SAFEST prediction in the history of music

by **Free** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 6:58 am

Steve Perry will never record an album again.

by **TRAGChick** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:09 am

Free wrote:Steve Perry will never record an album again.

I'll see your prediction....

....and raise you - "iPod Tunes" only. No tours.

by *Laura » Sun Feb 19, 2006 12:45 am

Free wrote:Steve Perry will never record an album again.

What,did you have a beer with Nostradamus? :roll:

by **The_Noble_Cause** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:30 am

Free wrote:Steve Perry will never record an album again.

I've got a better one:

On their next upcoming tour, Journey will close their shows using LTS as an encore.
You heard it here first!

by **Rockindeano** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:50 am

Free wrote:Steve Perry will never record an album again.

I'll take that bet.

by **Red13JoePa** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 5:40 am

MMMMmmmmmm....I'll modify it to "rock album."

Covers, unless they're rock covers, and especially not standards covers (latest to grab Rod The Mod's coattails is Eddie Money to Andrew's chagrain) will not count.

by **Rockindeano** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 7:00 am

I'll bet you Perry puts out an cd before Journey does?

by **ohsherrie** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 7:14 am

Rock'ndeano wrote:I'll bet you Perry puts out an cd before Journey does?

Hope you win that one. Are you talking about a whole album by Steve or just an appearance on someone else's? Or maybe you mean you don't think Journey will record again. :?:

by **yak** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 7:15 am

Free wrote:Steve Perry will never record an album again.

Now there's a no-brainer! Especially, and in light of, his Chicago performance.

by **jrnyman28** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 7:49 am

Well, If Tommy Denander really hits it off with Perry, he may just be the catalyst Perry needs to record an album. I can easily see Tommy politely pushing Perry in a creative fashion. And I can see there being a little rock to it. I wouldn't call it a rock album though, anymore than I would call U2 a rock band.

by **ohsherrie** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 8:09 am

jrnyman28 wrote:Well, If Tommy Denander really hits it off with Perry, he may just be the catalyst Perry needs to record an album. I can easily see Tommy politely pushing Perry in a creative fashion. And I can see there being a little rock to it.

I don't know anything about Tommy Denander, but if he gets Steve to sing he's allright with me.

I wouldn't call it a rock album though, anymore than I would call U2 a rock band.

U2 not a rock band? :shock:

by *Laura » Sun Feb 19, 2006 8:15 am

ohsherrie wrote: U2 not a rock band?

Ex-rock band,at least that`s how I personally feel about them.

It all ended with 'Joshua Tree' for me. That`s a masterpiece for which I forgive them for everything they have put out after that.

by **ohsherrie** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 8:58 am

Shania wrote:
ohsherrie wrote: U2 not a rock band?

Ex-rock band,at least that`s how I personally feel about them. It all ended with 'Joshua Tree' for me. That`s a masterpiece for which I forgive them for everything they have put out after that.

I just always think of them as a rock band. I don't consciously put music into catagories when I listen to it. If I like it, I like it regardless of the genre. There is just more music I like in some genres than others. I have a great deal of respect for Bono and will always think of U2 as one of the great bands.

by **jrnyman28** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:09 am

Shania wrote:
ohsherrie wrote: U2 not a rock band?

Ex-rock band,at least that`s how I personally feel about them.

Exactly what I was getting at!

Shania wrote:It all ended with 'Joshua Tree' for me. That`s a masterpiece for which I forgive them for everything they have put out after that.

"Achtung Baby" was a great rock CD as well IMO. After that......all downhill! In Fact, I would say that Building The Atomic Bomb sounds like a weak remake of Achtung Baby.

by **Free** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 12:49 pm

Rock'ndeano wrote:I'll bet you Perry puts out an cd before Journey does?

How much???????

by **anonymousse** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:13 pm

"Achtung Baby" was a great rock CD as well IMO. After that......all downhill! In Fact, I would say that Building The Atomic Bomb sounds like a weak remake of Achtung Baby.[/quote]

Agree with that. All of Achtung Baby is excellent.

by **Monker** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 1:39 pm

Shania wrote:
ohsherrie wrote: U2 not a rock band?

Ex-rock band,at least that`s how I personally feel about them. It all ended with 'Joshua Tree' for me. That`s a masterpiece for which I forgive them for everything they have put out after that.

That's a bit judgemental. They're a rock band in the same way that Nirvana was a rock band. You may not like the music but that doesn't mean it isn't rock. If it's not alternative rock (which is what U2 ALWAYS WAS), what is it?

by **Rockindeano** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 1:41 pm

I agree.

U2 isn't close to a rock band. Thay are just a political ass kissing pop band.

by *Laura » Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:28 pm

Rock'ndeano wrote: Thay are just a political ass kissing pop band.

Maybe that`s why they`ll be inducted in the R`n`R HOF in March.
Then Bono can relax and get his 1.5 mill worth Nobel Prize.

I`ve read somewhere he spoke at both the Republican and Democrat party conventions in the US. True?
Busy guy,eh?

MR

SAFEST prediction in the history of music

SAFEST prediction in the history of music

Re: SAFEST prediction in the history of music

Re: SAFEST prediction in the history of music

Re: SAFEST prediction in the history of music

Re: SAFEST prediction in the history of music

Re: SAFEST prediction in the history of music

Who is online