

Moderator: Andrew
Gideon wrote:I have the exquisite pleasure of being tasked by my professor to analyze the State of the Union address from the perspective of Murray Edelman's Political Spectacle. I hate this country so much right now.![]()
Gideon wrote:I have the exquisite pleasure of being tasked by my professor to analyze the State of the Union address from the perspective of Murray Edelman's Political Spectacle. I hate this country so much right now.![]()
Boomchild wrote:Department of Homeland Security purchases retro fitted armored vehicles for domestic use. This in addition to the massive order of ammunition earlier. So, why is it that DHS feels they need to have these? Very interesting. Of course not a peep from the mainstream media asking about it.
https://www.examiner.com/article/report ... mestic-use
Memorex wrote:Boomchild wrote:Department of Homeland Security purchases retro fitted armored vehicles for domestic use. This in addition to the massive order of ammunition earlier. So, why is it that DHS feels they need to have these? Very interesting. Of course not a peep from the mainstream media asking about it.
https://www.examiner.com/article/report ... mestic-use
I don't understand this and the ammo. They can't deny they aren't gearing up for something, but what? Very strange.
steveo777 wrote:Don wrote:Go prep your safehouses already, you losers.
Done a long time ago.
I bet I have a bigger bunker than you do.
Don wrote:steveo777 wrote:Don wrote:Go prep your safehouses already, you losers.
Done a long time ago.
I bet I have a bigger bunker than you do.
I would have to have a bunker for there to be a comparison. You can't hide, old man. Just accept your fate.
steveo777 wrote:Don wrote:steveo777 wrote:Don wrote:Ughh, Don't quite your day job.
I know, that fucking joke has been around since before we were born.
Since before SOME of us were born, yes.
Stevew2, where ya been!?
Eric Holder: Drone strikes against Americans on U.S. soil are legal
http://washingtonexaminer.com/eric-hold ... le/2523319
Attorney General Eric Holder can imagine a scenario in which it would be constitutional to carry out a drone strike against an American on American soil, he wrote in a letter to Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.
“It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States,” Holder replied in a letter yesterday to Paul’s question about whether Obama “has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without trial.”
Paul condemned the idea. “The U.S. Attorney General’s refusal to rule out the possibility of drone strikes on American citizens and on American soil is more than frightening – it is an affront the Constitutional due process rights of all Americans,” he said in a statement.
Holder noted that Paul’s question was “entirely hypothetical [and] unlikely to occur,” but cited the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks as the type of incidents that might provoke such a response.
“Were such an emergency to arise, I would examine the particular facts and circumstances before advising the President on the scope of his authority,” he concluded.
Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, an attorney and Judiciary Committee member, told The Washington Examiner last month that the drone policy so far outlined by the administration is too vague.
“That has the potential to swallow the rule,” Lee said after the drone program white paper was leaked. “If you’re going to regard somebody as presenting an imminent threat of an attack on the U.S. simply because you have concluded that they are an ‘operational leader’ or they are involved in planning an attack in one way or another, you find yourself giving way to much discretion to the government.”
Lee said that the White House should release the formal legal analysis underpinning the drone program. “We know that in some instances where the government has released its legal analysis, it gets it wrong,” he said.
Memorex wrote:I don't generally get into all that conspiracy stuff. But someone sent this article to me today and if I wasn't so busy, I think maybe I'd spend a little time freaking out. I don't understand the tanks at all.
And as far as drone strikes on Americans... WTF? I always considered due process our greatest right, the greatest equalizer in this country. Think about this. If the government says, "We struck down this bad dude with a missile in Florida today. He was planning this or that and we took him out." How many of us would care one ounce about it? We hear bad guy and we shrug our shoulders and move on. Where's that guy's due process and right to trial?
I know this article comes from a site that's pretty out there, so take that into account. But facts are facts. It's just so odd.
http://www.infowars.com/troops-deployed-ahead-of-economic-collapse-gun-confiscation/
Don wrote:Yes, all the white people will be gathered up and penned, eventually redomesticated to do mundane tasks. Planet of the Apes all over again. Oh, the horror!
Boomchild wrote:Don wrote:Yes, all the white people will be gathered up and penned, eventually redomesticated to do mundane tasks. Planet of the Apes all over again. Oh, the horror!
Yeah, A government turning on it's citizens never happens.
steveo777 wrote:We have DHS having recently puchased billions of rounds of ammo, an order of 2700 armored trucks labeled for "domestic use", now the president can use drones against his own citizens. What's next? I suppose the "Martial Law in Effect" signs are already being manufactured as well.
Don wrote:Boomchild wrote:Don wrote:Yes, all the white people will be gathered up and penned, eventually redomesticated to do mundane tasks. Planet of the Apes all over again. Oh, the horror!
Yeah, A government turning on it's citizens never happens.
It won't happen here. No one's gonna stop you from hiding out at Ruby Ridge or whatever you want to do but you aren't going to miss anything, believe me..
steveo777 wrote:Memorex wrote:I don't generally get into all that conspiracy stuff. But someone sent this article to me today and if I wasn't so busy, I think maybe I'd spend a little time freaking out. I don't understand the tanks at all.
And as far as drone strikes on Americans... WTF? I always considered due process our greatest right, the greatest equalizer in this country. Think about this. If the government says, "We struck down this bad dude with a missile in Florida today. He was planning this or that and we took him out." How many of us would care one ounce about it? We hear bad guy and we shrug our shoulders and move on. Where's that guy's due process and right to trial?
I know this article comes from a site that's pretty out there, so take that into account. But facts are facts. It's just so odd.
http://www.infowars.com/troops-deployed-ahead-of-economic-collapse-gun-confiscation/
I've never bought into conspiracy theories either. All I can tell you is that there are trucks that deliver things to stores, but when they are empty they have been hauling signs on the "dead head" back to where they came from. MARTIAL LAW IN EFFECT
It was seen and they were in there
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests