They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[Monker]

I call him John "Ketchup" Kerry. I've heard talk that he's considering running for POTUS in 2020. I hope he does, that oughta be a hoot!

Maybe he is looking to beat Hillary's record for failing to win a run for POTUS.

Ralph Nader ran four consecutive times.

[Monker]

Monker, these should make your ass pucker up tight...

In an effort to preserve the integrity of all U.S. elections, as ordered by the President of the United States, after an extensive investigation in select counties (the ‘sampling’), the DHS has concluded that while Russian entities (as outlined within SC Mueller’s investigation were complicit in attempting to undermine the presidential election of 2016) had no direct impact or bearing on the outcome of the presidential election, nor were any U.S. person(s) knowingly part of such an attempt to sabotage as it relates to the Russian investigation, U.S. and other foreign entities (as further described within DHS[XXXX]), acting outside of Russian agents, did attempt on numerous occasions, and were successful, in interfering w/ the presidential election of 2016, senate elections of [x, y, z], [x] elections, whereby several million of illegal, non-resident ballots (the “irregularities”) were counted, while legal ballots were improperly tabulated and/or intentionally mishandled. We believe these actions were a coordinated attack against the democracy of our country.

The DHS will be submitting a final report to the WH/DOJ/other state and local agencies outlining our findings as early as March [ ], 2018. While this report only encompasses a sampling of twenty-two (22) counties across the U.S., it is strongly suggested, based on the evidence provided, that a mandated countrywide investigation begin under the recommended US50-EIC guidelines as set forth in Section VII of the final report. Furthermore, based on our immediate findings, we recommend the adoption of 8(E)(F)(G)(H) be made immediately to combat sources & methods currently being deployed to …………………………..

.

Trump: "Did we catch them in the act or what? You know what I'm talking about. Oh did we catch them in the act! They are very embarrassed. They never thought they were going to be caught. We caught 'em… It's so much fun. "

And now we know that illegals casting votes is no longer just a "theory".

Yeah, if you believe this fake bullshit is real.

[Monker]

Well, you tried to answer it but you were way off.
It's like asking you if you like dogs, and you go off and say it doesn't matter if Trump likes dogs. Most Presidents have dogs. You fucking dipshit, even Obama had a dog. Then I say that none of that even addresses the question on if you like dogs. Then you go off saying that you never said you didn't like dogs, find a quote where I said I didn't like dogs, you fucking idiotic piece of shit! Then I say you have gone loopy, and then there is this.

Actually, it's like you asking about dogs in a post about cats. Like I said, TOTAL non-sequitur. My post was about Bush's lack of credibility on foreign affairs - be it Russian voting booth boogeymen or Iraqi - Al Qaeda links.

Seriously, do you even have the ability to let things go? It doesn't seem like you do to me.

Can’t. In too deep. Seeing your face plastered on a billboard overlooking Times Square emblazoned with the words, “Rain Man: The Musical – Coming Soon” is my life goal.

Well, then that says a lot more about your character than mine.

[Monker]

"Tell me, when was my last "run to Andrew" moment?"

See page 200.

Even after going there and reading it, I have no idea what you are talking about. You are wrong.

[Monker]

Could FISA Judges be part of it too?

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... documents/

So, now you believe in a conspiracy that involves the White House, the SOS, congress and the judiciary.

With that kinda mindset, you can make up any kind of conspiracy you want and believe it is "truth"....because truth doesn't matter to you any longer....simple common sense doesn't even matter.

[Monker]

Tell me, when was my last "run to Andrew" moment?

Or, do you just have no clue what you are talking about?

Let's not ignore the obvious. After TNC posted what has been claimed to be a dating profile with a picture of you and your children Andrew shows up to scold people. Then post said event is when you started making repeated suggestions that Andrew should shut this thread down and not let his site be used to push a "political agenda".

I feel perfectly justified asking Andrew to remove pictures of my family off of his forum.

But, my question was not "pick an instance when...." It was, "when was the LAST TIME..." If you (and others) are going to post I have "run to Andrew" moments, which, IMO, implies that I go to Andrew frivolously, then you should be able to post an example that is not admitted to.

[quoted]

Please, all three of you were essentially blaming everybody else for the tone of the forum. It's been forever since I said any of those things here...yet TNC is on a rampage and insulting in every post he makes.

I have pointed out that you throw out personal insults and are now trying to imply that it is only other people doing such. To me it's clear by your response here you started the insults. YOU set the tone.YOU set the bait. YOU just didn't expect or like the results.
[/quote]

This is just bullshit.

I was not implying ANYTHING. If you actually READ my conversation with TNC, you will find that I did not insult him AT ALL. But, in almost EVERY reply, he was attempting to insult me. I did not "start" anything. He just went right into it.

I can play either side of this...I can come on here and not personally insult anybody on this forum, as you do. Or, I can come on here and insult in every post, as TNC does. It all depends on what Andrew wants this forum to be. He has repeatedly said here to stop the personal attacks, so I have. Can your side do the same? Not from what I have seen.

My side? [/quote]

Yes, your side.

It's interesting that you use the term "play" in your response. It's seems to me that this is some kind of game to you.

Well, I can make it a game.

But, that is not why I said that. Two sides, be totally insulting beyond belief, or not insulting at all. Two sides which I can easily be a part of. I can be a part, or "play", on either side of that scenario.

Maybe you would be better off posting your opinions and thoughts on the subject matter and leave out the personal insults and condescending overtones.

Well, since you can't take notice when I *AM* doing that, perhaps you should stay off this topic completely.

[steveo777]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... dictments/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... stigation/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... collusion/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... -meddling/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... ce-scheme/

Too many levels of stupid to address here. Keep living in that Faux News bubble!

So, I guess the fact that the Deputy Attorney General got on TV and spoke to the American people about the Russian indictments is Faux News bubble? Andrew, did you hear his speech? He simply told us the results of the investigation into Russia's meddling. He also said no Americans were knowingly involved and that would include Trump.[/quote]

No, it's taking that speech and twisting it in an attempt to show proof that there was no collusion And you saying this was the "results" of the investigation implies that the "Russian meddling" portion is over. You are being very naive if that is what you truly believe.

First of all,,.you all have been saying for over a year that there was no Russian meddling. Now you all will go about downplaying it...which should be totally expected.

These indictments are at the lowest level...and I would expect there to be many more. In fact, IMO, all of these sealed indictments are more probably related to Russian collusion than anything Republicans are writing in bogus memos.

Trump's collusion piece is more dealing more directly with the Russian government. I doubt you will hear anything on this until Trump testifies in some form to Mueller.

In addition to this, we have Bannon and Gates cooperating with Mueller. If you think people at that level are not giving info about Trump and his family, you are being extremely naive. In the end, I would not be surprised if Manafort doesn't turn as well...he seems to be the only one who didn't jump the sinking ship.

By the end of this, Mueller may be able to tell Trump to resign the Presidency or he will charge his entire family with multiple crimes and put them in jail for decades, and recommend that he be impeached.[/quote]

I've never denied Russian meddling. They've been doing it forever and it didn't just start when Trump ran for President. What I am denying is that Trump colluded with the Russians. So far, there is no evidence to support that claim. Even if he did, collusion, in itself, is not illegal. Would you like some condiments on your nothing burger, how about fries with that?

[Andrew]

Following up on what Steveo just said, my daughter and her British husband were here for Christmas. They live in London, and both are so brainwashed with American misinformation it isn’t funny.

Maybe as foreigners, we can see from a distance exactly what is going on?

When Drumpf is in prison, I'll be here ready to gloat.

[Andrew]

Too many levels of stupid to address here. Keep living in that Faux News bubble!

Frankly you barely have addressed anything in this thread to support your position. That includes giving you credit for the one liner insults towards Trump.

No, its that I know anything typed here is a complete waste of time and I have better things to do. I just drop in for a few random comments now and then.

[Andrew]

I said this on the Florida school thread, Trump must read here..

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump

Very sad that the FBI missed all of the many signals sent out by the Florida school shooter. This is not acceptable. They are spending too much time trying to prove Russian collusion with the Trump campaign - there is no collusion. Get back to the basics and make us all proud!
8:08 PM - 17 Feb 2018

Aren't you Americans embarrassed by this president?

The question I have - is how far does the hypocrisy go? Clinton gets impeached for a blowjob, but "your" guy can fuck hookers and playmates, be financed by the Russian mob, make everything about himself and reverse every sensible regulation Obama Administration put in place?

How low can he go?

PLEASE respond....what would Drumpf have to do to lose your vote???????????????

[Andrew]

Too many levels of stupid to address here. Keep living in that Faux News bubble!

Frankly you barely have addressed anything in this thread to support your position. That includes giving you credit for the one liner insults towards Trump.

I wonder who would win in a fight between a Wombat and an orange faced Orangutan with tiny hands.

Hehehe....

[The_Noble_Cause]

Aren't you Americans embarrassed by this president?

Nope. He is already easily the most consequential president since Reagan.
Does anyone doubt future presidents will also use Twitter to communicate directly with the American people? Trump changed the culture. He's already won.
As Obama once said, "Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not, and a way that Bill Clinton did not.”
The same is true about Trump.
The most memorable presidents were about *BIG* ideas. Building the wall is the biggest infrastructure idea since Ike built the interstate.

The question I have - is how far does the hypocrisy go? Clinton gets impeached for a blowjob, but "your" guy can fuck hookers and playmates,

The country has changed and has become more sex-positive.
Back during the Clinton scandal, gay marriage was anathema. Meanwhile Trump had gays talk at his convention.
You are comparing two vastly different eras.
Additionally, do you have proof that he is fucking hookers and playmates in the White House?

..... be financed by the Russian mob,

And as already mentioned, the Kennedys had mob ties. The Bushes had Nazi arms ties. So what?

PLEASE respond....what would Drumpf have to do to lose your vote???????????????

Why should we bother? All you have is insults or unnamed online SIGINT sources - all of whom are discredited frauds (Schindler, Nance).
At this point, I am willing to vote for Trump again just to piss you and Monker off.

[The_Noble_Cause]

I feel perfectly justified asking Andrew to remove pictures of my family off of his forum.

Did you also feel justified posting the picture on a public booty call site? Idiot.

Ralph Nader ran four consecutive times.

As if that's an equal comparison.
Hillary had the combined might of the DNC and the media.
You may as well bring up LaRouche running since the 70s.

But, my question was not "pick an instance when...." It was, "when was the LAST TIME..." If you (and others) are going to post I have "run to Andrew" moments, which, IMO, implies that I go to Andrew frivolously, then you should be able to post an example that is not admitted to.

We'll get right on that....
But first, show proof that Sebastian Gorka is wanted by "multiple governments"?
Also, a link to Hillary having permission would also be nice.

Again, you are in no position to make demands of anybody. You lie with complete deranged abandon.

[ohsherrie]

No, it's taking that speech and twisting it in an attempt to show proof that there was no collusion And you saying this was the "results" of the investigation implies that the "Russian meddling" portion is over. You are being very naive if that is what you truly believe.

First of all,,.you all have been saying for over a year that there was no Russian meddling. Now you all will go about downplaying it...which should be totally expected.

These indictments are at the lowest level...and I would expect there to be many more. In fact, IMO, all of these sealed indictments are more probably related to Russian collusion than anything Republicans are writing in bogus memos.

Trump's collusion piece is more dealing more directly with the Russian government. I doubt you will hear anything on this until Trump testifies in some form to Mueller.

In addition to this, we have Bannon and Gates cooperating with Mueller. If you think people at that level are not giving info about Trump and his family, you are being extremely naive. In the end, I would not be surprised if Manafort doesn't turn as well...he seems to be the only one who didn't jump the sinking ship.

By the end of this, Mueller may be able to tell Trump to resign the Presidency or he will charge his entire family with multiple crimes and put them in jail for decades, and recommend that he be impeached.

What possible reason could you have for believing that. There is NOTHING in this indictment to indicate such a thing. In fact, they said no American was aware of the Russian involvement.

On the other hand we do have solid evidence that the Clintons and Obama used a fake dossier paid for by the Clintons to feed to the media and create false evidence that they used to get warrants against the Trump campaign.

I guess it doesn't surprise me that you just hate losing the election so much that you've become irrational about it.

I think the Mueller witch hunt is over because there is nowhere else to go but to the witch who started it all and if she goes down she'll take too many of the previous administration with her starting with Loretta Lynch and possibly ending with Obama.

[The_Noble_Cause]

What possible reason could you have for believing that. There is NOTHING in this indictment to indicate such a thing. In fact, they said no American was aware of the Russian involvement.

On the other hand we do have solid evidence that the Clintons and Obama used a fake dossier paid for by the Clintons to feed to the media and create false evidence that they used to get warrants against the Trump campaign.

I guess it doesn't surprise me that you just hate losing the election so much that you've become irrational about it.

I think the Mueller witch hunt is over because there is nowhere else to go but to the witch who started it all and if she goes down she'll take too many of the previous administration with her starting with Loretta Lynch and possibly ending with Obama.

Irrational is an apt word, Sherrie.
Thanks for being one of the few voices of reason around here.

Imo, even if Mueller has texts between Trump and Putin plotting to buy ads on FB, it's still not a crime.
Since when is FB and Twitter the exclusive property of the US? It's a multinational business.
If me and 12 of my friends privately funded ads for or against Maduro have we committed high crimes against Venezuela? This is some very thin watery gruel.

As I mentioned earlier, the Russia social media ads ran the gamut from being pro-Black Lives Matter to anti-Hillary. Below is an actual Russian-funded ad. Does anyone believe this changed a single vote? Get real.

[Boomchild]

No, its that I know anything typed here is a complete waste of time and I have better things to do. I just drop in for a few random comments now and then.

Thank you for letting me know that. Now I know there is no need to respond to your posts.

[Boomchild]

Aren't you Americans embarrassed by this president?

The question I have - is how far does the hypocrisy go? Clinton gets impeached for a blowjob, but "your" guy can fuck hookers and playmates, be financed by the Russian mob, make everything about himself and reverse every sensible regulation Obama Administration put in place?

How low can he go?

PLEASE respond....what would Drumpf have to do to lose your vote???????????????

You post this after posting this:

No, its that I know anything typed here is a complete waste of time and I have better things to do. I just drop in for a few random comments now and then.

Like you said, posting here is a waste of time so why should people feel compelled to respond to your question? Or could it be that you are contradicting yourself.

[Monker]

"Tell me, when was my last "run to Andrew" moment?"

See page 200.

Even after going there and reading it, I have no idea what you are talking about. You are wrong.

Keep that record of lying perfect Monker. Everybody saw it.

In the 20yrs or so that I have been on forums Andrew has owned, I can count on one hand the number of times I went to Andrew about an issue. Other than the removal of the picture of my family, I have not complained to Andrew about anything on this thread.

Andrew posts reads and posts here for his own reasons. He complains to you all about things he doesn't like not because somebody else points them out - but because he reads them himself.

You brain damaged conspiracy theory idiots just make shit up and believe otherwise because it fits your agenda.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Other than the removal of the picture of my family, I have not complained to Andrew about anything on this thread.

"picture of my family" = a public dating profile on a sleazy hook-up site.
Because nothing says "Father of the Year" quite like contracting fatal dick mumps.

You brain damaged conspiracy theory idiots just make shit up and believe otherwise because it fits your agenda.

Didn't you just say: "[Andrew] has repeatedly said here to stop the personal attacks, so I have."
Throw another Monker lie on the pyre.

[ohsherrie]

What possible reason could you have for believing that. There is NOTHING in this indictment to indicate such a thing. In fact, they said no American was aware of the Russian involvement.

On the other hand we do have solid evidence that the Clintons and Obama used a fake dossier paid for by the Clintons to feed to the media and create false evidence that they used to get warrants against the Trump campaign.

I guess it doesn't surprise me that you just hate losing the election so much that you've become irrational about it.

I think the Mueller witch hunt is over because there is nowhere else to go but to the witch who started it all and if she goes down she'll take too many of the previous administration with her starting with Loretta Lynch and possibly ending with Obama.

Irrational is an apt word, Sherrie.
Thanks for being one of the few voices of reason around here.

Imo, even if Mueller has texts between Trump and Putin plotting to buy ads on FB, it's still not a crime.
Since when is FB and Twitter the exclusive property of the US? It's a multinational business.
If me and 12 of my friends privately funded ads for or against Maduro have we committed high crimes against Venezuela? This is some very thin watery gruel.

As I mentioned earlier, the Russia social media ads ran the gamut from being pro-Black Lives Matter to anti-Hillary. Below is an actual Russian-funded ad. Does anyone believe this changed a single vote? Get real.

I would hope that rational people would realize that when two people who argued so heatedly against the former conservative administration are now arguing against the liberal side there must be a reason.

I wish there was some way to get people to look at what the President has actually done as president since he came into office instead of the liberal media's babbling bullshit.

[steveo777]

This place could use some trolls..err, help. Way too lopsided there. I can't believe I used to be a moderator there!
https://forums.anandtech.com/forums/pol ... d-news.24/

[Monker]

I would hope that rational people would realize that when two people who argued so heatedly against the former conservative administration are now arguing against the liberal side there must be a reason.

During the primaries you were on here saying you hoped Trump would win because you felt he would destroy the Republican party. So, you being on the Trump side of this should not be surprising at all...despite what your current beliefs are.

I wish there was some way to get people to look at what the President has actually done as president since he came into office instead of the liberal media's babbling bullshit.

The bablling buillshit comes from the President himself...such as the state of the union lullaby. Or, his lunch dates, like Sean Hannity, Or, midnight rendezvous's like Devin Nunes.

[Monker]

No, it's taking that speech and twisting it in an attempt to show proof that there was no collusion And you saying this was the "results" of the investigation implies that the "Russian meddling" portion is over. You are being very naive if that is what you truly believe.

First of all,,.you all have been saying for over a year that there was no Russian meddling. Now you all will go about downplaying it...which should be totally expected.

These indictments are at the lowest level...and I would expect there to be many more. In fact, IMO, all of these sealed indictments are more probably related to Russian collusion than anything Republicans are writing in bogus memos.

Trump's collusion piece is more dealing more directly with the Russian government. I doubt you will hear anything on this until Trump testifies in some form to Mueller.

In addition to this, we have Bannon and Gates cooperating with Mueller. If you think people at that level are not giving info about Trump and his family, you are being extremely naive. In the end, I would not be surprised if Manafort doesn't turn as well...he seems to be the only one who didn't jump the sinking ship.

By the end of this, Mueller may be able to tell Trump to resign the Presidency or he will charge his entire family with multiple crimes and put them in jail for decades, and recommend that he be impeached.

What possible reason could you have for believing that. There is NOTHING in this indictment to indicate such a thing. In fact, they said no American was aware of the Russian involvement.

For believing what? That last sentence? There are so many key people who have turned against Trump that it is clear there is going to be a huge mountain of evidence against him and his family. Mueller is not going to agree to a deal where he gets nothing substantial in return. The point of being able to make a deal with someone in Mueller's position is that you have something to give...not that he has something you want...and at the level these people are at, IMO, the main people they would be implicating are Donald Trump and his family.

On the other hand we do have solid evidence that the Clintons and Obama used a fake dossier paid for by the Clintons to feed to the media and create false evidence that they used to get warrants against the Trump campaign.

No you don't. You have a biased memo of opinion...or a bunch of made up bullshit by people like Sean Hannity. The "facts" that prove such things are classified...and you have read NOTHING about them.

I guess it doesn't surprise me that you just hate losing the election so much that you've become irrational about it.

It has nothing to do with losing an election. It has to do with getting an unqualified, tiny hand, orangutan, who has no clue what he is doing, out of office before he does irreparable harm to this country, or does something stupid like launch nukes at North Korea. This thing has no business being President of anything.

I think the Mueller witch hunt is over because there is nowhere else to go but to the witch who started it all and if she goes down she'll take too many of the previous administration with her starting with Loretta Lynch and possibly ending with Obama.

First, all of this crap about Clinton and Democrats has gone NOWHERE in two years of constant "it's almost time" from idiots like KC. NOTHING has happened. Uranium One, for example, is based on nothing but a conspiracy theory, "connect the dots", gradeschool mentality that has nothing to do with simple facts of timing. How can you bribe somebody to vote a certain way years before they were SOS and could even vote...unless you are a time traveler, you would have no clue they would even be in a position to vote. Not only that, you have to believe in such a huge conspiracy that it is hysterical...the entirety being bribed by Russians in order to get this deal. It's all bullshit. uranium One was passed because at the time we were in Russian reset, despite the argument the truth is we were really not giving up much - we IMPORT almost all of our uranium.

Mueller's investigation is NOT over because he has not interviewed Trump. Until that happens, you KNOW it is still on.

[Andrew]

At this point, I am willing to vote for Trump again just to piss you and Monker off.

Your downfall, not mine.

[Andrew]

No, its that I know anything typed here is a complete waste of time and I have better things to do. I just drop in for a few random comments now and then.

Thank you for letting me know that. Now I know there is no need to respond to your posts.

Er, yes.... like this

[Monker]

At this point, I am willing to vote for Trump again just to piss you and Monker off.

Your downfall, not mine.

Yeah, well, you say that now. But, just wait until he starts blaming Austria for WWI, can't find it in on the globe gets all pissed off and nukes Australia instead.

[Andrew]

There's no question he's stupid enough to do just about anything....

[frfksks]

At this point, I am willing to vote for Trump again just to piss you and Monker off.

Your downfall, not mine.

Yeah, well, you say that now. But, just wait until he starts blaming Austria for WWI, can't find it in on the globe gets all pissed off and nukes Australia instead.

Hilarious!
& gut wrenching - it's so absurdly possible...


.

[annpea]

At this point, I am willing to vote for Trump again just to piss you and Monker off.

Your downfall, not mine.

Yeah, well, you say that now. But, just wait until he starts blaming Austria for WWI, can't find it in on the globe gets all pissed off and nukes Australia instead.

LMAOF: I love you Andrew and you too Monker best comments I've read all year.

[annpea]

He even has children angry at him now...SAD!