
Moderator: Andrew
MSR wrote:Hate them too. I cannot stand this time of year when the ads heat up. I generally tune them out, because it's all the same garbage, insults flinging back and forth. Most candidates appear to be more interested in tearing down their opponents, instead of trying to build themselves up.
Useless.
NealIsGod wrote:Makes you wonder why you should vote for any of those clowns.
AR wrote:Arthur Carlson
For City Council
knox wrote:I am tired of people TALKING about the political ads - not you in this post, but on the news and talk shows.
We only have a couple more days, then we get to hear what went wrong on the losers' side, who SHOULD have won, and still very little change based on who actually got elected.
Aaaahhh, politics. Here in TN it is Ford vs Corker. Talk about smear campains on both sides.
ohsherrie wrote:Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.
NealIsGod wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.
ohsherrie for President.
ohsherrie wrote:NealIsGod wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.
ohsherrie for President.
Thanks for the vote of confidence NIG but I think I'd rather clean toilets.
NealIsGod wrote:ohsherrie wrote:NealIsGod wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.
ohsherrie for President.
Thanks for the vote of confidence NIG but I think I'd rather clean toilets.
What you described above isn't much different.
ohsherrie wrote:Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests