President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby artist4perry » Thu Nov 10, 2011 2:07 pm

Seven Wishes wrote:
artist4perry wrote:I am saying would you like it if your accused, and trust me they can get women out of the woodwork if paid enough dough to do so, and you are considered guilty before all the facts are in? Now as I said, if he is guilty then let that show.

REALLY? Six different women! Wait until they find out who conceived and actualized THIS conspiracy!

artist4perry wrote:I just know Obama is not the golden boy he was proclaimed to be. I know you cannot borrow and spend your way out of a financial mess. That seems to be his strategy and it is bankrupting this country.

Since 90% of the deficit is attribuatable to Bush and his policies, and most economists believe the ONLY way out of a recession is for the government to spend money on job creation, I'm not giving you this bogey. You're just dead wrong on this one.

artist4perry wrote:Seriously what does a Gay Senator have to do with Herman Cain's accusers? That made me laugh, what a ADD addition to your rant! LOL There have probably been quite a few gay Senators all through out history on both sides of the parties, and who cares? I don't vote only for a party. I have voted both ways in my lifetime and unlike many here I vote according to who I think will do the least amount of damage. Everyone should. Screw the party lines.

If you can't discern the difference between the part of my post that dealt with Cain versus the part that dealt with the GOP as a whole, it's no wonder you vote Republican. The fact is, the tide is turning nationally, and your party is in trouble. And seriously, if you want anyone to believe you've ONCE voted for a Democrat, you'll need to show ONE OUNCE of moderism on ANY issues.

artist4perry wrote:Here is a little tidbit about your precious party, did you realize during the day the some Democrats were pro-slavery? They changed their minds when they decided they could get more votes by changing their tunes. No party is above shame.

You do realize we're in the year 2011, and not 1842, right? Germans once supported the Nazi party, too. Times have changed.


I never said I was Republican. If you would have not plucked out only key things I said you would know I have voted for either side throughout my life. I vote for the lesser of the evils.

How many jobs have been created by throwing BILLONS of dollars to sources that cannot seem to manage to account for where the money went much less show high employment rates? Where's the beef chief? The jobs created were temporary mostly at best, and hands went out for more money. Tell me if your daughter has a credit card spending problem do you give her another credit card to pay for the first? She will just run out and spend more on the second one. Giving Congress money to play with is like letting a baby play with fire. Disaster is inevitable.
Bush was an idiot who screwed up the economy, Obama just came behind him to add to the surplus of debt, we swim in it thanks to his help.

I just said I am not voting for Obama, and yes I am aware that the Democrats have changed their tune about slavery, but they have changed their tunes to whatever gets them voted many times. I also put that Liberal Democrats of the time were not pro slavery. :roll: I was pointing out that both parties have their skeletons in the closet. You should vote for the best man, not a party. The parties are so corrupted on both sides they both stink to high heaven.

As for Herman Cain I am not voting for him, I just laugh at how people thought Clinton was the Darling of the White house. Clinton was a known womanizer, and he was accused of many a unwanted advance in his day. I live in this state and I am quite aware of his wonderfulness. :roll: :roll: I was glad when he became a New Yorker. I wish he would come back and hitch a truck to that ugly glass trailer he calls a library and haul it up north but for good.
Image


If Herman Cain is found to be a creep then people should not back him. I think weather he is guilty or not, he will be guilty in the eye of the public. If your accused you must be guilty right? I will remember that if you commit a crime. :wink: :lol: And you can put that in your pipe and smoke it!




Seriously SW you take all this as though I am attacking you, I am joking with you some but I disagree with your insight of the purity of the Democratic party. Open your eyes and see them for what they are..........same as the GOP............human and with feet of clay.
Last edited by artist4perry on Thu Nov 10, 2011 2:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby RossValoryRocks » Thu Nov 10, 2011 2:16 pm

So 7...this doesn't bother you in the least?

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-donor-discu ... 29142.html

WASHINGTON (AP) — A major donor to President Barack Obama discussed with White House officials a solar energy company that received a half-billion dollar federal loan and later went bankrupt, newly released emails show.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby artist4perry » Thu Nov 10, 2011 2:26 pm

Paula Corbin Jones (born Paula Rosalee Corbin; September 17, 1966) is a former Arkansas state employee who sued U.S. President Bill Clinton for sexual harassment. The lawsuit was dismissed before trial on the grounds that Jones failed to demonstrate any damages. However, while the dismissal was being appealed, Clinton entered into an out-of-court settlement, agreeing to pay Jones and her attorneys a total of $850,000.

Three women publicly accused Bill Clinton of far more serious instances of sexual harassment in the 1990's.

All I am saying is where there is smoke.....there is fire. :P :wink: :lol:

Is an accusation of more than one woman make you guilty? Then if so, Clinton is equally a monster. If Cain did what he is accused of, he is a monster as well and we are well rid of him.
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby S2M » Thu Nov 10, 2011 2:42 pm

Let's get real here. I'm really tired of women crying about being called things. I agree that physical contact is wrong, but if a guy says you have a nice ass, rack, or whatever - just be fucking glad someone is aknowledging you.... :roll:

SugarTits is my current fave.... :lol:
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby artist4perry » Thu Nov 10, 2011 2:45 pm

S2M wrote:Let's get real here. I'm really tired of women crying about being called things. I agree that physical contact is wrong, but if a guy says you have a nice ass, rack, or whatever - just be fucking glad someone is aknowledging you.... :roll:

SugarTits is my current fave.... :lol:


Is that what your calling your boyfriend these days? :wink: :lol: :P :P
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby S2M » Thu Nov 10, 2011 2:54 pm

artist4perry wrote:
S2M wrote:Let's get real here. I'm really tired of women crying about being called things. I agree that physical contact is wrong, but if a guy says you have a nice ass, rack, or whatever - just be fucking glad someone is aknowledging you.... :roll:

SugarTits is my current fave.... :lol:


Is that what your calling your boyfriend these days? :wink: :lol: :P :P


Don't you have an egghead, or a bespectacled bald man to paint, or something, Sugar Tits?
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Rick » Thu Nov 10, 2011 5:45 pm

artist4perry wrote:
S2M wrote:Let's get real here. I'm really tired of women crying about being called things. I agree that physical contact is wrong, but if a guy says you have a nice ass, rack, or whatever - just be fucking glad someone is aknowledging you.... :roll:

SugarTits is my current fave.... :lol:


Is that what your calling your boyfriend these days? :wink: :lol: :P :P


LOL Sean has a point, to a point. Some things are better thought than said though. For example... Not too many days ago, I brought a stroller up to the jetbridge and set it up for whomever might come off the airplane, and it happened to be an incredibly attractive young mother. When she stooped over to place her child in the stroller, her boob fell out of her top. I mean fell out, meaning "Wow, there's a fully exposed titty". She, with all of the grace in the world, fixed herself, and said, with a knowing smile "Thanks for setting up the stroller". I couldn't speak.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby artist4perry » Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:00 pm

S2M wrote:
artist4perry wrote:
S2M wrote:Let's get real here. I'm really tired of women crying about being called things. I agree that physical contact is wrong, but if a guy says you have a nice ass, rack, or whatever - just be fucking glad someone is aknowledging you.... :roll:

SugarTits is my current fave.... :lol:


Is that what your calling your boyfriend these days? :wink: :lol: :P :P


Don't you have an egghead, or a bespectacled bald man to paint, or something, Sugar Tits?


I am not your boyfriend S2M! :shock:

Rick, I bet you were at a loss for words. :shock:

Pop goes the booby! :oops: :oops: :oops: :wink: :lol:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby conversationpc » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:03 am

Rick wrote:LOL Sean has a point, to a point. Some things are better thought than said though. For example... Not too many days ago, I brought a stroller up to the jetbridge and set it up for whomever might come off the airplane, and it happened to be an incredibly attractive young mother. When she stooped over to place her child in the stroller, her boob fell out of her top. I mean fell out, meaning "Wow, there's a fully exposed titty". She, with all of the grace in the world, fixed herself, and said, with a knowing smile "Thanks for setting up the stroller". I couldn't speak.


:shock: :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby slucero » Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:05 am

Rick wrote:
artist4perry wrote:
S2M wrote:Let's get real here. I'm really tired of women crying about being called things. I agree that physical contact is wrong, but if a guy says you have a nice ass, rack, or whatever - just be fucking glad someone is aknowledging you.... :roll:

SugarTits is my current fave.... :lol:


Is that what your calling your boyfriend these days? :wink: :lol: :P :P


LOL Sean has a point, to a point. Some things are better thought than said though. For example... Not too many days ago, I brought a stroller up to the jetbridge and set it up for whomever might come off the airplane, and it happened to be an incredibly attractive young mother. When she stooped over to place her child in the stroller, her boob fell out of her top. I mean fell out, meaning "Wow, there's a fully exposed titty". She, with all of the grace in the world, fixed herself, and said, with a knowing smile "Thanks for setting up the stroller". I couldn't speak.



...a known side effect of a fully erect weiner is the temporary loss of speaking ability... :wink:

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:21 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:(To 7 Wishes)

You are seriously trying to predict and election 1 year out??? 2 months ago and Obama was getting beating handily by "Generic Republican"

Really dude, get Rachel Madows ponderous clit out of your mouth, and wake up...it really doesn't matter WHO wins...we are fucked.


Egghead,

Point 1- You and I argued the last election. In fact I bet you 3 dollars for every electoral college vote Obama won by and I remember saying a good 1+ year out, that Obama would win by 200 ev's. Without checking, I think I was off by 4?
I'll say it again this year. NO WAY you righties win. People see what's going on. They see the GOP for what it is: out of touch and obstructionist. They see the awful GOP Congress as well, shit. Then they turn on the GOP debates and see the cast of the bar goers in Star Wars. Not ONE of those people should be taken seriously. Rick, how many agencies you gonna cut man, 3? Which 3? LOL.

Point 2- As for Maddow, she is by far, better rehearsed and researched than anyone on Fox news. It's not even close.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby RossValoryRocks » Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:26 am

Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:(To 7 Wishes)

You are seriously trying to predict and election 1 year out??? 2 months ago and Obama was getting beating handily by "Generic Republican"

Really dude, get Rachel Madows ponderous clit out of your mouth, and wake up...it really doesn't matter WHO wins...we are fucked.


Egghead,

Point 1- You and I argued the last election. In fact I bet you 3 dollars for every electoral college vote Obama won by and I remember saying a good 1+ year out, that Obama would win by 200 ev's. Without checking, I think I was off by 4?
I'll say it again this year. NO WAY you righties win. People see what's going on. They see the GOP for what it is: out of touch and obstructionist. They see the awful GOP Congress as well, shit. Then they turn on the GOP debates and see the cast of the bar goers in Star Wars. Not ONE of those people should be taken seriously. Rick, how many agencies you gonna cut man, 3? Which 3? LOL.

Point 2- As for Maddow, she is by far, better rehearsed and researched than anyone on Fox news. It's not even close.


Ahh yes...one year out??? One year out your said HILLARY was going to be the next President...as a matter of fact you said something to the effect of Obama not having a chance of getting the nomination. Yes you correctly predicted the outcome, but only AFTER McCain imploded with the "I am suspending my campaign" bit, and at that point McCain was LEADING by 3 points...and I said right then McCain was done...go look it up.

The GOP Congress??? HAHAHAHAHA! You mean Harry Reid who won't even bring shit to the floor for a vote because he knows he would have enough defections from his own ranks that the legislation would pass...the Republicans aren't being obstructionist, Harry Reid is...if he had any balls as all he would let items get voted on and leave it Obama to veto, but he won't do that because he is as corrupt as the come.

As for Madow...I didn't even bring up Fox, I don't even watch Fox...she is a militant left leaning lesbian, not that I care she munches rug, but she is so far left she makes you look like a long lost Bush family member. I was just throwing the same kind of "you can't think for yourself" comment that 7 likes to use against everyone...try and tarnish by equating one "bad" person with another regardless of fact.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:59 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:(To 7 Wishes)

You are seriously trying to predict and election 1 year out??? 2 months ago and Obama was getting beating handily by "Generic Republican"

Really dude, get Rachel Madows ponderous clit out of your mouth, and wake up...it really doesn't matter WHO wins...we are fucked.


Egghead,

Point 1- You and I argued the last election. In fact I bet you 3 dollars for every electoral college vote Obama won by and I remember saying a good 1+ year out, that Obama would win by 200 ev's. Without checking, I think I was off by 4?
I'll say it again this year. NO WAY you righties win. People see what's going on. They see the GOP for what it is: out of touch and obstructionist. They see the awful GOP Congress as well, shit. Then they turn on the GOP debates and see the cast of the bar goers in Star Wars. Not ONE of those people should be taken seriously. Rick, how many agencies you gonna cut man, 3? Which 3? LOL.

Point 2- As for Maddow, she is by far, better rehearsed and researched than anyone on Fox news. It's not even close.


Ahh yes...one year out??? One year out your said HILLARY was going to be the next President...as a matter of fact you said something to the effect of Obama not having a chance of getting the nomination. Yes you correctly predicted the outcome, but only AFTER McCain imploded with the "I am suspending my campaign" bit, and at that point McCain was LEADING by 3 points...and I said right then McCain was done...go look it up.

The GOP Congress??? HAHAHAHAHA! You mean Harry Reid who won't even bring shit to the floor for a vote because he knows he would have enough defections from his own ranks that the legislation would pass...the Republicans aren't being obstructionist, Harry Reid is...if he had any balls as all he would let items get voted on and leave it Obama to veto, but he won't do that because he is as corrupt as the come.

As for Madow...I didn't even bring up Fox, I don't even watch Fox...she is a militant left leaning lesbian, not that I care she munches rug, but she is so far left she makes you look like a long lost Bush family member. I was just throwing the same kind of "you can't think for yourself" comment that 7 likes to use against everyone...try and tarnish by equating one "bad" person with another regardless of fact.



Stop wasting Andrew's bandwidth.

I was right, you were wrong, scoreboard.

Say, I'll wager you again, at 3 bucks per ev. ???

Also, if YOU are going to type with a straight face that Harry Reid is the obstructionist, then I have a former Penn State defensive coordinator you can hire over at Pitt. Look, the public blames the GOP for the obstruction, 56% vs Obama at 32%. Do the math.

Let me know on the wager. I am ready, pissed and looking to slay more ass.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Rick » Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:53 am

I'm going to waste a little more of it. :lol:

Image
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby RossValoryRocks » Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:01 am

Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:(To 7 Wishes)

You are seriously trying to predict and election 1 year out??? 2 months ago and Obama was getting beating handily by "Generic Republican"

Really dude, get Rachel Madows ponderous clit out of your mouth, and wake up...it really doesn't matter WHO wins...we are fucked.


Egghead,

Point 1- You and I argued the last election. In fact I bet you 3 dollars for every electoral college vote Obama won by and I remember saying a good 1+ year out, that Obama would win by 200 ev's. Without checking, I think I was off by 4?
I'll say it again this year. NO WAY you righties win. People see what's going on. They see the GOP for what it is: out of touch and obstructionist. They see the awful GOP Congress as well, shit. Then they turn on the GOP debates and see the cast of the bar goers in Star Wars. Not ONE of those people should be taken seriously. Rick, how many agencies you gonna cut man, 3? Which 3? LOL.

Point 2- As for Maddow, she is by far, better rehearsed and researched than anyone on Fox news. It's not even close.


Ahh yes...one year out??? One year out your said HILLARY was going to be the next President...as a matter of fact you said something to the effect of Obama not having a chance of getting the nomination. Yes you correctly predicted the outcome, but only AFTER McCain imploded with the "I am suspending my campaign" bit, and at that point McCain was LEADING by 3 points...and I said right then McCain was done...go look it up.

The GOP Congress??? HAHAHAHAHA! You mean Harry Reid who won't even bring shit to the floor for a vote because he knows he would have enough defections from his own ranks that the legislation would pass...the Republicans aren't being obstructionist, Harry Reid is...if he had any balls as all he would let items get voted on and leave it Obama to veto, but he won't do that because he is as corrupt as the come.

As for Madow...I didn't even bring up Fox, I don't even watch Fox...she is a militant left leaning lesbian, not that I care she munches rug, but she is so far left she makes you look like a long lost Bush family member. I was just throwing the same kind of "you can't think for yourself" comment that 7 likes to use against everyone...try and tarnish by equating one "bad" person with another regardless of fact.



Stop wasting Andrew's bandwidth.

I was right, you were wrong, scoreboard.

Say, I'll wager you again, at 3 bucks per ev. ???

Also, if YOU are going to type with a straight face that Harry Reid is the obstructionist, then I have a former Penn State defensive coordinator you can hire over at Pitt. Look, the public blames the GOP for the obstruction, 56% vs Obama at 32%. Do the math.

Let me know on the wager. I am ready, pissed and looking to slay more ass.


I learned to hold opinions not wager them...of course you didn't ANSWER a single one of my statements...regardless of whom the public blames (Source on that please) the facts are Harry Reid won't let the Senate vote on ANY of the legislation sent over to the Senate from the house...THAT is obstructionist.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Seven Wishes2 » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:33 pm

Congress is more dysfunctional than the Bundys.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe."
---Albert Einstein
User avatar
Seven Wishes2
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1621
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:49 am
Location: Charlotte, NC

Postby RossValoryRocks » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:40 pm

Seven Wishes wrote:Congress is more dysfunctional than the Bundys.


Something you and I agree 100% on!
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Seven Wishes2 » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:57 pm

You start to get queued into that realization when you can see that both parties can make legitimate claims about the other, whether it be obstructionism, altruism, or philosophical exclusivism.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe."
---Albert Einstein
User avatar
Seven Wishes2
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1621
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:49 am
Location: Charlotte, NC

Postby slucero » Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:17 pm

Image

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby slucero » Mon Nov 14, 2011 3:59 pm

More examples of why what is wrong in Washington is NOT about parties... it's about morality...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-uefCvt ... ideo_title

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUmfy1cs ... ideo_title

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby steveo777 » Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:26 pm

slucero wrote:Image


If you want to go down on something, I'm sure Deano would post up a picture of his crank for you. :lol:
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby Rick » Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:29 pm

steveo777 wrote:
slucero wrote:Image


If you want to go down on something, I'm sure Deano would post up a picture of his crank for you. :lol:


:lol: :lol: :lol:
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby slucero » Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:47 pm

steveo777 wrote:
slucero wrote:Image


If you want to go down on something, I'm sure Deano would post up a picture of his crank for you. :lol:



Read what it's pointing to dipshit...

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby hoagiepete » Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:21 am

Nice to see 60 Minutes do a non-partisan piece. Pelosi is as corrupt as the best of them. She's hilarious trying to wiggle out of it. What a spoiled, sliced, stretched, and injected ditz.

They get up there on the hill for so long they begin to think we're all brainless and they can say and do anything. I'm talking Rs and Ds.

It is criminal there are no insider trading laws in place for the legislative branch of government. How many congressmen go to DC slightly better than well to do, and leave as multi-millionaires? Someone should compare net worth as a freshman as to when they leave office. It would be an interesting study.
hoagiepete
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1610
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:16 am

Postby Rick » Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:38 am

What do you think about this guy?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEArFmRDtrw
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby parfait » Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:13 am

Here's a real leader for you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czoRE39K-GE

Fiscally conservative, socially liberal and does everything he can to uphold the integrity and history of his country.
User avatar
parfait
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:38 pm
Location: France

Postby Rockindeano » Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:27 am

parfait wrote:Here's a real leader for you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czoRE39K-GE

Fiscally conservative, socially liberal and does everything he can to uphold the integrity and history of his country.


No offense P, I like you, a lot more than others do on this noard, but Zarkosy is a piece of old, dried up jizz. He can go fuck himself, however, he does fuck hot trim doesn't he?
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Rockindeano » Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:36 am

Hey Cons-

Hahaha, how are you Cons doing?

Let's reset the recent GOP "movement," shall we?

We see a guy who can't answer a question about Libya, who answers every question with a ridiculous "9-9-9" answer, a robot frontrunner nobody wants, nor who can even compete with Obama, a jughead ex Speaker while very smart, has more skeletons in his closet than a Halloween store, is always pissed at the media, and finally, a bufoon who cannot remember 3 departments of Govt he would cut if he somehow "got there" to do so. The closest Rick Perry is getting to the White House is a public tour. Oh yeah, also, there are three republican governors who all returned billions of FREE money from the Federal Govt for high speed rail that would have created thousands of jobs, a project the citizens of Florida, Wisconsin and Ohio all wanted- and all three are in big trouble- one of which looks like he'll be recalled in 6 months.

HUGE momentum you morons got going into 2012.

I'll laugh my ass off if the House goes back to Democrats, which is a very real possibility.
I see a GOP Governor is getting recalled
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby parfait » Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:55 am

Rockindeano wrote:
parfait wrote:Here's a real leader for you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czoRE39K-GE

Fiscally conservative, socially liberal and does everything he can to uphold the integrity and history of his country.


No offense P, I like you, a lot more than others do on this noard, but Zarkosy is a piece of old, dried up jizz. He can go fuck himself, however, he does fuck hot trim doesn't he?


Wait a minute. People don't like me? Well, fuck me!

But seriously; watch the video. Few in his position has the balls to tell the truth without being afraid of offending someone (in this case muslims)
User avatar
parfait
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:38 pm
Location: France

Postby Slander » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:09 am

Rockindeano wrote:Hey Cons-

Hahaha, how are you Cons doing?

Let's reset the recent GOP "movement," shall we?

We see a guy who can't answer a question about Libya, who answers every question with a ridiculous "9-9-9" answer, a robot frontrunner nobody wants, nor who can even compete with Obama, a jughead ex Speaker while very smart, has more skeletons in his closet than a Halloween store, is always pissed at the media, and finally, a bufoon who cannot remember 3 departments of Govt he would cut if he somehow "got there" to do so. The closest Rick Perry is getting to the White House is a public tour. Oh yeah, also, there are three republican governors who all returned billions of FREE money from the Federal Govt for high speed rail that would have created thousands of jobs, a project the citizens of Florida, Wisconsin and Ohio all wanted- and all three are in big trouble- one of which looks like he'll be recalled in 6 months.

HUGE momentum you morons got going into 2012.

I'll laugh my ass off if the House goes back to Democrats, which is a very real possibility.
I see a GOP Governor is getting recalled



Rockin Well put. I could throw some re-election data your way that will make these baggers vomit! The problem for the gop is it doesn't matter what BO's approval rating is or how the economy is doing, what matters is a viable alternative and frankly the gop doesn't have one. By the way have you seen the approval rating of the republican controlled congress? Herpes is more popular. GOP in trouble and they know it.
Last edited by Slander on Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
"But it ain't about how hard you hit... it's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward." Rocky Balboa
Slander
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2674
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:36 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests