They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[Boomchild]

Please insert quarter to play again.

You posted the following:

I just asked if somebody ever got fired over an Obama toon.

The teacher got fired of an instance that involved a cartoon criticizing Obama.

The article about the NAACP was about calling for the firing over a cartoon criticizing Obama.

The article other article surrounded someone getting fired for speaking out against a cartoon criticizing Obama.

The articles are all relevant to what you asked. The main point being is this kind thing goes on both sides of the street. It isn't exclusive to one politician or the party they are affiliated with. You are trying to make the case that this kind thing happens in only one direction. The articles show that it doesn't.

[Boomchild]

I wish everybody who wants to live in a sanctuary city would move to Central America and start a community for all of these people they're trying to protect from enforcement of our immigration laws.

I have a better idea. We are told the people illegally entering the U.S. are doing so because they are fleeing economic problems, oppression, violence etc.. Why don't these people plan trips to the countries that people are fleeing from. They could help the citizens of those countries organize demonstrations, protests, help start political campaigns for people they think can solve the ills of said countries. That would be a great "humanitarian" gesture right??

[RPM]

And it's getting better every day. In fact we're going to make it GREAT again! #MAGA

Poor bastards have to run against record low unemployment, record high stock market, low taxes, less war, more opportunities, nuke free NK, and a man they said could never even be nominated to run. He’s a beast and we may see our first 50 State landslide in a little over 2 years.

Never count Donald Trump out, you will lose.

And there are the Facts. spot on, good luck lib / prog losers.
Biden is your best option....what a joke.

[steveo777]

You sound cocksure, but who's counting?

Hey dude, we could simplify your problem and just tell you, you have your head up your ass, but that would be giving your rectum too much credit.

[ohsherrie]

I wish everybody who wants to live in a sanctuary city would move to Central America and start a community for all of these people they're trying to protect from enforcement of our immigration laws.

I have a better idea. We are told the people illegally entering the U.S. are doing so because they are fleeing economic problems, oppression, violence etc.. Why don't these people plan trips to the countries that people are fleeing from. They could help the citizens of those countries organize demonstrations, protests, help start political campaigns for people they think can solve the ills of said countries. That would be a great "humanitarian" gesture right??

Perfect solution!

[verslibre]

Hey dude, we could simplify your problem and just tell you, you have your head up your ass, but that would be giving your rectum too much credit.

I think you'd have a much easier time with your head, considering your ass is bald.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Hey dude, we could simplify your problem and just tell you, you have your head up your ass, but that would be giving your rectum too much credit.

I think you'd have a much easier time with your head, considering your ass is bald.

Y'know, I'm all for a no-holds-barred forum smackdown, but most of your comments don't even make any sense.

[verslibre]

Please insert quarter to play again.

You posted the following:

I just asked if somebody ever got fired over an Obama toon.

I also posted this:

I meant actual newspapers, rags, publications, etc.

See the difference?

The teacher got fired of an instance that involved a cartoon criticizing Obama.

The so-called "cartoon" is actually a photograph with a little ink added to it.

The article about the NAACP was about calling for the firing over a cartoon criticizing Obama.

Like I said, the NAACP is a third party organization, not the publisher. Nor was there mention of any fire or suspension afterward.

The article other article surrounded someone getting fired for speaking out against a cartoon criticizing Obama.

She was an editor, not the cartoonist.

The articles are all relevant to what you asked. The main point being is this kind thing goes on both sides of the street. It isn't exclusive to one politician or the party they are affiliated with. You are trying to make the case that this kind thing happens in only one direction. The articles show that it doesn't.

I asked if any cartoonists had been fired by their employer for drawing an Obama toon. Technically, none of your examples qualify.

[verslibre]

Hey dude, we could simplify your problem and just tell you, you have your head up your ass, but that would be giving your rectum too much credit.

I think you'd have a much easier time with your head, considering your ass is bald.

Y'know, I'm all for a no-holds-barred forum smackdown, but most of your comments don't even make any sense.

Neither do Steve's, but I don't give a shit.

[ohsherrie]

Looks like Ryan, Nunes and Gowdy are about to unleash the kraken.

https://mobile.twitter.com/fauxnews/sta ... 85/video/1

I love watching Gowdy tear into them when he's really fired up.

[Boomchild]

I asked if any cartoonists had been fired by their employer for drawing an Obama toon. Technically, none of your examples qualify.

All you are doing is splitting hairs. You and I both know what you are trying to prove is that the bias in the media only goes one way. It doesn't. Besides that, a media organization has the right to control what it does and does not publish as well as who creates the content they publish.

[verslibre]

I asked if any cartoonists had been fired by their employer for drawing an Obama toon. Technically, none of your examples qualify.

All you are doing is splitting hairs.

No, you are. You've yet to provide a legit example of what I asked for. I wasn't on a witch hunt, I was just curious. You're trying to turn it into a crusade.

You and I both know what you are trying to prove is that the bias in the media only goes one way. It doesn't. Besides that, a media organization has the right to control what it does and does not publish as well as who creates the content they publish.

Again, that's not what this was about. You just love to hear yourself talk/type.

[Boomchild]

Looks like Ryan, Nunes and Gowdy are about to unleash the kraken.

https://mobile.twitter.com/fauxnews/sta ... 85/video/1

I love watching Gowdy tear into them when he's really fired up.

This one text from Strzok where he says "No,no we won't. We will stop it." is a very incriminating statement for a federal law enforcement officer to make. At the very least he should be questioned by a prosecutor about it. He should be asked specifically who he means by "we" and exactly what actions is he referring to when he states "We will stop it". I don't know about you but, this statement shows intent to commit treason or sedition.

[Boomchild]

Again, that's not what this was about. You just leave to hear yourself talk/type.

You can think what ever you like about me. Your just upset that this media company is able to fire at will and it was over a politician you don't care for.

[ohsherrie]

Looks like Ryan, Nunes and Gowdy are about to unleash the kraken.

https://mobile.twitter.com/fauxnews/sta ... 85/video/1

I love watching Gowdy tear into them when he's really fired up.

This one text from Strzok where he says "No,no we won't. We will stop it." is a very incriminating statement for a federal law enforcement officer to make. At the very least he should be questioned by a prosecutor about it. He should be asked specifically who he means by "we" and exactly what actions is he referring to when he states "We will stop it". I don't know about you but, this statement shows intent to commit treason or sedition.

Yes, it does and I don't believe all of the bias that was in the report could possibly have had no effect on the conclusion. I think everything about the conclusion screams bias. Comey itemized all of the evidence that would have been criminal in any other case, then "insubordinately" took it upon himself to say there would be no prosecution. How could that be insubordination when Lynch had already said she was going to go with the FBI's recommendation?

There are a lot of things in that report that need clarification if not further investigation. We can't continue to be snowed by these cover-ups cleverly worded to pass as explanations

[verslibre]

Again, that's not what this was about. You just leave to hear yourself talk/type.

You can think what ever you like about me. Your just upset that this media company is able to fire at will and it was over a politician you don't care for.

Not upset at all. You totally read me wrong, but that's no surprise.

Btw, have you considered changing your username to Veruca_Salt?

[Memorex]

Strzok willing to testify before Congress without immunity or 5th Amendment!

Not sure if that is brave or downright stupid.

[ohsherrie]

Strzok willing to testify before Congress without immunity or 5th Amendment!

Not sure if that is brave or downright stupid.

“Willing and will” are 2 different things.


More..


"Former State Department official Victoria Nuland, who reportedly connected FBI officials to the former British spy who wrote the infamous anti-Trump dossier, will testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee next week."

I think Strzok will lie and weasel like Comey did, but I still want to see Gowdy tear into him. The woman may be more interesting. I really want to hear how Horowitz could conclude that there was no bias in the conclusion.

[The_Noble_Cause]

You and I both know what you are trying to prove is that the bias in the media only goes one way. It doesn't.

Of course that was Vers's point. Now he denies it. Maybe he should just say he was trying to "bazingga" the forum. Everybody in this thread who is anti-Trump can't debate worth shit.

[ohsherrie]

“How is that not classified?” Huma Abedin to FBI when shown email between Clinton & Obama using his pseudonym. Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president’s use of a pseudonym and asked if she could have a copy of the email.”​

Are these emails in the IG report? Even if they're not you know everybody involved with the investigation has to have seen them.

[Boomchild]

Strzok willing to testify before Congress without immunity or 5th Amendment!

Well why not? The IG reported that he saw no evidence that Strzok was biased in investigating the HRC email case. When was the last time we have seen someone being prosecuted over findings by a Congressional oversight committee or Senate intelligence committee? They all know this is a rigged system.

[Boomchild]

Strzok willing to testify before Congress without immunity or 5th Amendment!

Not sure if that is brave or downright stupid.

“Willing and will” are 2 different things.


More..


"Former State Department official Victoria Nuland, who reportedly connected FBI officials to the former British spy who wrote the infamous anti-Trump dossier, will testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee next week."

I think the SIC will here a lot of, "On the advice of council, I am invoking my 5th amendment rights and respectfully decline to answer".

[verslibre]

You and I both know what you are trying to prove is that the bias in the media only goes one way. It doesn't.

Of course that was Vers's point. Now he denies it. Maybe he should just say he was trying to "bazingga" the forum.

And you still can't spell it right. (Btw, it means "Gotcha!")

I asked if a cartoonist had been fired after drawing an Obama cartoon.

Since you jackoffs love to move the goalposts so much, I'll send you post-hole diggers for Christmas.

I'll also make sure to use precise terminology since apparently you can't get the message without it. "Has anyone ever been fired over..." (anyone=cartoonist/illustrator, ffs) turned into "Yeah, the fuckin' janitor got suspended for 30 days without pay after he pulled a drawing with the caption 'Moo-chelle go mooooo!' out of the wastebasket and took it the principal and said 'This is what they're doing in Mr. Humperdinck's kindergarten class these days'..."

Everybody in this thread who is anti-Trump can't debate worth shit.

Everyone here who's pro-Drumpf doesn't hear shit when anything remotely critical of the guy bounces off your foiled skulls. You've got your filters set to max because you can't handle anything except "MAGA!"

You probably all have posters of a shirtless Stephen Miller on your bathroom doors (minus Sherrie).

[verslibre]

If the question is did anyone get fired, I answered already. The Rodeo Clown in Missouri did. What's your point?

My poster is of Mnuchins wife

A clown, right? Not a [political] cartoonist/illustrator? You can't read, either. That's my point!

P.S. BAZINGA!

[The_Noble_Cause]

Since you jackoffs love to move the goalposts so much, I'll send you post-hole diggers for Christmas.

Sure u were.

It sounds like you are making up a rationale for a stupid question (similar to Monker's desperate exercise in Buzzingering). Name a single goal post I moved. Be specific.

Everyone here who's pro-Drumpf doesn't hear shit when anything remotely critical of the guy bounces off your foiled skulls. You've got your filters set to max because you can't handle anything except "MAGA!"

You probably all have posters of a shirtless Stephen Miller on your bathroom doors (minus Sherrie).

I've criticized him for dropping the MOAB, his unconstitutional missile strikes, the federal crackdown on marijuana dispensaries, and his attacks on the First Amendment. Meanwhile, you are on here sounding like an even less funny version of Dennis Miller.

[Boomchild]

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

Why was the FBI’s sick loser, Peter Strzok, working on the totally discredited Mueller team of 13 Angry & Conflicted Democrats, when Strzok was giving Crooked Hillary a free pass yet telling his lover, lawyer Lisa Page, that “we’ll stop” Trump from becoming President? Witch Hunt!

Because your pick for AG is spineless and can't play in the "big boys club". He recused himself based on incorrect advice from legal counsel that was affiliated with the Obama administration. Which further explains his inept actions or lack of as head of the nation's judicial system. Maybe he is part of the swamp you pledged to drain from Washington. At this point, I don't know what your strategy is regarding Sessions. But, I am pretty sure if you continue to give him more rope it's gonna cost you "biggly" in the end. Oh BTW he also was the one that said he wasn't interested in doing any follow up investigations regarding the HRC email server case.

[Monker]

That's the current media lie of the day. Trump said yesterday that the law was there when he took office.

Yeah, and almost everything Donald Judas Trump says is a lie.

Quote the law that says he MUST separate children, including babies, from their mothers. Trump is a pathological liar and you are a naive zombie.

Everytime he tries to do something about imagration, he has Democrats fighting him tooth and nail.

This is an embarrassment. The US now looks no better on human rights than China, Russia, or North Korea. What kind of fucked up nation believes it is OK to separate children from their parents and send them to what amounts to concentration camps in old Wal-Mart stores? What kind of leader feels it is OK to do such a thing? What kind of leadership is the US representing when we do such things. Comparisons to Hitler and Stalin and very valid in this case...and not exaggerations. This country deserves international condemnation for these actions.

These are actions that Donald Jong Trump is 100% responsible for. As I said before in another argument, the Executive branch is responsible for enforcing the law. NOTHING has changed except how Donald Jong Trump enforces the law. Comparisons to Hitler and Stalin are very valid in this case. Trump has decided to enforce the same laws that have existed for years prior to his administration. HE is the asshole who is the root of this embarrassment and he alone should be taking full responsibility for it.

And, you zombies who SUPPORT this policy should also be embarrassed. If it were you who were in some foreign country who had your children taken away, you would probably be in some third world country and feel deprived of your basic human rights.

It is wrong. The worst decision a President has made since the Japanese internment camps.

[Monker]

Looks like Ryan, Nunes and Gowdy are about to unleash the kraken.

https://mobile.twitter.com/fauxnews/sta ... 85/video/1

I love watching Gowdy tear into them when he's really fired up.

This one text from Strzok where he says "No,no we won't. We will stop it." is a very incriminating statement for a federal law enforcement officer to make. At the very least he should be questioned by a prosecutor about it. He should be asked specifically who he means by "we" and exactly what actions is he referring to when he states "We will stop it". I don't know about you but, this statement shows intent to commit treason or sedition.

Oh, please. Bill Maher Nailed this one. It's nothing but a guy who is having an affair trying to impress the girl he's fucking. Get over it. It's texts between horny lovers of a guy trying to act all big and bad ass to impress some lady. And, no "crime" was committed so it is evidence of NOTHING. It's just one more conspiracy theory that you have latched on to.

[Monker]

President Trump isn't trying to get rid of trade, he's trying to make it more fair to This country and it's people.

Creating tariffs doesn't make anything "fair", or create jobs. It does nothing but raise prices and damages the economies of both countries.

As the President has said, what's coming across the border now are the dregs of their society. They range from indigents to small time criminals, to large scale drug dealers, to violent gang members and any combination of them all.

Which is a generalization and is frankly not true.

The same has been said about many immigrant groups that came to the US in numbers. And, again, those who spoke such things - and especially those who acted on that racism - are ALWAYS on the wrong side of history.

There are Muslim enclaves in this country that do live by Sharia Law and they get away with it because none of our law enforcement is notified of any incidents.There is one right here in VA and one in Texas that I know of, but the biggest ones are in Minnesota and Wisconsin. I don't care if you believe it or not.

You are free to practice any type of religious "law" you want. But, that does NOT mean it takes precedence over state and federal law. It just doesn't. You are free to live by the "Law of Moses" in the old testament as well. But, if you go around stoning people, you are violating federal and state laws. It is no different for you.

Israel isn't trying to kill us.

If you are not willing to cut Israel's military aid, then you are not serious. Period.

When we have no borders, when we have no national pride, sovereignty becomes no more than a technicality.

Even if that is true, you are admitting that the US is still a sovereign nation.

But, we do have borders, regardless of your opinion. Just because you lack national pride doesn't mean that nobody feels it.

The US is not losing its sovereignty...saying such things is simple alt-right BULLSHIT.

[Monker]

When Trey,when?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/0 ... ons-video/

So, Chicken Little, when is Clinton going to jail for Uranium One? You do remember the date when I said it would never happen, don't you? You were wrong....nobody is going to jail over it.