Moderator: Andrew
Lights1961 wrote:EVERY NEWS PAPER and media outlet wanted to show you that WMDS were there.... wow how minds forget..
Lights1961 wrote:THE BIG QUESTION should be if they were there in 1998, where did they go in 2003???
Saint John wrote:1) Where did I say that we are winning the PR war?
Saint John wrote:but I don't think "Al Qaeda is ahead by leaps and bounds in the PR war." I think they WERE, but killing Al Zarqawi, capturing that hairy fucker Khalid Sheik Mohammad and the fact that Bin Laden is either dead or too afraid to show his sorry ass has some seeing that progress is steadily being made.
Saint John wrote:3) Hard to respect the opinion of someone that can't spell "Al Qaeda." You're a jackass.
Skylorde wrote:I'd vote for a JFK era Democrat in a heartbeat. That just shows you how much both parties together have slid left on the scale.
And Hillary? She's a tried and true socialist, make no mistake about it.
Skylorde wrote:I disagree Rick. I do believe Bush was and is fucking stupid enough to have gulped down the WMD intel. Then again, so was every presenditial candidate except Obama!
Skylorde wrote:Frankly, I really don't care if our soldiers were water boarding FOR THE FUCK OF IT! Go watch the video of Nick Berger getting his head lopped off and then come back and tell me pink underwear as an atrocity.
RockinDeano wrote:Are you serious? I mean, are you fucking serious? You think Iraq had ANYTHING to do with 9/11? I want your honest answer. If it comes back "yes" I am ging to blow a gasket big time.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Saint John wrote:1) Where did I say that we are winning the PR war?
Right here....Saint John wrote:but I don't think "Al Qaeda is ahead by leaps and bounds in the PR war." I think they WERE, but killing Al Zarqawi, capturing that hairy fucker Khalid Sheik Mohammad and the fact that Bin Laden is either dead or too afraid to show his sorry ass has some seeing that progress is steadily being made.
Saint John wrote:You should go "blow" another man. That's acceptable in your party.
Saint John wrote:Not thinking that "Al Qaeda is ahead by leaps and bounds in the PR war" does NOT translate into me thinking we are winning the PR war.
Saint John wrote:Furthermore, the events I mentioned above were intended to illustrate that some are "seeing that progress is steadily being made."
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Saint John wrote:You should go "blow" another man. That's acceptable in your party.
And for true Republicans, the kind that hold minimal government sacred, what u do in the bedroom is nobody's business.
Of course, you wouldn't know that.
You don't know what the fuck you are.
You woke up one morning with hate in your heart and so, naturally, registered as a Republican.
Half you people don't even understand what true Conservatism is all about.
Can't wait till Rudy wins and dilutes the party's brand once and for all.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Skylorde wrote:I'd vote for a JFK era Democrat in a heartbeat. That just shows you how much both parties together have slid left on the scale.
And Hillary? She's a tried and true socialist, make no mistake about it.
Yet somehow the New Frontier/Great Deal policies of the JFK administration would not fall under your undiscriminating umbrella of all-things socialism?![]()
Your posts read like the work of an ADHD-riddled talk radio junkie impetuously toggling the dial between Art Bell and Sean Hannity.
One part conspiracist and another part sponge-brained GOP lemming, you desperately need to finish that G.E.D. as quickly as possible.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Skylorde wrote:Frankly, I really don't care if our soldiers were water boarding FOR THE FUCK OF IT! Go watch the video of Nick Berger getting his head lopped off and then come back and tell me pink underwear as an atrocity.
Let’s think this through, who has more credibility on military affairs?
McCain, two former Chiefs of Staff, Powell, and countless other retired military leaders who want torture banned?
Or you, a schlubby, basement-dwelling webmaster of a Journey forum who’s yet to see pussy up-close in a non 2-dimensional, pixilated form?
I know whose line in the sand I’d rather be standing behind.
Faulty intelligence, a known outcome of torture, is one of the chief reasons we are in this Iraqi Gordian Knot.
Iban al Shakh al Libby claimed a strong connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda as he was torturted in one of our overseas black CIA prisons.
Colin Powell would later make a fool of himself stating this outright malarkey in front of the UN Security Council.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Saint John wrote:Not thinking that "Al Qaeda is ahead by leaps and bounds in the PR war" does NOT translate into me thinking we are winning the PR war.
Then what are you saying?
That Al Qaeda is only slightly winning?
That the USA and Al Qaeda are in a dead heat?Saint John wrote:Furthermore, the events I mentioned above were intended to illustrate that some are "seeing that progress is steadily being made."
Now your confusing progress from the surge millitary policy with advances made in PR.
We've barely made a dent in the anti-West media that floods Middle Eastern airwaves.
You don't know what the fuck you're babbling about.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Like Dubbya, his aw-shucks everyman routine is invoked strictly for personal/political gain.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200705040001
Attention to Terrorism: Clinton Administration
P 174: President Clinton "deeply concerned" about Osama Bin Ladin.
P 101: President Clinton makes chemical, biological, and nuclear terrorism a priority.
P 109: Clinton Administration establishes "the Bin Ladin unit."
P 358: Clinton Administration's management of the last weeks of December 1999 was "the one period in which the government as a whole seemed to be acting in concert to deal with terrorism."
P 487: Clinton Administration successful in arresting al Qaeda members.
P 457: Richard Clarke runs exercise where terrorists use plane for suicide mission.
Skylorde wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Skylorde wrote:
Your posts read like a little kid playing with his cock in the corner of the room just dying to get everyone's attention
"LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME! I HAVE ONE TOO!, CAN I JOIN IN?"
gtrplr1960 wrote:This is to my buddy Deano, I'm Sorry I missed your posts last night. It surprises me that you can take time away from your gay porno to share some ideas with us. I don't care that you hate me. Your opinions are wrong and you have a weak vocabulary. Ever try to make a statement without cussing.
Red13JoePa wrote:Inaccurate read on TheNobleCause.
Read his posts, don't read them he doesn't care, the guy's not an attention seeker.
Saint John wrote:RockinDeano wrote:Are you serious? I mean, are you fucking serious? You think Iraq had ANYTHING to do with 9/11? I want your honest answer. If it comes back "yes" I am ging to blow a gasket big time.
You should go "blow" another man. That's acceptable in your party.
Saint John wrote:
The people of the Middle East hate us NO less now than they have over the last oh....several hundred years. Thousands if you trace back to Europe. Anyway, the fact that they can DO something about that hatred on a much larger scale has only come about because the Clinton administration was asleep while these guys were running training camps right in front of everyone to see. There's even video to prove it. He is said to have laughed when he saw it. Real funny.
conversationpc wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Inaccurate read on TheNobleCause.
Read his posts, don't read them he doesn't care, the guy's not an attention seeker.
I loathe TNC's politics, but you're right on the money.
Skylorde wrote:conversationpc wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Inaccurate read on TheNobleCause.
Read his posts, don't read them he doesn't care, the guy's not an attention seeker.
I loathe TNC's politics, but you're right on the money.
Perhaps. Since this my first spar with him, I'll retract based on that.
RockinDeano wrote:Go to Dictionary.com and sign up for "word of the Day" to be sent to your email box. I have learned a great many words, but hard to fit them into the Melodicrock Forums.
TNC is a smart fucker, but I can take him..I think.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 39 guests