Moderator: Andrew
Fact Finder wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Ever hear of the geiod? No? Didn't think so....The geiod is the equipotential surface of the earth's gravitational field that approximates the mean sea surface. It is the core concept in the measurement of sea levels. Ever hear about glacio-hydro-isostatic modeling? Eustatic and tectonic effects on shoreline dynamics? Holocene sedimentary sequences? Intertidal foraminifera distributions? Carbon analysis of coastal paleoenvironments? Aminostratigraphy?
Before you wax poetic about sea levels, do some research on these topics.....
Can ya just give us a Readers Digest version?
StocktontoMalone wrote: Holocene sedimentary sequences? Intertidal foraminifera distributions?
Fact Finder wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Fact Finder wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Ever hear of the geiod? No? Didn't think so....The geiod is the equipotential surface of the earth's gravitational field that approximates the mean sea surface. It is the core concept in the measurement of sea levels. Ever hear about glacio-hydro-isostatic modeling? Eustatic and tectonic effects on shoreline dynamics? Holocene sedimentary sequences? Intertidal foraminifera distributions? Carbon analysis of coastal paleoenvironments? Aminostratigraphy?
Before you wax poetic about sea levels, do some research on these topics.....
Can ya just give us a Readers Digest version?
Just as I thought.....nothing to say = nervous sarcasm
What? No C&P tonight?
Scientists have withdrawn their claims of sea level changes due to Man Made Global Warming. If you want to talk about gravitational pull and so forth that's a different topic and has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion.
Can and will coastlines sometimes get blasted, sure.
If that cliff ever falls off over in the Canary Islands might there be a tsunami in Florida, yes.
Can an undersea earthquake cause a disruption in tidal flow, of course.
Can gravational pull and tide currents cause big waves that washes people off the shore, yes. Just did last week in California.
What does that have to do with Man Made Global Warming?
Fact Finder wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Fact Finder wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Fact Finder wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Ever hear of the geiod? No? Didn't think so....The geiod is the equipotential surface of the earth's gravitational field that approximates the mean sea surface. It is the core concept in the measurement of sea levels. Ever hear about glacio-hydro-isostatic modeling? Eustatic and tectonic effects on shoreline dynamics? Holocene sedimentary sequences? Intertidal foraminifera distributions? Carbon analysis of coastal paleoenvironments? Aminostratigraphy?
Before you wax poetic about sea levels, do some research on these topics.....
Can ya just give us a Readers Digest version?
Just as I thought.....nothing to say = nervous sarcasm
What? No C&P tonight?
Scientists have withdrawn their claims of sea level changes due to Man Made Global Warming. If you want to talk about gravitational pull and so forth that's a different topic and has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion.
Can and will coastlines sometimes get blasted, sure.
If that cliff ever falls off over in the Canary Islands might there be a tsunami in Florida, yes.
Can an undersea earthquake cause a disruption in tidal flow, of course.
Can gravational pull and tide currents cause big waves that washes people off the shore, yes. Just did last week in California.
What does that have to do with Man Made Global Warming?
Jeesh, you are so blinded by your obsessive quest to convert any and all to your cult-like belief, that you fail to even ask yourself what side of the fence I am actually on!
re-read your final question to me, and ask yourself that question again.....
Ahem, dude, it's AlGore who is leading the cult..think of me as a de-programmer.
Fact Finder wrote:Sarah wrote:This is something I'm sure someone else out there has thought of before me, but it's funny to me how there's such a movement against the climate change and the money to be made off of something that may not be true, when religion is an even greater moneymaking industry with government pull that's also based on something arguably fabricated, but a movement against that is quickly laughed off.
Not sure what you mean by religion having Government pull.
Go ahead and bash religion all you want. The people who give on Sunday at church are doing so of their own free will, and not having it forced out of thier wallets like these Climate Treaties would do. Big difference.
lights1961 wrote:Sarah wrote:This is something I'm sure someone else out there has thought of before me, but it's funny to me how there's such a movement against the climate change and the money to be made off of something that may not be true, when religion is an even greater moneymaking industry with government pull that's also based on something arguably fabricated, but a movement against that is quickly laughed off.
HUH??? the reason we are challenging climate change or global warming... is while the people who are making the policy
flies around in private jets... fancey and GAS GUSSLING SUVS... live in 5000 acre mansions using 15x more energy than the rest of us.... while THEY LECTURE US THE POISON of it all... they are doing what??? telling us we cant live that way, travel that way, even breathe that way... just saying... THATS THE WHOLE DAMN FUCKING PROBLEM I HAVE ON IT AND WHY YOU SHOULD TOO...
You Can Call Him Al ... But Al Won't Call You Back
By Gene J. Koprowski
- FOXNews.com
Al Gore won a Nobel Prize and an Oscar for his film, An Inconvenient Truth. But in the last three months, as global warming has gone from a scientific near-certitude to the subject of satire, Gore -- the public face of global warming -- has been mum on the topic.
7 Wishes wrote:Wow, another brilliantly written, in-depth, New Yorker-esque artical from a Fox "journalist". It's laughable you put any stock into any of that taint.
7 Wishes wrote:Wow, another brilliantly written, in-depth, New Yorker-esque artical from a Fox "journalist". It's laughable you put any stock into any of that taint.
steveo777 wrote:7 Wishes wrote:Wow, another brilliantly written, in-depth, New Yorker-esque artical from a Fox "journalist". It's laughable you put any stock into any of that taint.
Fine, then you call AG and ask whassup. I'll bet he has nothing to say and all questions related to GW must be routed through his attorney.![]()
Fact Finder wrote:That NYT piece by ALGORE is nothing but unadulterated rubbish. I hope that fucker rots in hell for rotting people like your's brains.
Fact Finder wrote:Look what ALGORE has caused....I hope he rots in hell along with all the other fraudsters.![]()
7 Wishes wrote:I mean, I don't even want Evil Dick Cheney to rot in hell, and he's directly responsible for the deaths of more than 50,000 innocent Iraqui civilians.
Fact Finder wrote:Look what ALGORE has caused....I hope he rots in hell along with all the other fraudsters.
Baby girl survives after being shot in the chest in parents' 'global warming suicide pact'
By Gerard Couzens
Last updated at 2:48 PM on 01st March 2010
A seven-month-old baby girl survived three days alone with a bullet in her chest beside the bodies of her parents and toddler brother.
Argentines Francisco Lotero, 56, and Miriam Coletti, 23, shot their children before killing themselves after making an apparent suicide pact over fears about global warming.
Their son Francisco, two, died instantly after being hit in the back.
But their unnamed daughter cheated death after the bullet from her dad's handgun missed her vital organs.
Paramedics rushed her to hospital covered in blood when police alerted by worried neighbours discovered the massacre three days later.
The youngster is recovering in hospital in the town of Goya in the northern Argentine province of Corrientes, where doctors say she is out of danger.
Her parents said they feared the effects of global warming in a suicide note discovered by police.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldne ... z0gyrMhSat
Rip Rokken wrote:7 Wishes wrote:I mean, I don't even want Evil Dick Cheney to rot in hell, and he's directly responsible for the deaths of more than 50,000 innocent Iraqui civilians.
That's because Dick Cheney kicks a$$ Old Testament style - that's how he rolls! He'll wipe out your seed and the seed of your seed, too! (There's no "u" in Iraqi, btw.)
Monker wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:7 Wishes wrote:I mean, I don't even want Evil Dick Cheney to rot in hell, and he's directly responsible for the deaths of more than 50,000 innocent Iraqui civilians.
That's because Dick Cheney kicks a$$ Old Testament style - that's how he rolls! He'll wipe out your seed and the seed of your seed, too! (There's no "u" in Iraqi, btw.)
No he doesn't. He's a chicken-hawk. He'd rather send your son/daughter to do it for him.
Rip Rokken wrote:Monker wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:7 Wishes wrote:I mean, I don't even want Evil Dick Cheney to rot in hell, and he's directly responsible for the deaths of more than 50,000 innocent Iraqui civilians.
That's because Dick Cheney kicks a$$ Old Testament style - that's how he rolls! He'll wipe out your seed and the seed of your seed, too! (There's no "u" in Iraqi, btw.)
No he doesn't. He's a chicken-hawk. He'd rather send your son/daughter to do it for him.
Oh. What's it called when Obama sends people's sons and daughters to the Middle East?
7 Wishes wrote:You're extrapolating falsehoods from sub-theories that predicted things hypothetically, using language such as "could" and "likely will". You're nitpicking here and there without seeing the whole picture, and you're using your typical GOP weapon of mass distraction to avoid having to address the whole truth, under which your rejectionist theories are wholly buried.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-03/uoca-ais022806.php
Oh, and Hoagiepete...or should I say Dr. Hoagiepete...the evaporation leading to increased snow theory is FULLY supported and is irrefutable scientific fact. Put down the crack pipe.
Rip Rokken wrote:Monker wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:7 Wishes wrote:I mean, I don't even want Evil Dick Cheney to rot in hell, and he's directly responsible for the deaths of more than 50,000 innocent Iraqui civilians.
That's because Dick Cheney kicks a$$ Old Testament style - that's how he rolls! He'll wipe out your seed and the seed of your seed, too! (There's no "u" in Iraqi, btw.)
No he doesn't. He's a chicken-hawk. He'd rather send your son/daughter to do it for him.
Oh. What's it called when Obama sends people's sons and daughters to the Middle East?
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests