Seven Wishes wrote:
Gropfenfuhrer
Adolf Twittler

Moderator: Andrew
Seven Wishes wrote:
Gropfenfuhrer
Adolf Twittler
Seven Wishes wrote:Last time I checked, Flynn pleaded guilty. Quite literally NOTHING has come out exonerating him in any way whatsoever.
ohsherrie wrote:If there is any real basis for these suits more specifics will come out. Right now they're just like a bunch of coyotes scrambling in to try to grab a piece of it.
The only differences between what our President has been doing and what Obama was doing are that is that Trump was enforcing the laws as they were written and Obama was releasing them on their own recognizance to never show up again. I guess it doesn't pay to follow the law too rigidly.
Seven Wishes wrote:Jesus, really? Who the fuck hacked your account?
I just POSTED IRREFUTABLE FACTS. Good Lord. What's insulting is how people on this board peddle in easily debunked conspiracy theories while letting Trump shred the Constitution and destroy our democracy.
Last time I checked, Flynn pleaded guilty. Quite literally NOTHING has come out exonerating him in any way whatsoever.
At what point does country prevail over party for all of you? What does it take? This tribalism is terrifying. One need only scroll back a few weeks to see where most people who post on this board completely flipped their positions as soon as the Gropfenfuhrer did one of his patented about-faces.
BTW, what is more likely? That a cabal of Republicans and traditional conservatives have conspired by the thousands to frame a lifelong liberal-turned-GOP fascist for electioneering, racketeering, gerrymandering, obstruction of justice, money laundering, and treason? Or that Adolf Twittler is guilty? Occam's Razor, anyone?
Fact Finder wrote:Oh shit, Melania is in Texas at a detention center. Here comes the howling mob.....![]()
I love this man!
Fact Finder wrote:Slam dunk, 50 State landslide...this covers a lot of voters.
Treasury Says New Postcard-Sized Tax Return To Be Released Next Week
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphill ... de7ba6408b
The bottom line is that any time any criminal is detained, of course their children are not sent to prison with them! Can you imagine the pictures if children actually got sent to adult prison? Imagine what would happen them in general population."
Fact Finder wrote:Monker wrote:The bottom line is that any time any criminal is detained, of course their children are not sent to prison with them! Can you imagine the pictures if children actually got sent to adult prison? Imagine what would happen them in general population."
This ignores the FACT that these are NOT "criminals". They have not even been to trial. Or, are you an anarchist who no longer believes in a fair trial and being innocent until proven guilty?
Crossing the border illegaly is also not a felony. It's a misdemeanor. So, you are in favor of taking children away from people doing things like "J walking' and other misdemeanor crimes. This also not supposed to be "jail". How often are people charged with misdemeanors sent to jail prior to trial? I bet hardly any of them.
If they were in the general population and accused of a misdemeanor, they would be sent home to await trial.
Illegally crossing the border and not using official entry points is a misdemeanor for first offense and a felony on second.
Why do you lie to yourself so?
Reno v Flores, its the new thing, check it out, even Cuomo quoted it today among many others.
Monker wrote:These people coming from central america have not been here before. These are not a bunch of Mexicans who have been here before.
Fact Finder wrote:verslibre wrote:Monker wrote:These people coming from central america have not been here before. These are not a bunch of Mexicans who have been here before.
You have to remember that to guys like FF there's no difference between "Mexican, Guatemalan, Colombian, Brazilian," etc. To them/him, they're all the same.
Yeah, if they cross our border illegally, they are criminals. Period, stop, end of story. All the same, treated all the same.
Monker wrote:If they were in the general population and accused of a misdemeanor, they would be sent home to await trial.
Monker wrote:Obama decided to let the families go from the start, instead of going down the wormhole of presecuting them...and instead of devoting resources into it, to focus prosecuting the real criminals - gang members, drug dealers, etc. This is not something new that I am stating...I said the same thing to Sherrie months ago.
Monker wrote:The court cases about this are valid. IMO, it would not be out of line for the US government to pay repairations to these families in the same way repairations were paid to Japanese Americans in interment camps during wWII. I don't care if they are not citizens...the USA is better than this and Trump has made a shameful mark on our history.
And, finally, I don't remember the exact quote but during the signing of the executive order, he said something like, "You have to be heartless to not feel for these children." There are obviously a lot of heartless bastards in this forum. Again, it is shameful that you put your personal politics at such a high priority that you justify taking children away from their parents.
You try to mix this with the child refugees being sent from central America. It is not the same situation, it is a completely different topic.
ohsherrie wrote:Until the wall is built I would like to see tanks and other large military vehicle with armed personnel parked all along the borders turning every person back. That would probably cost more than the wall.
Fact Finder wrote:Trump to meet with Putin.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Seven Wishes wrote:Lots of insults and no solutions. Anybody else noticing a trend?
Last time you were here 7, you were babbling about Flynn and the Russians right before ABC News had to retract their reporting. I don't think you should be lecturing anyone about facts.
Jesus, really? Who the fuck hacked your account? I just POSTED IRREFUTABLE FACTS. Good Lord. What's insulting is how people on this board peddle in easily debunked conspiracy theories while letting Trump shred the Constitution and destroy our democracy.
Last time I checked, Flynn pleaded guilty. Quite literally NOTHING has come out exonerating him in any way whatsoever.
At what point does country prevail over party for all of you? What does it take? This tribalism is terrifying. One need only scroll back a few weeks to see where most people who post on this board completely flipped their positions as soon as the Gropfenfuhrer did one of his patented about-faces.
BTW, what is more likely? That a cabal of Republicans and traditional conservatives have conspired by the thousands to frame a lifelong liberal-turned-GOP fascist for electioneering, racketeering, gerrymandering, obstruction of justice, money laundering, and treason? Or that Adolf Twittler is guilty? Occam's Razor, anyone?
Good God. You people are gullible.
https://saraacarter.com/meadows-fbi-may ... stigation/
verslibre wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Until the wall is built I would like to see tanks and other large military vehicle with armed personnel parked all along the borders turning every person back. That would probably cost more than the wall.
LMFAO!! Did you tell your grandkids to enlist and/or apply to CBP? Seems like all trigger-happy hotheads are the ones who never want their kin involved in conflicts domestic or global. Watching Duck Dynasty won't cut it.
ohsherrie wrote:http://www.fauxnews.com/politics/2018/06/21/department-justice-files-flores-agreement-modification-to-fall-in-line-with-trump-executive-order.html
They changed the Flores decision to conform to the executive order.
Monker wrote:Ah, so he's going to pull the military from the now "safe" South Korea and put them on the border to protect the US from Central American children and parents seeking asylum. Makes perfect sense. Not.
ohsherrie wrote:A lot of lawyers thought the Executive Order couldn't override the Flores case, but I guess if nobody challenges it there won't be a problem, right now. After all, the Dems would look pretty bad right now if they stopped the kids who actually have parents from being with them.
The families can be sent back across the border rather than let loose here. That would be my preference. As for the kids whose parents chose not to make the trip, find them and send the kids back.
If you can't find the parents tell their countries of origin to come get them or all Aid from this country will stop.
Frankly I don't care how they do it as long as the point is made to Honduras, San Salvatore and all the rest of the shithole countries that this country is closed to them until we can get control or our border.
Trump has tried since he took office to get an immigration law passed but hasn't been able to because the Dems won't pass a law with enough teeth to do any good. The only solution is a WALL. If they couldn't get in here without doing so legally they would stop.
I disagree with ignoring the border and going after the criminals. That's how you get into a mess like Obama had in 2014 and we have again now. We've got to strengthen border security with a wall and stricter laws at the ports of entry while we go after the criminals.
We don't owe any of those people anything. They came here illegally. The only ones that even deserve consideration are the ones who came through the ports of entry.
DUI is a misdemeanor if most cases on first offense, unless you have a kid in the car because you're endangering the life of the child. Maybe the same thing should be true for illlegal border crossing.
Until the wall is built I would like to see tanks and other large military vehicle with armed personnel parked all along the borders turning every person back. That would probably cost more than the wall.
Everybody in this country illegally is a criminal.
Heartless? Every parent who is a citizen of this country who is in jail or in the military has be taken away from their children.
As long as we keep letting them use numbers to storm their way in they will continue to coming until they do to all of this country what they have parts of Los Angelos and San Francisco.['/quote]
Again, these are NOT MEXICANS. How hard is that for you to understand?If you don't know what that means you should look it up and decide if you want that in a neighborhood near you.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:Ah, so he's going to pull the military from the now "safe" South Korea and put them on the border to protect the US from Central American children and parents seeking asylum. Makes perfect sense. Not.
And if the ports of entry are at capacity (as many are), can these asylum-seekers be dumped in your backyard?
America is not a Starbucks bathroom. Not everybody gets to come in and shit all over.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests