New RATT single

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

New RATT single

Postby T-Bone » Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:52 am

Doesn't sound too bad at all. A good cross between the Reach For The Sky and Detonator albums

http://www.amazon.com/Best-Of-Me/dp/B00359REVQ
T-Bone
 

Postby S2M » Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:46 am

Me likey..... :lol:
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Glenn » Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:01 pm

Not really one to look forward to aging hairbands new music, but this and Dokken interests me. Sounds good.

Warren as always is top notch.
User avatar
Glenn
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1262
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:30 am
Location: TEXAS

Postby Starrider » Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:03 pm

Sounds pretty good!

Pearcy sounds good, and he's not a young guy (50 years old or so now). Hopefully this isn't something that's been ProTooled to death.
User avatar
Starrider
45 RPM
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:56 am

Postby Glenn » Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:11 pm

Starrider wrote:Sounds pretty good!

Pearcy sounds good, and he's not a young guy (50 years old or so now). Hopefully this isn't something that's been ProTooled to death.



His "vocals" always had studio help. Didn't care though, it was part of the "Ratt sound".
User avatar
Glenn
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1262
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:30 am
Location: TEXAS

Postby Rip Rokken » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:36 am

JSS Rocks! wrote:
Starrider wrote:Sounds pretty good!

Pearcy sounds good, and he's not a young guy (50 years old or so now). Hopefully this isn't something that's been ProTooled to death.



His "vocals" always had studio help. Didn't care though, it was part of the "Ratt sound".


I asked one of the band members a few years back if the story was true they had to triple-track Stephen's vocals back then, and he confirmed it. If you listen to his voice on his "Stripped" unplugged album from a few years back, it's night-and-day different. Here are some samples:

http://www.amazon.com/Stripped-Stephen- ... B000F4RHCK

I think I remember "Back For More" was particularly rough, but that sample doesn't have his vocals (maybe by choice). Listen to "Lay It Down" instead.

I really like the new sample though, and it's the first decent thing I've heard from RATT since Detonator. Collage and the 1999 S/T album SUCKED. This, however is pure gold! Hahahahaha!

Image
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:52 am

Rip Rokken wrote:
JSS Rocks! wrote:
Starrider wrote:Sounds pretty good!

Pearcy sounds good, and he's not a young guy (50 years old or so now). Hopefully this isn't something that's been ProTooled to death.



His "vocals" always had studio help. Didn't care though, it was part of the "Ratt sound".


I asked one of the band members a few years back if the story was true they had to triple-track Stephen's vocals back then, and he confirmed it. If you listen to his voice on his "Stripped" unplugged album from a few years back, it's night-and-day different. Here are some samples:




Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.
Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby T-Bone » Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:07 pm

Here's the FULL track streaming from the blabbie site

Scroll down a little and click play on the player...

http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbe ... mID=134459
T-Bone
 

Postby Rip Rokken » Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:13 pm

Carlitto H@kk wrote:Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.


It's absolutely the RATT sound, and I wouldn't want it any other way! They always had him sounding killer at every RATT/Pearcy show I've seen, too. :) I'm for WHATEVER it takes in the studio to make good rock tunes. Except for AutoTune -- I'm so sick of hearing that robotic-sounding crap on every single pop tune these days I avoid radio like the plague.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby yulog » Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:34 pm

I love vanilla! :lol:
User avatar
yulog
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4285
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 1:33 pm

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:14 pm

Rip Rokken wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.


It's absolutely the RATT sound, and I wouldn't want it any other way! They always had him sounding killer at every RATT/Pearcy show I've seen, too. :) I'm for WHATEVER it takes in the studio to make good rock tunes. Except for AutoTune -- I'm so sick of hearing that robotic-sounding crap on every single pop tune these days I avoid radio like the plague.


True. And that's the big difference between to of the big LA band singers:
Vince Neil, not a great singer at all, multi-tracked but Autotuned to death in the studio.

Stephen Pearcy, not a great singer at all, multi-tracked 2, 3, 4 tracks per song and just about
every one of them is a little off-key or out of tune and it just meshes so well :lol:
Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby Carla777 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:45 am

Sound pretty good to me ;)
User avatar
Carla777
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: Chile

Postby bru87tr » Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:11 pm

Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.


It's absolutely the RATT sound, and I wouldn't want it any other way! They always had him sounding killer at every RATT/Pearcy show I've seen, too. :) I'm for WHATEVER it takes in the studio to make good rock tunes. Except for AutoTune -- I'm so sick of hearing that robotic-sounding crap on every single pop tune these days I avoid radio like the plague.


True. And that's the big difference between to of the big LA band singers:
Vince Neil, not a great singer at all, multi-tracked but Autotuned to death in the studio.

Stephen Pearcy, not a great singer at all, multi-tracked 2, 3, 4 tracks per song and just about
every one of them is a little off-key or out of tune and it just meshes so well :lol:


Vince sounded pretty damn good on the last tour.


Love the new Ratt tune!!!
User avatar
bru87tr
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2002 7:15 am

Postby Starrider » Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:54 am

Rip Rokken wrote:
JSS Rocks! wrote:
Starrider wrote:Sounds pretty good!

Pearcy sounds good, and he's not a young guy (50 years old or so now). Hopefully this isn't something that's been ProTooled to death.



His "vocals" always had studio help. Didn't care though, it was part of the "Ratt sound".


I asked one of the band members a few years back if the story was true they had to triple-track Stephen's vocals back then, and he confirmed it. If you listen to his voice on his "Stripped" unplugged album from a few years back, it's night-and-day different. Here are some samples:

http://www.amazon.com/Stripped-Stephen- ... B000F4RHCK

I think I remember "Back For More" was particularly rough, but that sample doesn't have his vocals (maybe by choice). Listen to "Lay It Down" instead.

I really like the new sample though, and it's the first decent thing I've heard from RATT since Detonator. Collage and the 1999 S/T album SUCKED. This, however is pure gold! Hahahahaha!


Ouch. Those vocals on "Lay it Down" are wretched.

The vocals on the new track sound great, quadruple-tracked or not. The lyrics could have used a little work.
User avatar
Starrider
45 RPM
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:56 am

Postby shaka » Sun Feb 07, 2010 4:39 pm

Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.


It's absolutely the RATT sound, and I wouldn't want it any other way! They always had him sounding killer at every RATT/Pearcy show I've seen, too. :) I'm for WHATEVER it takes in the studio to make good rock tunes. Except for AutoTune -- I'm so sick of hearing that robotic-sounding crap on every single pop tune these days I avoid radio like the plague.


True. And that's the big difference between to of the big LA band singers:
Vince Neil, not a great singer at all, multi-tracked but Autotuned to death in the studio.
:


There was no such thing as Autotune when Motley Crue made most of their records. Vince achieved his vocals the old fashion way, a billion takes until he got it right. He is not a good singer. He only sings a third of the lyrics in concert.
shaka
LP
 
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:39 am

Postby Rip Rokken » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:43 am

Starrider wrote:The vocals on the new track sound great, quadruple-tracked or not. The lyrics could have used a little work.


That's actually what makes them authentic RATT lyrics -- pretty thin in content and never deep. It works! :)
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Carla777 » Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:24 am

Rip Rokken wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.


It's absolutely the RATT sound, and I wouldn't want it any other way! They always had him sounding killer at every RATT/Pearcy show I've seen, too. :) I'm for WHATEVER it takes in the studio to make good rock tunes. Except for AutoTune -- I'm so sick of hearing that robotic-sounding crap on every single pop tune these days I avoid radio like the plague.


+1.000
User avatar
Carla777
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:06 pm
Location: Chile

Postby Rip Rokken » Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:04 am

Carla777 wrote:+1.000


Hola, la niña Carliña! ¿Cuál es tu canción favorita RATT?

Image
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Starrider » Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:29 pm

My favorite RATT song, but certainly not this rendition:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6ImgMQvAB0
User avatar
Starrider
45 RPM
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:56 am

Postby conversationpc » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:54 am

Anyone else ever hear of Whitecross? They were considered to be a Ratt soundalike. I think their vocalist was actually a better singer than Pearcy, though, and, believe it or not, their guitarist, Rex Carroll, was/is a better guitarist than DeMartini.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Rip Rokken » Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:08 pm

conversationpc wrote:Anyone else ever hear of Whitecross? They were considered to be a Ratt soundalike. I think their vocalist was actually a better singer than Pearcy, though, and, believe it or not, their guitarist, Rex Carroll, was/is a better guitarist than DeMartini.


LOVED Whitecross, and agree on both points. I think Equilibrium, even without Rex, was a near perfect album and probably my favorite.
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City


Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests