Neal Talks Augeri and Soto in classic rock!!

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Gordon from Edinburgh » Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:55 am

Enigma869 wrote:
Greg wrote: but some bands have wound up being more commercially successful because of it, albeit for those bands (Van Halen) it was at the height of melodic rock's popularity.



Very few bands have went on to become commercially successful, after changing their singer. Genesis, Chicago (who never really had one lead singer), and Van Halen are the only ones I can think of.


Come on John,,,
Survivor
Deep Purple
AC/DC
Black Sabbath
Rainbow
User avatar
Gordon from Edinburgh
8 Track
 
Posts: 775
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:57 am

Postby SusieP » Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:57 am

Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
Greg wrote: but some bands have wound up being more commercially successful because of it, albeit for those bands (Van Halen) it was at the height of melodic rock's popularity.



Very few bands have went on to become commercially successful, after changing their singer. Genesis, Chicago (who never really had one lead singer), and Van Halen are the only ones I can think of.


Come on John,,,
Survivor
Deep Purple
AC/DC
Black Sabbath
Rainbow


And I think Fleetwood Mac had a bit of success after Peter Green. :wink:
..................................


http://www.smoothduo.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/SuzeFromSmoothDuo/ Twitter @smoothduo
..................................
Rest In Peace Deano.
User avatar
SusieP
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:13 am
Location: up to no good in rainy Nottinghamshire, England

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:50 am

SusieP wrote:
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
Greg wrote: but some bands have wound up being more commercially successful because of it, albeit for those bands (Van Halen) it was at the height of melodic rock's popularity.



Very few bands have went on to become commercially successful, after changing their singer. Genesis, Chicago (who never really had one lead singer), and Van Halen are the only ones I can think of.


Come on John,,,
Survivor
Deep Purple
AC/DC
Black Sabbath
Rainbow


And I think Fleetwood Mac had a bit of success after Peter Green. :wink:


Kansas still had chart success after Steve Walsh left.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby ProgRocker53 » Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:53 am

Looks like we're close to being officially able to say Journey has had mainstream chart success without Steve Perry.
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Don » Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:43 am

conversationpc wrote:
SusieP wrote:
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
Greg wrote: but some bands have wound up being more commercially successful because of it, albeit for those bands (Van Halen) it was at the height of melodic rock's popularity.



Very few bands have went on to become commercially successful, after changing their singer. Genesis, Chicago (who never really had one lead singer), and Van Halen are the only ones I can think of.


Come on John,,,
Survivor
Deep Purple
AC/DC
Black Sabbath
Rainbow


And I think Fleetwood Mac had a bit of success after Peter Green. :wink:


Kansas still had chart success after Steve Walsh left.


Commercially, it was the best thing that ever happened to Iron Maiden when Bruce Dickinson replaced Paul Di'Anno. They had success with Paul on Killers but Bruce has brought them to unbelievable heights with his contribution to the band.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Enigma869 » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:05 am

Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:
Come on John,,,
Survivor
Deep Purple
AC/DC
Black Sabbath
Rainbow


Sorry Gordon...I was only able to come up with the three I had mentioned. Also, with the exception of Survivor, I don't listen to any of those other bands, so am not an authority on their history. Survivor is a very interesting case, because they were put on the map with Bickler singing "Eye of the Tiger", but had no other success until Jamison was brought in. I please ignorance on the history of the rest of the bands you mentioned.


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby mistiejourney » Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:54 pm

Shadowsong wrote:
Behshad wrote:Deb
I know you like to visulize anything that involved JSS,,,,,or ME,,,,, so I can just imagine the excitment in your mind when you could visualize what Trav wrote lol.,....



Shadow Song,,,,, could you please change your posting style . Reading your posts , like Andrew Dice Clay would say, "is like masturbating with a cheesegrator....slightly enjoyable but mostly painful"..... :wink: 8)


It is unfortunate that my posts cause you such distress but I have no intention of changing the way I express myself.
If it really pains you so may I suggest that you just try some other means of gratification.

BTW
Ouch!

:wink:


Oh you GO, girl! :lol:

Beshad, what a visual!!!! :lol:
Image

Kim in CA : )
User avatar
mistiejourney
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2415
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Postby stevew2 » Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:10 pm

Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
Greg wrote: but some bands have wound up being more commercially successful because of it, albeit for those bands (Van Halen) it was at the height of melodic rock's popularity.



Very few bands have went on to become commercially successful, after changing their singer. Genesis, Chicago (who never really had one lead singer), and Van Halen are the only ones I can think of.


Come on John,,,
Survivor
Deep Purple
AC/DC
Black Sabbath
Rainbow
Chicago was smart, they replace there high vocals{Peter S} with a much younger guy about 10 years ago and he can still sing, and has aged and looks like an original member {to most] that just agded well.Journey tried that but failed cause of their greed, and because the lead singer sang all of the songs
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby msmercury01 » Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:30 pm

bluejeangirl76 wrote:This is what I'm not getting:

'After we asked him to leave it got nasty and he decided to sue us'

The last I recall, as posted by JSS himself, Jeff was never asked or told to leave, or told anything by the band at all before it happened. Either I missed something, which I know is highly possible, or this is more of Neal's increasingly amusing perception of the world around him.

:shock:


I agree with you. From what I gathered, they never "asked" him to leave. They never told him anything. Jeff found out he was out of the band from other people. He didn't know anything about it. The suing part is the first i've heard of it.
User avatar
msmercury01
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 4:15 pm
Location: Pensacola, Fl.

Postby stevew2 » Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:44 pm

Onestepper wrote:
JSS Rocks! wrote:"But personality wise he was not right"


that comment strikes me kinda funny....Jeff is widely known to be one of the good guys in the biz....Both with musicians and fans alike.


Actually just because his personality did not mix well with the band, doesn't mean they said he wasn't one of the good guys in the business. NS never said he was a bad guy.
Jeff had a cock,the band didnt
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby Matthew » Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:18 pm

stevew2 wrote:
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
Greg wrote: but some bands have wound up being more commercially successful because of it, albeit for those bands (Van Halen) it was at the height of melodic rock's popularity.



Very few bands have went on to become commercially successful, after changing their singer. Genesis, Chicago (who never really had one lead singer), and Van Halen are the only ones I can think of.


Come on John,,,
Survivor
Deep Purple
AC/DC
Black Sabbath
Rainbow
Chicago was smart, they replace there high vocals{Peter S} with a much younger guy about 10 years ago and he can still sing, and has aged and looks like an original member {to most] that just agded well.Journey tried that but failed cause of their greed, and because the lead singer sang all of the songs



But Stevew2...I reckon Chicago lost their authenticity when they hired Jason Scheff to be a Cetera clone in 1985. They might have been able to exploit the afterglow of Chicago 17 for a couple of albums but by 1990 it was all over and Chicago have been a cynical nostalgia act ever since. Probably what would have happened to Journey had they done the same thing in the 1980s...

And Scheff might still look youngish but have you heard the guy sing recently? Here's a clip of two recent concerts...one featuring Cetera...and the other with Scheff. I know which show I'd rather be at....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-OonMkm ... re=related
User avatar
Matthew
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4979
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:47 am
Location: London

Postby Cheyenne » Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:04 pm

Image

OMG! You guys are amazing. No really, I've never come across such authorities of the music biz and yet here you are wasting your God-given talents on a Journey forum.

First of all, according to your posts it's okay for Journey to maintain some minimal level of success by playing the same tired old songs over and over again, but you're going to ream Chris Tucker for making 3 Rush Hour movies?

MJM1959 hit the nail on the head, your beloved Revolution just sounds the same. No surprises, nothing unique at all. But you guys keep clinging to that (oh, and the fantastic CD sales - whoo hoo), apparently it's all you have.

There are several idiots posting on this forum, you all know who you are: RedWing Fan, what the fuck difference does it make what someone looks like? I don't care if Kevin Cronin is the fucking Elephant Man, he can belt a tune that makes you crank up the volume. Looks have nothing to do with it. Idiot #1.

Enigma869: Do you really think that Steve Perry is the most imitated singer ever? And you also believe there are maybe a handful of people in the whole world that have the amount of talent he has? You're not an idiot you're just delusional.

Yes, Red13JoePa, "he" wasn't named Singer For Life, but maybe "Singer For Longer Than It Took For The Band to Sober Up And Realize They Just Signed A Contract With Someone" would have been nice. Or, how about this? Don't . . . sign . . . him . . . at . . . all. If he was that horrible, just let him come in, save your asses and your precious tour and then let him go back about his business. Hmm, there's a novel idea.

I just had to save the biggest idiot of all for last - you know this is coming don't you Saint John? You are so intent on pissing people off on this forum that you don't even care what you say. A comparison is never ridiculous if the person making the comparison believes it. That's called an opinion, sorry if we don't all share yours. How much is your entire net worth, because I've got a nickle in my purse so I'll match your net worth. No, I can see where you wouldn't enjoy a performer who does those "same pre-scripted, contrived moves over and over" because you're much better off watching Journey. They don't ever move. You could set a camcorder up on a tripod and get an entire concert filmed! Go for it.

The one thing that you've seem to have forgotten throughout this obnoxiously nasty pissing match is that it's only about the music. Do you remember the music? It's not about numbers. It's not about who's most popular or who's the best looking. It's about the way the music rocks your fucking soul. The way you wake up with a song in your head and you can't get it out all day. The way the volume knob on the stereo just doesn't seem to go up high enough. Or you can't sing loud enough. It's all about what it makes you feel in your heart. Jeff Scott Soto does that for me - and apparently he does it for quite a few of us. Whoever does that for you - go turn on some of their tunes and mellow out. Find some peace in your life and quit wasting your time here aggravating people.
Image
Get the code to this advert: click here!
User avatar
Cheyenne
Fresh Air
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:57 pm

Postby Saint John » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:09 pm

Cheyenne wrote:I just had to save the biggest idiot of all for last - you know this is coming don't you Saint John?

Actually, most of us figured out that "the biggest idiot of all" was you when you called Revelation, "Revolution." :lol:

Cheyenne wrote: A comparison is never ridiculous if the person making the comparison believes it.

So you wouldn't mind if I compared your mother to Susan Smith or Andrea Yates as long as I believe it?! :lol: Man, second grade must have been the hardest 3 years of your life. :lol:

Cheyenne wrote: That's called an opinion, sorry if we don't all share yours.

Nor should you, but when you do make comparisons please make sure they have some sort of relative parallel. Makes you seem like you have something called "intelligence." :wink:


Cheyenne wrote: The one thing that you've seem to have forgotten throughout this obnoxiously nasty pissing match is that it's only about the music. Do you remember the music?

You're fucking kidding, right?!?!?! The people that have decided to move along with the band are the ones that have kept this solely about "the music!!!" We don't give a fuck that Soto didn't get a Hallmark sendoff or that no one has talked to him since. Is it shitty? Perhaps...but I have neither the time nor energy to care about the inner workings of the band. I keep it all "about the music." And I continue to like the music, and couldn't care less if Neal and Jon have gerbil races up their assholes while watching Monty Python reruns!!!
Last edited by Saint John on Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Andrew » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:09 pm

Cheyenne wrote: Do you remember the music? It's not about numbers. It's not about who's most popular or who's the best looking. It's about the way the music rocks your fucking soul. The way you wake up with a song in your head and you can't get it out all day. The way the volume knob on the stereo just doesn't seem to go up high enough. Or you can't sing loud enough. It's all about what it makes you feel in your heart. Jeff Scott Soto does that for me - and apparently he does it for quite a few of us.


POST OF THE WEEK!!!!!!!

AMEN!!!!
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby Andrew » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:12 pm

Saint John wrote: Acknowledge that and accept it. It's true.


I acknowledge you are full of shit :P
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby Andrew » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:21 pm

Rhiannon wrote:
Tito wrote:Plus, you can ask of couple of others I was "blasting" Soto back then. Everytime someone said something about Soto I rolled my eyes.


This is true, for what time I've been around the man, he's always had the same opinion of Jeff (and anyone for that matter). I don't even think he stood up once during his set in SB.


Then my question - WHY BORE THE SHIT OUT OF THE REST OF US WITH CONSTANT LAME POSTS ON THE SUBJECT!!!!!!!!!!!!! We get it already!!
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby Andrew » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:24 pm

Saint John wrote:
SunshineTwilight wrote:
JSS wrote:
Saint John wrote:I'm not going to apologize because the artists I listen to can move units. It means their talents are liked and appreciated, and is a great part of why all artists do what they do. To sell records. Sorry that the dudes you listen to have small followings, but that's not my problem. As for the stage presence and live performance comments, I do go there for the live show, but I don't need a guy that dresses like he's in an LA street gang rubbing his hair every 5 seconds, showering the stage with sweat tosses and doing the same pre-scripted contrived moves over and over to have a good time at a Journey concert. It's just a mask for the fact that he's a very average professional singer and can't sell albums because he generates basically zero interest in the U.S. Dude, no one is interested in the guy in the U.S...never have been and probably never will be. But you guys think he's better off. :lol: :roll: Now that's funny as hell. Rock fans can generally recognize talent and they've simply passed on Soto. Acknowledge that and accept it. It's true.


For your info, I was 'dressed' by the consultant brought in by the band, all my clothes were chosen for me. Sweat glands are not something I can control so you got me on that one, never had a US manager/producer or anyone that is usually hired to guide an artist to success so there goes your 'no interest' theory (if William Hung or Billy Bob Thorton can have music careers/interest, its because they have someone working for them....means ANYONE can generate interest, has NOTHING to do with talent), rubbing my hair every 5 seconds is good, helps invigorate the follicles so it continues to grow, & most average professional singers don't have a fraction of the background I do....you're alone again dude, seems only you can take a post that is about how someone is masking the truth again & turn it into a personal attack on me. Come to one of my shows in Europe & meet some rock fans who have passed on me...small audiences in the US are because I hadn't done anything there of real stature in....ever! I never had a Herbie Herbert or even a mango sherbert to push my career there....stay tuned for more on your theory in the next year, more like watch & listen.



DAMN STRAIGHT!!!

Dan, you just need to STFU while you're ahead, your ignorance is showing! You have ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE!!!


Fuck you, Pam. Don't ever tell me what to do. Go fly all over the world and continue to stalk Jeff. You're pathetic.


You have said more than enough SJ. Take your own advice.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby Andrew » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:26 pm

Tito wrote:
NealIsGod wrote:This thread is a tornado of hair and teeth. Keep it up! :P


Andrew is going to be pissed when he wakes up!

I just hope he reads this with a clear mind and doesn't take it out on SJ and myself unfairly.


Well you 2 guys are the only ones getting up people's noses as usual.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby epresley » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:31 pm

Andrew wrote:
Tito wrote:
NealIsGod wrote:This thread is a tornado of hair and teeth. Keep it up! :P


Andrew is going to be pissed when he wakes up!

I just hope he reads this with a clear mind and doesn't take it out on SJ and myself unfairly.


Well you 2 guys are the only ones getting up people's noses as usual.


Now THIS is the post of the week........... :wink:
User avatar
epresley
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1645
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:26 am
Location: West Texas

Postby Behshad » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:39 pm

This shit has been going on for too long. Lets make a deal Saint John and Tito.......
Going forward, no Soto fan is allowed to compare him to Perry or any other singer in this Journey section of the forum. In return you guys promise that you dont butt in every thread you see Soto's name, just to start shit again.
You both have made it clear to ALL OF US, with ALL YOUR FACTS that Jeff isnt any near as successful in US than any other rock artist in your ipod minis .
We also know that you guys wouldnt be caught dead at a Soto show.
We Also knows that for every million cds Journey sells, there is ONE single download of ONE single song of Jeff's online (and only half of those paid for legally).
We all know that Jeff will never get the same crowd to his shows that Journey does.
We all stand corrected that Journey is better of with Jeff.
But most importantly , we dont give a damn, cause we are his fans and we will listen to his music, go to his shows and remain loyal to him. Just please, please dont let that bother you that much. Its not worth it....

Fair enough!?
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Vladan » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:44 pm

Cheyenne wrote:Image

OMG! You guys are amazing. No really, I've never come across such authorities of the music biz and yet here you are wasting your God-given talents on a Journey forum.

First of all, according to your posts it's okay for Journey to maintain some minimal level of success by playing the same tired old songs over and over again, but you're going to ream Chris Tucker for making 3 Rush Hour movies?

MJM1959 hit the nail on the head, your beloved Revolution just sounds the same. No surprises, nothing unique at all. But you guys keep clinging to that (oh, and the fantastic CD sales - whoo hoo), apparently it's all you have.

There are several idiots posting on this forum, you all know who you are: RedWing Fan, what the fuck difference does it make what someone looks like? I don't care if Kevin Cronin is the fucking Elephant Man, he can belt a tune that makes you crank up the volume. Looks have nothing to do with it. Idiot #1.

Enigma869: Do you really think that Steve Perry is the most imitated singer ever? And you also believe there are maybe a handful of people in the whole world that have the amount of talent he has? You're not an idiot you're just delusional.

Yes, Red13JoePa, "he" wasn't named Singer For Life, but maybe "Singer For Longer Than It Took For The Band to Sober Up And Realize They Just Signed A Contract With Someone" would have been nice. Or, how about this? Don't . . . sign . . . him . . . at . . . all. If he was that horrible, just let him come in, save your asses and your precious tour and then let him go back about his business. Hmm, there's a novel idea.

I just had to save the biggest idiot of all for last - you know this is coming don't you Saint John? You are so intent on pissing people off on this forum that you don't even care what you say. A comparison is never ridiculous if the person making the comparison believes it. That's called an opinion, sorry if we don't all share yours. How much is your entire net worth, because I've got a nickle in my purse so I'll match your net worth. No, I can see where you wouldn't enjoy a performer who does those "same pre-scripted, contrived moves over and over" because you're much better off watching Journey. They don't ever move. You could set a camcorder up on a tripod and get an entire concert filmed! Go for it.

The one thing that you've seem to have forgotten throughout this obnoxiously nasty pissing match is that it's only about the music. Do you remember the music? It's not about numbers. It's not about who's most popular or who's the best looking. It's about the way the music rocks your fucking soul. The way you wake up with a song in your head and you can't get it out all day. The way the volume knob on the stereo just doesn't seem to go up high enough. Or you can't sing loud enough. It's all about what it makes you feel in your heart. Jeff Scott Soto does that for me - and apparently he does it for quite a few of us. Whoever does that for you - go turn on some of their tunes and mellow out. Find some peace in your life and quit wasting your time here aggravating people.


Wow, just wow. I think i'm going to stay away from your path :) you mean business. Deano eat your heart out. Amaziing, well... can't argue with that. and! just fo the record since JSS is here and reading. JSS, I think your bloody good!.
Last edited by Vladan on Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Vladan
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1515
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 2:10 am
Location: Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Postby SusieP » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:48 pm

Behshad wrote:
Going forward, no Soto fan is allowed to compare him to Perry or any other singer in this Journey section of the forum.



I would like to compare Jeff to Perry or any other singer in this Journey section of the forum if the mood takes me, because it is human nature to compare. Why is that a problem?
If discussions are kept courteous and are not baiting, and other people's opinion's are respected, why is it even an issue? Just because SJ and Tito say so?

Also, even if Jeff was only Journey's singer for one week, he was still a member of Journey. Therefore discussion about him is not off topic in this forum - in my opinion.

If anything is to be outlawed I think it should be shit stirring. Veiled or otherwise.
..................................


http://www.smoothduo.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/SuzeFromSmoothDuo/ Twitter @smoothduo
..................................
Rest In Peace Deano.
User avatar
SusieP
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:13 am
Location: up to no good in rainy Nottinghamshire, England

Postby Saint John » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:51 pm

Andrew wrote:Then my question - WHY BORE THE SHIT OUT OF THE REST OF US WITH CONSTANT LAME POSTS ON THE SUBJECT!!!!!!!!!!!!! We get it already!!

For the exact same reason that people constantly bore the shit out of us by bashing the band!!! What's good for the goose is good for the gander, mate. :wink: And I have never ever called into question Soto's sexuality, made fun of his appearance, called him "gay" or said anything personal about him. It seems to me that we are the ones debating constructively without name-calling and personal attacks. So we have to stop "boring" you, but you will allow further attacks on the band? Seems odd, eh? :lol: And believe me, the personal attacks on the band don't bother me a bit. In fact, posts like stevew2's crack me the fuck up. :lol: The dude is funny...hands down. I just don't want to be vilified for being boring...it's just highly hypocritical relative to what the "other side" is doing.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Behshad » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:53 pm

SusieP wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Going forward, no Soto fan is allowed to compare him to Perry or any other singer in this Journey section of the forum.



I would like to compare Jeff to Perry or any other singer in this Journey section of the forum if the mood takes me, because it is human nature to compare. Why is that a problem?
If discussions are kept courteous and are not baiting, and other people's opinion's are respected, why is it even an issue? Just because SJ and Tito say so?

Also, even if Jeff was only Journey's singer for one week, he was still a member of Journey. Therefore discussion about him is not off topic in this forum - in my opinion.

If anything is to be outlawed I think it should be shit stirring. Veiled or otherwise.


I know what you mean Susie,,, but I didnt say we can not discuss Soto here, like Tito suggested few weeks ago..... I am just saying that we will discuss him here like we always have,,, but should the need arise for him to be compared to any singer/artist , we will do it in JSS section.... We gotta have some incentives for SJ&Tito to have a valid negotiation ,,,, 8)
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby finalfight » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:59 pm

Andrew wrote:
Cheyenne wrote: Do you remember the music? It's not about numbers. It's not about who's most popular or who's the best looking. It's about the way the music rocks your fucking soul. The way you wake up with a song in your head and you can't get it out all day. The way the volume knob on the stereo just doesn't seem to go up high enough. Or you can't sing loud enough. It's all about what it makes you feel in your heart. Jeff Scott Soto does that for me - and apparently he does it for quite a few of us.


POST OF THE WEEK!!!!!!!

AMEN!!!!


Pity the rest of the post was just another heated rambling from yet another JSS fan (likely female with I love JSS/JSS Rocks or God forbid the prerequisite 'Me and JSS' picture in their avatar) punching keys two forums above their weight. It's not as much about the music as some peoples need to defend 'their man' against any form of criticism. Its getting really old fast as pretty much every interesting topic inevitably turns into a thread about JSS which then seems to turn everything sour.

Now I like JSS and DO think some of the criticism is often unnecessary and repeated ad nauseam. Its just that everything is getting to be very predictable and I'm no Nostradamus!
finalfight
 

Postby Andrew » Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:00 am

Behshad wrote:This shit has been going on for too long. Lets make a deal Saint John and Tito.......


You have your board/s to moderate, I'll moderate this one ok? There are no deals.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby Deb » Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:00 am

Saint John wrote:
Andrew wrote:Then my question - WHY BORE THE SHIT OUT OF THE REST OF US WITH CONSTANT LAME POSTS ON THE SUBJECT!!!!!!!!!!!!! We get it already!!

For the exact same reason that people constantly bore the shit out of us by bashing the band!!! What's good for the goose is good for the gander, mate. :wink: And I have never ever called into question Soto's sexuality, made fun of his appearance, called him "gay" or said anything personal about him.


Ok, then what do you call those comments in this thread.....on his clothes, moves, hair and how much he sweats? :?
Last edited by Deb on Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:03 am, edited 2 times in total.
Deb
MP3
 
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Gotta Love The Ride!

Postby finalfight » Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:01 am

Saint John wrote:
Andrew wrote:Then my question - WHY BORE THE SHIT OUT OF THE REST OF US WITH CONSTANT LAME POSTS ON THE SUBJECT!!!!!!!!!!!!! We get it already!!

For the exact same reason that people constantly bore the shit out of us by bashing the band!!! What's good for the goose is good for the gander, mate. :wink: And I have never ever called into question Soto's sexuality, made fun of his appearance, called him "gay" or said anything personal about him. It seems to me that we are the ones debating constructively without name-calling and personal attacks. So we have to stop "boring" you, but you will allow further attacks on the band? Seems odd, eh? :lol: And believe me, the personal attacks on the band don't bother me a bit. In fact, posts like stevew2's crack me the fuck up. :lol: The dude is funny...hands down. I just don't want to be vilified for being boring...it's just highly hypocritical relative to what the "other side" is doing.


Amen.
finalfight
 

Postby Red13JoePa » Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:01 am

Cheyenne wrote:There are several idiots posting on this forum, you all know who you are: RedWing Fan,
Enigma869:
Yes, Red13JoePa, "he" wasn't named Singer For Life, but maybe "Singer For Longer Than It Took For The Band to Sober Up And Realize They Just Signed A Contract With Someone" would have been nice. Or, how about this? Don't . . . sign . . . him . . . at . . . all. If he was that horrible, just let him come in, save your asses and your precious tour and then let him go back about his business. Hmm, there's a novel idea.

I just had to save the biggest idiot of all for last - you know this is coming don't you Saint John?



There are several idiots on here, but RedWing, Enigma, myself and SJ aren't among them.
Your presence here increases it by 1 though, you sanctimonious horse's ass.

He was terminated and got, per Neal and others "in the know," commensurate severance pay.
Same thing happened w/ Augeri, an 8-year man and his departure was just as unceremonious and without tear-jerking farewell speeches, banquets and parades. Again contracts aren't permanent in this business.
Augeri was an 8-year man and let go in a similar fashion.
Difference is when that happened Augeri was the biggest pariah around places like these since Barabas and so the all-business hush hush way he was jettisoned was the funniest thing ever.
Last edited by Red13JoePa on Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I love almost everybody."---Rocky Balboa 1990
"Let's reform this thing.Let's go out and get some guys who want to work and go do it"--Neal Schon February, 2001
"I looked at Neal, and I just saw a guy who really wants his band back"-JCain 2/01
Red13JoePa
MP3
 
Posts: 11646
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Happy Valley

Postby finalfight » Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:01 am

Deb wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Andrew wrote:Then my question - WHY BORE THE SHIT OUT OF THE REST OF US WITH CONSTANT LAME POSTS ON THE SUBJECT!!!!!!!!!!!!! We get it already!!

For the exact same reason that people constantly bore the shit out of us by bashing the band!!! What's good for the goose is good for the gander, mate. :wink: And I have[b] never ever called into question Soto's sexuality, made fun of his appearance, called him "gay" or said anything personal about him. [/b]


Ok, then what do you call those comments on his clothes, moves, hair and how much he sweats? :?


Amen also! :lol:
finalfight
 

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests