President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

by **Saint John** » Sat Oct 08, 2011 3:33 pm

Someone needs to take one for the team and mow down these anti-Wall Street pussies. Go out and get jobs, scumbags. They're out there. Just like the doom and gloom bullshit of the lazy bastards while president Bush was in office, these fucks are reprehensible. The country is fine, aside from our debt. Whining about Wall Street is just misguided energy that would be better served pounding the pavement looking for a job. Either that or blow your fucking brains out! I prefer the latter, but the former will suffice. But quit the shameless belly aching!

by **Saint John** » Sun Oct 09, 2011 2:03 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Raw sewer: An unidentified man defecates on a NYPD patrol car in downtown Manhattan. HT/Dailymail.uk

Deano!!!

by **Behshad** » Sun Oct 09, 2011 2:05 am

Saint John wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
Raw sewer: An unidentified man defecates on a NYPD patrol car in downtown Manhattan. HT/Dailymail.uk

Deano!!!

by **Seven Wishes2** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 12:45 pm

Dude, I can't read that. My feeble liberal brain can't handle that massive screen. Help me, man!

by **Memorex** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:42 am

This article depressed me.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/aimless_obama_walks_alone_OUgoMTkORRJioLl7B6ZYmN

by **Saint John** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:49 am

Memorex wrote:This article depressed me.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/aimless_obama_walks_alone_OUgoMTkORRJioLl7B6ZYmN

I think it's a tell-tale sign that his presidency has had no direction, no consistency and no good ideas. And the worst part about it is that he's too stubborn to concede that his ideas won't/haven't work(ed). So he's isolated himself, looking to garner sympathy votes. But that's not going to work either. But, then again, this guy doesn't even know what work is.

by **RedWingFan** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:02 am

Saint John wrote:And the worst part about it is that he's too stubborn to concede that his ideas won't/haven't work(ed).

You're assuming he wanted his "stimulus" bill to lower unemployment. You're assuming that he wanted "Obamacare" to lower premiums.

What he's done is implemented all this stuff to make everything worse, and he's tried to blame others for it. Killing 2 birds with one stone, creating dependence and assigning blame to his enemies. Luckily a lot of the people who were stupid enough to vote for him aren't too stupid to see through his constant lies. (except for 7 Wishes and I'm sure ohsherrie)

He said himself, "I'd rather be a good 1 term president than a mediocre 2 term president"

Why on Earth would a good president not be re-elected? Obama's definition of a "good president" requires harming society for (what he believes to be) their own good. And deliberately governing against the will of the people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBsaF1kfv2I

by **Seven Wishes2** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:30 am

Saint John wrote:
Memorex wrote:This article depressed me.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/aimless_obama_walks_alone_OUgoMTkORRJioLl7B6ZYmN

I think it's a tell-tale sign that his presidency has had no direction, no consistency and no good ideas. And the worst part about it is that he's too stubborn to concede that his ideas won't/haven't work(ed). So he's isolated himself, looking to garner sympathy votes. But that's not going to work either. But, then again, this guy doesn't even know what work is.

Come on, Dan. Only the greatest Presidents, like OJ, find all the answers on the golf course.

He's been awful. The only question at this point is, can the GOP nominate someone who's not considered too radical to win the general election? I've been saying all along Romney would tear Obama a new one if he's the Republican candidate. Perry, at this point, would be about a 50/50 proposition.

by **Saint John** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:43 am

I think Herman Cain has the best ideas on the right (and left). And I find it odd that no one in the media is picking up the Herman Cain poll numbers and the possibility of him being the first black president. But they'd surely be all over this if he were a democrat.

by **conversationpc** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:21 am

Saint John wrote:I think Herman Cain has the best ideas on the right (and left). And I find it odd that no one in the media is picking up the Herman Cain poll numbers and the possibility of him being the first black president. But they'd surely be all over this if he were a democrat.

I like him more just about every time I hear from him. He's the only that seems to have any common sense and isn't just spewing canned answers.

by **Ehwmatt** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:38 am

conversationpc wrote:
Saint John wrote:I think Herman Cain has the best ideas on the right (and left). And I find it odd that no one in the media is picking up the Herman Cain poll numbers and the possibility of him being the first black president. But they'd surely be all over this if he were a democrat.

I like him more just about every time I hear from him. He's the only that seems to have any common sense and isn't just spewing canned answers.

Whatever "barrier" Barack Obama's election erased, the cop-out "Uncle Tom" accusation/barrier for black republicans/conservatives will remain an insurmountable barrier for the foreseeable future. Too many blacks have been raised believing that any of their ilk who oppose shit like affirmative action and government welfare entitlements are puppet Uncle Toms. That makes it all the easier for the liberal establishment to battle politically with people like Cain.

Don't believe me? Just go click on any news story about Colin Powell, Justice Clarence Thomas (Supreme Court), and any other conservative black politician and read the comments.

by **Gin and Tonic Sky** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:40 am

conversationpc wrote:
Saint John wrote:I think Herman Cain has the best ideas on the right (and left). And I find it odd that no one in the media is picking up the Herman Cain poll numbers and the possibility of him being the first black president. But they'd surely be all over this if he were a democrat.

I like him more just about every time I hear from him. He's the only that seems to have any common sense and isn't just spewing canned answers.

Whilst I would prefer one of the two libertarian candidates(Paul or Johnson). I'd have no problem supporting Cain- got some fresh ideas and not afraid to be bold about them, and I think that he'd unite the all the wings of the GOP.

However, I would suggest the time to put the guy under intense fire and a hot spotlight is RIGHT now. Because if the gets the nod , either the nomination or the Veep slot, the Media are going hit him extremely hard. and being in Obama's corner they wont start this until he is nominatined and its too late for the GOP to pick anyone else.

Thanks,

Matt

by **RedWingFan** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:19 pm

This just in from the "global warming" wing of the scientific community. It ALSO contains absolute, indisputable, irrefutable proof, that the existence of the Yeti is 100% FACT!!!! :lol:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/1 ... 32#s388533

by **Seven Wishes2** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:37 pm

Dude, there is no "global warming wing" of the scientific community. The scientific community is 99% united in its knowledge that humankind is at least partly responsible for climate change.

Great article, though. Yahoos.

by **The_Noble_Cause** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:44 am

Seven Wishes wrote:I've been saying all along Romney would tear Obama a new one if he's the Republican candidate.

Romney has no credibility w/ anybody. Cain would win in a landslide. Like Ron Paul, the media and the establishment are trying to decide whether to A) buy him off, or B) marginalize him.

by **conversationpc** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:22 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Seven Wishes wrote:I've been saying all along Romney would tear Obama a new one if he's the Republican candidate.

Romney has no credibility w/ anybody. Cain would win in a landslide. Like Ron Paul, the media and the establishment are trying to decide whether to A) buy him off, or B) marginalize him.

Agreed!

by **AlteredDNA** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:36 am

conversationpc wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Seven Wishes wrote:I've been saying all along Romney would tear Obama a new one if he's the Republican candidate.

Romney has no credibility w/ anybody. Cain would win in a landslide. Like Ron Paul, the media and the establishment are trying to decide whether to A) buy him off, or B) marginalize him.

Agreed!

Ditto as well, although I do think the establishment has pretty much settled on Romney...

by **Gin and Tonic Sky** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 5:11 am

AlteredDNA wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Seven Wishes wrote:I've been saying all along Romney would tear Obama a new one if he's the Republican candidate.

Romney has no credibility w/ anybody. Cain would win in a landslide. Like Ron Paul, the media and the establishment are trying to decide whether to A) buy him off, or B) marginalize him.

Agreed!

Ditto as well, although I do think the establishment has pretty much settled on Romney...

Agree with the consensus of opinion here too. I just don't see Romney winning anything.

by **Rockindeano** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 5:27 am

Morons(Righties)...the next election isn't in the cards for you.

Why the Hell you think the big guns of your party aren't taking a shot this time around? Christie, Bush, Bloomburg, Trump, Palin, etc...they want no part of Obama? Why? I have no idea personally. I think he is vulnerable but there must be something we can't see that is telling these republicans to not run this year. In the case of Christie and Palin, I can see why they said no. If they fail, they can't come back to politics, being governors. There has to be "something" that Obama has "locked in" to ensure a second term. I just hope Christie and Palin and the others know that in 2016 they get Hillary instead of a soft Obama. Personally, I would take my shot this year rather than face her in 4.

It's clear the White house would be happiest if Romney was not the nominee, but on the other side, they don't seem to like him. The WH wants Perry, Newt, Paul or Bachman, as that would be a cakewalk. if I were Obama, I would fear Cain, as he would split the black vote.

by **KenTheDude** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 5:29 am

Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:
AlteredDNA wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Seven Wishes wrote:I've been saying all along Romney would tear Obama a new one if he's the Republican candidate.

Romney has no credibility w/ anybody. Cain would win in a landslide. Like Ron Paul, the media and the establishment are trying to decide whether to A) buy him off, or B) marginalize him.

Agreed!

Ditto as well, although I do think the establishment has pretty much settled on Romney...

Agree with the consensus of opinion here too. I just don't see Romney winning anything.

Romney is just 1 or 2 notches above a Democrat. An improvement, but not nearly enough for me. Herman Cain is the man.

by **Gin and Tonic Sky** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 5:40 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Why the Hell you think the big guns of your party aren't taking a shot this time around? Christie, Bush, Bloomburg, Trump, Palin, etc...they want no part of Obama? Why? I have no idea personally. .

You actually hit on an interesting point. I think there are two possible reasons:

1) To win Obama wil have to run the most racially devisive mean spirited campaign ever. I dont think any candiate wants to be caught in the middle of that .

2)And if they did happen to win, why would you want it? I worry about what Christie Bush , Trump , Huckabee, Daniels, Barbour and the other guys in the know might see coming down the Turnpike. I think they expect that the next four to six years might be so horrible in the world (Eurozone break up , Double dip II, Middle East War) Who would want to become president and be thought of by history as a rolled up version of James Buchanan, Herbert Hoover, and Jimmy Carter. Scary if they wont chance it. Really

So you have two types of candidates left. Losers who face their only and last chance (Romney Perry, Gingrich, and Sanitorum) and real men of principle (Paul, Johnson, Cain) who could make a differnce but who the establishment wont let win.

by **KenTheDude** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:16 am

Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Why the Hell you think the big guns of your party aren't taking a shot this time around? Christie, Bush, Bloomburg, Trump, Palin, etc...they want no part of Obama? Why? I have no idea personally. .

You actually hit on an interesting point. I think there are two possible reasons:

1) To win Obama wil have to run the most racially devisive mean spirited campaign ever. I dont think any candiate wants to be caught in the middle of that .

2)And if they did happen to win, why would you want it? I worry about what Christie Bush , Trump , Huckabee, Daniels, Barbour and the other guys in the know might see coming down the Turnpike. I think they expect that the next four to six years might be so horrible in the world (Eurozone break up , Double dip II, Middle East War) Who would want to become president and be thought of by history as a rolled up version of James Buchanan, Herbert Hoover, and Jimmy Carter. Scary if they wont chance it. Really

So you have two types of candidates left. Losers who face their only and last chance (Romney Perry, Gingrich, and Sanitorum) and real men of principle (Paul, Johnson, Cain) who could make a difference but who the establishment wont let win.

Nail on the head right there. Nicely stated.

by **slucero** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:02 pm

KenTheDude wrote:
Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Why the Hell you think the big guns of your party aren't taking a shot this time around? Christie, Bush, Bloomburg, Trump, Palin, etc...they want no part of Obama? Why? I have no idea personally. .

You actually hit on an interesting point. I think there are two possible reasons:

1) To win Obama wil have to run the most racially devisive mean spirited campaign ever. I dont think any candiate wants to be caught in the middle of that .

2)And if they did happen to win, why would you want it? I worry about what Christie Bush , Trump , Huckabee, Daniels, Barbour and the other guys in the know might see coming down the Turnpike. I think they expect that the next four to six years might be so horrible in the world (Eurozone break up , Double dip II, Middle East War) Who would want to become president and be thought of by history as a rolled up version of James Buchanan, Herbert Hoover, and Jimmy Carter. Scary if they wont chance it. Really

So you have two types of candidates left. Losers who face their only and last chance (Romney Perry, Gingrich, and Sanitorum) and real men of principle (Paul, Johnson, Cain) who could make a difference but who the establishment wont let win.

Nail on the head right there. Nicely stated.

... no one wants to be POTUS in a Depression... and the 2012 winner will likely get the full blame..

by **Rockindeano** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:27 pm

slucero wrote:
KenTheDude wrote:
Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Why the Hell you think the big guns of your party aren't taking a shot this time around? Christie, Bush, Bloomburg, Trump, Palin, etc...they want no part of Obama? Why? I have no idea personally. .

You actually hit on an interesting point. I think there are two possible reasons:

1) To win Obama wil have to run the most racially devisive mean spirited campaign ever. I dont think any candiate wants to be caught in the middle of that .

2)And if they did happen to win, why would you want it? I worry about what Christie Bush , Trump , Huckabee, Daniels, Barbour and the other guys in the know might see coming down the Turnpike. I think they expect that the next four to six years might be so horrible in the world (Eurozone break up , Double dip II, Middle East War) Who would want to become president and be thought of by history as a rolled up version of James Buchanan, Herbert Hoover, and Jimmy Carter. Scary if they wont chance it. Really

So you have two types of candidates left. Losers who face their only and last chance (Romney Perry, Gingrich, and Sanitorum) and real men of principle (Paul, Johnson, Cain) who could make a difference but who the establishment wont let win.

Nail on the head right there. Nicely stated.

... no one wants to be POTUS in a Depression... and the 2012 winner will likely get the full blame..

If you assholes would actually put country first, and pass the jobs Act, we could avoid a second recession or gasp, a depression. There isn't a single fucking reason the republicans should veto any part of Obama's Jobs Bill except that you want HIM to fail.

Gutless sonsofbitches. Really anti American motherfuckers the republicans and their ilk are.

by **slucero** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:33 pm

Rockindeano wrote:
slucero wrote:
KenTheDude wrote:
Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Why the Hell you think the big guns of your party aren't taking a shot this time around? Christie, Bush, Bloomburg, Trump, Palin, etc...they want no part of Obama? Why? I have no idea personally. .

You actually hit on an interesting point. I think there are two possible reasons:

1) To win Obama wil have to run the most racially devisive mean spirited campaign ever. I dont think any candiate wants to be caught in the middle of that .

2)And if they did happen to win, why would you want it? I worry about what Christie Bush , Trump , Huckabee, Daniels, Barbour and the other guys in the know might see coming down the Turnpike. I think they expect that the next four to six years might be so horrible in the world (Eurozone break up , Double dip II, Middle East War) Who would want to become president and be thought of by history as a rolled up version of James Buchanan, Herbert Hoover, and Jimmy Carter. Scary if they wont chance it. Really

So you have two types of candidates left. Losers who face their only and last chance (Romney Perry, Gingrich, and Sanitorum) and real men of principle (Paul, Johnson, Cain) who could make a difference but who the establishment wont let win.

Nail on the head right there. Nicely stated.

... no one wants to be POTUS in a Depression... and the 2012 winner will likely get the full blame..

If you assholes would actually put country first, and pass the jobs Act, we could avoid a second recession or gasp, a depression. There isn't a single fucking reason the republicans should veto any part of Obama's Jobs Bill except that you want HIM to fail.

Gutless sonsofbitches. Really anti American motherfuckers the republicans and their ilk are.

yo Deano... welcome back - hope yer doing OK...

you'll need to blame the Dem led Senate for this... as they blocked it....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 05548.html

by **Rockindeano** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:43 pm

Nice deflection. It was DOA in the House anyway and the dissenting handful of Dems(Blue Dogs) knew that so why go on record as voting FOR it?

The bill contains values that the GOP has long stood for but now?...magically are opposed to. Fuck you. I hope Obama beats the black off Cain's sorry pizza making ass, or wipes the hair gel off Willard's lettuce because you guys are ALL frauds and assholes. The GOP has no care for the country at all. Just beat Obama Baby! That's all they care about.

by **slucero** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:48 pm

Rockindeano wrote:Nice deflection. It was DOA in the House anyway and the dissenting handful of Dems(Blue Dogs) knew that so why go on record as voting FOR it?

The bill contains values that the GOP has long stood for but now?...magically are opposed to. Fuck you. I hope Obama beats the black off Cain's sorry pizza making ass, or wipes the hair gel off Willard's lettuce because you guys are ALL frauds and assholes. The GOP has no care for the country at all. Just beat Obama Baby! That's all they care about.

simple... The Senate votes on it... passes it... then Pelosi and Reid can blame the Republican House for "failing the American people"...

and if you wanna talk FRAUDS.. this outta be an eye opener for ya..

The sooner you figure out that Washington politicians. Dems and Reps alike, serve the same Master... the sooner you'll figure out who to really be mad at... until then you're playing directly into both parties hands...

and Fuck you too...

by **KenTheDude** » Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:48 pm

Rockindeano wrote:
slucero wrote:
KenTheDude wrote:
Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Why the Hell you think the big guns of your party aren't taking a shot this time around? Christie, Bush, Bloomburg, Trump, Palin, etc...they want no part of Obama? Why? I have no idea personally. .

You actually hit on an interesting point. I think there are two possible reasons:

1) To win Obama wil have to run the most racially devisive mean spirited campaign ever. I dont think any candiate wants to be caught in the middle of that .

2)And if they did happen to win, why would you want it? I worry about what Christie Bush , Trump , Huckabee, Daniels, Barbour and the other guys in the know might see coming down the Turnpike. I think they expect that the next four to six years might be so horrible in the world (Eurozone break up , Double dip II, Middle East War) Who would want to become president and be thought of by history as a rolled up version of James Buchanan, Herbert Hoover, and Jimmy Carter. Scary if they wont chance it. Really

So you have two types of candidates left. Losers who face their only and last chance (Romney Perry, Gingrich, and Sanitorum) and real men of principle (Paul, Johnson, Cain) who could make a difference but who the establishment wont let win.

Nail on the head right there. Nicely stated.

... no one wants to be POTUS in a Depression... and the 2012 winner will likely get the full blame..

If you assholes would actually put country first, and pass the jobs Act, we could avoid a second recession or gasp, a depression. There isn't a single fucking reason the republicans should veto any part of Obama's Jobs Bill except that you want HIM to fail.

Gutless sonsofbitches. Really anti American motherfuckers the republicans and their ilk are.

LMAO!! How did this first stimulus pile of shit work? Taxing the rich that own the companies that would provide the needed jobs is insane. You slap a tax on them and they'll seal up tighter than Fort Knox. They won't hire a mail room boy. That Jobs Act just gives more money to the unions that are in bed with Obama. That's all it does. Why not start taxing unions? Why do they get a free ride? They are nothing more than a greedy, money-making entity nowadays anyway. And how are we going to pay for this? We already owe everybody & their brother! Coming back and calling people assholes & frauds is a weak defense at best. Spend, spend, spend! Liberals are laughable. I'm not rich by any means but I paid over $40,000 in taxes last year. And that doesn't count sales tax on things I bought or what my wife paid in!! I think that's fucking plenty!! And to think that my money went to subsidize a failed solar energy company to the tune of $500 million pisses me off. Where did the first stimulus money go? Nobody knows! Oh wait, I know. It went to build a $10 million high school in California that never opened because they don't have enough money to run it. Or how about replacing all the windows in a visitor's center in a park that's been closed for years? Wasted fucking money & you want to spend MORE? How about better use of the money they already have? What a concept!!

by **Behshad** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:38 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Rockindeano wrote: I hope Obama beats the black off Cain's sorry pizza making ass, or wipes the hair gel off Willard's lettuce because you guys are ALL frauds and assholes.

O is done dude...get over it already...He's Dead Jim!

Obama at Pittsburgh 2008 vs 2011

As good old Madsplash would always say : We'll See....

by **RedWingFan** » Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:57 am

Rockindeano wrote:If you assholes would actually put country first, and pass the jobs Act, we could avoid a second recession or gasp, a depression. There isn't a single fucking reason the republicans should veto any part of Obama's Jobs Bill except that you want HIM to fail.

Gutless sonsofbitches. Really anti American motherfuckers the republicans and their ilk are.

Well there goes your hope of ever blaming your political retardation on the alcohol.

MR

President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

Who is online