Moderator: Andrew
Lula wrote:here is some interesting gallup stuff
"Still, Obama's initial approval rating in his second year as president is among the lowest for elected presidents since Dwight Eisenhower. Only Ronald Reagan -- who, like Obama, took office during challenging economic times -- began his second year in office with a lower approval score (49%). However, Obama's disapproval rating is slightly higher than Reagan's was (44% vs. 40%)."
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124949/appro ... -spot.aspx
Lula wrote:not exactly pleased with obama's job performance, but not ready to give up on him either. wish he would get rid of a few of his top dogs tho, i think rahm emanual needs to go.
conversationpc wrote:Lula wrote:not exactly pleased with obama's job performance, but not ready to give up on him either. wish he would get rid of a few of his top dogs tho, i think rahm emanual needs to go.
We agree on something! Yay!

Rockindeano wrote:conversationpc wrote:Lula wrote:not exactly pleased with obama's job performance, but not ready to give up on him either. wish he would get rid of a few of his top dogs tho, i think rahm emanual needs to go.
We agree on something! Yay!
Obama should make the switch- pull CIA Chief Leon Panetta and instill him as Chief of Staff. He did it brilliantly under Clinton. Emanuel, with all his Chicago style politics, seems lost. The guy is clueless, as is David Axlerod. Fuck, give me the job. I will guarantee you the White House would develop an instant backbone and develop a concise message overnight.
Fact Finder wrote:

Lula wrote:donnaplease wrote:Fact Finder wrote:More right wing leaning polls...![]()
NEW LOW FOR O: USATODAYGALLUP HAS OBAMA APPROVE AT 41%...
Only 41% of those surveyed Tuesday through Sunday approved of the way Obama is handling his job, his lowest rating in the USA TODAY/Gallup Poll since he took office in January 2009. In Gallup's separate daily tracking poll, his approval was at 45% Monday.
What was Bush at his lowest? Clinton? Just curious how it correlates.
when clinton left office he was about 66% and gore won the popular vote, but alas bush won the electoral college, bush left office with about 34% just like carter.

Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
Gee, that bumper sticker looks to have been there awhile, say maybe, 8 years or so?
conversationpc wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
Gee, that bumper sticker looks to have been there awhile, say maybe, 8 years or so?
Closer to 10, I think.

donnaplease wrote:Lula wrote:donnaplease wrote:Fact Finder wrote:More right wing leaning polls...![]()
NEW LOW FOR O: USATODAYGALLUP HAS OBAMA APPROVE AT 41%...
Only 41% of those surveyed Tuesday through Sunday approved of the way Obama is handling his job, his lowest rating in the USA TODAY/Gallup Poll since he took office in January 2009. In Gallup's separate daily tracking poll, his approval was at 45% Monday.
What was Bush at his lowest? Clinton? Just curious how it correlates.
when clinton left office he was about 66% and gore won the popular vote, but alas bush won the electoral college, bush left office with about 34% just like carter.
Certainly that wasn't his lowest rating though? Apples to apples please.

AlteredDNA wrote:donnaplease wrote:Lula wrote:donnaplease wrote:Fact Finder wrote:More right wing leaning polls...![]()
NEW LOW FOR O: USATODAYGALLUP HAS OBAMA APPROVE AT 41%...
Only 41% of those surveyed Tuesday through Sunday approved of the way Obama is handling his job, his lowest rating in the USA TODAY/Gallup Poll since he took office in January 2009. In Gallup's separate daily tracking poll, his approval was at 45% Monday.
What was Bush at his lowest? Clinton? Just curious how it correlates.
when clinton left office he was about 66% and gore won the popular vote, but alas bush won the electoral college, bush left office with about 34% just like carter.
Certainly that wasn't his lowest rating though? Apples to apples please.
Lowest Points:
Clinton - 37
Bush - 29

Rockindeano wrote:conversationpc wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
Gee, that bumper sticker looks to have been there awhile, say maybe, 8 years or so?
Closer to 10, I think.
You make no sense. Are you saying Clinton was an idiot? Even the hard core Cons won't say that.
When business in the United States underwent a mild contraction in 1927, the Federal Reserve created more paper reserves in the hope of forestalling any possible bank reserve shortage. More disastrous, however, was the Federal Reserve's attempt to assist Great Britain who had been losing gold to us because the Bank of England refused to allow interest rates to rise when market forces dictated (it was politically unpalatable). The reasoning of the authorities involved was as follows: if the Federal Reserve pumped excessive paper reserves into American banks, interest rates in the United States would fall to a level comparable with those in Great Britain; this would act to stop Britain's gold loss and avoid the political embarrassment of having to raise interest rates. The "Fed" succeeded; it stopped the gold loss, but it nearly destroyed the economies of the world, in the process. The excess credit which the Fed pumped into the economy spilled over into the stock market-triggering a fantastic speculative boom. Belatedly, Federal Reserve officials attempted to sop up the excess reserves and finally succeeded in braking the boom. But it was too late: by 1929 the speculative imbalances had become so overwhelming that the attempt precipitated a sharp retrenching and a consequent demoralizing of business confidence. As a result, the American economy collapsed. Great Britain fared even worse, and rather than absorb the full consequences of her previous folly, she abandoned the gold standard completely in 1931, tearing asunder what remained of the fabric of confidence and inducing a world-wide series of bank failures. The world economies plunged into the Great Depression of the 1930's.


Rockindeano wrote:And where did Shrub go to school? Yale? LOL, he couldn't get in to the University of Texas, but somehow was accepted at Yale. What a joke.

conversationpc wrote:Lula wrote:here is some interesting gallup stuff
"Still, Obama's initial approval rating in his second year as president is among the lowest for elected presidents since Dwight Eisenhower. Only Ronald Reagan -- who, like Obama, took office during challenging economic times -- began his second year in office with a lower approval score (49%). However, Obama's disapproval rating is slightly higher than Reagan's was (44% vs. 40%)."
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124949/appro ... -spot.aspx
Unfortunately for Obama, our debt is far more crushing now than it was then. It can be turned around and I hope he can do it but, from what I've seen in the 1 & 1/2+ years that he's been in office, I'm not too hopeful.
Monker wrote:conversationpc wrote:Lula wrote:here is some interesting gallup stuff
"Still, Obama's initial approval rating in his second year as president is among the lowest for elected presidents since Dwight Eisenhower. Only Ronald Reagan -- who, like Obama, took office during challenging economic times -- began his second year in office with a lower approval score (49%). However, Obama's disapproval rating is slightly higher than Reagan's was (44% vs. 40%)."
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124949/appro ... -spot.aspx
Unfortunately for Obama, our debt is far more crushing now than it was then. It can be turned around and I hope he can do it but, from what I've seen in the 1 & 1/2+ years that he's been in office, I'm not too hopeful.
And, this is a hypocritical argument since the Republicans, at that time, were arguing that the dept didn't matter, that our government has ALWAYS run a deficit, etc. I guess it only matter when there is some other party in power.. And, I guess it doesn't matter that the Republicans took a SURPLUS and started us down this path of ruin. I believe it was Reagan who said that it would get worse before it got better. it was no different a 1 1/2 yrs ago...in fact, the Republicans left things a LOT worse then the Democrats did with Carter.

slucero wrote:Rockindeano wrote:And where did Shrub go to school? Yale? LOL, he couldn't get in to the University of Texas, but somehow was accepted at Yale. What a joke.
Yea think about that... Both Clinton and Bush went to Yale...
You can blame Bush for whats happening now... and its probably well deserved... Bush fucked the economy good by spending like a fool... Obamas continuing the fucking.. how.. by spending like Bush
But Clinton set the table for a 1929 Wall Street repeat by signing into law that act in 1999... that a Republican Congress passed.. and later Clinton defended himself and let Congress off the hook.. saying he felt no pressure to sign it..
All these people are educated, and supposedly smart... yet here we are... getting equally fucked by BOTH PARTIES.. over and over again... yet all you Cons and Libs do is toss poo at each other like monkeys at the zoo... maybe its time people stopped pointing fingers at each other and instead STARTED pointed fingers at Washington..
They and CONGRESS are both EQUALLY to blame...
Monker wrote:Bush did NOTHING to invest in this country. 6yrs of investing in Iraq and Afghanistan...and the fear of terrorism The only thing he could do for the US is suggest we go shopping, or give us a hush-puppy tax cut. At a time when we NEEDED jobs to help turn this country around the only thing he could do is point to terrorism and invent some "War Games" defcon system to scare the public into following him. What was the suggestion if there was a terrorist threat? Wrap your house with shrink wrap. Eight years of that type of crap was FAR too many. Mini-Bush did NOTHING good for this country...and a lot of things bad. Eight years of doing NOTHING.
Republicans and conservatives like to compare to Obama to Hitler, which I think is unpatriotic and insults the country as a whole. But, it was the previous president, and Republicans still do it today, who play the politics of fear and negative propaganda to a sickening degree. Tbey demonize to scare voters and get both support and negative popular views of their opposition. That is more Nazi like then anything that has gone on with the other side. The politics of fear and propaganda is what Nazi's, Communists, Fascists, and Republicans do best.
Right now, I think Palin will win the Republican nomination. That may change, I hope so. But, she's learned how to play the game. She knows how to rile up the core of the Republican party. She knows how to take a slight truth and misrepresent it to rouse up the Republicans, and make the Democrats look bad. Don't know if it will be enough to win an election...but it is certainly enough to win a Republican nomination to run against a first term president. She's not smart...but, mini-Bush proves that people will vote for stupid people if they are scared, angry, or both....and that is what she is playing to.slucero wrote:Rockindeano wrote:And where did Shrub go to school? Yale? LOL, he couldn't get in to the University of Texas, but somehow was accepted at Yale. What a joke.
Yea think about that... Both Clinton and Bush went to Yale...
You can blame Bush for whats happening now... and its probably well deserved... Bush fucked the economy good by spending like a fool... Obamas continuing the fucking.. how.. by spending like Bush
But Clinton set the table for a 1929 Wall Street repeat by signing into law that act in 1999... that a Republican Congress passed.. and later Clinton defended himself and let Congress off the hook.. saying he felt no pressure to sign it..
All these people are educated, and supposedly smart... yet here we are... getting equally fucked by BOTH PARTIES.. over and over again... yet all you Cons and Libs do is toss poo at each other like monkeys at the zoo... maybe its time people stopped pointing fingers at each other and instead STARTED pointed fingers at Washington..
They and CONGRESS are both EQUALLY to blame...

Monker wrote:
Right now, I think Palin will win the Republican nomination. That may change, I hope so. But, she's learned how to play the game. She knows how to rile up the core of the Republican party. She knows how to take a slight truth and misrepresent it to rouse up the Republicans, and make the Democrats look bad. Don't know if it will be enough to win an election...but it is certainly enough to win a Republican nomination to run against a first term president. She's not smart...but, mini-Bush proves that people will vote for stupid people if they are scared, angry, or both....and that is what she is playing to.

Rockindeano wrote:Monker wrote:
Right now, I think Palin will win the Republican nomination. That may change, I hope so. But, she's learned how to play the game. She knows how to rile up the core of the Republican party. She knows how to take a slight truth and misrepresent it to rouse up the Republicans, and make the Democrats look bad. Don't know if it will be enough to win an election...but it is certainly enough to win a Republican nomination to run against a first term president. She's not smart...but, mini-Bush proves that people will vote for stupid people if they are scared, angry, or both....and that is what she is playing to.
Helluva post Monker except this part. NO WAY does Palin see a nomination. People aren't that fucking stupid. I get she'll do the fear card on people, and she will rouse up the right, but that's where it stops. Gingrich is a far superior candidate, who can interview and talk without having notes jotted down on his palm. I cannot see he winning the nomination, let alone the presidency. I'll move to Mexico if she wins. I will gladly give up my citizenship to a Mexican if that happens. I want no part of a Palin run America.
The three scariest words in the dictionary: President Sarah Palin.

slucero wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Monker wrote:
Right now, I think Palin will win the Republican nomination. That may change, I hope so. But, she's learned how to play the game. She knows how to rile up the core of the Republican party. She knows how to take a slight truth and misrepresent it to rouse up the Republicans, and make the Democrats look bad. Don't know if it will be enough to win an election...but it is certainly enough to win a Republican nomination to run against a first term president. She's not smart...but, mini-Bush proves that people will vote for stupid people if they are scared, angry, or both....and that is what she is playing to.
Helluva post Monker except this part. NO WAY does Palin see a nomination. People aren't that fucking stupid. I get she'll do the fear card on people, and she will rouse up the right, but that's where it stops. Gingrich is a far superior candidate, who can interview and talk without having notes jotted down on his palm. I cannot see he winning the nomination, let alone the presidency. I'll move to Mexico if she wins. I will gladly give up my citizenship to a Mexican if that happens. I want no part of a Palin run America.
The three scariest words in the dictionary: President Sarah Palin.
Palin will not even run... she's toxic for for the swing vote..
And I'll move to Mexico WITH YOU Deano... We can sit on a beach in Ensenada and get hammered all damn day long...

Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama

Monker wrote: I guess it only matters when there is some other party in power...

donnaplease wrote:
What Abe Lincoln said in 1858 is even truer today: A house divided upon itself cannot stand. (Matthew 12:25). We're in trouble, folks.

Monker wrote:And, this is a hypocritical argument since the Republicans, at that time, were arguing that the dept didn't matter, that our government has ALWAYS run a deficit, etc. I guess it only matter when there is some other party in power.. And, I guess it doesn't matter that the Republicans took a SURPLUS and started us down this path of ruin. I believe it was Reagan who said that it would get worse before it got better. it was no different a 1 1/2 yrs ago...in fact, the Republicans left things a LOT worse then the Democrats did with Carter.
Republicans and conservatives like to compare to Obama to Hitler...
RocknRoll wrote:No way can Palin run in 2012. I'm actually looking at Costa Rica(safer) and I'll be there if Palin gets in.
conversationpc wrote:RocknRoll wrote:No way can Palin run in 2012. I'm actually looking at Costa Rica(safer) and I'll be there if Palin gets in.
This is just as ridiculous as the folks like Alec Baldwin saying they would move out of the country if Bush was re-elected in 2004. Come on.
conversationpc wrote:RocknRoll wrote:No way can Palin run in 2012. I'm actually looking at Costa Rica(safer) and I'll be there if Palin gets in.
This is just as ridiculous as the folks like Alec Baldwin saying they would move out of the country if Bush was re-elected in 2004. Come on.

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests