Moderator: Andrew
JourneyRox wrote:I don't come after u Fred. U are the one who has posted after me. Scroll up. Open the old eyes & read.
Ur retorts aren't getting to me at all. They're stupid & show just how much of an idiot u are. Nothing more.
Oh, it's amusing, make no mistake about that. It's also sad.
fred_journeyman wrote:saint John wrote:...NOWHERE are you guaranteed to meet your favorite artist(s)....
And if you'll ready my posts (for meaning), you would have understand that I was NOT saying there was a guarantee....Furthermore, it doesn't mention or insinuate that "chances should be better than 90% that the band WILL attend and the fan will get to see them." YOU made that up....
Of course I did and it should have been obvious to anyone. Sorry that you missed it. I did NOT go anywhere and pull a number off of anyplace. I simply indicated that this is what I would have thought and expected.That seems to be YOUR rule, not ILAA's. When you fabricate facts to support your argument because you don't have a leg to stand on, it really ruins your credibility. Like Monker, you seem to have an axe to grind.
I did NOT fabricate anything, Johnny. I simply made what I felt were reasonable statements. I have no axe to grind. In fact, I've NEVER purchased any type of ILAA package, so I DON'T have any axe to grind. I responded to Monker's post because it seemed reasonable to me that if people are consistently paying for and NOT receiving the full experience, then something is wrong. I assumed (wrongly, I guess) that anyone reading my comments would understand that I was speaking in generalities, not factual statements.
NEVER did I state in ANY of my posts in this thread that I believe there was any type of guarantee provided by ILAA. In fact, I stated that it would be "legal suicide" for the band.
Citygirl wrote:Maybe the reason no-one asked how the show was is because none of you seem to be interested in the actual show. You were too busy harping on about your wee party.
AR wrote:I will do whatever I want, as long as it's within Andrew's guidelines.
I've noticed as much as you want the board to talk about "Journey" that you never once asked how the show was.
fred_journeyman wrote: Right, which is why you believe you have to make the incendiary remarks, even when Monker makes a comment about it being childish for posting sexual behavior, etc., you have to come back with "Sorry you ain't getting any" or some such nonsense.
If my retorts aren't getting to you, then you wouldn't be asking me to PM you. Obviously you want to keep it off the forum on one hand, but continue to argue about it on the other...
fred_journeyman wrote:AR wrote:I will do whatever I want, as long as it's within Andrew's guidelines.
As will I.I've noticed as much as you want the board to talk about "Journey" that you never once asked how the show was.
I read the posts, such as they were, and looked at the pictures. What did I miss?
There are more threads having to do with the party than the concert itself. Come on, even the people who WENT to the concert apparently thought the party was better.
fred_journeyman wrote:AR wrote:I will do whatever I want, as long as it's within Andrew's guidelines.
As will I.I've noticed as much as you want the board to talk about "Journey" that you never once asked how the show was.
I read the posts, such as they were, and looked at the pictures. What did I miss?
There are more threads having to do with the party than the concert itself. Come on, even the people who WENT to the concert apparently thought the party was better.
Citygirl wrote:Maybe the reason no-one asked how the show was is because none of you seem to be interested in the actual show. You were too busy harping on about your wee party.
saint John wrote:...The way I see it, you now stay on this board not be constructive or constructively critical, but rather a whining, fly in the ointment pain in the ass. Like Monker, your life on this board ( and perhaps off of it too) revolves around negativity.
Monker wrote:Citygirl wrote:Maybe the reason no-one asked how the show was is because none of you seem to be interested in the actual show. You were too busy harping on about your wee party.
LOL! That's true too! Did ANY of them actualy post a review...or were they too busy posting party pics?
Monker wrote:Citygirl wrote:Maybe the reason no-one asked how the show was is because none of you seem to be interested in the actual show. You were too busy harping on about your wee party.
LOL! That's true too! Did ANY of them actualy post a review...or were they too busy posting party pics?
ohsherrie wrote:As Saint John and NIG said, this party wasn't a PR requirement, it was just a chance for the guys to hang out with some people for a while in a relaxed, social atmosphere rather than being fawned over. It's a whole different thing.
whocares wrote:fred_journeyman wrote:AR wrote:I will do whatever I want, as long as it's within Andrew's guidelines.
As will I.I've noticed as much as you want the board to talk about "Journey" that you never once asked how the show was.
I read the posts, such as they were, and looked at the pictures. What did I miss?
There are more threads having to do with the party than the concert itself. Come on, even the people who WENT to the concert apparently thought the party was better.
not one post I read abotu the party mentioned that it was better than the concert. At least not Journey's part, so again, you are making shit up Fred.
You wanted out of the forum, you maade a thread to draw importance and drama to yourself, then you signed up under a new name, started the shit again, and came back as the same ass you were before. That's making it all about you.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:OF COURSE, meeting rock stars is waaay cooler than taking in a concert.
Naturally, it's gonna be talked about more.
You can always take in another concert, how often can share a sofa with Jeff Soto or Ross?
Those who fail to grasp this have obviously never met someone they admired.
That, or it's just sour grapes that they didn't get an invite.
Calbear94 wrote:Or, they are not insecure about themselves, and don't have to fill some void with hero worship or the denigration of others.
Calbear94 wrote: I don't think that JSS's youthful, hipper appearance will be enough to offset the drastic vocal change.
JourneyRox wrote:Calbear94 wrote: I don't think that JSS's youthful, hipper appearance will be enough to offset the drastic vocal change.
What drastic vocal change? Drastic change from Augeri, yeah. But not from Perry. Jeff has a strong soulful voice, as did Perry. It was Augeri who made the songs sound like elevator music w/his weak thin & later on, croaky voice.
Monker wrote:NJT At Your Cervix wrote:Monker, if you are not jealous, then why waste your time with this thread? Do you really think that any one of the band wants to hang out with you???????????
LOL...have I not specificaly said in another thread that even if JSS personaly invited me backstage that I wouldn't go? Not because I have anything personal against him, or any other past or present member of Journey, but because being too close to the music I love can very easily taint it...This is a very good example.
AR wrote:Monker wrote:Citygirl wrote:Maybe the reason no-one asked how the show was is because none of you seem to be interested in the actual show. You were too busy harping on about your wee party.
LOL! That's true too! Did ANY of them actualy post a review...or were they too busy posting party pics?
There is footage and pics from the show all over the place on this board.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests