They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[ohsherrie]

Rosanne's pro Trump series got such high ratings that Fox is considering bringing back Tom Allen's show Las Man Standing.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/fox-c ... UE?ocid=sf

[ohsherrie]

Outside Counsel is John Huber from Utah..I doubt this is copyrighted but just in case here’s the link. Appointed by lil berry, so that should ease everyone’s mind on partisanship.

http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... views.html

List of things that we know happened in relation to Hillary's tenure as SOS and as a candidate, whether the Dems want them to be called criminal or not, would seem to fit the criteria for a Special Council much more so than the Russia, Russia, Russia nonsense, but so it goes in the swamp. I'm just glad somebody is doing something and it's not all just getting swept under the rug.

The fact that they're even going this far means they know they can't just ignore it any longer.

[ohsherrie]

This is total bullshit!

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28834/la ... benshapiro

[steveo777]

This is total bullshit!

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28834/la ... benshapiro

We've heard that hope and fundamental change message before, and it turned out to be not so pretty. This guy is backed by someone and I have a feeling I know who it is. These "modern day liberals", and I know you and TNC are not them, disgust me! I have no problem with you two...at all. There is a new breed of leftists, who are out to destroy every semblance we once had as a country. I know you recognize it.

[ohsherrie]

This is total bullshit!

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28834/la ... benshapiro

Read the comments below.

I don't see comments. I'm not a member I just followed a link from FB.

[ohsherrie]

This is total bullshit!

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28834/la ... benshapiro

We've heard that hope and fundamental change message before, and it turned out to be not so pretty. This guy is backed by someone and I have a feeling I know who it is. These "modern day liberals", and I know you and TNC are not them, disgust me! I have no problem with you two...at all. There is a new breed of leftists, who are out to destroy every semblance we once had as a country. I know you recognize it.

They're why I no longer consider myself liberal. I don't like labels anyway. I am who I am. The left will call me conservative. The right will call me liberal. I just call me an American with practical common sense who thinks for herself.

[Monker]

This is total bullshit!

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28834/la ... benshapiro

Why? She called him out, and he went right to where it hurts the most - her $'s. Smart kid. She should have not even commented on it. And, her "apology" was a joke. "Holy week" has nothing to do with anything....and he is right, the only reason she did it was because his boycott was having success. It almost seems to me that FOX told her to apologize.

Conservatives and the alt-right should find something else to complain about...you are making yourselves look stupid by picking fights with teens - and then losing.

[Monker]

Andrew, BTW, here is how you change the max post length...about halfway down, it shows the setting:

https://www.inmotionhosting.com/support ... t-settings

There you go. Monker admits he can't win so censorship for all. That is how liberals work. See Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Castro, Chavez, ect. Only liberal Monker approved posts should be seen. No wonder he wants everybodies guns. Look at what he stands for.

Hey, Andrew, maybe you can change some of these other links, too. ConservativeTreeHouse can be: ConservativeShitHouse, for example.

[Monker]

Andrew, can you maybe limit the size of posts? it's going to get a bit ridiculous here if everybody starts pasting entire articles.

The bandwidth argument died a long time ago. If you don't like the content, or length of a post, you think we shouldn't have it either. Why not just scroll past it, rather than advocate your will on the rest of us? You make a great little pinko brown shirt. Typical. Your ilk try and suppress free conversation you don't agree with. Maybe you should move to a country that does it your way. Go down some tide pods, or eat some crayons, which are non toxic, you window licker, you.

Hey, Andrew, is there a way to limit the bandwidth of certain posters here? Throttle their IP address whenever they try to post here.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Why? She called him out, and he went right to where it hurts the most - her $'s. Smart kid.

It's almost as smart as pleading and begging a websmaster to censor news links you disagree with.

Laura Ingraham's tweet linked to an article. That article commented on information that was publicly available. This kid has made himself a grandstanding public figure. So why isn't such commentary fair game?

Is this little shit above criticism because he witnessed a tragedy? That's not how life works. He better get used to it.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Hey, Andrew, maybe you can change some of these other links, too. ConservativeTreeHouse can be: ConservativeShitHouse, for example.

But remember, folks - Monker says what this thread needs is civil discussion and diversity of ideas.

Sure sounds like it, right?

[Monker]

But remember, folks - Monker says what this thread needs is civil discussion and diversity of ideas.

Just to clarify. I believe ALL forums need respectful conversations and a diversity of opinion.

I believe that is now impossible in THIS thread...and it is up to Andrew on what to do about it. If it were me, I'd shut it down.

[ohsherrie]

This is total bullshit!

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28834/la ... benshapiro

Why? She called him out, and he went right to where it hurts the most - her $'s. Smart kid. She should have not even commented on it. And, her "apology" was a joke. "Holy week" has nothing to do with anything....and he is right, the only reason she did it was because his boycott was having success. It almost seems to me that FOX told her to apologize.

Conservatives and the alt-right should find something else to complain about...you are making yourselves look stupid by picking fights with teens - and then losing.

You still believe this is a teenager? Everything to do with this "young man" is Alt-Left driven bullshit. Have you really paid attention who he is, what he has done and said before, do you care if he has any substance or is it enough for you that he pisses off conservatives?

I'm not a huge fan of Laura, I agree with some of the things she says. I don't know why she was interested in this guy's gpa but I see nothing in what she said to cause his reaction. It's just another grandstand by this phony punk. Probably makes hid sugar daddy Soros proud.

[ohsherrie]

But remember, folks - Monker says what this thread needs is civil discussion and diversity of ideas.

Just to clarify. I believe ALL forums need respectful conversations and a diversity of opinion.

I believe that is now impossible in THIS thread...and it is up to Andrew on what to do about it. If it were me, I'd shut it down.

If that's how you feel about this forum why don't you just leave? I'm sure you know of lots of liberal forums out there where you could have civil discussion.

Let me guess , it's not enough for you to take all your toys and leave the playground. You have to blow up the playground (like you did on vh1).

[Boomchild]

Let me guess , it's not enough for you to take all your toys and leave the playground. You have to blow up the playground (like you did on vh1).

Haven't you heard? In this very thread he said he was done posting in this thread. Yet here he still is. He told everyone here the thread has become a waste of his time. Yet here he is still posting. Then he went on to trying to encourage Andrew to delete this thread. Yet here he STILL is. Now he has moved onto trying to get Andrew to limit what can be posted here. Seems to me that these are actions of desperate individual. Mionker sure keeps participating in something he thinks is a waste or not constructive. That's some logic.

[Boomchild]

What are y'all talking about?

Early on in this thread when someone brought up something related to HRC or Obama, Monker would attempt to decree that said posts "didn't belong" in this thread. That they should be posted in the "correct" thread. These exchanges prompted someone to create a thread called "Bash the Clintons and Liberals" thread. It was up for a while and then Andrew deleted said thread. Then Andrew began his Trump bashing in this thread. See the pattern?

[Monker]

If that's how you feel about this forum why don't you just leave? I'm sure you know of lots of liberal forums out there where you could have civil discussion.

Nope, don't go looking for forums. MR is the only forum I post to, on any topic. If Andrew closes it, I'd probably go to some scifi forum and maybe reply to music posts once in a while on FB.

Let me guess , it's not enough for you to take all your toys and leave the playground. You have to blow up the playground (like you did on vh1).

LOL...yeah, I blew up VH1, sure. That place is a perfect example of what happens on unmoderated forums where anything goes. You can either deal with it and thrive in it, or it drives you crazy. I remember making up some long epic poetry/opera story thing about Perry and Journey and posting it in episodes. It was modeled mostly from Lexx, if anyone cares. Did anybody even read it? I don't know, it was just fun to do...and other people were posting wild and crazy stuff, and that was my response I think some people were posting under multiple ID"s. Meanie was there, bombing people. Was that where the crazy lady was who said she visited Perry in the hospital during his surgery and was having some type of phone sex affair with him? Then there was the prophet lady who kept writing posts and making stuff up...I think she was under different ID's, too, PerryMedium or something like that. That place was nuts, but fun. Yeah, I blew it up, sure, LOL.

[ohsherrie]

What are y'all talking about?

Early on in this thread when someone brought up something related to HRC or Obama, Monker would attempt to decree that said posts "didn't belong" in this thread. That they should be posted in the "correct" thread. These exchanges prompted someone to create a thread called "Bash the Clintons and Liberals" thread. It was up for a while and then Andrew deleted said thread. Then Andrew began his Trump bashing in this thread. See the pattern?

Got it.

[Monker]

What are y'all talking about?

Early on in this thread when someone brought up something related to HRC or Obama, Monker would attempt to decree that said posts "didn't belong" in this thread. That they should be posted in the "correct" thread. These exchanges prompted someone to create a thread called "Bash the Clintons and Liberals" thread. It was up for a while and then Andrew deleted said thread. Then Andrew began his Trump bashing in this thread. See the pattern?

That is NOT what happened. The 'pattern' is you guys just make shit up to fit your agenda.

Some of you were demanding I reply to your Hillary/Obama rants. I said that I'd be happy to talk about that if you posted it in the correct thread...this thread is supposed to be dedicated to the Trump Presidency, not the Obama one. I believe I then made a list of Trump topics that you all ignore that could be discussed here.

That got twisted by some of you into meaning what you said above. I have never said to not post Clinton/Obama stuff here. I have only said I won't reply to it, and if you want me to - post it to the correct thread. I have never replied to a post here and said, "this is in the wrong thread..." YOU GUYS HAVE, not me. And, I generally do not get into long discussions about Clinton or Obama here in the Trump thread.

Then V., or somebody, started the Clinton bashing thread (that is what it was literally called). You guys used it to bash Clinton...there was no intent to have any real discussion there so I let it be. Andrew deleted it a long while back.

The bottom line is that I believe the Trump Presidency is such a horrific failure that you don't want to talk about it. Who wants to talk about all of the latest hirings/firings of such a deranged man? Who wants to talk about Trump's latest scandal, or the latest interview with someone who is suing him? Who wants to talk about who Mueller is interviewing next and why? These are the type of things that happen to Trump DAILY.

Nah, you don't want to talk about that stuff. You'd much rather go back in time up to 25yrs and talk about the same topics but under the Clinton name and not Trump. You all are in denial about how horrible Trump really is.

[Monker]

What are y'all talking about?

Early on in this thread when someone brought up something related to HRC or Obama, Monker would attempt to decree that said posts "didn't belong" in this thread. That they should be posted in the "correct" thread. These exchanges prompted someone to create a thread called "Bash the Clintons and Liberals" thread. It was up for a while and then Andrew deleted said thread. Then Andrew began his Trump bashing in this thread. See the pattern?

That is NOT what happened. The 'pattern' is you guys just make shit up to fit your agenda.

Some of you were demanding I reply to your Hillary/Obama rants. I said that I'd be happy to talk about that if you posted it in the correct thread...this thread is supposed to be dedicated to the Trump Presidency, not the Obama one. I believe I then made a list of Trump topics that you all ignore that could be discussed here.

That got twisted by some of you into meaning what you said above. I have never said to not post Clinton/Obama stuff here. I have only said I won't reply to it, and if you want me to - post it to the correct thread. I have never replied to a post here and said, "this is in the wrong thread..." YOU GUYS HAVE, not me. And, I generally do not get into long discussions about Clinton or Obama here in the Trump thread.

Then V., or somebody, started the Clinton bashing thread (that is what it was literally called). You guys used it to bash Clinton...there was no intent to have any real discussion there so I let it be. Andrew deleted it a long while back.

The bottom line is that I believe the Trump Presidency is such a horrific failure that you don't want to talk about it. Who wants to talk about all of the latest hirings/firings of such a deranged man? Who wants to talk about Trump's latest scandal, or the latest interview with someone who is suing him? Who wants to talk about who Mueller is interviewing next and why? These are the type of things that happen to Trump DAILY.

Nah, you don't want to talk about that stuff. You'd much rather go back in time up to 25yrs and talk about the same topics but under the Clinton name and not Trump. You all are in denial about how horrible Trump really is.[/quote]

And, if you want to see the truth, go back to around July 14/2017 on this forum and read it for yourself. Yes, they are hanging on and bringing shit up from that long ago, and before.

[ohsherrie]

Monker, you said in an earlier post that being "king" didn't matter to you. I think it matters to you so much that you would rather see this thread disappear than fail to at least be in the majority. I don't know what may have happened to all of those liberal posters that you say have been driven away. They may have decided that they really didn't want to argue politics or they may have decided that their candidate was really too flawed to continue to defend. If they were run away please show me some example posts because nobody else seems to remember it that way.

I've known you on message boards for over 15 years and i know this is typical behavior for you.

You are the one who can't have a civil discussion with anybody who isn't generally of your same opinion, or that you can't dominate. Your candidate didn't win and there is nobody on this board who wanted her to, so you have nobody to bolster your arguments. It could never occur to you that your arguments are flawed.

When Andrew spoke up for you it was all you needed to PLAY THE KING OF THE BOARD! Regardless of the fact that you still can't support your arguments.

[Monker]

He could just make it a dating website, but then you'd be running people off. But do continue with your admission of defeat and need for censorship so you can with an argument.

Hey Andrew, maybe you can just ban anybody with K.C. in their nick.

[The_Noble_Cause]

I believe that is now impossible in THIS thread...and it is up to Andrew on what to do about it. If it were me, I'd shut it down.

"Impossible" based on what? You keep referring to liberals being run off this thread. But aside from Ann, you offer no examples. I strongly supported Bernie in the primaries and I'm still here. Is that not liberal? All informed opinions are welcome and encouraged here.

[Monker]

Monker, you said in an earlier post that being "king" didn't matter to you. I think it matters to you so much that you would rather see this thread disappear than fail to at least be in the majority. I don't know what may have happened to all of those liberal posters that you say have been driven away. They may have decided that they really didn't want to argue politics or they may have decided that their candidate was really too flawed to continue to defend. If they were run away please show me some example posts because nobody else seems to remember it that way.

I've known you on message boards for over 15 years and i know this is typical behavior for you.

You are the one who can't have a civil discussion with anybody who isn't generally of your same opinion, or that you can't dominate. Your candidate didn't win and there is nobody on this board who wanted her to, so you have nobody to bolster your arguments. It could never occur to you that your arguments are flawed.

Ok, so when have I not been civil to you in this thread?

As for others, as I said, wait until someone new shows up and see how they are treated.

Why can't people accept the fact that Trump won and move on from the election? I have said MANY times that, yes, Clinton lost. That is NOT an issue with me.

My issue is with the current President and his insanity. My God, the guy is so loopy he nominates his doctor to head the VA...even though he has no manager experience. It's just crazy...he now hires people because he likes what they say on FOX News. His turn-over rate is now 50%, and some major vacancees have never even been filled, while his top advisors have turned over up to three times in one year. The guy can't even find experienced lawyers to defend him. He agrees to sign congressional compromises, and then sends them back because he did not like them - multiple times, and then blames Democrats for a rush POS final bill that HE and the WH negotiated...which gave him LESS than the compromises with Democrats that he refused! He spends up to 1/3 of his time ON VACATION.

I could go on and on and on about very basic competencies that Trump FAILS. It has NOTHING to do with Clinton or Obama...put that in the past. Who are the people who hang on to Clinton and Obama and constantly discuss them? It's not me...IMO, it seems certain people want to stay in the campaign, or even before, and not pay any attention to Trump as President because they would MUCH rather discuss Clinton and Obama...and one of those people is Trump the Tyrant himself...and of course, his zombies follow him.

When Andrew spoke up for you it was all you needed to PLAY THE KING OF THE BOARD!

When did he speak up for me? I have no idea what you are talking about.

I'm not "king" of this board. I am a majority of 1, and THAT IS HOW I LIKE IT. If there were a dozen people speaking like me, I probably wouldn't say nearly as much.

Regardless of the fact that you still can't support your arguments.

Which argument?

[The_Noble_Cause]

Trump wants out of Syria. How soon till fake liberals and Neocons say he simply wants out to help Putin?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/29/politics ... index.html

[The_Noble_Cause]

As for others, as I said, wait until someone new shows up and see how they are treated.

Sounds like a definite dodge to me. Sherrie asked for examples of posters being run off. Only one I can think of is S2M. And he was no choir boy in his posting etiquette either. You have no proof because you are just lying again.

[Boomchild]

Trump wants out of Syria. How soon till fake liberals and Neocons say he simply wants out to help Putin?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/29/politics ... index.html

1.2 seconds.

[Boomchild]

Monker, you said in an earlier post that being "king" didn't matter to you. I think it matters to you so much that you would rather see this thread disappear than fail to at least be in the majority. I don't know what may have happened to all of those liberal posters that you say have been driven away. They may have decided that they really didn't want to argue politics or they may have decided that their candidate was really too flawed to continue to defend. If they were run away please show me some example posts because nobody else seems to remember it that way.

I've known you on message boards for over 15 years and i know this is typical behavior for you.

You are the one who can't have a civil discussion with anybody who isn't generally of your same opinion, or that you can't dominate. Your candidate didn't win and there is nobody on this board who wanted her to, so you have nobody to bolster your arguments. It could never occur to you that your arguments are flawed.

When Andrew spoke up for you it was all you needed to PLAY THE KING OF THE BOARD! Regardless of the fact that you still can't support your arguments.

Ohsherrie, Notice how Monker has completely ignored the comments about how he said he was done here and wasn't going to waste his time posting in this thread. I think you just may be putting too much effort in responding to him.

[ohsherrie]

Monker, you said in an earlier post that being "king" didn't matter to you. I think it matters to you so much that you would rather see this thread disappear than fail to at least be in the majority. I don't know what may have happened to all of those liberal posters that you say have been driven away. They may have decided that they really didn't want to argue politics or they may have decided that their candidate was really too flawed to continue to defend. If they were run away please show me some example posts because nobody else seems to remember it that way.

I've known you on message boards for over 15 years and i know this is typical behavior for you.

You are the one who can't have a civil discussion with anybody who isn't generally of your same opinion, or that you can't dominate. Your candidate didn't win and there is nobody on this board who wanted her to, so you have nobody to bolster your arguments. It could never occur to you that your arguments are flawed.

When Andrew spoke up for you it was all you needed to PLAY THE KING OF THE BOARD! Regardless of the fact that you still can't support your arguments.

Ohsherrie, Notice how Monker has completely ignored the comments about how he said he was done here and wasn't going to waste his time posting in this thread. I think you just may be putting too much effort in responding to him.

I think you're right Boomchild, but he challenged me by not accepting that I agreed with TNC and assured people that I could speak for myself. I spoke for myself.

[Boomchild]

Hope(ful) Hicks
@WHCommHopeHicks
·
3h
Many are misinformed about AG Sessions. The IG investigation has been ongoing, secrecy was key. John Huber was brought in months ago for prosecutorial power, to assemble a grand jury, to indict.

You’re hearing about Huber now bc the investigation is basically completed.


Hope(ful) Hicks
Hope(ful) Hicks
@WHCommHopeHicks
·
3h
The next step is rolling out the results in phases, at a pace and in an order that’s digestible for the general public. Buckle up!

Remember when Trump mentioned to watch for "something special" in early April?