that is not true. reps don't want to take away a womens choice... they want to put restrictions like there should be. way too many abortions are being performed. 1 million each year. do you really think all those are "emergencies".
i'm not a religious anything or pro this or that but i'm not living in denial. bottom line is way too many women are having abortions... something that can be avoided by not getting pregnant in the first place. the numbers speak for themselves... people are using it as back-up birth control... think about it.
i read here people saying that if mccain/palin are elected they will overturn roe vs. wade. that is bs. the same thing was said about bush. palin never said she would outlaw abortion... but she believes restrictions should be added. she is right.
this country is messed up because we have too many people not taking responsibility & not being accountable or made to be for themselves.
bottom line is way too many abortions are being performed each year. saying the reps just want to outlaw it is bullshit... and even if they did... not going to ever happen.
Lula wrote:that's the thing, jana. the party that wants to make a choice for a woman is the same party that wants to cut the welfare programs. i'm not saying women should abort, obviously responsibility with their sex lives needs to be practiced. for low income women planned parenthood is a great place to get birth control and education. there are so many children in this country going to bed hungry, living in cars, being abused, etc... to cut programs is a sin. to not support the childrens health program is a crime. to not offer thorough sex education to age appropriate students is irresponsible. i could go on, but i'm getting tired.