Moderator: Andrew
Liquid_Drummer wrote:This fucktard is talking shit about other band and from a musicians point of view this is as classless as it gets. No fucking cooth... I have the NAKED vocal track from Bringing On The Heartbreak. No effects, no nothing.. Dry as a bone. This was when he was in his "PRIME" ok.... He has only made it as a singer because of overdubs, effects, creative mixing techniques and backing tracks... Listen below and you will see what I mean... The only music you hear is the bleed through from his headphones. Enjoy... haha
http://media.putfile.com/Joe-Elliot-Naked
Enigma869 wrote:GEEZ...The name of that link scared the shit out of me![]()
![]()
![]()
John from Boston
styxman wrote:Trouble with Joe is this, he has the look of a rock star, he's sellable, they'll always work around the voice to make the bucks. Thanks for the link, it's something most of us expect to hear.
If we opened this style of scruntiny with other bands who would you list as being in the same stable as Joe?
styxman wrote:Trouble with Joe is this, he has the look of a rock star, he's sellable, they'll always work around the voice to make the bucks. Thanks for the link, it's something most of us expect to hear.
If we opened this style of scruntiny with other bands who would you list as being in the same stable as Joe?
styxman wrote:Trouble with Joe is this, he has the look of a rock star, he's sellable, they'll always work around the voice to make the bucks. Thanks for the link, it's something most of us expect to hear.
If we opened this style of scruntiny with other bands who would you list as being in the same stable as Joe?
finalfight wrote:styxman wrote:Trouble with Joe is this, he has the look of a rock star, he's sellable, they'll always work around the voice to make the bucks. Thanks for the link, it's something most of us expect to hear.
If we opened this style of scruntiny with other bands who would you list as being in the same stable as Joe?
He has the look of a plumber. Albeit a very, VERY rich plumber.
Liquid_Drummer wrote:I think it sounds shite and liked them up to pyromania. After that all shite IMO. I love Bringin on the heartbreak myself its just that based on his performance he has no business putting down anyone. Pour Some Sugar and Lets get rocked was fucking garbage. IMO almost as bad as We built this city..... Ewwww shudder..
Enigma869 wrote:! If you ever get your hands on the Hysteria documentary DVD, there is a bonus clip on there with just Joe and Phil Collen playing guitar (non electric) and singing Hysteria. It's a GREAT performance with no artificial enhancements!
John from Boston
Liam wrote:
I've got it and it's one of my favorite versions of the song.
finalfight wrote:styxman wrote:Trouble with Joe is this, he has the look of a rock star, he's sellable, they'll always work around the voice to make the bucks. Thanks for the link, it's something most of us expect to hear.
If we opened this style of scruntiny with other bands who would you list as being in the same stable as Joe?
He has the look of a plumber. Albeit a very, VERY rich plumber.
Liquid_Drummer wrote:styxman wrote:Trouble with Joe is this, he has the look of a rock star, he's sellable, they'll always work around the voice to make the bucks. Thanks for the link, it's something most of us expect to hear.
If we opened this style of scruntiny with other bands who would you list as being in the same stable as Joe?
Bachman Turner Overdrives vocalist
Canned Heat......
Ehwmatt wrote:finalfight wrote:styxman wrote:Trouble with Joe is this, he has the look of a rock star, he's sellable, they'll always work around the voice to make the bucks. Thanks for the link, it's something most of us expect to hear.
If we opened this style of scruntiny with other bands who would you list as being in the same stable as Joe?
He has the look of a plumber. Albeit a very, VERY rich plumber.
Yeah Joe looks like hell nowadays. Fat and wrinkled. His voice is definitely shot too. But, in spite of all that, they're still a blast to see live.
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:styxman wrote:Trouble with Joe is this, he has the look of a rock star, he's sellable, they'll always work around the voice to make the bucks. Thanks for the link, it's something most of us expect to hear.
If we opened this style of scruntiny with other bands who would you list as being in the same stable as Joe?
All of Poison and Crue
Nelson
Some of danger danger
Slaughter...........
styxman wrote:Trouble with Joe is this, he has the look of a rock star, he's sellable, they'll always work around the voice to make the bucks. Thanks for the link, it's something most of us expect to hear.
If we opened this style of scruntiny with other bands who would you list as being in the same stable as Joe?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests