President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Behshad » Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:41 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Rick wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
Memorex wrote:
FinnFreak wrote:True.
Obama should resign immediately.
Imagine.
John - :?


Not what I am suggesting at all. That would be lame. But he should be leading the charge to figure what the hell went wrong. As far as what went down that day, from the start of the attack until it was done, I have no idea who is at fault. None. Post attack, the president has truly disappointed me. Really for the first time.

I have to say I am a little weirded out by the lack of concern over what happened. It's odd.



Not odd at all, The Won is a Democrat and even more so a flaming liberal. He will be protected by the media and his lemming followers. Had this been W, katy bar the door. :evil:
p

You're mental. W did exactly what he wanted the entire 8 years he was in office. Including initiating the Patriot Act, where he referred to the Constitution as just a god rammed piece of paper. Let Obama try something like that and see what happens.



I'm also dead right and you know it. Everyhing W did the left and the press howled with "faux concern". This Libya thing is about the biggest scandal that's come along in a long long time and what do we get from the left and the compliant press...crickets.

The President lied to us Rick, the SOS Lied to us, and the World. That's a big fucking deal.

As for being mental, well, I'll let next Tuesday speak for itself. The people are gonna back me up, BIG TIME! Book it.



W did much worse things. He lied to us about things going on, on 9/11. He lied to us about Iraq. Did he "get in trouble " for any of it ?! Fuck no ! He got away with it all. He even got elected a second term and carried on his acts if lunacy.
Why weren't you concerned about your president lying to you when Juje president was white & republican , but now all if a sudden you're the man of truth and peace.
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Behshad » Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:22 am

Flight 93 ! :evil:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:32 am

Fact Finder wrote:Rasmussen: Romney 261, Obama 253

State-by-state polling by Rasmussen Reports now shows Mitt Romney narrowly leading President Obama in the projected tally of electoral votes — 261 to 253. Of the nine key swing states, Rasmussen’s polling (all conducted during the past week except for in Pennsylvania) shows Romney ahead in Florida (by 5 percentage points), Virginia (by 3 points), Colorado (by 4 points), and New Hampshire (by 2 points). It shows Obama ahead in Pennsylvania (by 5 points), Wisconsin (by 2 points), and Nevada (by 2 points). It shows Ohio and Iowa tied.


I can already smell a recount three weeks in advance........ and then those boxes full of dead people votes should fix this problem up kindly for the Dems, however mysteriously they appear.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby conversationpc » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:16 am

Behshad wrote:Flight 93 ! :evil:


What about flight 93?
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Behshad » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:23 am

You won't question the flight 93 , cause you buy what the media told you. But I can guarantee you that if this had happened during Obama's term , you/drudge/Limbaugh and the rest of your clan would've been all over it like stink on shit. Literally.

I'm not gonna type all that was discussed a while back , so here is the C&P ;)

Behshad wrote:
Saint John wrote:The last phone calls were made from the plane at about 10 am, and they have recordings stating that the "counter attack" was about to begin. The final recordings contain Muslim prayers as the passengers gain entry into the cockpit, and the last muffled screams at 10:05 am are in English. The plane crashes at 10:06 am. Again, everything is in a perfect timeline. Unless, of course, the people on the planes are actually still alive and just playing a cruel joke on their loved ones, the phone companies are in on it and their records have been altered. Yeah, that seems plausible. :lol:


Lets rewind back to the morning of 9/11/01
Up until that morning, anytime a plane would be hijacked, no one ever thought the plane could be used as a weapon the way the terrorists used it that morning.
Almost any and all hijacking incidents would result in the plane landing, some negotiations, and eventually killing or capturing the hijackers and rescuing the hostages.
That morning everything chaged as we all know.
Now once youre in a plane like Flight 93 and you find out there are hijackers aboard, fear spreads quickly inside that plane and dont know about you, but most people would have this sick to the stomach feeling, nervousity and again FEAR. During the time you know you have hijackers aboard, you dont think that this is my last chance to say goodbye to my family , cause you know that every little noise you make could be observed and could result in your life ending RIGHT THEN AND THERE.
We all know that when the plane was taken over it was above 8000 feet and back in 2001 the technology didnt allow us to make cellular phone calls midair. Yes there were Airphones at some planes where you could slide your credit card and make a phone call. However you have to realize that these passengeres did not know what was going on in NYC. They were scared for their lives and they figured this plane will land shortly and negotiations begin and hopefully they will come out of it just fine.
Of course had this hijacking happend a day or a week or month after 9/11 , I would understand peoples reaction being different than "normal procedures" and they would try to do something about it. But that morning all they were worried about is how soon will we land and how effective the negotiations will be to save their lives.
Now lets say against all odds, few brave passangers DID contact their loved ones, found out about twin towers and then decided to take the plane down.
Even if this happened, our government wasnt aware of what is really goin on inside that plane. All they know about was that the plane is not responding and its headed towards DC.
The president had ordered the Air Force to take down ANY plane that doesnt respond back. There were F16 around Flight 93 and unless you are suggesting that through some Holllywod style miracle a passenger contacts their family, tell them " dont worry about us, we are takin this plane down", the family member quickly calls authotrities, they get a hold of President, he gets in touch with Air Force and they notify the pilots of F-16, last second with their thumbs on the red button, hear "abort mission" , and then plane is taken down, makes for a great story.
So EVEN if there was a heroic action onboard and people trying to take the plane down, thoose F16 pilots didnt know anything about it and they did what they were ordered to do , BRING IT DOWN.

Now, neither you or I know EXACTLY what happened that morning and probably will never find out.
Im giving you theories, you THINK youre coming up with FACTS. We both should know that we can not convince eachother about what we think happened that morning.

If the plane was shot down , would you see the Air Force pilots as the bad guys? I sure as hell dont. They did what they had to do.
I bet you most of us agree that if we had the opportunity to shoot down the planes that hit the twin towers (which we didnt ), we should have done so and people wouldve totally understood why we did it.Not only would we have saved lives of those in the towers, but also the buildings of course and it wouldve been a big FUCK YOU to the terrorist that their plan FAILED.
The same way, I think people would understand why we had to bring Flight 93 down, SPECIALLY after people witnessed what couldve happened if that plane wasnt shot down.
I just think that IF flight 93 was shot down ( which I personaly believe it was ), the government shouldve not kept it a secret from the people.
The people on that plane should be seen as heroes regardless of HOW the plane went down, simply because their lives were sacrificed to save thousands of other people's lives.

I dont expect you to "buy" this, but dont try to force your FF-style copy&paste SPECULATIONS and THEORIES as FACT! :)


Couple of simple questions you failed to answer :

Why would Donald Rumsfeld mention anything about the plane being shot down ?

Why wouldnt any of "your eyewitnesses" see the plane ripping apart as its crashing. You say the debris is caused by the plane being ripped apart midair before the crash, but you also say the debris was cause of the crash impact and explosion cause Jet fuel is 10 times stronger than TNT :lol: :lol:


Saint John wrote:PS I'm not even getting into the simple physics of how a plane could start coming apart from intentional pilot error. That's almost as silly as arguing that you couldn't damage a car by driving it like a fool.

Driving a car like a fool and going left and right on the road doesnt damage the car to the point it starts ripping apart . Impact with other objects does. FACT!


Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:25 am

Fact Finder wrote:CONGRESSMAN JIM MORAN’S (D-Va.), SON CAUGHT ON TAPE TEACHING VOTE FRAUD TECHNIQUES...


Patrick Moran, son of Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA), resigned from his father's campaign on Wednesday after conservative activist James O'Keefe released a video that appears to show him offering advice to an undercover videographer who claimed to want to commit voter fraud.


One down.....but a whole lot more Dems where that one came from.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby Behshad » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:26 am

The Sushi Hunter wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:CONGRESSMAN JIM MORAN’S (D-Va.), SON CAUGHT ON TAPE TEACHING VOTE FRAUD TECHNIQUES...


Patrick Moran, son of Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA), resigned from his father's campaign on Wednesday after conservative activist James O'Keefe released a video that appears to show him offering advice to an undercover videographer who claimed to want to commit voter fraud.


One down.....but a whole lot more Dems where that one came from.



The vote fraud is of course only from democrats and never ever by republicans
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Monker » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:28 am

Fact Finder wrote:Rasmussen: Romney 261, Obama 253

State-by-state polling by Rasmussen Reports now shows Mitt Romney narrowly leading President Obama in the projected tally of electoral votes — 261 to 253. Of the nine key swing states, Rasmussen’s polling (all conducted during the past week except for in Pennsylvania) shows Romney ahead in Florida (by 5 percentage points), Virginia (by 3 points), Colorado (by 4 points), and New Hampshire (by 2 points). It shows Obama ahead in Pennsylvania (by 5 points), Wisconsin (by 2 points), and Nevada (by 2 points). It shows Ohio and Iowa tied.


And, now you are back to Rasmussen as Gallup shows things tightening up.

The momentum Romney had stopped and now it's swinging back to Obama.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby slucero » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 am

Interesting factoid about jobs... and so much for the argument that the Boomer demographic is the major cause for the decline in the Labor Force Participation Rate...



55 And Under? No Job For You!

Nearly two years ago, and progressing to this day, we first observed (and subsequently even the mainstream media caught on) that America's labor force is slowly but surely converting itself from a full-time to part-time worker society. The reasons for this are obvious: to corporations, the benefits associated with employing part-time workers are countless: avoiding substantial benefits-related costs, evading long-term job contracts, hourly basis wages, and many others. In fact, as long as there is slack in the economy, and there will be for a long, long time as the shift in labor demand is now secular, regardless of what the Fed wants to admit, employers will have ever more leverage, while workers have less and less (and are forced to agree to any employment terms, as long as they get some paycheck at all). This much has been known. What has gotten far less prominence is that of the much trumpeted 4+ million jobs added since the trough in late 2009, virtually all the job additions have gone to (part-time) workers 55 years and over. Indeed, as the chart below shows, starting since the official NBER end of the recession in June 2009, the US has cumulatively added 2.9 million jobs. However, when broken down by age cohort, 3.5 million of these jobs have gone to US workers aged between 55 and 69. Another 729K have gone to recent college grads aged 20-24.

What about those workers in their prime years: between 25 and 54 years of age? They have lost a total of 729,000 jobs since June 30, 2009!

In other words, the US jobs "recovery" has been one that while "benefiting" part-time workers, and those who ordinarily would be exiting the labor force to focus on retirement (and can't as they suddenly realize their savings under ZIRP are worthless while their fixed income portfolios return virtually nothing), has crushed American workers in their key work years, whose jobs instead have been taken by "veteran" workers who increasingly refuse to leave the workforce.

The chart below shows the cumulative jobs gains for those aged 20-24 (red) and 55-69 (gray). The ones below the X-axis, the cumulative job losses, are for those aged 16-19 (green) and 25-54 (blue).

Image

The same chart but going back three years since September 2009, or right around the time the job loss process troughed and since which point the BLS has reported a continuous monthly addition of jobs.

Of the 4.2 million jobs added since September 2009, 3.5 million have gone to "experienced" workers aged 55 and over!

Image

So the next time a potential employer denies your job application because the job was just taken, speak to mom and dad: more than likely they applied for the same job, and got it.


Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby Rick » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:38 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Rick wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
Memorex wrote:
FinnFreak wrote:True.
Obama should resign immediately.
Imagine.
John - :?


Not what I am suggesting at all. That would be lame. But he should be leading the charge to figure what the hell went wrong. As far as what went down that day, from the start of the attack until it was done, I have no idea who is at fault. None. Post attack, the president has truly disappointed me. Really for the first time.

I have to say I am a little weirded out by the lack of concern over what happened. It's odd.



Not odd at all, The Won is a Democrat and even more so a flaming liberal. He will be protected by the media and his lemming followers. Had this been W, katy bar the door. :evil:
p

You're mental. W did exactly what he wanted the entire 8 years he was in office. Including initiating the Patriot Act, where he referred to the Constitution as just a god rammed piece of paper. Let Obama try something like that and see what happens.



I'm also dead right and you know it. Everyhing W did the left and the press howled with "faux concern". This Libya thing is about the biggest scandal that's come along in a long long time and what do we get from the left and the compliant press...crickets.

The President lied to us Rick, the SOS Lied to us, and the World. That's a big fucking deal.

As for being mental, well, I'll let next Tuesday speak for itself. The people are gonna back me up, BIG TIME! Book it.


It works both ways. I would say the WMD thing that spawned crickets from the right was pretty damning, but it's tit for tat I guess.

I definitely respect your steadfastness, FF.

I'm glad the election will be over when my dad comes to visit in November. He's about as big of a right winger as you'll ever meet. He's a good dude though, as a lot of you are.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Monker » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:50 am

artist4perry wrote: Good luck with that Monker If he becomes President I hope he is the great HOPE he has always touted to be. So far the hope is running thin...my son is still working only part time and can't find a decent job. My brother in law was laid off from his good paying job due to cut backs in the economy in the last 2 years. And where are all those unemployed soldiers going to find work when guys who have been pounding the pavement for the last couple of years can't find anything? People are losing their homes, gas prices are up, food is up, utilities is up....up and up we go. Still waiting for that HOPE, and empty promises...I am sick of promises and explanations and excuses. How about fixing things then you won't have to make any excuses? You cannot feed a family on excuses, and promises. We need jobs, real jobs now. Those displaced soldiers he will be cutting back on are coming home where little to no jobs are to be found.
Useless conversation... We will watch and see...so far it has been 4 years of this guy and I am not LOVIN it. I am not feeling the manure and roses he promised the last time. Your party loyal...I am sorry I am not. I don't want to blindly follow any of these guys. Lemmings never live long I am afraid...hopefully you will look at him with objective eyes. I am more scared of lemmings on either side than anything. That cliff can be a doosey. :wink: :lol:


I'm not a Democrat.

If you believe lofty promises from EITHER party, you are naive at best. I knew going in that Obama was over-hyped...but he was MUCH better then a McCain who was acting senile and unable to grasp any drastic situation presented to him...going from "the fundamentals of the economy are strong" to going all loopy and suspending his campaign and calling for some weird economic summit with W, Obama, etc....just plain stupid.

But, I give him credit that he TRIED to bring the sides together ..The FACT is that Republicans became uncompromising obstructionists. I've repeated that many times here...the Republicans can not be allowed to win for that one reason alone.

Now you have Romney...I really do not see how ANYBODY can vote for him. All he does is market himself like a product...shifting his views to whatever gets him the most votes. That's how he operates. It's how he has been since he entered politics. He has no real principals that he stands for even against popular opinion. If the last debate had happened during the primaries, he would have NEVER been nominated...he positioned himself to the LEFT of Obama, as some kind of peace monger. He's back and forth on almost EVERY SINGLE ISSUE...and then denies that he shifted. The scariest thing is, he believes his own lies that didn't shift.

Then there are the empty promises he is making. Repeal Obamacare? First of all, it's just not going to happen. He will never get the votes to do it. But, lets say he goes for that fight...do you really think any Democrat is going to compromise with him on ANY issue? After obstructionism is a proven strategy to win the White House, and the new President acting like a partisan ass? His 20% is tax cut is DOA for that reason alone. He wants to close loopholes FOR THE WEALTHY, which is a backhanded tax increase. Do you think REPUBLICANS are going to vote for that? NONE if this has any possibility of happening...but he is out there preaching his own version of empty 'hope'. He has no realistic plan after he gets elected...all this 'stuff' (as the VP would say) is to get elected. He hasn't even talked about what he will 'really' do after the election.

And, quite honestly, I think more people are starting to realize this....right at the end of the game.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby Monker » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:52 am

slucero wrote:The government doesn't create jobs....


So, if the government signs a billion dollar contract with General Dynamics or Lockhead, or whoever, no jobs are going to be created.

And, if those contracts are cut, no jobs are lost.

You are simply wrong.
Last edited by Monker on Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby Behshad » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:56 am

Monker wrote:
artist4perry wrote: Good luck with that Monker If he becomes President I hope he is the great HOPE he has always touted to be. So far the hope is running thin...my son is still working only part time and can't find a decent job. My brother in law was laid off from his good paying job due to cut backs in the economy in the last 2 years. And where are all those unemployed soldiers going to find work when guys who have been pounding the pavement for the last couple of years can't find anything? People are losing their homes, gas prices are up, food is up, utilities is up....up and up we go. Still waiting for that HOPE, and empty promises...I am sick of promises and explanations and excuses. How about fixing things then you won't have to make any excuses? You cannot feed a family on excuses, and promises. We need jobs, real jobs now. Those displaced soldiers he will be cutting back on are coming home where little to no jobs are to be found.
Useless conversation... We will watch and see...so far it has been 4 years of this guy and I am not LOVIN it. I am not feeling the manure and roses he promised the last time. Your party loyal...I am sorry I am not. I don't want to blindly follow any of these guys. Lemmings never live long I am afraid...hopefully you will look at him with objective eyes. I am more scared of lemmings on either side than anything. That cliff can be a doosey. :wink: :lol:


I'm not a Democrat.

If you believe lofty promises from EITHER party, you are naive at best. I knew going in that Obama was over-hyped...but he was MUCH better then a McCain who was acting senile and unable to grasp any drastic situation presented to him...going from "the fundamentals of the economy are strong" to going all loopy and suspending his campaign and calling for some weird economic summit with W, Obama, etc....just plain stupid.

But, I give him credit that he TRIED to bring the sides together ..The FACT is that Republicans became uncompromising obstructionists. I've repeated that many times here...the Republicans can not be allowed to win for that one reason alone.

Now you have Romney...I really do not see how ANYBODY can vote for him. All he does is market himself like a product...shifting his views to whatever gets him the most votes. That's how he operates. It's how he has been since he entered politics. He has no real principals that he stands for even against popular opinion. If the last debate had happened during the primaries, he would have NEVER been nominated...he positioned himself to the LEFT of Obama, as some kind of peace monger. He's back and forth on almost EVERY SINGLE ISSUE...and then denies that he shifted. The scariest thing is, he believes his own lies that didn't shift.

Then there are the empty promises he is making. Repeal Obamacare? First of all, it's just not going to happen. He will never get the votes to do it. But, lets say he goes for that fight...do you really think any Democrat is going to compromise with him on ANY issue? After obstructionism is a proven strategy to win the White House, and the new President acting like a partisan ass? His 20% is tax cut is DOA for that reason alone. He wants to close loopholes FOR THE WEALTHY, which is a backhanded tax increase. Do you think REPUBLICANS are going to vote for that? NONE if this has any possibility of happening...but he is out there preaching his own version of empty 'hope'. He has no realistic plan after he gets elected...all this 'stuff' (as the VP would say) is to get elected. He hasn't even talked about what he will 'really' do after the election.

And, quite honestly, I think more people are starting to realize this....right at the end of the game.




Image
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Monker » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:56 am

Memorex wrote:Trump - What an idiot. Who cares if a marriage hit a bump in the road 12 years ago. Hell, Bill Clinton managed far worse in his marriage. When a person becomes President, things rise above marriage. It's just how it is.

There are a lot of stories of Michelle's unhappiness in the white house and that she didn't want him to run again. But guess what - my wife would feel the same in that frickin fish bowl of a life. She is not getting her wishes and she does not run the country. It's sad that american politics is such that just the nature of things puts a marriage at risk. One would hope that the first few post-white-house years are spent repairing what lingering resentment there may be.

Trump is going to look like an idiot.

Unless of course divorce papers ask for place of birth. Ha ha ha ha. j/k


LOL...this was on a Frontline special on PBS where they did a biography of both Obama and Romney. Michelle admitted that their marriage was strained between the time he was in Illinois and the US Senate. Neither of them were really happy. She didn't say it came close to divorce...but it is no secret it was a hard time between them.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby slucero » Thu Oct 25, 2012 3:40 pm

Monker wrote:
slucero wrote:The government doesn't create jobs....


So, if the government signs a billion dollar contract with General Dynamics or Lockhead, or whoever, no jobs are going to be created.

And, if those contracts are cut, no jobs are lost.

You are simply wrong.



"Shovel ready" jobs, simply to count people as "employed", government funded at an average cost of $200K per, is not an efficient use of taxpayer money... The government taking an actual requirement to bid, then placing an award with the winning supplier for an actual good or service is another thing entirely.


I know a little bit about this.. I've been a Purchasing Manager for over 20 years.. and have over $600 Million in spend under my belt.

I'm as right as you were wrong about boomer demographics being the leading cause of the decline in the Labor Participation Rate... apparently you missed that....

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby Gin and Tonic Sky » Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:13 pm

Monker wrote:
slucero wrote:The government doesn't create jobs....


So, if the government signs a billion dollar contract with General Dynamics or Lockhead, or whoever, no jobs are going to be created.

And, if those contracts are cut, no jobs are lost.

You are simply wrong.


Interesting that someone who rightfully points out that wars of the past ten years has been a drain on the economy suddenly supports the military industrial complex as job maker?! Seems there is some consistency missing here?

Sure, when the government signs a contract with General Dynamics jobs are created, and if we have sequestration next year (likely) jobs will be lost. But you need to understand that when the government spends money that money gets transferred out of the private sector- one less dollar spend by the government isn't used to invest produce , or create in the private sector. Do you think these business owners will just go away and become small vegetable farmers if there will be no govt contracts. No, they will innovate and create in the private sector.

Of course you are going to say to me "So What one job is one job . And that govt spending has a multiplier effect that private spending wont? And we can have that spending now?" Well in fact none of this is true. Government contracting with its sealed bids and lowest cost bid evaluation, and the lack of effective oversight in contract execution encourages inefficiency along the line and what is called rent seeking (where a supplier/person hired of the contract takes the contract and money and doesn't work to add value). None of this happens in the private sector (Well it does but companies go out of business and folks get fired very quickly). Therefore the economy isn't getting the productivity or growth out of a big general dynamics contract with the department of defense than it would from general dynamics contract funded by , sold in, and executed in the private sector.

In the Short term- govt contracts create jobs, and short term cutting govt contracts cost jobs, yes. But mid to long term you have an poorly balanced economy, with more inefficiency and higher overall unemployment.
Matt
User avatar
Gin and Tonic Sky
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:46 am
Location: in a purple and gold haze

Postby KenTheDude » Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:15 am

Image
User avatar
KenTheDude
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:55 pm
Location: Texas

Postby Memorex » Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:41 am

It's looking like they did. I suspect this is really going to fall apart for the administration if they are re-elected. It's not looking good, although most news outlets are not covering it. If you watch MSNBC or read HuffingtonPost, you'd think the worst thing going on in the world is some idiot's remark about rape and abortion.
User avatar
Memorex
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby Behshad » Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:07 am

Since FF missed this one , I fill in for him :




Colin Powell endorses Obama for second term !!


(Reuters) - Former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell on Thursday endorsed Barack Obama's bid for re-election, citing the Democratic president's efforts to wind down the war in Afghanistan and tackle terrorism.

"I think we ought to keep on the track that we are on," the Republican, who also backed Obama in 2008, told "CBS This Morning," adding, "I voted for him in 2008 and I plan to stick with him in 2012."

The move comes just days after Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney clashed over foreign policy in the third and last presidential debate ahead of the November 6 election.

Polls show Obama and Romney neck and neck. A Reuters/Ipsos online tracking poll gave Romney a 1-point edge on Wednesday, 47 percent to Obama's 46 percent.

Obama's campaign was quick to promote the endorsement in a video statement released about 30 minutes after Powell's appearance.

The president called Powell on Thursday to thank him for his endorsement, White House spokesman Jay Carney later told reporters aboard Air Force One heading from Florida to Virginia.

Powell criticized Romney's foreign policy as inconsistent and questioned the former Massachusetts governor's ability to address the deficit and looming defense cuts.

"I'm not quite sure which Governor Romney we'd be getting with respect to foreign policy," Powell said, calling Romney's foreign policy "a moving target."

As for the U.S. budget, he added: "It's essentially, let's cut taxes and compensate for that with other things, but that compensation does not cover all the cuts intended or the expenses associated with defense."

Powell has been critical of Romney's foreign policy advisers and has taken issue with the former business executive's stance on countries such as Russia.

A moderate Republican, Powell served under President George W. Bush. Some of Romney's advisers are more conservative veterans of the Bush administration.

"There's some very, very strong neo-conservative views that are presented by the governor that I have some trouble with," Powell said on CBS.

He added that other issues such as the economy and education also loomed large in his support for a second term for Obama.
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Behshad » Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:11 am

Gallup , Registered Voters


Obama 48% +1

Romney 47% -1
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Memorex » Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:44 am

Behshad wrote:Gallup , Registered Voters


Obama 48% +1

Romney 47% -1


Who's reporting that?
User avatar
Memorex
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby Behshad » Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:45 am

Memorex wrote:
Behshad wrote:Gallup , Registered Voters


Obama 48% +1

Romney 47% -1


Who's reporting that?



;)
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Memorex » Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:46 am

Behshad wrote:
Memorex wrote:
Behshad wrote:Gallup , Registered Voters


Obama 48% +1

Romney 47% -1


Who's reporting that?



;)


I went there and it still had yesterdays number. Maybe I am missing today's update.
User avatar
Memorex
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:47 am

Behshad wrote:Since FF missed this one , I fill in for him :

Colin Powell endorses Obama for second term !!


Yeah and this is the same Col0n who came out publically saying that the illigal immigrant leaf blowers and such are the backbone of the American work force. Yeah, immigrants work for much less and run their side job businesses much less because the American small business owners and operators need to have permits, licenses, report and pay earnings and employee payroll taxes while the immigrants don't. Any wonder why the immigrants work for less? They have less overhead. But leave it up to individuals like Col0n to hire immigrants to work his property because he's a cheap fuck and doesn't want to pay an American who's got to pay for permits and licenses, along with report and pay earnings and employee payroll taxes.

Yeah, it's a good thing this fuckhead is endorsing noBOzo 2012.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_orUcQJMNoI

Sure I've seen them at my house, but only long enough for me to tell them I do my own fucking yard work, to hang flyers on the front door and the occassion wondering group of Jehovah's Witnesses.
Last edited by The Sushi Hunter on Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:03 am, edited 6 times in total.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby Memorex » Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:48 am

I see it now. Registered voters. I was looking at likely voters. My bad.
User avatar
Memorex
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby Behshad » Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:03 am

You'd think even a moron like Sushi would understand this. But I guess not. :roll:


Colin Powell is clarifying comments he made this weekend on Meet the Press to emphasize that he does not hire illegal immigrants.

News coverage of his appearance on the NBC Sunday talk show, such as a story by The Associated Press, reported that Powell said "illegal immigrants do essential work in the U.S. and that he has firsthand knowledge of that — because they fix his house."

In the interview , Powell said a path to legal status should be offered to illegal immigrants in the U.S. because they "are doing things we need done in this country."

He added: "They're all over my house, doing things whenever I call for repairs, and I'm sure you've seen them at your house. We've got to find a way to bring these people out of the darkness and give them some kind of status."

This morning, however, comes word from Powell's office that he "misspoke."

"I don't hire illegal immigrants," Powell says in a statement today. "On Meet the Press yesterday, I referred to illegal immigrants working around my house. I was referring to the many service contractors who work in my neighborhood, using mostly immigrant workers, who do good work. Some may well be 'illegal.' There are 11 million illegal immigrants in this country and most are working somewhere in our economy."
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:05 am

I see that Col0n is now in the business of building another one of those popular bikes that peddle backwards. Dems love those things since they are so "green" and keeps the global warming & greenhouse gasses to a minimum.

We have millions and millions of illegal immigrants in our country, undocumented individuals who are working, who are doing things we need done in this country, they’re all over my house doing things whenever I call for repairs…..Colon
Last edited by The Sushi Hunter on Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby Memorex » Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:08 am

Behshad wrote:You'd think even a moron like Sushi would understand this. But I guess not. :roll:


Colin Powell is clarifying comments he made this weekend on Meet the Press to emphasize that he does not hire illegal immigrants.

News coverage of his appearance on the NBC Sunday talk show, such as a story by The Associated Press, reported that Powell said "illegal immigrants do essential work in the U.S. and that he has firsthand knowledge of that — because they fix his house."

In the interview , Powell said a path to legal status should be offered to illegal immigrants in the U.S. because they "are doing things we need done in this country."

He added: "They're all over my house, doing things whenever I call for repairs, and I'm sure you've seen them at your house. We've got to find a way to bring these people out of the darkness and give them some kind of status."

This morning, however, comes word from Powell's office that he "misspoke."

"I don't hire illegal immigrants," Powell says in a statement today. "On Meet the Press yesterday, I referred to illegal immigrants working around my house. I was referring to the many service contractors who work in my neighborhood, using mostly immigrant workers, who do good work. Some may well be 'illegal.' There are 11 million illegal immigrants in this country and most are working somewhere in our economy."


Ha ha. Ok. Yea - I can see why he would call for repairs on other people's homes. Cool.
User avatar
Memorex
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:30 pm

Postby conversationpc » Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:11 am

Behshad wrote:
Memorex wrote:
Behshad wrote:Gallup , Registered Voters


Obama 48% +1

Romney 47% -1


Who's reporting that?



;)


Behshad apparently, since Gallup has Romney up by 3.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Gin and Tonic Sky » Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:23 am

Behshad wrote:Since FF missed this one , I fill in for him :




Colin Powell endorses Obama for second term !!


(Reuters) - Former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell on Thursday endorsed Barack Obama's bid for re-election, citing the Democratic president's efforts to wind down the war in Afghanistan and tackle terrorism.

"I think we ought to keep on the track that we are on," the Republican, who also backed Obama in 2008, told "CBS This Morning," adding, "I voted for him in 2008 and I plan to stick with him in 2012."

The move comes just days after Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney clashed over foreign policy in the third and last presidential debate ahead of the November 6 election.

Polls show Obama and Romney neck and neck. A Reuters/Ipsos online tracking poll gave Romney a 1-point edge on Wednesday, 47 percent to Obama's 46 percent.

Obama's campaign was quick to promote the endorsement in a video statement released about 30 minutes after Powell's appearance.

The president called Powell on Thursday to thank him for his endorsement, White House spokesman Jay Carney later told reporters aboard Air Force One heading from Florida to Virginia.

Powell criticized Romney's foreign policy as inconsistent and questioned the former Massachusetts governor's ability to address the deficit and looming defense cuts.

"I'm not quite sure which Governor Romney we'd be getting with respect to foreign policy," Powell said, calling Romney's foreign policy "a moving target."

As for the U.S. budget, he added: "It's essentially, let's cut taxes and compensate for that with other things, but that compensation does not cover all the cuts intended or the expenses associated with defense."

Powell has been critical of Romney's foreign policy advisers and has taken issue with the former business executive's stance on countries such as Russia.

A moderate Republican, Powell served under President George W. Bush. Some of Romney's advisers are more conservative veterans of the Bush administration.

"There's some very, very strong neo-conservative views that are presented by the governor that I have some trouble with," Powell said on CBS.

He added that other issues such as the economy and education also loomed large in his support for a second term for Obama.


Well Colin is right about Romney's team being filled with a bunch of "neo-con" ideologues (which is really neo-Wilsonianism), and is right to criticize that . However, Obama's foreign policy is filled with the exact same thing a "neo-con" neo Wilsonian viewpoint on the world.

If he was being true to his realist "paleo-con" view of foreign policy he would have endorsed no one. Or one of the third party candidates.

As far as any other issue outside of foreign policy, I'm glad he never tried to get put in charge.
Matt
User avatar
Gin and Tonic Sky
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:46 am
Location: in a purple and gold haze

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests