Moderator: Andrew
mikemarrs wrote:meanwhile the packers are 2-0 and they have this left.....
3 Mon, Sept. 27 at Chicago Bears ESPN 8:30 p.m.
4 Sun, Oct. 3 vs. Detroit Lions FOX 1 p.m.
5 Sun, Oct. 10 at Washington Redskins FOX 1 p.m.
6 Sun, Oct. 17 vs. Miami Dolphins CBS 1 p.m.
7 Sun, Oct. 24 vs. Minnesota Vikings NBC 8:20 p.m.
8 Sun, Oct. 31 at New York Jets FOX 1 p.m.
9 Sun, Nov. 7 vs. Dallas Cowboys NBC 8:20 p.m.
10 Bye
11 Sun, Nov. 21 at Minnesota Vikings FOX 1 p.m.
12 Sun, Nov. 28 at Atlanta Falcons FOX 1 p.m.
13 Sun, Dec. 5 vs. San Francisco 49ers FOX 1 p.m.
14 Sun, Dec. 12 at Detroit Lions FOX 1 p.m.
15 Sun, Dec. 19 at New England Patriots NBC 8:20 p.m.
16 Sun, Dec. 26 vs. New York Giants FOX 4:15 p.m.
17 Sun, Jan. 2 vs. Chicago Bears FOX 1 p.m.
meanwhile 2-0 chicago bears have this schedule left......
3 Mon, Sept. 27 vs. Green Bay Packers ESPN 8:30 p.m.
4 Sun, Oct. 3 at New York Giants NBC 8:20 p.m.
5 Sun, Oct. 10 at Carolina Panthers FOX 1 p.m.
6 Sun, Oct. 17 vs. Seattle Seahawks FOX 1 p.m.
7 Sun, Oct. 24 vs. Washington Redskins FOX 1 p.m.
8 Bye
9 Sun, Nov. 7 at Buffalo Bills FOX 1 p.m.
10 Sun, Nov. 14 vs. Minnesota Vikings FOX 1 p.m.
11 Thu, Nov. 18 at Miami Dolphins NFLN 8:20 p.m.
12 Sun, Nov. 28 vs. Philadelphia Eagles FOX 1 p.m.
13 Sun, Dec. 5 at Detroit Lions FOX 1 p.m.
14 Sun, Dec. 12 vs. New England Patriots CBS 1 p.m.
15 Mon, Dec. 20 at Minnesota Vikings ESPN 8:30 p.m.
16 Sun, Dec. 26 vs. New York Jets CBS 1 p.m.
17 Sun, Jan. 2 at Green Bay Packers FOX 1 p.m.
the NFC North is anyone's division at this point.
Everett wrote:Here's hoping the vikings go 0-8.
Not gonna happen but hey one can dream
mikemarrs wrote:in our thread here before the season i picked the green bay packers to win the north.i think they'll get it done.i had a feeling before the season minnesota would struggle.chicago has been a surprise as i didn't see them going 2-0.green bay is my super bowl pick this year.
YoungJRNY wrote:mikemarrs wrote:in our thread here before the season i picked the green bay packers to win the north.i think they'll get it done.i had a feeling before the season minnesota would struggle.chicago has been a surprise as i didn't see them going 2-0.green bay is my super bowl pick this year.
I was telling lights last season that if Green Bay could put the right men into that relentless 3-4 style defense, they will be on their dominating ways. It looks like they have finally arrived and their defense, led by the fierce Clay Matthews, are playing up to expectations. Rodgers is the stud QB and IMO, will be that next generation of elite QB's like Manning gives us now. If they can protect Rodgers and keep building around him, they will contend for the title for YEARS. My prediction is that Green Bay wins the SB this year and I'm sticking by it.
Ehwmatt wrote:Trav, I'm with you 100% on Flacco - I think you know that already. I haven't bought into him at all the last two years.
YoungJRNY wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Trav, I'm with you 100% on Flacco - I think you know that already. I haven't bought into him at all the last two years.
Defiantly. He just seems so lanky and club-footed and barely uses the talent around him and is very indecisive. He does make some impressive throws and could make any throw on the field but other than that I think he rely's on the deep ball way too often and that takes away from the player he could be and is a major cop-out. With Ray Rice & McGahee back there and Boldin, Mason, Heap, and T.J Houseyourmama then there's no doubt that they should be able to put more than 10 points on the board weekly. They get away from their run game way too often and gives Flacco too much he can handle throwing the ball 40 times and only having 150 yards to show for it. Terrible.
S2M wrote:Travis, the Jets didn't do anything to NE. I explained it in an earlier post. NE stopped going to Welker underneath. That's the ballgame right there. No run game, and trying to force the ball to Moss once Revis left....Agreed that NE defense is young and dumb, but so wasn't the '99 Rams. They just scored more points than their opponents. NE dropped the ball on play calling. Instead of playing possession ball, they chose to try and grab huge chunks of real estate on long bombs to Moss....
YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:Travis, the Jets didn't do anything to NE. I explained it in an earlier post. NE stopped going to Welker underneath. That's the ballgame right there. No run game, and trying to force the ball to Moss once Revis left....Agreed that NE defense is young and dumb, but so wasn't the '99 Rams. They just scored more points than their opponents. NE dropped the ball on play calling. Instead of playing possession ball, they chose to try and grab huge chunks of real estate on long bombs to Moss....
New England's passing game is New England's running game so that's not really a mystery. It's not like all of a sudden the Patriots just threw their hands up and decided to forget their weapons and stop calling the game they are use to call. The Patriots have been playing the same kind of ball for years with Brady under the helm and everyone labeled Bellichick a genius that can never do wrong. That's a typical Bellichick/Brady connection: go for the juggler rather than possess.
Don't you think it was the Rex Ryan defense that forced New England to go elsewhere with the football? It was more of the Jets than it was New England's play calling. Very rare do you see a New England offense struggle with play calling issues. Wonder why? Could it be that the Jets were taking away options? I think so. Give the Jets more credit.
My sigs beautiful. I don't care if we're called for 500 roughing the passers. After last season and how soft we have become during that stretch, that is beautiful. That is what you call a gang tackle and the whistle wasn't even blown and Young still had possession of the ball, he didn't release it. You could either have that or the refs calling every single hit on the women that call themselves quarterbacks like the Ravens had to endure against the Bengals. Tomlin said he wants his team to be violent. Nothing will stop us from hitting hard. Throw the flags if you want, we're coming after you. Old school football players like Ronni Lott, Dick Butkus, Jack Lambert, Mike Singleterry, or hell, even Ray Lewis will appreciate that slam.
S2M wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:Travis, the Jets didn't do anything to NE. I explained it in an earlier post. NE stopped going to Welker underneath. That's the ballgame right there. No run game, and trying to force the ball to Moss once Revis left....Agreed that NE defense is young and dumb, but so wasn't the '99 Rams. They just scored more points than their opponents. NE dropped the ball on play calling. Instead of playing possession ball, they chose to try and grab huge chunks of real estate on long bombs to Moss....
New England's passing game is New England's running game so that's not really a mystery. It's not like all of a sudden the Patriots just threw their hands up and decided to forget their weapons and stop calling the game they are use to call. The Patriots have been playing the same kind of ball for years with Brady under the helm and everyone labeled Bellichick a genius that can never do wrong. That's a typical Bellichick/Brady connection: go for the juggler rather than possess.
Don't you think it was the Rex Ryan defense that forced New England to go elsewhere with the football? It was more of the Jets than it was New England's play calling. Very rare do you see a New England offense struggle with play calling issues. Wonder why? Could it be that the Jets were taking away options? I think so. Give the Jets more credit.
My sigs beautiful. I don't care if we're called for 500 roughing the passers. After last season and how soft we have become during that stretch, that is beautiful. That is what you call a gang tackle and the whistle wasn't even blown and Young still had possession of the ball, he didn't release it. You could either have that or the refs calling every single hit on the women that call themselves quarterbacks like the Ravens had to endure against the Bengals. Tomlin said he wants his team to be violent. Nothing will stop us from hitting hard. Throw the flags if you want, we're coming after you. Old school football players like Ronni Lott, Dick Butkus, Jack Lambert, Mike Singleterry, or hell, even Ray Lewis will appreciate that slam.
I'm 100% positive Rex told his defense to knock Welker's block off....Eric Smith's dirty hit should've resulted in a penalty, ejection from the game, and a suspension....just like that dirty fuck Ryan Clark. Wes Welker runs rampant in the secondary....teams are afraid of him, and what he brings to Pats....Smith was trying to knock him out of the game, and he succeeded...I'm sure he has a concussion....
S2M wrote:Yeah, but Welker has NEVER had alligator arms, and Smith went for his head with a forearm shiver....PENALTY, EJECTION, SUSPENSION.
YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:Yeah, but Welker has NEVER had alligator arms, and Smith went for his head with a forearm shiver....PENALTY, EJECTION, SUSPENSION.
During the game these guys can't slow down and will use any kinds of techniques that were taught to them. I'm sure if is as bad as it was or is, he will be hearing from the league sooner rather than later. These are just guys doing their jobs but eventually, every player will be fined for something with the kind of direction this league is heading with hits.
As for the Clark hit on Welker, how do you know for a fact Clark didn't know the ball was nowhere near Welker? Welker has a history of scorching defense's across the middle and New England made a 16-0 living off of it at one time. Clark saw him and braced for an impact, not even locating the ball. It's just the way these dudes go about business. Football is a dirty game all around, these guys will do anything to instill fear.
"I try to hit everybody," Clark said yesterday, hours after learning the league judged his hit on Patriots receiver Wes Welker clean. "I don't care which one. I'll take them all, I don't turn any of them down. We're just going to go out there and play.
"Like I said Sunday, I thought the hit was clean," Clark said. "I was just playing football. It's good they said something like that but if you look at that situation, if we'd have lost that game, if that drive would have cost us the game, it would not have mattered much what they say after the fact."
"They will get smashed," Ward said of receivers going across the middle. "That comes with the territory. I'm just glad it wasn't me."
"A lot of people think it's a foul to leave your feet," Mike Pereira told the Boston Herald. "Launching is not a foul. ... It is a foul to hit with your helmet against a defenseless receiver. It is a foul to throw a forearm into the neck or head area of your opponent. I don't think either of those things happened. I'm not a fan of those high hits, but if you do it with your shoulder, you're OK."
YoungJRNY wrote:There isn't really any reason to go back and forth over this really. This won't be the last you see NFL safeties take WR's heads off over the middle. If a flag isn't thrown, that player will eventually hear from the league, no question about it. I don't sweat it, if it was Hines Ward going across the middle, your damn right someone is aiming to hurt him badly.
Here are some of the comments after the fact of the hit:
League comes clean: says Clark's hit was OK.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08339/932643-66.stm
Clark:"I try to hit everybody," Clark said yesterday, hours after learning the league judged his hit on Patriots receiver Wes Welker clean. "I don't care which one. I'll take them all, I don't turn any of them down. We're just going to go out there and play."Like I said Sunday, I thought the hit was clean," Clark said. "I was just playing football. It's good they said something like that but if you look at that situation, if we'd have lost that game, if that drive would have cost us the game, it would not have mattered much what they say after the fact."
Hines Ward:"They will get smashed," Ward said of receivers going across the middle. "That comes with the territory. I'm just glad it wasn't me."
The Boston Herald:"A lot of people think it's a foul to leave your feet," Mike Pereira told the Boston Herald. "Launching is not a foul. ... It is a foul to hit with your helmet against a defenseless receiver. It is a foul to throw a forearm into the neck or head area of your opponent. I don't think either of those things happened. I'm not a fan of those high hits, but if you do it with your shoulder, you're OK."
It is what it is. These players must have that mentality or they won't last long in the NFL.
lights1961 wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:There isn't really any reason to go back and forth over this really. This won't be the last you see NFL safeties take WR's heads off over the middle. If a flag isn't thrown, that player will eventually hear from the league, no question about it. I don't sweat it, if it was Hines Ward going across the middle, your damn right someone is aiming to hurt him badly.
Here are some of the comments after the fact of the hit:
League comes clean: says Clark's hit was OK.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08339/932643-66.stm
Clark:"I try to hit everybody," Clark said yesterday, hours after learning the league judged his hit on Patriots receiver Wes Welker clean. "I don't care which one. I'll take them all, I don't turn any of them down. We're just going to go out there and play."Like I said Sunday, I thought the hit was clean," Clark said. "I was just playing football. It's good they said something like that but if you look at that situation, if we'd have lost that game, if that drive would have cost us the game, it would not have mattered much what they say after the fact."
Hines Ward:"They will get smashed," Ward said of receivers going across the middle. "That comes with the territory. I'm just glad it wasn't me."
The Boston Herald:"A lot of people think it's a foul to leave your feet," Mike Pereira told the Boston Herald. "Launching is not a foul. ... It is a foul to hit with your helmet against a defenseless receiver. It is a foul to throw a forearm into the neck or head area of your opponent. I don't think either of those things happened. I'm not a fan of those high hits, but if you do it with your shoulder, you're OK."
It is what it is. These players must have that mentality or they won't last long in the NFL.
Favre was great at passing over the middle when he had Freedman and Brooks as his receiving core... those guys would get smashed bounce back up and Favre would do it again... over and over...
Rick
YoungJRNY wrote:
Oh man I remember watching that live! I about changed the channel after that one. How do you get to that level and be scared is beyond me. Hilarious.
S2M wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:
Oh man I remember watching that live! I about changed the channel after that one. How do you get to that level and be scared is beyond me. Hilarious.
Yeah, and who was the Redskin player getting ready to give him the shiver? None other than Mr. Ryan Clark.
YoungJRNY wrote:mikemarrs wrote:in our thread here before the season i picked the green bay packers to win the north.i think they'll get it done.i had a feeling before the season minnesota would struggle.chicago has been a surprise as i didn't see them going 2-0.green bay is my super bowl pick this year.
I was telling lights last season that if Green Bay could put the right men into that relentless 3-4 style defense, they will be on their dominating ways. It looks like they have finally arrived and their defense, led by the fierce Clay Matthews, are playing up to expectations. Rodgers is the stud QB and IMO, will be that next generation of elite QB's like Manning gives us now. If they can protect Rodgers and keep building around him, they will contend for the title for YEARS. My prediction is that Green Bay wins the SB this year and I'm sticking by it.
RPM wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:mikemarrs wrote:in our thread here before the season i picked the green bay packers to win the north.i think they'll get it done.i had a feeling before the season minnesota would struggle.chicago has been a surprise as i didn't see them going 2-0.green bay is my super bowl pick this year.
I was telling lights last season that if Green Bay could put the right men into that relentless 3-4 style defense, they will be on their dominating ways. It looks like they have finally arrived and their defense, led by the fierce Clay Matthews, are playing up to expectations. Rodgers is the stud QB and IMO, will be that next generation of elite QB's like Manning gives us now. If they can protect Rodgers and keep building around him, they will contend for the title for YEARS. My prediction is that Green Bay wins the SB this year and I'm sticking by it.
They will lose to the Bears Monday night. The same Bears who are not in your "TOP TEN"
NO running game, an excellent pass defense, however ill take Martz over capers. Rodgers is
very good, but without Grant, one dimensional.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests