OT: Women - Republicans vs. Democrats

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

OT: Women - Republicans vs. Democrats

Postby NealIsGod » Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:19 pm

This page shows famous women who are Republicans. Then click on the link above the pic for the Democrats.

http://boortz.com/more/funny/republican_women.html
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Re: OT: Women - Republicans vs. Democrats

Postby SteveForever » Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:25 pm

NealIsGod wrote:This page shows famous women who are Republicans. Then click on the link above the pic for the Democrats.

http://boortz.com/more/funny/republican_women.html


:lol: :lol:
SteveForever
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3177
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:37 am

re

Postby lights1961 » Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:33 am

:)
lights1961
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5362
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:33 am

Postby Just Mindy » Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:40 am

Leave it to NIGGY to find something like this :lol:
Things do not change, we change. ~ Henry David Thoreau
User avatar
Just Mindy
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:26 am

Re: OT: Women - Republicans vs. Democrats

Postby Barb » Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:51 am

NealIsGod wrote:This page shows famous women who are Republicans. Then click on the link above the pic for the Democrats.

http://boortz.com/more/funny/republican_women.html



8)
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:56 am

I don't want people in public servive that I want to stick my dick into.
Damnit, I want people who know what the fuck they are doing!
That is why we are in the inextricable rut we are currently in.
No, not because people voted for Dubbya based upon how badly they wanted to lay him.
But because of similar superficial judgements, like "I'd rather drink a beer with him over that other guy. Besides, Kerry looks frighteningly like Herman Munster."

Image
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Barb » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:06 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:I don't want people in public servive that I want to stick my dick into.
Damnit, I want people who know what the fuck they are doing!
That is why we are in the inextricable rut we are currently in.
No, not because people voted for Dubbya based upon how badly they wanted to lay him.
But because of similar superficial judgements, like "I'd rather drink a beer with him over that other guy. Besides, Kerry looks frighteningly like Herman Munster."

Image


I voted for him because he wants to kick terrorist ass. John Kerry sees terrorism as a "police matter". Not to mention the guy couldn't stick with one position on anything if his life depended on it -- a different position depending to which audience he was speaking. Now THAT is leadership! :roll:
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby heardonthestreet » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:09 am

The world needs to see us as a formidable looking foe, not a bunch of pussies. :wink:
User avatar
heardonthestreet
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2351
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 3:23 am
Location: "How Can I Keep From Singing?"

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:18 am

Barb wrote:I voted for him because he wants to kick terrorist ass.


There were terrorists in Iraq before we invaded?
News to me.
In fact, Saddam was a noted secularist who wouldn't stand for fundamentalist Arab scum in his land.
Also, Al Qaeda is gradually overtaking Afghanistan again.
So much for "kicking ass". :roll:

Barb wrote:John Kerry sees terrorism as a "police matter".


In part, he'd be correct.
It was thru the efforts of the British police that the recent terror plot was thwarted.

Barb wrote:Not to mention the guy couldn't stick with one position on anything if his life depended on it -- a different position depending to which audience he was speaking. Now THAT is leadership! :roll:


For every contradicted position Kerry put out, I can find twice as many Bush has flipped on since taking office.
Now go dunk your head back into the Koolaid barrel.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Barb » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:23 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Barb wrote:I voted for him because he wants to kick terrorist ass.


There were terrorists in Iraq before we invaded?
News to me.
In fact, Saddam was a noted secularist who wouldn't stand for fundamentalist Arab scum in his land.
Also, Al Qaeda is gradually overtaking Afghanistan again.
So much for "kicking ass". :roll:

Barb wrote:John Kerry sees terrorism as a "police matter".


In part, he'd be correct.
It was thru the efforts of the British police that the recent terror plot was thwarted.

Barb wrote:Not to mention the guy couldn't stick with one position on anything if his life depended on it -- a different position depending to which audience he was speaking. Now THAT is leadership! :roll:


For every contradicted position Kerry put out, I can find twice as many Bush has flipped on since taking office.
Now go dunk your head back into the Koolaid barrel.


Not gonna argue with you TNC -- I just stated my opinion. I didn't insult you, but like most liberals, you can't state an opinion or engage in discussion without a personal slam. Thanks. :)
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby Big J » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:29 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Barb wrote:I voted for him because he wants to kick terrorist ass.


There were terrorists in Iraq before we invaded?
News to me.
In fact, Saddam was a noted secularist who wouldn't stand for fundamentalist Arab scum in his land.
Also, Al Qaeda is gradually overtaking Afghanistan again.
So much for "kicking ass". :roll:

Barb wrote:John Kerry sees terrorism as a "police matter".


In part, he'd be correct.
It was thru the efforts of the British police that the recent terror plot was thwarted.

Barb wrote:Not to mention the guy couldn't stick with one position on anything if his life depended on it -- a different position depending to which audience he was speaking. Now THAT is leadership! :roll:


For every contradicted position Kerry put out, I can find twice as many Bush has flipped on since taking office.
Now go dunk your head back into the Koolaid barrel.


It's funny how liberals/democrats always refer to us Republicans as being Kool-aid drinkers when, in stating their points, any 10 of them will say damned near the EXACT same words.
User avatar
Big J
8 Track
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 7:28 am

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:31 am

Barb wrote:Not gonna argue with you TNC -- I just stated my opinion. I didn't insult you, but like most liberals, you can't state an opinion or engage in discussion without a personal slam. Thanks. :)


And you, like most Conservative ass-jockeys, are armed only with a wellspring of self-righteous anger and a lifetime of sexual repression.
Nice facts, ma'am.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:34 am

Big J wrote:It's funny how liberals/democrats always refer to us Republicans as being Kool-aid drinkers when, in stating their points, any 10 of them will say damned near the EXACT same words.


Yeah, because the brainless hordes of GOPers who march in lockstep with the President are really known for straying from the script.
Every speech goes something along these lines.......

"9-11....fighting them over there so we don't fight them here.....9-11.....9-11.......9-11..........Clinton's dick.........fighting them over there so we don't fight them here......oh, and did I mention 9-11?"
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby Barb » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:40 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Barb wrote:Not gonna argue with you TNC -- I just stated my opinion. I didn't insult you, but like most liberals, you can't state an opinion or engage in discussion without a personal slam. Thanks. :)


And you, like most Conservative ass-jockeys, are armed only with a wellspring of self-righteous anger and a lifetime of sexual repression.
Nice facts, ma'am.


LOL - if you only knew me. :lol:
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

re

Postby lights1961 » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:45 am

I would bet on any given day the british police did not find that terror plot out on there own.. I would guess that the new age of CIA/FBI and all the other anti terror agencies through out the world helped solve this case, before it happened... not so before 9/11...we had this wall the 9/11 commission kinda wrote about that... but since the 9/11 movie came out--none of the libs want to believe it now...even though Richard Clark was their hero during the hearings... sad really...

and Kerry has no guts to go out on a limb, except to go after the swift boaters who are now over 60... :) Iam JOHN KERRY and I served in Vietnam.. After I served I ran home and ratted against all his fellow soldiers...gee what a swell guy...


Rick
lights1961
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5362
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:33 am

Re: re

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:46 am

lights1961 wrote: but since the 9/11 movie came out--none of the libs want to believe it now...even though Richard Clark was their hero during the hearings... sad really...


This film was disowned by Republicans and Dems alike.
An FBI-consultant on the film even quit midway thru it.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Re: re

Postby Barb » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:47 am

lights1961 wrote:I would bet on any given day the british police did not find that terror plot out on there own.. I would guess that the new age of CIA/FBI and all the other anti terror agencies through out the world helped solve this case, before it happened... not so before 9/11...we had this wall the 9/11 commission kinda wrote about that... but since the 9/11 movie came out--none of the libs want to believe it now...even though Richard Clark was their hero during the hearings... sad really...

and Kerry has no guts to go out on a limb, except to go after the swift boaters who are now over 60... :) Iam JOHN KERRY and I served in Vietnam.. After I served I ran home and ratted against all his fellow soldiers...gee what a swell guy...


Rick


My older brother was in Vietnam for five freaking years. He NEVER talks about it brags about it, let alone bring a VIDEO CAMERA with him to document his own heroics! :lol:
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Re: re

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:50 am

Barb wrote:My older brother was in Vietnam for five freaking years. He NEVER talks about it brags about it, let alone bring a VIDEO CAMERA with him to document his own heroics! :lol:


So Kerry took a camera with him and Bush was AWOL.
Which would you choose?
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Re: re

Postby Barb » Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:59 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
Barb wrote:My older brother was in Vietnam for five freaking years. He NEVER talks about it brags about it, let alone bring a VIDEO CAMERA with him to document his own heroics! :lol:


So Kerry took a camera with him and Bush was AWOL.
Which would you choose?


You are too hateful TNC. It's Friday -- lighten up!
Barb
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:55 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Postby squirt1 » Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:19 am

Google -Saddam and terrorists -and start reading. He was up to his bumpers in terrorists and allowed Iraq to be a training ground.
squirt1
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1914
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:47 am

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:24 am

squirt1 wrote:Google -Saddam and terrorists -and start reading. He was up to his bumpers in terrorists and allowed Iraq to be a training ground.


Ok, and as I do that you can thumb thru the last week's 148 pg report from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence which states unequivocally (yet again) that Saddam had no link to Al Qaeda.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby conversationpc » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:20 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Ok, and as I do that you can thumb thru the last week's 148 pg report from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence which states unequivocally (yet again) that Saddam had no link to Al Qaeda.


The issue isn't necessarily whether Iraq had a link to Al Qaeda. It's partly do do with Iraq having a link to ANY terrorist organizations or individuals. It's well known that Saddam rewarded the families of the Palestinian homicide bombers. Anyway, "intelligence" and "Senate" should never be mentioned in the same sentence...



MORE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN SADDAM AND AL QAEDA

The Big Lie technique is alive and well .. and being practiced to perfection by the Democratic Party and their fellow travelers in the mainstream American media. You certainly don't have to travel, or read far to hear some Democrat say that there was absolutely no connection whatsoever between Saddam Hussein, Iraq and Al Qaeda. In fact, you'll usually hear it stated something like this: "Everybody knows that there was no connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda." or "It's been proven that there was no connection ......" etc.

The trouble is that those statements are just flat-out lies. There was a connection, and the connection has been proven. Not proven by American intelligence estimates and statements, but proven by documents secured from the Iraqi Intelligence Service.

Here's a link to an amazing article that appears in the current edition of The Weekly Standard. The article is entitled "The Mother of All Connections." It's 15 pages long -- and a somewhat complicated read. Here are just a few gems from the article:

- Saddam agreed in the mid 1990's to a request from Al Qaeda to broadcast anti-Saudi messages on Iraq radio.

- In 1998 there were a series of payments from Saddam Hussein to Osama bin Laden's No. 2 goon, Ayman al Zawahri in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. This was happening at the same time the U.S. was putting increased pressures on Saddam for more inspections, and at the same time Bill Clinton was actually making speeches at the Pentagon that some viewed as preparing the nation for war against Iraq.

- Other documents recovered from Iraqi intelligence show that there were meetings between a high-level Al Qaeda operative and Iraqi intelligence officials in Baghdad. It was also at this very time that Osama bin Laden issued a Fatwa for the "killing of Americans wherever you find them." Not only were these meetings referenced in the documents recovered from the bombed-out Iraqi intelligence headquarters, these meetings were also detailed in the 9/11 Commission Report ... a section of the report never, or so it would seem, released to the Democrats.

- You want more? How about evidence that a former Iraqi soldier who was recruited by the Taliban to fight in Afghanistan was found to have participated with Iraqi intelligence in a plot to blow up an American embassy in Pakistan .. with a chemical bomb. Chemical Bomb? That would be a WMD, in case you didn't know.

You're going to see much more on the Nuze .. and hear about it on the air. There was a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda. There was a connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. And .. yes, connections can be shown between Iraqi intelligence officials and the people who actually carried out the 9/11 attacks on the United States.

Those who seek to politicize the war on terror will never admit the connections. Those who believe that we need to commit ourselves to fighting those who want to kill us will understand that the connections are, in fact, real .. and that the current front for the war on terror is rightfully in Iraq.

http://boortz.com/nuze/200507/07122005.html
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:30 am

conversationpc wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Ok, and as I do that you can thumb thru the last week's 148 pg report from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence which states unequivocally (yet again) that Saddam had no link to Al Qaeda.


The issue isn't necessarily whether Iraq had a link to Al Qaeda. It's partly do do with Iraq having a link to ANY terrorist organizations or individuals. It's well known that Saddam rewarded the families of the Palestinian homicide bombers. Anyway, "intelligence" and "Senate" should never be mentioned in the same sentence...



MORE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN SADDAM AND AL QAEDA

The Big Lie technique is alive and well .. and being practiced to perfection by the Democratic Party and their fellow travelers in the mainstream American media. You certainly don't have to travel, or read far to hear some Democrat say that there was absolutely no connection whatsoever between Saddam Hussein, Iraq and Al Qaeda. In fact, you'll usually hear it stated something like this: "Everybody knows that there was no connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda." or "It's been proven that there was no connection ......" etc.

The trouble is that those statements are just flat-out lies. There was a connection, and the connection has been proven. Not proven by American intelligence estimates and statements, but proven by documents secured from the Iraqi Intelligence Service.

Here's a link to an amazing article that appears in the current edition of The Weekly Standard. The article is entitled "The Mother of All Connections." It's 15 pages long -- and a somewhat complicated read. Here are just a few gems from the article:

- Saddam agreed in the mid 1990's to a request from Al Qaeda to broadcast anti-Saudi messages on Iraq radio.

- In 1998 there were a series of payments from Saddam Hussein to Osama bin Laden's No. 2 goon, Ayman al Zawahri in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. This was happening at the same time the U.S. was putting increased pressures on Saddam for more inspections, and at the same time Bill Clinton was actually making speeches at the Pentagon that some viewed as preparing the nation for war against Iraq.

- Other documents recovered from Iraqi intelligence show that there were meetings between a high-level Al Qaeda operative and Iraqi intelligence officials in Baghdad. It was also at this very time that Osama bin Laden issued a Fatwa for the "killing of Americans wherever you find them." Not only were these meetings referenced in the documents recovered from the bombed-out Iraqi intelligence headquarters, these meetings were also detailed in the 9/11 Commission Report ... a section of the report never, or so it would seem, released to the Democrats.

- You want more? How about evidence that a former Iraqi soldier who was recruited by the Taliban to fight in Afghanistan was found to have participated with Iraqi intelligence in a plot to blow up an American embassy in Pakistan .. with a chemical bomb. Chemical Bomb? That would be a WMD, in case you didn't know.

You're going to see much more on the Nuze .. and hear about it on the air. There was a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda. There was a connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. And .. yes, connections can be shown between Iraqi intelligence officials and the people who actually carried out the 9/11 attacks on the United States.

Those who seek to politicize the war on terror will never admit the connections. Those who believe that we need to commit ourselves to fighting those who want to kill us will understand that the connections are, in fact, real .. and that the current front for the war on terror is rightfully in Iraq.

http://boortz.com/nuze/200507/07122005.html


Dude, this article is cribbed from the Weekly Standard - why don't you quote MAD Magazine while you're at it?
The execustive editor, Fred Barnes, just wrote one gargantuan WH dick-suck disguised as objective journalism called "Rebel in Chief".
Give me a break.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Postby conversationpc » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:34 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Dude, this article is cribbed from the Weekly Standard - why don't you quote MAD Magazine while you're at it?
The execustive editor, Fred Barnes, just wrote one gargantuan WH dick-suck disguised as objective journalism called "Rebel in Chief".
Give me a break.


I don't even read that magazine but, yeah, since it's in that conservative scum rag, therefore there's no chance of any of it being true. :roll:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:39 am

conversationpc wrote:I don't even read that magazine but, yeah, since it's in that conservative scum rag, therefore there's no chance of any of it being true. :roll:


Yep pretty much.
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is non-partisan and features both Dems and Repubs.
Meanwhile you just threw me a copy of Joseph Goebel Monthly.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Re: OT: Women - Republicans vs. Democrats

Postby FormerJrnyFan » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:44 am

NealIsGod wrote:This page shows famous women who are Republicans. Then click on the link above the pic for the Democrats.

http://boortz.com/more/funny/republican_women.html


Image
Image
... I will ALWAYS be a Sototarian
User avatar
FormerJrnyFan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3242
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:54 am
Location: Yes, that was me!

Postby SteveForever » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:53 am

Find some good Democratic leaders and put them out there, we can't help it if your party can't unite. Who you got? whiny Liebermann, rich boy Kerry, Barney Clark?
SteveForever
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3177
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:37 am

Postby conversationpc » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:55 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
conversationpc wrote:I don't even read that magazine but, yeah, since it's in that conservative scum rag, therefore there's no chance of any of it being true. :roll:


Yep pretty much.
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is non-partisan and features both Dems and Repubs.
Meanwhile you just threw me a copy of Joseph Goebel Monthly.


Yeah, just like the 9-11 Commission was bipartisan. Jamie Gorelick...Now there was a really smart pick to be on that commission. :roll:

Looking over the list of Repubs on that committe, I'm not overly impressed. Of course, I'm not overly impressed with about 90% of the Repubs currently in office anyway.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby conversationpc » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:57 am

steveforever wrote:Find some good Democratic leaders and put them out there, we can't help it if your party can't unite. Who you got? whiny Liebermann, rich boy Kerry, Barney Clark?


The Republicans can't unite, either, for that matter. They can't unite on one of the most important issues right now, immigration reform and border security. Along with the Libs, they are mostly a bunch of sorry losers.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:59 am

steveforever wrote:we can't help it if your party can't unite.


It's ur party currently in meltdown, or haven't u kept up with all this week's headlines about the GOP rebels?

steveforever wrote:Who you got? whiny Liebermann,


That guy's pretty much a Republican. Take him.

steveforever wrote:rich boy Kerry,


Yeah, as if no other politicians are rich.
Didn't George W. start out as a poor impoverished dirt farmer?

Barney Clark?


That's not even a politician.

Thanks for the belly laughs.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16055
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Next

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests