Yes...the Voice makes all the difference. If you mapped out Journey's career in a graph it would start low....then with Perry's arrival it the line would shoot to the top of the grid....and with his departure it would shoot back down again.
And I'm not just talking about record sales, tour income, use of limos and helicopters. The quality of the songs, the production, the authenticity of the music are other criteria where the Perry years are far, far superior to anything the band have produced without him.
Sure...a tiny handful of die-hards might take offence to all this...but I reckon about 95% of Journey fans wouldn't disagree.
As for ROR....well, no disrespect to Smith and Valory...but Perry made the right decision. It was 1986 and Journey needed a modern, contemporary sound. This wasn't the time for throwback, 70s rock - so the simple drumming, the heavy reliance on keyboards and the glorious voice high in the mix made total sense the radio stations and the market at the time.
Let's face it...every major rock band in the mid-80s did much the same thing. Take Queen... Heart... Foreigner...John Waite...Don Henley....all of these rock/AOR acts went for a smooth, slightly synthetic production.
Smith just wasn't cut out for mid-80s rock - whereas say Roger Taylor was happy to adapt. So let's not keep portraying Smith as a victim of the megalomania of Perry.
Anyway...just my opinion.
