Moderator: Andrew
jrnyman28 wrote:Everything Journey does nowadays seems to be reactive or spontaneous.
NoMoreTails wrote:While location can be a problem, I dont think it has to be. Journey basically work only 3-4 months a year. They could plan to get together for a week here and there during the other months and have plenty of opportunity to write. It just means Steve traveling to NorCal where Neal and Jon are, they can afford a plane ticket. The problem is not as much location as motivation or intent. Its not like Neal and Perry hung out together as buddies and wrote songs, they wrote because the were going to do an album. I think Journey used to write in the studio or before going into the studio for that purpose.
This album just seem to happen, not really planned. There used to album/tour/album/tour. They knew what the plan was. We wonder when or if there will be another album, I don't think they're sure themselves.
Even the Schon/Soto method could work--if they are motivated to create Journey music.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Augeri is centered in NY, and the rest of the guys are near/around LA, right?
Do they rely on the fruits of technology to traverse the distance and pool their collective writing ideas? Do they only write during the finite time when they are on tour together?
Or is this just indicative of a much larger problem; a Journey of today that really doesn't care all that much about writing new material?
Where is that synergistic rapport in current day Journey?
Is it anywhere to be found?
Discuss.
sngrchk04 wrote:.....I mean, what if you come up with a really cool, unique musical idea/melody line - you're REALLY fired-up to do something with it NOW, but you CAN'T....because the "other half" is 3,000 miles away?
Wouldn't that just piss you offchk?
Would piss ME off.....
sngrchk04 wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Augeri is centered in NY, and the rest of the guys are near/around LA, right?
Do they rely on the fruits of technology to traverse the distance and pool their collective writing ideas? Do they only write during the finite time when they are on tour together?
Or is this just indicative of a much larger problem; a Journey of today that really doesn't care all that much about writing new material?
Where is that synergistic rapport in current day Journey?
Is it anywhere to be found?
Discuss.
**cracking knuckles before typing**
EXCELLENT THREAD ~ KUDOS!
OK:
I believe that new music is created and expressed "on the fly" - with all members present and accounted for. Even though there IS new technology out there, it just "cans" everything for me, personally.....I mean, what if you come up with a really cool, unique musical idea/melody line - you're REALLY fired-up to do something with it NOW, but you CAN'T....because the "other half" is 3,000 miles away?
Wouldn't that just piss you off?
Would piss ME off.....
ohsherrie wrote:Motivation sounds like the perfect word, but who can say why they're lacking it. Maybe they're also missing that old chemistry they(Perry/Cain/Schon)used to have, even if it was often of the explosive kind, and it's just not "clicking" for them the way it used to.
heardonthestreet wrote:I think that it's a simple case of too many cooks, spoiling the broth, when a few of them are not cooks to begin with.
heardonthestreet wrote:Augeri, not in my opinion.. A songwriter is a songwriter, is a songwriter.....Just because you're a musician, dosen't mean you qualify as a songwriter. Anybody can write a song but unless the world wants to hear it, you get egg fu yung.
heardonthestreet wrote:Cain has lost whatever he had and I think what he had was Perry. He objects to what Perry was leaning toward and he writes junk like Arrival's lyrics?
heardonthestreet wrote:Cain has lost whatever he had and I think what he had was Perry.
heardonthestreet wrote:He objects to what Perry was leaning toward and he writes junk like Arrival's lyrics?
heardonthestreet wrote:Pull up Arrival's lyrics, Noble Cause, and read the magic of Cain. Talk about sappy lost love lyrics. It's a joke.
heardonthestreet wrote:Cain's a has been, if he every was.
ohsherrie wrote:Motivation sounds like the perfect word, but who can say why they're lacking it. Maybe they're also missing that old chemistry they(Perry/Cain/Schon)used to have, even if it was often of the explosive kind, and it's just not "clicking" for them the way it used to.
heardonthestreet wrote:Cain has lost whatever he had and I think what he had was Perry.
He objects to what Perry was leaning toward and he writes junk like Arrival's lyrics?
The non-presence of Perry is what's lacking Monker...now put your head back in the sand...Monker wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Motivation sounds like the perfect word, but who can say why they're lacking it. Maybe they're also missing that old chemistry they(Perry/Cain/Schon)used to have, even if it was often of the explosive kind, and it's just not "clicking" for them the way it used to.
Even if Perry were in the band and the band were in the same frame as they were in 1983, that 'chemistry' would not be there if Jonathan were so discouraged by the process. Even your beloved ROR has a MAJOR influence from Jonathan.
It is not the presence of Perry that is lacking. It is the band working as a unit towards a common goal, with everybody stepping up and doing more then their part. THAT is what made Journey's music so great prior to ROR.
OpeningAct wrote:The non-presence of Perry is what's lacking Monker..
jrnyman28 wrote:Then Jon comes in and BOOM, a cd is written! It simply took a catalyst. This time Steve was the catalyst. Journey no longer has the catalyst of "hits", "fame", "fortune".
Monker wrote:It is not the presence of Perry that is lacking. It is the band working as a unit towards a common goal, with everybody stepping up and doing more then their part. THAT is what made Journey's music so great prior to ROR.
ohsherrie wrote:I guess you can say that's true IF you really think most of the songs on Arrival and Generation are of the quality of most of the ones that were on the earlier albums.
ohsherrie wrote:So do you think just anyone could have written those Journey songs that you love if they had Jon among them and worked hard enough on it? IMO some of their best songwriting is on ROR.
ohsherrie wrote:In another post you mentioned Somewhere There's Hope. Do you not think Missing You, You Better Wait, Anyway, and the title track FTLOSM are good songs?
ohsherrie wrote:You also mentioned LTS. It wasn't the instrumental parts that made it a fun song to hear, it was the story that it told and the way it was presented.
ohsherrie wrote:Lights said quite a lot within a great melody.
NoMoreTails wrote:Many may give Perry more credit than he is due for songs where Cain's contribution was probably more than Perry's.
NoMoreTails wrote:IMO, Augeri's writing prior to Journey is more impressive than Perry's outside of Journey.
NoMoreTails wrote:Perhaps Monker will supply the details of a statement one of the writers made about Perry giving some direction and expecting someone else to do the work and having to share credit with Perry.
NoMoreTails wrote:And LTS, Perry's biggest sole writing credit with Journey is a largely borrowed from Sam Cooke. IMO the instrumentation (Neal) of LTS is the only thing that makes it listenable.
jrnyman28 wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:Many may give Perry more credit than he is due for songs where Cain's contribution was probably more than Perry's.
But we will never know.
jrnyman28 wrote:[I think the term "listenanble" is a bit strong. And I don't see a problem with utilizing Sam Cooke's influences. But it is worth mentioning that much of Perry's talent comes from his influences.
jrnyman28 wrote:But how many co-writer's did Perry have for those songs? I never cared for Somewhere There's Hope or FTLOSM but I enjoy the other tracks you listed. I HATE "I Am". But when I listen to the FTLOSM CD I here what Perry was 'trying' to do but did not accomplish. That solo CD was truly the first time I ever listened to a CD (especially a Journey or Journey related CD) and heard things that should have been done differently.
LTS' strength is the instrumental portion of the song. The lyrics are very simple. They fit the song, but really...half the song is "Na Na Nana Na Na". there is not much substance to this song. Perry did a good job presenting the 'story' in a very simple manner. And that was effectively supported by the solid blues base of the song. But I truly believe that the main reason LTS still has a life is the instrumental portion of the song...especially LIVE.
NoMoreTails wrote:Many may give Perry more credit than he is due for songs where Cain's contribution was probably more than Perry's.
Even though Perry always sought out some of the biggest name writers to help on his solo stuff.
Perhaps Monker will supply the details of a statement one of the writers made about Perry giving some direction and expecting someone else to do the work and having to share credit with Perry.
ohsherrie wrote:Even though Perry always sought out some of the biggest name writers to help on his solo stuff.
Why wouldn't he? Didn't Jon have some help outside the band on Arrival and Generations? Did that happen on any other Journey albums? Not that I necessarily think that's bad, it's just that we're comparing the songwriting procedurers during the time of Classic Journey as opposed to the way the current band does it..
ohsherrie wrote: I do know that people say a lot of things for a lot of reasons. That doesn't necessarily mean they're precisely true from the point of view of everyone involved, or reflective of normal circumstances.
NoMoreTails wrote:Of course he would, I'm just saying he had to to replace Jonathan's (very likely greater than half) input.
My point was that I think Augeri's writing outside Journey was better than Perry's.
Outside writers is not needed anymore than it was while Perry was in the band.
The lyrics on most of Generations has more substance than most of the Cain/Perry era. As far as the music, Neal and Jon are both still there. Other than melody I doubt Perry had much to do with writing the music in most cases.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 39 guests