Monker wrote:Took you awhile to respond to this one.
Yep...because my multiple personalities were arguing with each other and deciding whether or not to pull your puppet strings. The sarcastic one won and it was just too tempting to bait you into the "Ambigously Gay Duo" comment. But, that is all I wanted to do.
??? No idea who you are even responding to here. Learn how to quote/post.
Monker wrote:You are just too easy and predictable to be any type of challenge. Of course, you'll go into denial mode and put some other type of motive out there. That is fine...it's how roll.
Predictable would be repeating DNC talking points like "Hillary had permission to use a private server" or that all of the intelligence agencies agree about Russian hacking. When you're not repeating DNC lies, you are campaigning to get this thread shut down. The reason you advocate censorship is because your ideas DO get challenged here. They are also consistently proven false and you can't tolerate it.
Monker wrote:But, here is a challenge for you: I doubt, very much, that you can spend an entire month being active in this topic without posting any type of insults. IMO, you think trading insults is "debate"...and that is really the only reason why you are here on these forums. Playing the "insult game" is all you really do.
I'm here to discuss music and politics. If I'm insulted, I insult right back. It's that simple. You don't get to set ground rules for the forum. You can't even adhere to your own haughty declarations of no insults or swearing off the forum for good. This is just you trying to dictate the content of this thread because you can't articulate a defense of your own shitty beliefs. When all else fails, censorship! We see you bitch.