They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[Monker]

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

Why was the FBI’s sick loser, Peter Strzok, working on the totally discredited Mueller team of 13 Angry & Conflicted Democrats, when Strzok was giving Crooked Hillary a free pass yet telling his lover, lawyer Lisa Page, that “we’ll stop” Trump from becoming President? Witch Hunt!

Because your pick for AG is spineless and can't play in the "big boys club". He recused himself based on incorrect advice from legal counsel that was affiliated with the Obama administration. Which further explains his inept actions or lack of as head of the nation's judicial system. Maybe he is part of the swamp you pledged to drain from Washington. At this point, I don't know what your strategy is regarding Sessions. But, I am pretty sure if you continue to give him more rope it's gonna cost you "biggly" in the end. Oh BTW he also was the one that said he wasn't interested in doing any follow up investigations regarding the HRC email server case.

You do remember that Chuck Grassley said that if Trump fires Sessions that another AG will never come up for a confirmation vote, correct? And as chairman of the Judiciary committee, he has the power to stop it.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Oh, please. Bill Maher Nailed this one. It's nothing but a guy who is having an affair trying to impress the girl he's fucking. Get over it. It's texts between horny lovers of a guy trying to act all big and bad ass to impress some lady. And, no "crime" was committed so it is evidence of NOTHING. It's just one more conspiracy theory that you have latched on to.

The only factual thing here is that they were having an affair. Everything else is a complete assumption. If I told you a few months ago that FBI agents were texting on how to stop Trump, you would tell me I'm a conspiracy theorist. Now you want to dismiss it as pillow talk. Make up your mind.

[The_Noble_Cause]

And, you zombies who SUPPORT this policy should also be embarrassed. If it were you who were in some foreign country who had your children taken away, you would probably be in some third world country and feel deprived of your basic human rights.

If I illegally snuck into a country, I would understand that there are serious consequences to me and my family. I also would rather have my children looked after by the government -instead of them potentially falling into the hands of child traffickers, which has happened previously.

The worst decision a President has made since the Japanese internment camps.

The comparisons to Stalin and Hitler (and FDR) are just completely insane and disgusting. The Japanese were already citizens, dumbass. They did not break any laws. Criminals with kids who break the law inevitably get separated from their kids anyway. I'll ask you the same question I asked Andrew: how many of these children are you willing to take in? Hypocritical asshole.

[The_Noble_Cause]

So, Chicken Little, when is Clinton going to jail for Uranium One? You do remember the date when I said it would never happen, don't you? You were wrong....nobody is going to jail over it.

You also said Laura Ingraham's days on TV are numbered. You also said Hillary had permission to use a private server. You say a lot of dumb shit. Who the fuck cares what you say.

[Boomchild]

Oh, please. Bill Maher Nailed this one. It's nothing but a guy who is having an affair trying to impress the girl he's fucking. Get over it. It's texts between horny lovers of a guy trying to act all big and bad ass to impress some lady. And, no "crime" was committed so it is evidence of NOTHING. It's just one more conspiracy theory that you have latched on to.

Gee that's great for Bill Maher. But I could care less what his take is on it. He doesn't work for our judicial system nor is he on any of the Congressional or Senate investigative committees. Since the investigations into this matter have yet to be concluded you are jumping the gun when you state no crime has been committed.

[Boomchild]

You do remember that Chuck Grassley said that if Trump fires Sessions that another AG will never come up for a confirmation vote, correct? And as chairman of the Judiciary committee, he has the power to stop it.

Sure I heard his comments on it. I also know that politicians say a lot of things and make a lot of threats. I also know that a lot of times they don't follow through on what they say they will do. I also know that politicians flip flop like a fish out of water on their positions. If the SIC recommends charges to the DOJ and Sessions doesn't act Grassley could very well change his position.

[ohsherrie]

President Trump isn't trying to get rid of trade, he's trying to make it more fair to This country and it's people.

Creating tariffs doesn't make anything "fair", or create jobs. It does nothing but raise prices and damages the economies of both countries.

Not if they agree to his ultimate goal of no tariffs for anybody. Right now he's just trying to keep the US from getting the losing end of the deal. Yes, there may temporarily be some higher prices while our own supply capacities ramp up to meet demand, but the end result means more jobs, less dependence on imports and no trade deficit.

As the President has said, what's coming across the border now are the dregs of their society. They range from indigents to small time criminals, to large scale drug dealers, to violent gang members and any combination of them all.

Which is a generalization and is frankly not true.

The same has been said about many immigrant groups that came to the US in numbers. And, again, those who spoke such things - and especially those who acted on that racism - are ALWAYS on the wrong side of history.

Whatever educated, productive people who are coming here for asylum go to crossing check points and go through the legal procedures for being allowed in as opposed to the criminals who cross illegally. Nobody is acting on racism, that is left wing propaganda bullshit.

There are Muslim enclaves in this country that do live by Sharia Law and they get away with it because none of our law enforcement is notified of any incidents.There is one right here in VA and one in Texas that I know of, but the biggest ones are in Minnesota and Wisconsin. I don't care if you believe it or not.

You are free to practice any type of religious "law" you want. But, that does NOT mean it takes precedence over state and federal law. It just doesn't. You are free to live by the "Law of Moses" in the old testament as well. But, if you go around stoning people, you are violating federal and state laws. It is no different for you.

The Muslims in these enclaves practice their laws within their enclaves and practices that break our laws are staying within the enclaves. Our law enforcement has no involvement.There is no representation of US law enforcement within the enclave. Nobody tells them what has happened. That's the way their laws work. Their religion is their law.

Israel isn't trying to kill us.

If you are not willing to cut Israel's military aid, then you are not serious. Period.

Your wrong opinion. Period.

When we have no borders, when we have no national pride, sovereignty becomes no more than a technicality.

Even if that is true, you are admitting that the US is still a sovereign nation.

But, we do have borders, regardless of your opinion. Just because you lack national pride doesn't mean that nobody feels it.

The US is not losing its sovereignty...saying such things is simple alt-right BULLSHIT.

I didn't say we had no sovereignty at this time. I said globalization and no control of our borders threaten it. I'm not lacking in National Pride, I want our President to make our country great again in fact I'm prouder of my country than I've been in at least 24 years. It's the left who are burning our flag, refusing to stand for our anthem and waving flags of other countries in protest marches.

[ohsherrie]

Maybe Monker is Andrew's source of information.

[Boomchild]

The Muslims in these enclaves practice their laws within their enclaves and practices that break our laws are staying within the enclaves. Our law enforcement has no involvement.There is no representation of US law enforcement within the enclave. Nobody tells them what has happened. That's the way their laws work. Their religion is their law.

We have had similar situations like this with other religious communities. Take the Amish communities and $cientology. In the case of $cientology, many have started to speak out about how their rights were violated and\or they have had crimes committed against them. Yet because it is wrapped around a "religion" the government fails to really act on the situation.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Always amusing when somebody proffers an example of the extreme. "I shot an unarmed burglar for attacking my mother with a crowbar; the burglar sued and won. Why did I get fucked?"

That wasn't my point AT ALL. I am just comparing two examples of illegality.
When a parent breaks the law and gets prosecuted (be it burglary, crossing the border, or WHATEVER) they don't get to bring the family with them to the station.
If you want to make the case for more temporary family shelters, go for it.
Right now, you are just doing a lot of moral preening and virtue signaling.

You guys cannot tolerate ANY criticism of Le Don. So who needs to grow up?

I have criticized Trump plenty. My values don't change regardless of who is in power.

[Monker]

Gee that's great for Bill Maher. But I could care less what his take is on it. He doesn't work for our judicial system nor is he on any of the Congressional or Senate investigative committees. Since the investigations into this matter have yet to be concluded you are jumping the gun when you state no crime has been committed.

I don't think so. This is nothing more than exagerated BS from a desperate niche of people who want to follow Trump's lead to distract from his legal issues. Since the IG report did not find any crimes, weirdos like you say it's a cover up and want even more investigations. There was nothing here, and there never was...get over it already.

[Monker]

Monker wrote:
You do remember that Chuck Grassley said that if Trump fires Sessions that another AG will never come up for a confirmation vote, correct? And as chairman of the Judiciary committee, he has the power to stop it.

Sure I heard his comments on it. I also know that politicians say a lot of things and make a lot of threats. I also know that a lot of times they don't follow through on what they say they will do. I also know that politicians flip flop like a fish out of water on their positions. If the SIC recommends charges to the DOJ and Sessions doesn't act Grassley could very well change his position.

My point is that the wannabe dictator in chief may be taking his words seriously, and/or others around him may and are advising him to not fire Sessions, or Rosenstein beause it will be the end of his presidency if he does.

[Monker]

I love Monkers defense. It's pure globalist lib 100%. It isn't that Clinton isn't guilty with proof, it's that she got away with it so far. And he's proud of that. He's proud his party that he'll say he doesn't belong too still has enough people in power to get away with anything that keeps the in charge and in the money. He's a real Soros puppet.

Quote me and prove that I have ever said "she got away with it so far" or that I'm "proud" of it.

I have said, from the start of this that Clinton will NEVER be charged with anything to do with Uranium One because you have to believe in time travel for any of this BS to be possible. She wasn't SOS when the Clinton Foundation received these donations that are supposed "evidence". Even as SOS she was not in a position to "Force" it through...and she wasn't even head of the committee that approved it. There hasn't been any evidence that SHE actually made the vote, and not her surrogate - who usually votes on such things. In addition, it also had to be approved by STATE energy commisions...which she would have NOTHING to do with. The entire thing was a big bogus lie propped up by FOX commentators - yet another LIE that FOX fully endorsed and you naively believe like a zombie.

And, YOU are the one who arrogantly said "mark this date" when made the post. Did you mark it? Maybe...but you obviously are trying to erase and make stuff up to replace it.

[The_Noble_Cause]

I don't think so. This is nothing more than exagerated BS from a desperate niche of people who want to follow Trump's lead to distract from his legal issues.

Strzok said "No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it” regarding Trump's presidential chances...doesn't sound flirtatious to me at all.
Somebody this politically biased should not have been overseeing investigations related to Trump or Hillary.

And besides, who are you to be analyzing texts between lovers anyway? Weren't you caught red-handed desperately trolling the web for ass? Loser.

[The_Noble_Cause]

And, YOU are the one who arrogantly said "mark this date" when made the post. Did you mark it? Maybe...but you obviously are trying to erase and make stuff up to replace it.

KC was just buzzingering you. You got played.

[Monker]

This has nothing to do with what Trump has done. Going back three years to the children immigrant crisis and trying to add those into statistics is YOU deflecting and trying to change the debate.

Donald Trump and Sarah Sanders have said Trump is just enforcing the law.

The first thing I did was ask you to quote the law that he is enforcing. Can you? I don't think you can. You mentioned the Bush POLICY. Presidential policy is NOT LAW. Trump is not bound to follow what Bush did.

You lie...LIE, LIE, LIE! You have no shame.

Oct. 6, 2015


The recent images of tens of thousands of desperate asylum seekers streaming into Europe recall a smaller but significant migration crisis unfolding along the southern border of the United States: Waves of Central American migrants — many of them children — were detained at the border last year.

A disturbing number of unaccompanied children from Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala have tried to reach the United States in the past two years, risking detention by law enforcement, abuse by human traffickers and dire conditions along the way.

From the beginning of October 2013 through July of 2015, nearly 80,000 unaccompanied minors from those Central American countries were detained by United States authorities along the Mexican border.

And those were the ones who made it that far. Others were ransomed by the very smugglers to whom their families paid thousands of dollars to sneak them into the United States. Some lost limbs during the journey or found themselves sold into sexual slavery, still others turned back.


https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/worl ... rants.html

[Boomchild]

I don't think so. This is nothing more than exagerated BS from a desperate niche of people who want to follow Trump's lead to distract from his legal issues. Since the IG report did not find any crimes, weirdos like you say it's a cover up and want even more investigations. There was nothing here, and there never was...get over it already.

"You don't think so". Thanks for pointing out the bleeding obvious. If you did, you wouldn't have brought his comments up. And yes I do believe that the system is corrupt. I don't trust Washington to investigate itself. I would much prefer that a special prosecutor from outside be DC brought in to look at these matters.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Another FBI informant reached out to Trump campaign says Roger Stone.

Note - Stone is a notorious liar. Still worth a read.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 4e5ebcc4d5

[ohsherrie]

What this is, is the media's way of keeping the I.G. report, and the next one coming off the radar.

Yes, deflection, change the narrative. Not gonna work.

Absolutely, and since the narrative that the majority of the painfully ignorant public will hear is from the MSM it will probably work. It wouldn't matter what level of treason is found within the deep state because all they care about is hating a President who is doing more to help the citizens of this country than any in may awareness of such matters.

[verslibre]

Always amusing when somebody proffers an example of the extreme. "I shot an unarmed burglar for attacking my mother with a crowbar; the burglar sued and won. Why did I get fucked?"

That wasn't my point AT ALL. I am just comparing two examples of illegality.
When a parent breaks the law and gets prosecuted (be it burglary, crossing the border, or WHATEVER) they don't get to bring the family with them to the station.
If you want to make the case for more temporary family shelters, go for it.
Right now, you are just doing a lot of moral preening and virtue signaling.

You guys cannot tolerate ANY criticism of Le Don. So who needs to grow up?

I have criticized Trump plenty. My values don't change regardless of who is in power.

OoOoOo! My nipples are getting hard.

[verslibre]

Your on here happy she has not been charged. Facts are she's nailed to the cross,so stop lying.

"Nailed to the cross"? Interesting choice of words. So she's a martyr?

[verslibre]

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/may/29/donald-trump/trump-blames-democrat-own-policy-separating-family/

[Boomchild]

Always amusing when somebody proffers an example of the extreme. "I shot an unarmed burglar for attacking my mother with a crowbar; the burglar sued and won. Why did I get fucked?"

That wasn't my point AT ALL. I am just comparing two examples of illegality.
When a parent breaks the law and gets prosecuted (be it burglary, crossing the border, or WHATEVER) they don't get to bring the family with them to the station.
If you want to make the case for more temporary family shelters, go for it.
Right now, you are just doing a lot of moral preening and virtue signaling.

You guys cannot tolerate ANY criticism of Le Don. So who needs to grow up?

I have criticized Trump plenty. My values don't change regardless of who is in power.

OoOoOo! My nipples are getting hard.

There you have it. And Andrew wonder's why there's no "debate" here.

[verslibre]

[The_Noble_Cause]

OoOoOo! My nipples are getting hard.

Not funny. Not edgy. Not informative. Not anything. Get lost dude.

[steveo777]

OoOoOo! My nipples are getting hard.

Not funny. Not edgy. Not informative. Not anything. Get lost dude.

He comes here after he's saturated the women's lingerie section of the sears catalogue and run out of Jerkins lotion.

[verslibre]

OoOoOo! My nipples are getting hard.

Not funny. Not edgy. Not informative. Not anything. Get lost dude.

He comes here after he's saturated the women's lingerie section of the sears catalogue and run out of Jerkins lotion.

That's right, baby. I don't pretend-fellate the male models on the page the way you do.

BAZINGA!!

[verslibre]

OoOoOo! My nipples are getting hard.

Not funny. Not edgy. Not informative. Not anything. Get lost dude.

It can't be both the first three and then "not anything." You cancelled yourself out.

[Monker]

Your on here happy she has not been charged. Facts are she's nailed to the cross,so stop lying.

No, I posted about it specifically because of your "mark your calendars..." comment from months ago.

Then I replied to your bullshit made up motives.

Clinton is not going to be charged for Uranium One. It will never happen because it was a made up conspiracy theory promoted by FOX and Trump zombies like you.

[Monker]

Anyone hear the Homeland Security lady earlier? She said that out of 12,000 kids in custody at border, 10,000 of them came alone with no family.

And, you morons talk about "deflection" and changing the topic.

First of all, nobody knows where she got those numbers from. This administration lies about almost everything so nobody should take this seriously until it is verified.

But, that oddly suspicious round number of 10,000 kids is not what anybody is complaining about. It is the 2,000 kids that Donals Dumb-ass is responsible for. You all are on the wrong side of this one and it is pathetic that you are attempting to ignore it and let it go by using these distractions.