The_Noble_Cause wrote:Memorex wrote:Sometimes really shitty things, though constitutional, should be changed. The health care law, with all it's good and bad points and regulations, needs a lot of changing. There is nothing wrong with that discussion.
You're right. But none of those things ( suffrage, voting rights) were passed by one party de-funding the government. Why don't you be honest,
your party is circumventing checks and balances and making a mockery of our system. There was an election in 2012, as well as a Supreme Court ruling. Deal with it. Either get a GOP President elected or a veto-proof majority and win. Btw, even if Romney won, he wouldn't have repealed Obamacare. You guys are getting played and are too dumb to know it.
Whoa. Slow down there cowboy. No one said this was my party. I am an independent, which allows me to think independently and pick and choose
whatever I want to support and
whomever I want to support. I don't have the same problem as the majority of voters - which is to support bad ideas solely so I can support my team. I can pivot based on reality and I don't have to wait for permission from my mommies and daddies in the party leadership.
If a party chooses to defund a bad law, isn't that the very checks and balances we are talking about? What checks and balances are you referring to if you give no power to one party, which holds the purse string powers?
In any case, I am not for a government shut down, or even a mini one like is happening now. I take that back - I wish the whole thing would shut down and reorganize. But I also don't blame one side over the other and I do have understanding of both sides.
If the Democrats could at least recognize that the law was written in a horrific way and that it is currently doing a lot of harm, then maybe we could get somewhere. If the Republicans had a better brand and kept their nose out of shit they don't even care about, then maybe we could get somewhere.