron
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 9:55 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Postby finalfight » Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:49 am

Aaron wrote:I understand your view and agree with your points. However, I think it will be very hard to follow the best vocalist ever. If Arnel can top Perry on the classics, then I'll retract my crap statement. I'm heading to Walfart now to see if it's out early here. It wasn't last night.

finalfight wrote:
Aaron wrote:Mac,

Thanks for the review man. I haven't read it in detail yet but I do have one question. Why not review the new material separately from the rehash crap? I don't think most folks give a crap about the re-make of the old material. What do you think?

Thanks,

Aaron


Thats quite an insular view when the review clearly explains that the redux versions were recorded primarily for licensing purposes (although I don't doubt there is a one fingered salute to Perry in there somewhere). The fact that they have done this might mean that Journey's music finds a larger audience through possible future ventures and initiatives. More recognition for the band can only be a good thing and therefore to me at least the re-recorded classics could never simply dismissed as crap and I look forward to hearing them in their entirety.


I hope you find a copy and sincerely hope you enjoy it. Hugo/Ramos up next! :D
finalfight
 

Postby Aaron » Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:52 am

Yea baby! And then a new Valentine record. Jeezus, I'm about to pass out as all the blood is rushing from my head. :wink:

finalfight wrote:
Aaron wrote:I understand your view and agree with your points. However, I think it will be very hard to follow the best vocalist ever. If Arnel can top Perry on the classics, then I'll retract my crap statement. I'm heading to Walfart now to see if it's out early here. It wasn't last night.

finalfight wrote:
Aaron wrote:Mac,

Thanks for the review man. I haven't read it in detail yet but I do have one question. Why not review the new material separately from the rehash crap? I don't think most folks give a crap about the re-make of the old material. What do you think?

Thanks,

Aaron


Thats quite an insular view when the review clearly explains that the redux versions were recorded primarily for licensing purposes (although I don't doubt there is a one fingered salute to Perry in there somewhere). The fact that they have done this might mean that Journey's music finds a larger audience through possible future ventures and initiatives. More recognition for the band can only be a good thing and therefore to me at least the re-recorded classics could never simply dismissed as crap and I look forward to hearing them in their entirety.


I hope you find a copy and sincerely hope you enjoy it. Hugo/Ramos up next! :D
Taking life a quarter mile at a time .... [img]
User avatar
Aaron
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 9:55 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Postby Barb » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:04 am

I finally got to finish reading your review. I agreed with most of it, but as a girl, I love the sappy lyrics on Like a Sunshower. I think it's beautiful. :D
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby Sarah » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:14 am

I don't necessarily love the lyrics, but LaS sounds great. It's the only song I've really wanted to listen to again.
Sarah
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:34 am
Location: Los Angeles

Postby Andrew » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:32 am

MarcelJordan wrote:Extremely well thought out review and objective as possible. I don't think we'll ever see a better all round review anywhere else. :D


That's what I aim for :) Thanks!
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Re: Revelation - MelodicRock Review

Postby Andrew » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:35 am

Saint John wrote:Neal and Jon are both very interested in Andrew's opinion as well as the opinion of the board as a whole. I'm quite certain they're very pleased by Andrew's review and the mainly positive initial feedback from the fans' reviews. I would fully expect for Andrew to hear from Neal. Probably a short e-mail.


Did you hack into my computer?

There was indeed an e-mail from Neal - a thank you for the positive review. Now Neal and I haven't always agreed on things, so for him to do this was very classy and I appreciated it very much.

Kev Caveman also dropped me a note and says he will be in town in January, so I look forward to hooking up with him then.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby Andrew » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:35 am

Maui Tom wrote:Nobody writes more complete reviews than you Andrew.....excellent...no matter the content...everytime.


Thank you sir!
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby Andrew » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:39 am

Barb wrote:I finally got to finish reading your review. I agreed with most of it, but as a girl, I love the sappy lyrics on Like a Sunshower. I think it's beautiful. :D


You go girl :)
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby slucero » Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:03 am

Great review (as always) 'Drew!

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby stevew2 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:53 pm

Rick wrote:I feel totally different. I think Faith In The Heartland is much improved and arguably the best track on Revelation. Can't find a 'skip' track on that record.
You must be stoned, Im likein the other tunes,but this is over produced and sounds gay in comparison. Should have left the fucker alone, What ,did they run out of songs?? Were they trying to prove something?? Write a new song for the new Cd Friga. Them two glasses of wine you have in you must burn have burned your brain.If he was going to change it get rid of that lame 2nd {FITH} II different song
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby Rick » Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:56 pm

stevew2 wrote:
Rick wrote:I feel totally different. I think Faith In The Heartland is much improved and arguably the best track on Revelation. Can't find a 'skip' track on that record.
You must be stoned, Im likein the other tunes,but this is over produced and sounds gay in comparison. Should have left the fucker alone, What ,did they run out of songs?? Were they trying to prove something?? Write a new song for the new Cd Friga. Them two glasses of wine you have in you must burn have burned your brain.If he was going to change it get rid of that lame 2nd {FITH} II different song


The reason they put it on there is because it's a great song and was getting zero attention on that shit album Generations. So now it has another chance. I think it's a great idea and I think Arnel blew the lid off of it. I haven't been stoned in years. Sure sounds fun though. :lol:
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby stevew2 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:16 pm

Rick wrote:
stevew2 wrote:
Rick wrote:I feel totally different. I think Faith In The Heartland is much improved and arguably the best track on Revelation. Can't find a 'skip' track on that record.
You must be stoned, Im likein the other tunes,but this is over produced and sounds gay in comparison. Should have left the fucker alone, What ,did they run out of songs?? Were they trying to prove something?? Write a new song for the new Cd Friga. Them two glasses of wine you have in you must burn have burned your brain.If he was going to change it get rid of that lame 2nd {FITH} II different song


The reason they put it on there is because it's a great song and was getting zero attention on that shit album Generations. So now it has another chance. I think it's a great idea and I think Arnel blew the lid off of it. I haven't been stoned in years. Sure sounds fun though. :lol:
The lid was already blown of when Augeri did it, the rest of the Cd blew, and with all the other bullshit that went on ,they should have left it alone.They should have written a new song, You dont see them putting previous Perrys songs on the new cd just cause it didnt make it.I think it is a kick in the balls to Augeri{not that he needed it problablly from Friga {who wrote it} ,just for that added twist
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby ProgRocker53 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:19 pm

stevew2 wrote:
Rick wrote:
stevew2 wrote:
Rick wrote:I feel totally different. I think Faith In The Heartland is much improved and arguably the best track on Revelation. Can't find a 'skip' track on that record.
You must be stoned, Im likein the other tunes,but this is over produced and sounds gay in comparison. Should have left the fucker alone, What ,did they run out of songs?? Were they trying to prove something?? Write a new song for the new Cd Friga. Them two glasses of wine you have in you must burn have burned your brain.If he was going to change it get rid of that lame 2nd {FITH} II different song


The reason they put it on there is because it's a great song and was getting zero attention on that shit album Generations. So now it has another chance. I think it's a great idea and I think Arnel blew the lid off of it. I haven't been stoned in years. Sure sounds fun though. :lol:
The lid was already blown of when Augeri did it, the rest of the Cd blew, and with all the other bullshit that went on ,they should have left it alone.They should have written a new song, You dont see them putting previous Perrys songs on the new cd just cause it didnt make it.I think it is a kick in the balls to Augeri{not that he needed it problablly from Friga {who wrote it} ,just for that added twist


I'm not a fan of the new FITH at all. The original kicked ass, the new one has several glaring issues:

1) The blandest Arnel vocals I've heard yet (I've only listened to four of the new songs so far)

2) The intro's abbreviated

3) Friga raised up the keys in the mix

4) Friga plays gay keys over top of Neal and Deen's closing jam

5) It's choppier than all hell, sounds like an amateur cut and paste job on Pro Tools
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Rick » Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:19 pm

stevew2 wrote:
Rick wrote:
stevew2 wrote:
Rick wrote:I feel totally different. I think Faith In The Heartland is much improved and arguably the best track on Revelation. Can't find a 'skip' track on that record.
You must be stoned, Im likein the other tunes,but this is over produced and sounds gay in comparison. Should have left the fucker alone, What ,did they run out of songs?? Were they trying to prove something?? Write a new song for the new Cd Friga. Them two glasses of wine you have in you must burn have burned your brain.If he was going to change it get rid of that lame 2nd {FITH} II different song


The reason they put it on there is because it's a great song and was getting zero attention on that shit album Generations. So now it has another chance. I think it's a great idea and I think Arnel blew the lid off of it. I haven't been stoned in years. Sure sounds fun though. :lol:
The lid was already blown of when Augeri did it, the rest of the Cd blew, and with all the other bullshit that went on ,they should have left it alone.They should have written a new song, You dont see them putting previous Perrys songs on the new cd just cause it didnt make it.I think it is a kick in the balls to Augeri{not that he needed it problablly from Friga {who wrote it} ,just for that added twist


I think it will help Augeri. He gets paid every time that song is played. It'll have a whole lot better chance now.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Since 78 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:22 pm

stevew2 wrote:
Rick wrote:
stevew2 wrote:
Rick wrote:I feel totally different. I think Faith In The Heartland is much improved and arguably the best track on Revelation. Can't find a 'skip' track on that record.
You must be stoned, Im likein the other tunes,but this is over produced and sounds gay in comparison. Should have left the fucker alone, What ,did they run out of songs?? Were they trying to prove something?? Write a new song for the new Cd Friga. Them two glasses of wine you have in you must burn have burned your brain.If he was going to change it get rid of that lame 2nd {FITH} II different song


The reason they put it on there is because it's a great song and was getting zero attention on that shit album Generations. So now it has another chance. I think it's a great idea and I think Arnel blew the lid off of it. I haven't been stoned in years. Sure sounds fun though. :lol:
The lid was already blown of when Augeri did it, the rest of the Cd blew, and with all the other bullshit that went on ,they should have left it alone.They should have written a new song, You dont see them putting previous Perrys songs on the new cd just cause it didnt make it.I think it is a kick in the balls to Augeri{not that he needed it problablly from Friga {who wrote it} ,just for that added twist


I agree with both of you here. The Band thought that this was a great track that wouldn't be heard and saw a chance to get it out there. however I don't think they did the song justice on Revelation and it should have been left alone.
User avatar
Since 78
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8194
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:21 pm
Location: Pinhead Nation

Postby Rick » Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:29 pm

Since 78 wrote:
stevew2 wrote:
Rick wrote:
stevew2 wrote:
Rick wrote:I feel totally different. I think Faith In The Heartland is much improved and arguably the best track on Revelation. Can't find a 'skip' track on that record.
You must be stoned, Im likein the other tunes,but this is over produced and sounds gay in comparison. Should have left the fucker alone, What ,did they run out of songs?? Were they trying to prove something?? Write a new song for the new Cd Friga. Them two glasses of wine you have in you must burn have burned your brain.If he was going to change it get rid of that lame 2nd {FITH} II different song


The reason they put it on there is because it's a great song and was getting zero attention on that shit album Generations. So now it has another chance. I think it's a great idea and I think Arnel blew the lid off of it. I haven't been stoned in years. Sure sounds fun though. :lol:
The lid was already blown of when Augeri did it, the rest of the Cd blew, and with all the other bullshit that went on ,they should have left it alone.They should have written a new song, You dont see them putting previous Perrys songs on the new cd just cause it didnt make it.I think it is a kick in the balls to Augeri{not that he needed it problablly from Friga {who wrote it} ,just for that added twist


I agree with both of you here. The Band thought that this was a great track that wouldn't be heard and saw a chance to get it out there. however I don't think they did the song justice on Revelation and it should have been left alone.


I guess it's just personal preference. I think it's now improved and one of my favorite tracks on Revelation. The only thing I like less about it is I miss Augeris soaring scream right at the beginning.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby stevew2 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:46 pm

Hey we all have valids points, and I agree on some disagree on others. I hope we can all agree that Friga is gay,and I wouldnt want that fucker patting my backside even you Progg
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby Liam » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:14 pm

The only thing I can say that I like on FITH is the extended "live" outro. The rest of it is awful. But it DOES boil down to personal preference. Where Did I lose Your Love is easily the best track on the album, followed VERY CLOSELY by Never Walk Away.
Liam

"It ain't how hard you can hit. It's how hard you can get it, and keep goin'." - Rocky
User avatar
Liam
MP3
 
Posts: 10064
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:54 am

Postby Centaure » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:30 pm

ProgRocker53 wrote:I'm not a fan of the new FITH at all. The original kicked ass, the new one has several glaring issues:

1) The blandest Arnel vocals I've heard yet (I've only listened to four of the new songs so far)

2) The intro's abbreviated

3) Friga raised up the keys in the mix

4) Friga plays gay keys over top of Neal and Deen's closing jam

5) It's choppier than all hell, sounds like an amateur cut and paste job on Pro Tools



Yeah, wtf happen to the intro ? Shirley should have cut it completely if he wanted to abbreviated it. The double guitar attack was pretty cool, but now it sounds ordinary.

All the cool vibe of the original seems to be lost. And as for Arnel, Augeri was better on the original.

As I said before, Shirley is an average producer. Most of his ideas are mediocre. He is a very nice guy and an awesome mixer and sound engeneer, but I usually don't like much of his albums that he produced.

Shirley liked the song and wanted to fix it... If it ain't broken, don't fix it !
Centaure
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 12:30 am

Postby stevew2 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:36 pm

Centaure wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:I'm not a fan of the new FITH at all. The original kicked ass, the new one has several glaring issues:

1) The blandest Arnel vocals I've heard yet (I've only listened to four of the new songs so far)

2) The intro's abbreviated

3) Friga raised up the keys in the mix

4) Friga plays gay keys over top of Neal and Deen's closing jam

5) It's choppier than all hell, sounds like an amateur cut and paste job on Pro Tools



Yeah, wtf happen to the intro ? Shirley should have cut it completely if he wanted to abbreviated it. The double guitar attack was pretty cool, but now it sounds ordinary.

All the cool vibe of the original seems to be lost. And as for Arnel, Augeri was better on the original.

As I said before, Shirley is an average producer. Most of his ideas are mediocre. He is a very nice guy and an awesome mixer and sound engeneer, but I usually don't like much of his albums that he produced.

Shirley liked the song and wanted to fix it... If it ain't broken, don't fix it !
He is definetly good at "fixing things '" {If you know what I mean}
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby Andrew » Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:04 pm

Centaure wrote:

Yeah, wtf happen to the intro ? Shirley should have cut it completely if he wanted to abbreviated it. The double guitar attack was pretty cool, but now it sounds ordinary.


Well, it isn't an album opening track now, so the intro would kill the flow of the song. I think they did well with it and it's different song - I treat them as 2 different songs. Initially it was hard to get past the idea of it being covered again.

I absolutely accept some won't ever be able to get past this new version.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby Liam » Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:12 pm

Andrew wrote:
Centaure wrote:

Yeah, wtf happen to the intro ? Shirley should have cut it completely if he wanted to abbreviated it. The double guitar attack was pretty cool, but now it sounds ordinary.


Well, it isn't an album opening track now, so the intro would kill the flow of the song. I think they did well with it and it's different song - I treat them as 2 different songs. Initially it was hard to get past the idea of it being covered again.

I absolutely accept some won't ever be able to get past this new version.


Me being one of those. I DO see it as a slight against Augeri though.
Liam

"It ain't how hard you can hit. It's how hard you can get it, and keep goin'." - Rocky
User avatar
Liam
MP3
 
Posts: 10064
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:54 am

Postby Andrew » Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:44 pm

Liam wrote:Me being one of those. I DO see it as a slight against Augeri though.


Absolutely. I understand that.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby Fire99 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:24 pm

Ehwmatt wrote: One thing Andrew's spot on about is Arnel is at his absolute best when he's singing his own material and his own personality gets to shine through.


I dont believe Arnel was involved in writing any of the songs..
Fire99
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 3:15 am

Postby finalfight » Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:35 pm

Liam wrote:
Andrew wrote:
Centaure wrote:

Yeah, wtf happen to the intro ? Shirley should have cut it completely if he wanted to abbreviated it. The double guitar attack was pretty cool, but now it sounds ordinary.


Well, it isn't an album opening track now, so the intro would kill the flow of the song. I think they did well with it and it's different song - I treat them as 2 different songs. Initially it was hard to get past the idea of it being covered again.

I absolutely accept some won't ever be able to get past this new version.


Me being one of those. I DO see it as a slight against Augeri though.


Augeri's bank balance disagrees.

To me the new version of Faith in the Heartland makes a more sweeping statement than the rockier, more direct original. Its like its been given room to breath.
finalfight
 

Postby Ehwmatt » Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:26 pm

Fire99 wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote: One thing Andrew's spot on about is Arnel is at his absolute best when he's singing his own material and his own personality gets to shine through.


I dont believe Arnel was involved in writing any of the songs..


Not what I meant.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Andrew » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:11 pm

Fire99 wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote: One thing Andrew's spot on about is Arnel is at his absolute best when he's singing his own material and his own personality gets to shine through.


I dont believe Arnel was involved in writing any of the songs..


Not this time around. My point here - to explain further - is he sounds great when not being forced to live up to certain expectations on songs we all know and love. Of course he sounds greta on all songs anyway...but less pressure on new material and more natural. Great stuff.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby cdjssfan » Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:48 am

rdekker wrote:
Matthew wrote:Cheers Andrew. Any word on when it'll be released in Europe and who'll be stocking it?


Frontiers will be releasing it with an extra track on june 6. I've received a mail from them this morning that it will be shipped tomorrow so I guess the release date has been pushed up to june 3rd as well.


Andrew wrote:This Friday and most usual outlets I believe.


Are you guys sure on that one, every single store over here in the UK has the release date still listed as the 9th June on their respective websites (Those being Amazon, HMV, Zavvi, Tesco, Woolworths, WHSmith and Asda (who are owned by Wal-Mart)).

I'll have a look about on Friday in Glasgow or East Kilbride, the closest places to me where there are stores big enough for staff to put the CD out by mistake if the release date is actually still Monday 9th.
User avatar
cdjssfan
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:35 pm
Location: Hamilton, Scotland

Postby Big J » Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:49 am

finalfight wrote:
Liam wrote:
Andrew wrote:
Centaure wrote:

Yeah, wtf happen to the intro ? Shirley should have cut it completely if he wanted to abbreviated it. The double guitar attack was pretty cool, but now it sounds ordinary.


Well, it isn't an album opening track now, so the intro would kill the flow of the song. I think they did well with it and it's different song - I treat them as 2 different songs. Initially it was hard to get past the idea of it being covered again.

I absolutely accept some won't ever be able to get past this new version.


Me being one of those. I DO see it as a slight against Augeri though.


Augeri's bank balance disagrees.

To me the new version of Faith in the Heartland makes a more sweeping statement than the rockier, more direct original. Its like its been given room to breath.


The appeal to me of the original was that it was expansive and melodic like you expect from Journey, but had a frantic I dunno...power to it, almost had a Dream Theater type thing going on in there. Heavier, I guess, to state it simply. Cain ruins it, I don't like the deedle-dee lead-in to the chorus on the new one...Arnel's screams at the beginning and lead in to the solo aren't as powerful or passionate as Augeri's.

Really, the problem for me comes down to the synth shit Cain adds to the mix and Arnel's vocals...NOT in that order. That track was SA's finest hour of 8 years or so that I really, truly enjoyed.
User avatar
Big J
8 Track
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 7:28 am

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 39 guests