Moderator: Andrew
Vladan wrote:I chose Revelations, because Arnel owns those songs, the classics are owned by Perry - not interested in the classics anymore, unless Steve Perry is at the helm!.
Rockindeano wrote:Hey children,
You all know I go nuts over Bruce and E Street, but I came across this and want to put it to you Journey fans.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ ... ling_in_09
The new Rolling Stone has an article on "Working on A Dream" the new Bruce Inc. release.
This paragraph is pretty interesting:
Springsteen and the E Street Band will tour behind the new album, following their Super Bowl halftime set on February 1st. A source says the tour will not be "a total marathon," probably 50 to 60 shows divided between the U.S. and Europe. One idea under consideration is a miniset each night devoted to a full performance of one of Springsteen's classic albums — "a way of addressing the past," the source says.
Honestly, I know I poke fun at Journey, but this I think would be a great idea. Let's hear your ideas and complaints to this.
I would love to go see Journey play an entire album. I do wonder if they have the patience to practice and play an oldie though. Are they good enough?
Marzdog wrote:When Boston toured on the "Third Stage" tour, they did the album straight through.
I agree with Vladan, although I won't be there to see/hear it.
Rockindeano wrote:Vladan wrote:I chose Revelations, because Arnel owns those songs, the classics are owned by Perry - not interested in the classics anymore, unless Steve Perry is at the helm!.
Always a solid poster. You rock dude, except soccer still sucks! You know that already so beat it you fag!
Vladan wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Vladan wrote:I chose Revelations, because Arnel owns those songs, the classics are owned by Perry - not interested in the classics anymore, unless Steve Perry is at the helm!.
Always a solid poster. You rock dude, except soccer still sucks! You know that already so beat it you fag!
Hahaha yeah thanks man, like wise. Yeah Soccer puzzles me at times, you seriously would think it's a corrupt sport (on the big stage) - obviously I have to be careful there right. But dude, Tennis season just started
Rockindeano wrote:Tell you what, If Journey did do this, I would go, regardless which CD was featured. It would show me balls and I would respect that!
Rockindeano wrote:Vladan wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Vladan wrote:I chose Revelations, because Arnel owns those songs, the classics are owned by Perry - not interested in the classics anymore, unless Steve Perry is at the helm!.
Always a solid poster. You rock dude, except soccer still sucks! You know that already so beat it you fag!
Hahaha yeah thanks man, like wise. Yeah Soccer puzzles me at times, you seriously would think it's a corrupt sport (on the big stage) - obviously I have to be careful there right. But dude, Tennis season just started
Ok asswipe..i do like tennis!
PianoMan1986 wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Tell you what, If Journey did do this, I would go, regardless which CD was featured. It would show me balls and I would respect that!
Right now, I'd like to catch 'em while Arnel is behind the mic -- that and see them while I still can since I never know when they'll actually call it quits, but that's beside the point.
It would be great to see them and not have the entire show be predictable.
Rockindeano wrote:Vladan wrote:I chose Revelations, because Arnel owns those songs, the classics are owned by Perry - not interested in the classics anymore, unless Steve Perry is at the helm!.
Always a solid poster. You rock dude, except soccer still sucks! You know that already so beat it you fag!
Rockindeano wrote:Honestly, I know I poke fun at Journey, but this I think would be a great idea. Let's hear your ideas and complaints to this.
I would love to go see Journey play an entire album. I do wonder if they have the patience to practice and play an oldie though. Are they good enough?
G.I.Jim wrote:Well, obviously I'm a conservative bitch, but I think they should play a 2-set show with an intermission. 1st set, they should rewind the clock back to 1981 and totally re-create the Escape tour right down to the wardrobe!Arnel could wear that damn tiger spotted (or whatever it was) yellow shirt, Neal could go back to full on fro, and Cain could wear that tank-top shit he had. They could play the album start to finish.
After a nice intermission, piss-break, they unveil the Frontiers stage and come out looking like they just stepped out of 1983. Do the full album (minus that gay ass "Back-Talk" of course), then play an encore of "What I Needed", "What It Takes To Win" and "Turn Down The World Tonight". Best show EVER!![]()
Lula wrote:time for the j-boys to back their new material and singer. i say go out and showcase the current and leave the past in the past. i know so many go to hear the same old same old, but give the band a chance to show their current creative juices and rock on!
SherriBerry wrote:How would they work that? Would you know ahead of time which CD was featured or would it be a surprise?
If they did something like this, they might have to consider limiting which CDs they picked from. The
pre-Perry Journey catalogue won't go over well and from what I've read on this forum, the consensus is
Arrival and Generations were not well received and Generations in particular was terrible.
The Boss doesn't have any CDs that suffer
from this problem, so he can pull from his entire catalogue.
I have favourites off of almost every CD, but like many I have never been to a Journey concert. This works more for
fans like you guys who go to several concerts every tour and have seen it all. But for those of us who may only be
able to go to one concert in a lifetime, to only hear one CD and not some favourites might be too great a disappointment.
And if I flew hundreds of miles and paid out a lot of money only to hear Generations or Trial By Fire, that would not be good.
The majority are casual fans who would not buy tickets if they thought they might only hear Trial By Fire,
but nothing off Escape or Frontiers, so already you are looking at smaller venues and lower ticket sales. Personally
though, I would prefer smaller, more intimate venues.
If I knew which CD it would be when I bought the ticket, then I like the idea - I would have to decide which songs
meant the most to me at that point in time. But I would rather they do what Bruce did for his last concert
and take audience requests - Journey would still be challenged to know their entire catalogue, it would still be a
surprise - for everyone, and the audience would leave happy.
G.I.Jim wrote:Well, obviously I'm a conservative bitch, but I think they should play a 2-set show with an intermission. 1st set, they should rewind the clock back to 1981 and totally re-create the Escape tour right down to the wardrobe!Arnel could wear that damn tiger spotted (or whatever it was) yellow shirt, Neal could go back to full on fro, and Cain could wear that tank-top shit he had. They could play the album start to finish.
After a nice intermission, piss-break, they unveil the Frontiers stage and come out looking like they just stepped out of 1983. Do the full album (minus that gay ass "Back-Talk" of course), then play an encore of "What I Needed", "What It Takes To Win" and "Turn Down The World Tonight". Best show EVER!![]()
EightyRock wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Honestly, I know I poke fun at Journey, but this I think would be a great idea. Let's hear your ideas and complaints to this.
I would love to go see Journey play an entire album. I do wonder if they have the patience to practice and play an oldie though. Are they good enough?
I think Bruce has more hard core fanbase attending his concerts than Journey, at this point. I can see where it would work for him. Alot of the following Journey had with Perry have moved on after X number of replacement singers. Journey has a shitload of the DSB-casual-karaoke-dirty-dozen-or bust crowd coming to their shows. They would be bored stiff sitting through an entire set of just one album.
Bruce's fans would camp out for a week waiting to hear him do this. Journey? Nah.....their days of devoted fanbase crying for deep cuts is over. I can't see Arnel pulling it off on stuff he hasn't practiced to death with a diction coach, either.
Carla777 wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:Well, obviously I'm a conservative bitch, but I think they should play a 2-set show with an intermission. 1st set, they should rewind the clock back to 1981 and totally re-create the Escape tour right down to the wardrobe!Arnel could wear that damn tiger spotted (or whatever it was) yellow shirt, Neal could go back to full on fro, and Cain could wear that tank-top shit he had. They could play the album start to finish.
After a nice intermission, piss-break, they unveil the Frontiers stage and come out looking like they just stepped out of 1983. Do the full album (minus that gay ass "Back-Talk" of course), then play an encore of "What I Needed", "What It Takes To Win" and "Turn Down The World Tonight". Best show EVER!![]()
I LOVE YOUU!! hahaha![]()
Rockindeano wrote:Carla777 wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:Well, obviously I'm a conservative bitch, but I think they should play a 2-set show with an intermission. 1st set, they should rewind the clock back to 1981 and totally re-create the Escape tour right down to the wardrobe!Arnel could wear that damn tiger spotted (or whatever it was) yellow shirt, Neal could go back to full on fro, and Cain could wear that tank-top shit he had. They could play the album start to finish.
After a nice intermission, piss-break, they unveil the Frontiers stage and come out looking like they just stepped out of 1983. Do the full album (minus that gay ass "Back-Talk" of course), then play an encore of "What I Needed", "What It Takes To Win" and "Turn Down The World Tonight". Best show EVER!![]()
I LOVE YOUU!! hahaha![]()
GI Jim told me more than a few times he wanted to get you in the sack. Your reply?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests