Moderator: Andrew
Starrider wrote:Sounds pretty good!
Pearcy sounds good, and he's not a young guy (50 years old or so now). Hopefully this isn't something that's been ProTooled to death.
JSS Rocks! wrote:Starrider wrote:Sounds pretty good!
Pearcy sounds good, and he's not a young guy (50 years old or so now). Hopefully this isn't something that's been ProTooled to death.
His "vocals" always had studio help. Didn't care though, it was part of the "Ratt sound".
Rip Rokken wrote:JSS Rocks! wrote:Starrider wrote:Sounds pretty good!
Pearcy sounds good, and he's not a young guy (50 years old or so now). Hopefully this isn't something that's been ProTooled to death.
His "vocals" always had studio help. Didn't care though, it was part of the "Ratt sound".
I asked one of the band members a few years back if the story was true they had to triple-track Stephen's vocals back then, and he confirmed it. If you listen to his voice on his "Stripped" unplugged album from a few years back, it's night-and-day different. Here are some samples:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.
Rip Rokken wrote:Carlitto H@kk wrote:Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.
It's absolutely the RATT sound, and I wouldn't want it any other way! They always had him sounding killer at every RATT/Pearcy show I've seen, too.I'm for WHATEVER it takes in the studio to make good rock tunes. Except for AutoTune -- I'm so sick of hearing that robotic-sounding crap on every single pop tune these days I avoid radio like the plague.
Carlitto H@kk wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:Carlitto H@kk wrote:Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.
It's absolutely the RATT sound, and I wouldn't want it any other way! They always had him sounding killer at every RATT/Pearcy show I've seen, too.I'm for WHATEVER it takes in the studio to make good rock tunes. Except for AutoTune -- I'm so sick of hearing that robotic-sounding crap on every single pop tune these days I avoid radio like the plague.
True. And that's the big difference between to of the big LA band singers:
Vince Neil, not a great singer at all, multi-tracked but Autotuned to death in the studio.
Stephen Pearcy, not a great singer at all, multi-tracked 2, 3, 4 tracks per song and just about
every one of them is a little off-key or out of tune and it just meshes so well
Rip Rokken wrote:JSS Rocks! wrote:Starrider wrote:Sounds pretty good!
Pearcy sounds good, and he's not a young guy (50 years old or so now). Hopefully this isn't something that's been ProTooled to death.
His "vocals" always had studio help. Didn't care though, it was part of the "Ratt sound".
I asked one of the band members a few years back if the story was true they had to triple-track Stephen's vocals back then, and he confirmed it. If you listen to his voice on his "Stripped" unplugged album from a few years back, it's night-and-day different. Here are some samples:
http://www.amazon.com/Stripped-Stephen- ... B000F4RHCK
I think I remember "Back For More" was particularly rough, but that sample doesn't have his vocals (maybe by choice). Listen to "Lay It Down" instead.
I really like the new sample though, and it's the first decent thing I've heard from RATT since Detonator. Collage and the 1999 S/T album SUCKED. This, however is pure gold! Hahahahaha!
Carlitto H@kk wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:Carlitto H@kk wrote:Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.
It's absolutely the RATT sound, and I wouldn't want it any other way! They always had him sounding killer at every RATT/Pearcy show I've seen, too.I'm for WHATEVER it takes in the studio to make good rock tunes. Except for AutoTune -- I'm so sick of hearing that robotic-sounding crap on every single pop tune these days I avoid radio like the plague.
True. And that's the big difference between to of the big LA band singers:
Vince Neil, not a great singer at all, multi-tracked but Autotuned to death in the studio.
:
Starrider wrote:The vocals on the new track sound great, quadruple-tracked or not. The lyrics could have used a little work.
Rip Rokken wrote:Carlitto H@kk wrote:Yea, you can tell Pearcy's vocals are multitracked but, like someone else said, THAT is the Ratt sound. So he's not the greatest siinger... Who cares. Pearcy's "3-4" voices sounded pretty bad-ass back in the day.
It's absolutely the RATT sound, and I wouldn't want it any other way! They always had him sounding killer at every RATT/Pearcy show I've seen, too.I'm for WHATEVER it takes in the studio to make good rock tunes. Except for AutoTune -- I'm so sick of hearing that robotic-sounding crap on every single pop tune these days I avoid radio like the plague.
conversationpc wrote:Anyone else ever hear of Whitecross? They were considered to be a Ratt soundalike. I think their vocalist was actually a better singer than Pearcy, though, and, believe it or not, their guitarist, Rex Carroll, was/is a better guitarist than DeMartini.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests