
but, looking at the increasing number of singers here, anyone can share his point of view.
Cheers!

Moderator: Andrew
I'm not a singer, but I would say Steve Perry!! A higher much more unique voice. IMOddregs wrote:Obviously this is addressed to the one and only JSS...![]()
but, looking at the increasing number of singers here, anyone can share his point of view.
Cheers!
whocares wrote:For me personally Trying to sing more than one or two Perry songs was extremely painful, probably because I was trying to sound TOO much like Perry himself. It always tore up my throat singing Perry Songs
Enigma869 wrote:whocares wrote:For me personally Trying to sing more than one or two Perry songs was extremely painful, probably because I was trying to sound TOO much like Perry himself. It always tore up my throat singing Perry Songs
Hey...Nice of Steve Augeri to make an appearance here at MR. Welcome aboard Steve
Sandman67 wrote:While Perry would get my vote, Cetera from Chicago strikes me as another who would be hard to imitate even more than Mercury.
conversationpc wrote:Sandman67 wrote:While Perry would get my vote, Cetera from Chicago strikes me as another who would be hard to imitate even more than Mercury.
Jason Scheff does a pretty good job of it.
Sandman67 wrote:While Perry would get my vote, Cetera from Chicago strikes me as another who would be hard to imitate even more than Mercury.
conversationpc wrote:Enigma869 wrote:whocares wrote:For me personally Trying to sing more than one or two Perry songs was extremely painful, probably because I was trying to sound TOO much like Perry himself. It always tore up my throat singing Perry Songs
Hey...Nice of Steve Augeri to make an appearance here at MR. Welcome aboard Steve
Post of the day nominee here!
whocares wrote:Yeah, that's for sure. Thank God I don't always think before I post. At least I don't try to make people think I'm someone that was actually IN or close to the band at one time, like a certain person (coughDVcough) implies from time to time. Anyway... What was I saying???
Enigma869 wrote:conversationpc wrote:Sandman67 wrote:While Perry would get my vote, Cetera from Chicago strikes me as another who would be hard to imitate even more than Mercury.
Jason Scheff does a pretty good job of it.
I'm not much of a Chicago fan, but didn't Chicago have a fairly big hit (I believe it was "Look Away") as soon as Cetera left the band to pursue his solo career? I always thought Cetera had a unique voice (but not in the same league as Perry or Mercury, IMO), so I was quite surprised that the music industry embraced Chicago without Cetera, who had been in the band forever!
John from Boston
Jeremey wrote:Freddie is a lot tougher, and the way he treated his voice makes him a true enigma!
Saint John wrote:Jeremey wrote:Freddie is a lot tougher, and the way he treated his voice makes him a true enigma!
Please elaborate, if you will. While you're certainly the more refined critic here, I just can't believe Mercury is more difficult to sing than Perry. I'd love to hear why.
Jeremey wrote:Saint John wrote:Jeremey wrote:Freddie is a lot tougher, and the way he treated his voice makes him a true enigma!
Please elaborate, if you will. While you're certainly the more refined critic here, I just can't believe Mercury is more difficult to sing than Perry. I'd love to hear why.
Freddie had very little formal technique. Guys like Freddie, Bon Scott, Brian Johnson, Axl Rose, Sammy Hagar, and others have/had a very singular way of singing, one that is 95% who they are, and 5% real technique. It's hard for me to explain, but Freddie could smoke, party all night, eat lots of sausages, or whatever, and what came out of his vocal cords was 95% going to be there, because he's basically belting what's there. He was real inconsistant live, had a very affected manor of singing when it came to his showboat style - Songs like "Radio Ga Ga" or "I Want To Break Free," and a very throaty, raw sound when he cut loose on songs like "Tie Your Mother Down." Freddie also didn't have a great tonal center, and he had more tendency to be "pitchy" live than a real studied vocalist.
All of these things make what he did more difficult to sing, for me at least. Perry had great technique, one of the best command of his own instrument of any male pop singer ever. Perry also followed a lot of rules, which makes it easier (not necessarily if you don't have the range) to sing a Perry song "straight" than a Freddie song.
That's all my opinion, of course - Jeff's got a good deal of experience covering both, so I'm sure he may have a different take on it, but every singer's different. Bottom line, you can't really say "what's tougher to sing - Howlin' Wolf or Wayne Newton?" because it's all subjective!!
Jeremey wrote: but Freddie could smoke, party all night, eat lots of sausages, or whatever,
Rockin'Deano wrote:Jeremey wrote: but Freddie could smoke, party all night, eat lots of sausages, or whatever,
Just what exactly do you mean by "eat lots of sausages?" You mean Dicks, or the actual grinded up meat product?
Rockin'Deano wrote:Jeremey wrote: but Freddie could smoke, party all night, eat lots of sausages, or whatever,
Just what exactly do you mean by "eat lots of sausages?" You mean Dicks, or the actual grinded up meat product?
Jeremey wrote:and a very throaty, raw sound when he cut loose on songs like "Tie Your Mother Down."
Rockin'Deano wrote:By the way Jeremey, are you coming to the "Baltimore Blowout?".....for you girls, it's "On all fours in Baltimore"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests