Here's my problem with AI...
The show is humongously popular. Not sure if the popularity has waxed or waned since the beginning or not. Anyway, each each year they add more rounds, stretching out the program by weeks....they make MOST of their money DURING the run of the show. Advertisements, whathaveyou.
The contestents probably sign part of their lives away to Simon Fuller, and I'd bet everyone in the top 12(13) has the opportunity to make a record, and AI will get a cut. It's a win-win for Simon and Idol....
I've wrestled with just what, or who determines the actual winner. I mean, you could say that the voting is a sham and in reality the judges and/or Fuller really pick the winner. I mean you can't let somethng as important as this be reliant on the voting public? Can you?
On the other hand, why not allow the public to vote? They're the ones who are going to buy these CDs, and attend AI concerts and shit....
Let's run down past winners:
Kelly Clarkson - 1st winner a few albums, basically fell off the planet.
Reuben Studdard - WHO?! Exactly
Fantasia Barrino - Again WHO? Nice trick playing the single mother card.
Carrie Underwood - most talented so far...
Jordin Sparks - another WHO? Not very original, boring....Melinda Doolittle was far and away the best talent that season.
Taylor Hicks - Are you kidding me? Did you actually think he was the next Michael McDonald?
David Cook - BORING! Can you tone down the Guyliner, Dave?
3 guys, 4 girls....Hmmmm? You think the next winner will be a guy?
Another thing is that 6 girls and 6 guys make it to the final 12...I can't help but think this is to get the gender advantage. Guys and girls voting. What a crock!
What if there were better girl singers this year, why couldn't there be 8 girls out of 12 in the final?
Idol makes MOST of the money from ADs, and voting.....whoever wins is just gravy.
AI is batting 2 out of 7....not a very good ratio.....sometimes I wonder about this show. Are we all suckers?
