Moderator: Andrew
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama

donnaplease wrote:Rockindeano wrote: Now after electing Obama, say what you will, but we are held in higher regard than the previous administration's days.
Do you have some tangible proof of this?

Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:Rockindeano wrote: Now after electing Obama, say what you will, but we are held in higher regard than the previous administration's days.
Do you have some tangible proof of this?
Not a single ounce. Nope, notta. .

Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:Rockindeano wrote: Now after electing Obama, say what you will, but we are held in higher regard than the previous administration's days.
Do you have some tangible proof of this?
Not a single ounce. Nope, notta. .
And there is none. I can tell you that the European attitude for example toward the United States has not changed one ounce for the better since Obama has taken office. An attitude constanty oscillating from grudging admiration to jealously fuelled distain and morally better than you attitude. Just today I watched back to back programmes on France 24 and Russia Today lambasting the US and Obama, and I hear all three parties in the UK snipe at the US, because it scores them brownie points in public opinion. Obamas apology tour did nothing for the US.

Rockindeano wrote:Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:Rockindeano wrote: Now after electing Obama, say what you will, but we are held in higher regard than the previous administration's days.
Do you have some tangible proof of this?
Not a single ounce. Nope, notta. .
And there is none. I can tell you that the European attitude for example toward the United States has not changed one ounce for the better since Obama has taken office. An attitude constanty oscillating from grudging admiration to jealously fuelled distain and morally better than you attitude. Just today I watched back to back programmes on France 24 and Russia Today lambasting the US and Obama, and I hear all three parties in the UK snipe at the US, because it scores them brownie points in public opinion. Obamas apology tour did nothing for the US.
Ok, then what you're saying is since Clinton left office, the European community has hated us. I know Europe loved us when Clinton was in office, so what you are basically saying, or just said was, Bush made Europe hate us. Is that correct?

RedWingFan wrote:It's obvious that the Bamster is an absolute disaster of a president. The question now is, is it because he's just incompetent and never ran anything in his life? Or is he doing destroying our economy and abandoning our allies purposefully?

Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:Rockindeano wrote: Now after electing Obama, say what you will, but we are held in higher regard than the previous administration's days.
Do you have some tangible proof of this?
Not a single ounce. Nope, notta. I just can definitely tell you we were absolutely hated under that asshole. Obama did well to apologize for his reckless rampage across the entire fucking globe.
Actually, after some thinking on your pointed question to me, I do remember United States biggest ally, Canada, booing the US anthem at every turn of every corner. I do remember many countries, either saying outright "no" to joining up in the "war against terror," or doing so very reluctantly...see Spain, Australia, Canada and Japan. In fact, I don't think Canada even sent troops to Iraq. Why can Canada, our most trusted historically strongest ally see through the lies of Iraq and take a stand and not go, but our own people here in this nation buy into the red white and blue covered lies? Wave that flag and draw up some blind, false, patriotic hopefuls, believing that a US war lead by our very own President is the right thing to do. You know it is also patriotic to take a stand and that POV should also be respected.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:RedWingFan wrote:It's obvious that the Bamster is an absolute disaster of a president. The question now is, is it because he's just incompetent and never ran anything in his life? Or is he doing destroying our economy and abandoning our allies purposefully?
You're one of the sad 22 percenters who still thinks Bush did a good job
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Almost every action Obama has made so far has been in response to the flaming bags of dog shit left sitting on the White House porch when he arrived.
Just like the pathetic little man we have as commander in chief, can't take responsibility for trashing the economy, inheriting 5 or 6% unemployment and running it up to 10% huh?The_Noble_Cause wrote:Until he gets a handle on the current Bush Great Depression, his legacy remains parked in neutral.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama

donnaplease wrote:I totally agree with you about taking a stand and allowing that POV to be respected. Some on here would be wise to adhere to that. And that's why I KNOW you will lay off the "tea baggers" for expressing theirs...

RedWingFan wrote:Just like the pathetic little man we have as commander in chief, can't take responsibility for trashing the economy, inheriting 5 or 6% unemployment and running it up to 10% huh?
I suppose Bush drew up the Stimulus package that flushed all our money down the toilet? Pathetic. Man up and defend your pathetic president's actions instead of trying to blame Bush.

RedWingFan wrote:I guess you consider Bush leaving our allies Poland and the Czech Republic with missile defense shields "flaming bags of dog shit" huh? Bamster stomped that out real fast and stripped them leaving them to fend for themselves.
RedWingFan wrote:Just like the pathetic little man we have as commander in chief, can't take responsibility for trashing the economy, inheriting 5 or 6% unemployment and running it up to 10% huh?
RedWingFan wrote:I suppose Bush drew up the Stimulus package that flushed all our money down the toilet?
RedWingFan wrote:Pathetic. Man up and defend your pathetic president's actions instead of trying to blame Bush.
donnaplease wrote:OK, assuming all that happened, what evidence is there that relations are better under BO?
donnaplease wrote:I personally think the so-called apology tour may have emboldened people to come against us.

SF-Dano wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:And I personally think it was because the country went Republican in 2000 that 9-11 happened.
I don't know if this was said in jest, but that is just a ridiculous statement. I would think the fact that several islamic terror attacks have taken place while this country was under Democrat leadership would be example enough that these terrorist don't care about the political ideology leading this country at any particular time.
SF-Dano wrote:I am sorry I didn't understand your context. Care to explain. I am going to guess not. And the swearing was un-called for, so go screw yourself. Loser.
Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:I totally agree with you about taking a stand and allowing that POV to be respected. Some on here would be wise to adhere to that. And that's why I KNOW you will lay off the "tea baggers" for expressing theirs...
Seriously? Not to worry, the Tea Baggers are pure comedy, and have no say in anything important. They are just bigoted blow hards who want guns, no taxes and no "spics or niggers" in this here nation. I don't mind them. Hell, they're doing a terrific job of fracturing the GOP that I laugh out loud hysterically at their stupidity.

The_Noble_Cause wrote:RedWingFan wrote:Just like the pathetic little man we have as commander in chief, can't take responsibility for trashing the economy, inheriting 5 or 6% unemployment and running it up to 10% huh?
Providing aid to states when tax revenues are down does not hinder the private sector from making a comeback.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:The stimulus did not increase unemployment. If anything, it kept workers in their jobs.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama

RedWingFan wrote:When you have no money, and print, tax and borrow against future generations, yeah it does hinder the private sector.
RedWingFan wrote:Stimulus was passed and private sector jobs plummet.
RedWingFan wrote:The unemployment rate went up, if it "kept workers in their jobs", then unemployment would have remained the same.
RedWingFan wrote:Stimulus did increase our debt...if anything.
RedWingFan wrote:And I personally think it was because we invaded Iraq that we didn't have a dozen other cities hit by terrorists. Just imagine how bad it would have been had Bush not invaded. Bush saved hundreds of thousands of innocent American lives.
RedWingFan wrote: Offensive and totally devoid of evidence? Yup. But that's how you sound.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:When I said this, it was to make a point about Donna making wild sweeping claims based on blind faith and magical thinking.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama

RedWingFan wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:When I said this, it was to make a point about Donna making wild sweeping claims based on blind faith and magical thinking.
Which is why I posted the same thing for your blind faith and magical thinking that the horrible economic calamity that followed Obama's stimulus, would have been a REALLY horrible economic calamity if he hadn't pulled the handle on the commode.

7 Wishes wrote:RedWingFan wrote:Bush saved hundreds of thousands of innocent American lives.
You are truly an abhorrently ignorant asshole, RightWingNutjob.
donnaplease wrote:Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:I totally agree with you about taking a stand and allowing that POV to be respected. Some on here would be wise to adhere to that. And that's why I KNOW you will lay off the "tea baggers" for expressing theirs...
Seriously? Not to worry, the Tea Baggers are pure comedy, and have no say in anything important. They are just bigoted blow hards who want guns, no taxes and no "spics or niggers" in this here nation. I don't mind them. Hell, they're doing a terrific job of fracturing the GOP that I laugh out loud hysterically at their stupidity.
Ok, suuurrreee.![]()

artist4perry wrote:donnaplease wrote:Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:I totally agree with you about taking a stand and allowing that POV to be respected. Some on here would be wise to adhere to that. And that's why I KNOW you will lay off the "tea baggers" for expressing theirs...
Seriously? Not to worry, the Tea Baggers are pure comedy, and have no say in anything important. They are just bigoted blow hards who want guns, no taxes and no "spics or niggers" in this here nation. I don't mind them. Hell, they're doing a terrific job of fracturing the GOP that I laugh out loud hysterically at their stupidity.
Ok, suuurrreee.![]()
Uh.......Deano.............I have joined in with the Tea Baggers but guess what...........no biggoted remarks...........no screaming for guns.................just people fed up with big government. Last time I checked we are free to protest..........oh I forgot.........unless it is a liberal protest it is not a legitimate protest. And all people who are in on the tea parties are biggots? I didn't see any of that. Mostly they were common folks........farmers, teachers, housewives, you know the folks that big government would rather lable biggots than listen to them and hear what they really have to say. If I am a biggot your anal retentive. Still love ya big guy............![]()

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Actually, no, it isn't. When I said this, it was to make a point about Donna making wild sweeping claims based on blind faith and magical thinking. The sad thing is, you genuinely believe hurling American kids into a meatgrinder somehow grants us an invisible force field against terrorists. I got news for you- terrorists intent on striking America will do whatever they want. Neither a diplomatic bow or a conventional hot war 10,000 miles away means a thing.


donnaplease wrote:
Like your pic, Ginger. I just read in our local paper this week that a tea party is organizing in my county. I may check it out, just to experience those bigots and racists. My eyes are already brown, so I guess I'm ok...

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests