They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[Boomchild]

Until the wall is built I would like to see tanks and other large military vehicle with armed personnel parked all along the borders turning every person back. That would probably cost more than the wall.

Properly securing the border and allowing border patrol to do their job is enough of a deterrent. The problem has been that our government did not live up to their promise to secure it and tied the hands of border patrol officers from effectively doing their jobs.

[Boomchild]

I always knew John McCain was a lying, two faced, back stabbing piece of shit. Now there's proof.

https://theconservativeshithouse.com/20 ... ty-groups/

Appears Andrew is playing his games with this one as well.

[Monker]

I always knew John McCain was a lying, two faced, back stabbing piece of shit. Now there's proof.

https://theconservativeshithouse.com/20 ... ty-groups/

Appears Andrew is playing his games with this one as well.

LOL...he took my advice from 100 pages back or so. There are a couple others...and then add a size limit to the posts, maybe 1000 characters, at most

[steveo777]

I'm laughing my ass off about the censoring /altering of links. All of us adults know how to find them anyway, by simply fixing them in our browser's address bar, or fixing them on a note page, then copying. This has not stopped me from reading anything.

[The_Noble_Cause]

LOL...he took my advice from 100 pages back or so. There are a couple others...and then add a size limit to the posts, maybe 1000 characters, at most

I'm sorry, but the only person this reflects poorly on is Andrew. Posters should be allowed to share/express ideas and content they agree with. I don't read the conservative treehouse or whatever. But I don't view it as a threat.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Just stop. You are justifying separating a child from a parent. If the government came and took your grand kids away, and didn't know where they took them or how you could contact them, you would be outraged and furious. These people are human beings and deserve to be treated as such. They are not an infestation as Trump has said. You have lost your humanity by being a Trump zombie and I pity you.

This example is fucking stupid. Children aren't being taken from their homes and rounded up in the middle of the night. These people are putting themselves in a position where they know they are going to get detained.

[steveo777]

Just stop. You are justifying separating a child from a parent. If the government came and took your grand kids away, and didn't know where they took them or how you could contact them, you would be outraged and furious. These people are human beings and deserve to be treated as such. They are not an infestation as Trump has said. You have lost your humanity by being a Trump zombie and I pity you.

This example is fucking stupid. Children aren't being taken from their homes and rounded up in the middle of the night. These people are putting themselves in a position where they know they are going to get detained.

If people don't want to be detained and put through a legal process, might I suggest not coming and not bringing kids? Sending unaccompanied minors to the border is a parental problem, not ours, as well. Pretty simple message. These people need to understand that we now have an administration that is going to enforce our laws. Has nothing to do with racism and everything to do with national security and our social safety net is and should be for Americans, not other countries. We don't pay taxes for the purposes of supporting people who break our laws by entering illegally.

Monker, you are full of shit, as far as the parents not knowing where the kids are going. They have been given contact instructions. Hoards of people illegally crossing the border are an infestation, or an invasion. Take your pick. Trump is calling it as it is. "Trump zombie?" Damn, you really need to find some new material. You sound like a fucking parrot.

And, finally, Monker, let me ask you this: Should a woman have a right to decide who she wants to have sex with, or should everyone be able to do it? Should the USA have the right to decide who is allowed to enter, or should everyone, no matter who they are, be allowed in? Having sex with a woman who doesn't want to is rape. People coming into our country against our will, is figuratively, also a form of rape. It is a violation of a body. America and her people are a body, who keep getting violated, over and over again, against our will.

[ohsherrie]

http://freebeacon.com/national-security ... erattacks/

Obama orders a stand down of counter attacks against Russian cyber attacks during 2016 election.

[ohsherrie]

This is how the infestation looks in California:

[ohsherrie]

[ohsherrie]

[Monker]

These are human beings. Describing them as an infestation is sub-human:

" I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You're a plague and we are the cure." Agent Smith, "The Matrix".

But, the truth is, as I have said, ALL IMMIGRANTS are described this way:

"The overflow Irish would settle into the gardens, back yards and alleys surrounding the house, living in wooden shacks. Demand for housing of any quality was extraordinary. People lived in musty cellars with low ceilings that partially flooded with every tide. Old warehouses and other buildings within the Irish enclave were hastily converted into rooming houses using flimsy wooden partitions that provided no privacy.

A Boston Committee of Internal Health studying the situation described the resulting Irish slum as "a perfect hive of human beings, without comforts and mostly without common necessaries; in many cases huddled together like brutes, without regard to age or sex or sense of decency. Under such circumstances self-respect, forethought, all the high and noble virtues soon die out, and sullen indifference and despair or disorder, intemperance and utter degradation reign supreme."

The unsanitary conditions were breeding grounds for disease, particularly cholera. Sixty percent of the Irish children born in Boston during this period didn't live to see their sixth birthday. Adult Irish lived on average just six years after stepping off the boat onto American soil.

Those who were not ill were driven to despair. Rowdy behavior fueled by alcohol and boredom spilled out into the streets of Boston and the city witnessed a staggering increase in crime, up to 400 percent for such crimes as aggravated assault. Men and boys cooped up in tiny rooms and without employment or schooling got into serious trouble. An estimated 1500 children roamed the streets every day begging and making mischief.

There were only a limited number of unskilled jobs available. Intense rivalry quickly developed between the Irish and working class Bostonians over these jobs. In Ireland, a working man might earn eight cents a day. In America, he could earn up to a dollar a day, a tremendous improvement. Bostonians feared being undercut by hungry Irish willing to work for less than the going rate. Their resentment, combined with growing anti-Irish and anti-Catholic sentiment among all classes in Boston led to 'No Irish Need Apply' signs being posted in shop windows, factory gates and workshop doors throughout the city."

That is history...and if you look and read, you will find ALL immigrant movements are described in the same racist way that you just did. They are human beings, just like you....I pity you for not respecting that.

[The_Noble_Cause]

These are human beings. Describing them as an infestation is sub-human

Aren't you on here calling people you disagree with "zombies"?
Now you want to pretend that language has actual consequences?
Not buying it.

"I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You're a plague and we are the cure." Agent Smith, "The Matrix".

You're citing a movie where people fly and fight tentacled cyborgs with machine guns.
When you're ready to take the red pill and join us in reality, let us know.

But, the truth is, as I have said, ALL IMMIGRANTS are described this way:

"The overflow Irish would settle into the gardens, back yards and alleys surrounding the house, living in wooden shacks. Demand for housing of any quality was extraordinary. People lived in musty cellars with low ceilings that partially flooded with every tide. Old warehouses and other buildings within the Irish enclave were hastily converted into rooming houses using flimsy wooden partitions that provided no privacy.

A Boston Committee of Internal Health studying the situation described the resulting Irish slum as "a perfect hive of human beings, without comforts and mostly without common necessaries; in many cases huddled together like brutes, without regard to age or sex or sense of decency. Under such circumstances self-respect, forethought, all the high and noble virtues soon die out, and sullen indifference and despair or disorder, intemperance and utter degradation reign supreme."

The unsanitary conditions were breeding grounds for disease, particularly cholera. Sixty percent of the Irish children born in Boston during this period didn't live to see their sixth birthday. Adult Irish lived on average just six years after stepping off the boat onto American soil.

Those who were not ill were driven to despair. Rowdy behavior fueled by alcohol and boredom spilled out into the streets of Boston and the city witnessed a staggering increase in crime, up to 400 percent for such crimes as aggravated assault. Men and boys cooped up in tiny rooms and without employment or schooling got into serious trouble. An estimated 1500 children roamed the streets every day begging and making mischief.

There were only a limited number of unskilled jobs available. Intense rivalry quickly developed between the Irish and working class Bostonians over these jobs. In Ireland, a working man might earn eight cents a day. In America, he could earn up to a dollar a day, a tremendous improvement. Bostonians feared being undercut by hungry Irish willing to work for less than the going rate. Their resentment, combined with growing anti-Irish and anti-Catholic sentiment among all classes in Boston led to 'No Irish Need Apply' signs being posted in shop windows, factory gates and workshop doors throughout the city."

That is history...and if you look and read, you will find ALL immigrant movements are described in the same racist way that you just did. They are human beings, just like you....I pity you for not respecting that.

The Irish who came here to escape the famine did so legally. Do you understand what that means?

[verslibre]

Nice pix of you and your hubs at Yosemite, Sherrie. The flag's a dead giveaway.

[ohsherrie]

Do you have neighborhoods like those in Des Moines yet Monker? You will have if we don't stop the illegal immigration. The people who live in these trash heaps are not the Mexicans who come here legally on work visas.

[ohsherrie]

http://www.businessinsider.com/robert-m ... rts-2018-6

Well Boo Hoo, poor Mueller, the press has been his best operative but somebody must have leaked the information inaccurately.


Mueller's office attacked The New York Times and The Washington Post for 'inaccurately' reporting on his investigation


"Mueller is preparing to face Manafort in a Virginia court on July 25 and wants to ensure that jurors aren't biased by things they've read in the media before the trial begins."

"It also called out reports that "question the legitimacy of the Special Counsel's investigation, tending to advance the opinion that the investigation is 'tainted' and therefore its results are suspect,"


Gee I wonder if what we learned in the IG report about the bias in the FBI might have had something to do with that.

[verslibre]

https://twitter.com/funder/status/1009956644061671426

[Monker]

https://www.bostonirish.com/history/201 ... historical

When it comes to the immigrants of yesteryear – especially Irish immigrants to America’s shores –historical distortions and outright lies abound. A huge number of Irish Americans refuse to accept any comparisons between their sacred ancestors from the old sod and the undocumented immigrants of today. Today’s Nativists hurl the argument that in the grim years of the Potato Famine, the waves of Irish streaming into America from “coffin ships” or across the Canadian border were not ever officially branded “illegal immigrants.”

On the surface, the assertion is accurate. The term “illegal immigrant” did not exist in the American lexicon of the 19th Century. Back in 2014, the Boston Globe’s Johanna Weiss’s column posed the question about the phrase to Mae Ngai, a Columbia University historian and expert on immigration. Ngai replied, “People are shocked when I say before World War I, there were no green cards, no visas, no quotas, no passports, even. Really, you just showed up. And if you could walk without a limp, and you had $30 in your pocket, you walked right in.”

“You walked right in” – Does that sound familiar from the Trumpian playbook? Any of us whose pre-World War I ancestors fled famine, oppression, and outright persecution from Ireland and other corners of Europe may well have simply “walked right in” to America. The borders were wide open, so to speak.

No one in his or her right mind believes that the US in 2018 should not have border security and comprehensive immigration reform. If anyone, however, truly believes that the Great Wall of Trump will rise across thousands of miles of our southern border, he or she is either benighted by hate or willingly foolish.

Back to our own Irish and European ancestors who “walked right in.” They arrived without documents. They faced no quota system and no immigration courts or law enforcement. Like it or not, our pre-war ancestors came to “the Golden Door of America” undocumented. In Boston during the mass immigration of the Great Famine era, about the only thing preventing the Irish from getting in was if they were quarantined at Deer Island due to disease. They did not have to deal with paperwork issues, quotas, or immigration courts.

“That was then, this is now!” President Trump and his fellow Nativists bleat today as they profess that they want only the “right kind” of immigrants. That’s where historical reality shreds the modern Nativists’ arguments and exposes either their bigotry or willing ignorance. The waves of Irish, Germans, Italians, and Eastern Europeans who came to America from the onset of the Great Famine into the early 20th century encountered the same prejudice and contempt that immigrants from Mexico, Central and Latin America, Haiti, Africa, and so many other places face today.

Our Irish American forebears—particularly the immigrants of the 1840s and 1850s—were in many ways as reviled by “real Americans” as the Mexicans, the Muslims, and the “dangerous immigrants” who have fueled the hateful rhetoric of Donald Trump and many of his allies and acolytes. The Irish – again, undocumented Irish – of the mid-19th Century in Massachusetts were “the other” when Nativists mounted their most serious previous attempt to seize the presidency. In the spring of 1854, they carried elections in Boston, Salem, and other cities. With the fall Massachusetts legislative and gubernatorial races looming, the Nativists, or Know-Nothings, had their collective eyes on higher office, where they could enact laws targeting foreigners and Catholics. Across the nation, the movement’s ranks swelled to over a million in 1854, their confidence leading them to anoint themselves the “American Party.”

What they knew all too well was that they loathed anything Irish, anything Catholic, any immigrant except the right kind, anything they deemed “un-American.” They proclaimed that they needed to save the nation from going broke to pay for “Paddy and Bridget,” who were arriving in unprecedented waves. Anyone who was not a native-born, Anglo-Protestant was not a real American, but a threat to them. Again, the outsider, the other. In short, the Nativists “wanted their country back.” Today, the phrase has an all-too-familiar ring.

In the 1856 presidential election, the American Party ran former President Millard Fillmore. The party teemed with the haters and the disaffected of the era, and they believed the White House was theirs for the taking.

While many Boston voters cast their ballots for the former president, he captured but one state, Maryland. The onset of the Civil War would shove the Nativists, or Know-Nothings, into history’s backwaters. Still, prejudice toward immigrants would endure, but along the way it galvanized the Boston Irish to do what the Know-Nothings had done: seize power through the ballot box. The Irish proved far better at holding onto that clout than had the Know-Nothings.

That is why today’s Irish Americans should think long and hard, and remember their own families’ history as the debate over borders, quotas, security, and DACA blazes. We do have to control our borders, but do so with sensible and humane – not hateful – immigration policy.

As the adage preaches, we ignore the past at our peril. This month, as we celebrate all things Irish on the 17th, one would vainly hope, it seems, that President Trump, his chief of staff, John Kelly (of course, that could end any day now), House Speaker Paul Ryan, and others across the nation might actually think back to last March, when former Irish Taoiseach Enda Kenny reminded the President that “St. Patrick was an immigrant.”

[The_Noble_Cause]

https://www.bostonirish.com/history/2018/%E2%80%98you-walked-right-%E2%80%99-%E2%80%98illegal%E2%80%99-and-%E2%80%98undocumented%E2%80%99-irish-immigrants-historical

When it comes to the immigrants of yesteryear – especially Irish immigrants to America’s shores –historical distortions and outright lies abound. A huge number of Irish Americans refuse to accept any comparisons between their sacred ancestors from the old sod and the undocumented immigrants of today. Today’s Nativists hurl the argument that in the grim years of the Potato Famine, the waves of Irish streaming into America from “coffin ships” or across the Canadian border were not ever officially branded “illegal immigrants.”

On the surface, the assertion is accurate. The term “illegal immigrant” did not exist in the American lexicon of the 19th Century. Back in 2014, the Boston Globe’s Johanna Weiss’s column posed the question about the phrase to Mae Ngai, a Columbia University historian and expert on immigration. Ngai replied, “People are shocked when I say before World War I, there were no green cards, no visas, no quotas, no passports, even. Really, you just showed up. And if you could walk without a limp, and you had $30 in your pocket, you walked right in.”

“You walked right in” – Does that sound familiar from the Trumpian playbook? Any of us whose pre-World War I ancestors fled famine, oppression, and outright persecution from Ireland and other corners of Europe may well have simply “walked right in” to America. The borders were wide open, so to speak.

No one in his or her right mind believes that the US in 2018 should not have border security and comprehensive immigration reform. If anyone, however, truly believes that the Great Wall of Trump will rise across thousands of miles of our southern border, he or she is either benighted by hate or willingly foolish.

Back to our own Irish and European ancestors who “walked right in.” They arrived without documents. They faced no quota system and no immigration courts or law enforcement. Like it or not, our pre-war ancestors came to “the Golden Door of America” undocumented. In Boston during the mass immigration of the Great Famine era, about the only thing preventing the Irish from getting in was if they were quarantined at Deer Island due to disease. They did not have to deal with paperwork issues, quotas, or immigration courts.

“That was then, this is now!” President Trump and his fellow Nativists bleat today as they profess that they want only the “right kind” of immigrants. That’s where historical reality shreds the modern Nativists’ arguments and exposes either their bigotry or willing ignorance. The waves of Irish, Germans, Italians, and Eastern Europeans who came to America from the onset of the Great Famine into the early 20th century encountered the same prejudice and contempt that immigrants from Mexico, Central and Latin America, Haiti, Africa, and so many other places face today.

Our Irish American forebears—particularly the immigrants of the 1840s and 1850s—were in many ways as reviled by “real Americans” as the Mexicans, the Muslims, and the “dangerous immigrants” who have fueled the hateful rhetoric of Donald Trump and many of his allies and acolytes. The Irish – again, undocumented Irish – of the mid-19th Century in Massachusetts were “the other” when Nativists mounted their most serious previous attempt to seize the presidency. In the spring of 1854, they carried elections in Boston, Salem, and other cities. With the fall Massachusetts legislative and gubernatorial races looming, the Nativists, or Know-Nothings, had their collective eyes on higher office, where they could enact laws targeting foreigners and Catholics. Across the nation, the movement’s ranks swelled to over a million in 1854, their confidence leading them to anoint themselves the “American Party.”

What they knew all too well was that they loathed anything Irish, anything Catholic, any immigrant except the right kind, anything they deemed “un-American.” They proclaimed that they needed to save the nation from going broke to pay for “Paddy and Bridget,” who were arriving in unprecedented waves. Anyone who was not a native-born, Anglo-Protestant was not a real American, but a threat to them. Again, the outsider, the other. In short, the Nativists “wanted their country back.” Today, the phrase has an all-too-familiar ring.

In the 1856 presidential election, the American Party ran former President Millard Fillmore. The party teemed with the haters and the disaffected of the era, and they believed the White House was theirs for the taking.

While many Boston voters cast their ballots for the former president, he captured but one state, Maryland. The onset of the Civil War would shove the Nativists, or Know-Nothings, into history’s backwaters. Still, prejudice toward immigrants would endure, but along the way it galvanized the Boston Irish to do what the Know-Nothings had done: seize power through the ballot box. The Irish proved far better at holding onto that clout than had the Know-Nothings.

That is why today’s Irish Americans should think long and hard, and remember their own families’ history as the debate over borders, quotas, security, and DACA blazes. We do have to control our borders, but do so with sensible and humane – not hateful – immigration policy.

As the adage preaches, we ignore the past at our peril. This month, as we celebrate all things Irish on the 17th, one would vainly hope, it seems, that President Trump, his chief of staff, John Kelly (of course, that could end any day now), House Speaker Paul Ryan, and others across the nation might actually think back to last March, when former Irish Taoiseach Enda Kenny reminded the President that “St. Patrick was an immigrant.”

America had naturalization and residency laws as far back as the 1700s. Even if the US government couldn't enforce those laws, they were on the books and pre-dated the famine. You are also citing a time when the US population was maybe 20 million or so. Now we are at 300 million+ with consumption rates far out of whack with other countries. As for the issue of anti-foreigner sentiment...this is totally removed from what anybody here is discussing. If you want to come to America, get in line like everybody else. End of story.

[Boomchild]

Well, I can only speak for myself. I refer to people entering the U.S. illegally as illegal aliens. No matter what race, creed, color or where they came from. Using the term immigrant is giving them false status. People are given "immigrant" status when they have lawfully entered the country and met the legal requirements to take up residency.

[ohsherrie]

Well, I can only speak for myself. I refer to people entering the U.S. illegally as illegal aliens. No matter what race, creed, color or where they came from. Using the term immigrant is giving them false status. People are given "immigrant" status when they have lawfully entered the country and met the legal requirements to take up residency.

That's the way I see it too. Immigration is coming here legally. Crossing the border illegally is nothing but a crime no matter what color or creed.

Monker is just twisting the same old inappropriate and invalid argument he always uses. He has nothing else. There is no legal or logical way to defend what is happening to our country as a result of the continuous assault by the masses that are storming our southern border.

[Monker]

Hey TNC, won't you be happy when monker gets his ass kissing done and we get cut down to 1000 words?

Oh, I can handle that. I love that type of challenge.

There won't be near as much of his lies and bullshit.

There were no lies in that post. Prior to WW1, there were NO "ilegal aliens" (as Boomster prefers). And, EVERY immigrant was "undocumented". If YOUR ancestors came prior to WW1, THEY were also undocumented - just as every Mexican and Central and South American is that you whine about today.

Those are simple facts - deal with it.

Also, those who come from central and south america today are here to seek asylum...which is no different then those fleeing famine in Ireland. The parallels are ALL there, including how they are accepted, treated, and viewed by racist bigots like you guys.

Funny how they have to alter things because they can't hang. Facebooks doing it.

You are at the mercy of the forum owner. Deal with it. There are some FB forums that are extremely moderated. There is one that I post to where I was sent a warning when I made a very slight reference to racial politics, and the post was deleted. It is THEIR forum...either respect the forum owner's wishes, or leave. It's as simple as that.

All I did was expose Monker as a liar and Moveon shill

I have never been to moveon.org. I have no clue what their agenda currently is or what their talking points are.

You also call EVERYBODYU a "liar". You are the Chicken Little of this forum, always predicting doom and gloom that never comes and calling everybody a liar regardless of the facts. You calling someone you disagree with a "liar" is pretty redundant....just like you saying Hillary will go to jail...you have been saying it for years now.

Your the one that keeps handing him his ass.

News to me...I hardly ever read his posts here. He argues just to argue and play games, and write insults. That is simply not worth my time and effort any longer.

I think most people here are more like me, and just skip over his fiction crap.

Except when you don't...like the one you replied to...and this one that you just read.

[The_Noble_Cause]

News to me...I hardly ever read his posts here. He argues just to argue and play games, and write insults. That is simply not worth my time and effort any longer.

Here's the truth, folks...

Monker doesn't dare respond because 1) he is intellectually outmatched and 2) he knows I found more than just one of his dating profiles.
The stuff I found makes Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein look like fucking choir boys. That is all.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Hey TNC, won't you be happy when monker gets his ass kissing done and we get cut down to 1000 words? There won't be near as much of his lies and bullshit. Funny how they have to alter things because they can't hang. Facebooks doing it. Even Yahoo forum comments are heavely censored to favor liberals. It's a power grab. That should scare anyone. Seems the guns are pointed at me 100% though. I must be a big threat. All I did was expose Monker as a liar and Moveon shill, which is exactly what he is. Your the one that keeps handing him his ass. I think most people here are more like me, and just skip over his fiction crap.

As I've said before KC....the MR forums used to be a counterpoint to the heavy-handed censorship at the BackTalk forums. Now we have censorship going on here. Even at the height of the dismal George W. Bush administration, I don't recall Andrew inserting himself into political conversations and personally lashing out at members.

As for MoveOn....you are quite right. Monker has previously promoted Indivisible, a Soros-funded astroturf group. He also cites Bill Maher regularly. It's very obvious where he gets his talking points from.

The concern for these children is totally bogus. Glenn Beck visited children in detention centers in 2014 and barely anybody batted an eyelash. Imo the entire thing is a coordinated psy-op. The media outrage machine was turned up to 11 at the exact same time that Laura Bush pens an oped about the issue. CIA heads, like Hayden, who condone torture, also came out decrying the treatment of the children. It's suspicious how everybody is reading from the same script.

[ohsherrie]

We were just listening to the local news out of Lynchburg because of tornadic weather in our area. We happened to hear that two Salvadoran gang members killed two other gang members in little ol' Lynchburg, VA.

[ohsherrie]

Mexican presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) called for mass immigration to the United States during a speech Tuesday declaring it a “human right” for all North Americans.

“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world,” Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find a life in the United States.”

He then declared it as “a human right we will defend,” eluniversal.com reports.

While the election is not until July 1, Obrador is by far the frontrunner.

I read about that guy yesterday. If he gets elected I hope the President will declare the border whatever kind of national security threat he needs to send the military down there because we will literally be under attack.

[Boomchild]

Mexican presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) called for mass immigration to the United States during a speech Tuesday declaring it a “human right” for all North Americans.

“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world,” Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find a life in the United States.”

He then declared it as “a human right we will defend,” eluniversal.com reports.

While the election is not until July 1, Obrador is by far the frontrunner.

Gee, it sounds like he is trying to say, Mexico sucks balls and people should leave it at any cost.

[steveo777]

Mexican presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) called for mass immigration to the United States during a speech Tuesday declaring it a “human right” for all North Americans.

“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world,” Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find a life in the United States.”

He then declared it as “a human right we will defend,” eluniversal.com reports.

While the election is not until July 1, Obrador is by far the frontrunner.

A good Mexican presidential candidate should be running on a commitment to fix his own shit hole, not send people over here. He's fucking with the wrong president over here. Trump has many ways to inflict pain on Mexico, if he gets pissed off enough. Tax the shit out of remittances, stop all commerce coming in from Mexico, block all persons from entering. Block all flights. There are a multitude of ways....

This illegal alien infestation problem is so easy to fix, but it seems there can be no agreement in congress to get it done.
Renewable guest worker program, where after a few years of being clean of crime, a green card, then eventual citizenship eligibility.
E-Verify enforcement, where employers hiring people not authorized to work here would be fined or jailed.
Zero tolerance for illegal entry with strict prosecution.

There! How hard is that?

[Boomchild]

Congress subpoenas Strzok, will testify next week.

Did he retract his offer to testify without being given a subpoena?

[Boomchild]

Shit, 10 times the number of emails we were led to believe. 700,000 emails! Why does everyone kiss that woman’s ass?

Most likely because she has a lot of dirt on those that do and that people that are a possible threat end up dying from unnatural causes.