Moderator: Andrew
Vladan wrote:I always thought Michael Bolton could of been a great choice for a Journey frontman. He did play with John and Neal didn't he, filled in for Perry. Is that footage anywhere to be heard or seen? sounds rare.
Matthew wrote:
At one point I believe the label had them go write more with some outside writers, resulting in a couple more ballads w/Kim Tribble.
Matthew wrote:I haven't heard of Tribble. Any good?
Matthew wrote:I actually much prefer "Generations" to "Arrival"...but aside from "A Better Life" it's hard for me to understand why you'd feel it had the potential to rank higher than, say, "Escape" or "Frontiers".
Matthew wrote:The implication you make here is that Journey hadn't been interested in writing pop songs before 1986. A brief glance at the track listing on the Greatest Hits shows this isn't true.
Matthew wrote:Well, Neal's solos had soul...and Perry's vocals had soul...so I guess you must be referring to Jonathan Cain's contribution.
Enigma869 wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:
As for ROR, it was a new direction that Perry wanted, not Journey. Cain to a degree, possibly may have been interested in writing pop songs, but Neal wasn't that involved in the writing, came in did his parts, got out basically.
Well, it's never been much of a secret that Neal LOATHES "pop songs". It's not his thing, never has been his thing, and never will be his thing! I've always been stunned how open Neal has been about how much disdain he seems to have for the "pop" sound, considering that he's made his living in a band that made themselves a household name by writing these types of songs. Neal has ALWAYS been a rocker, at heart and sometimes I wonder if he isn't disappointed a bit by the music that Journey became so famous for. My hunch is that Neal probably hates most of the dirty dozen songs that put Journey on the map.
John from Boston
NoMoreTails wrote:Yes, may still be but I haven't heard any of his more current stuff, I actually didn't care much for Hughes/Thrall but am surprised that Glenn wasn't more widely used as the sole lead singer in bands. I like quite a lot of the Hughes/Coverdale/Bolin Deep Purple stuff.
I'm about the only Generations fan who isn't crazy about ABL, its ok, but I find it kind of lifeless in a way, the one Gens song that could have fit on ROR imo.
True, but the albums those hits came from, weren't albums of just pop songs, as was the case with ROR.
NoMoreTails wrote:Enigma869 wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:
As for ROR, it was a new direction that Perry wanted, not Journey. Cain to a degree, possibly may have been interested in writing pop songs, but Neal wasn't that involved in the writing, came in did his parts, got out basically.
Well, it's never been much of a secret that Neal LOATHES "pop songs". It's not his thing, never has been his thing, and never will be his thing! I've always been stunned how open Neal has been about how much disdain he seems to have for the "pop" sound, considering that he's made his living in a band that made themselves a household name by writing these types of songs. Neal has ALWAYS been a rocker, at heart and sometimes I wonder if he isn't disappointed a bit by the music that Journey became so famous for. My hunch is that Neal probably hates most of the dirty dozen songs that put Journey on the map.
John from Boston
Yeah, and the ones he does like he's sick of playing anyway.
Matthew wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:Enigma869 wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:
As for ROR, it was a new direction that Perry wanted, not Journey. Cain to a degree, possibly may have been interested in writing pop songs, but Neal wasn't that involved in the writing, came in did his parts, got out basically.
Well, it's never been much of a secret that Neal LOATHES "pop songs". It's not his thing, never has been his thing, and never will be his thing! I've always been stunned how open Neal has been about how much disdain he seems to have for the "pop" sound, considering that he's made his living in a band that made themselves a household name by writing these types of songs. Neal has ALWAYS been a rocker, at heart and sometimes I wonder if he isn't disappointed a bit by the music that Journey became so famous for. My hunch is that Neal probably hates most of the dirty dozen songs that put Journey on the map.
John from Boston
Yeah, and the ones he does like he's sick of playing anyway.
It always amazes me how little pride and responsibility Schon takes in/for his own music.
NoMoreTails wrote:
You might say that in one context, but in another, Neal has always given quality performances on every recording, always playing brilliantly and what is appropriate for the song, so in that sense, he takes great pride in his work.
His problem, and mine, with Journey's music is that the general public only knows a fraction of what Journey is about and expects Journey to be only that. I think the post-Perry Journey has been overly concerned with what people expect them to be.
Matthew wrote:I couldn't agree more - and this is perhaps where they miss Perry. Yes, Perry was the archetypal rock sar frontman in many respects - but listening to Schon's comments on the BTM documentary it seems that Schon was happy to follow Perry's directions. Left to his own devices Schon lost his way....
NoMoreTails wrote:Matthew wrote:I couldn't agree more - and this is perhaps where they miss Perry. Yes, Perry was the archetypal rock sar frontman in many respects - but listening to Schon's comments on the BTM documentary it seems that Schon was happy to follow Perry's directions. Left to his own devices Schon lost his way....
While some leadership may have been missing, I'd have to say its that of Herbie as I think Perry steered Journey down the wrong path after 1983, of course Jon and Neal share in the blame for that as well as they supported Perry's decisions over Herbie's.
Vladan wrote:I always thought Michael Bolton could of been a great choice for a Journey frontman. He did play with John and Neal didn't he, filled in for Perry. Is that footage anywhere to be heard or seen? sounds rare.
Matthew wrote:Do you know why Journey haven't sacked Azoff and brought HH back? Or has HH retired now?
finalfight wrote:Vladan wrote:I always thought Michael Bolton could of been a great choice for a Journey frontman. He did play with John and Neal didn't he, filled in for Perry. Is that footage anywhere to be heard or seen? sounds rare.
Terence Trent D'Arby would have been a great choice before he went mad as a fish! Vocally he has a very similar range and tone to Perry but his voice and look was/is unique enough to bypass the copy cat comparisons.
Come to think of it - he sounds like a cross between Perry and JSS, great singers without question.
finalfight wrote:I forgot he performed with INXS.
Maybe its wishful thinking on my part but I would have loved to have seen how Terence would have panned out with Journey and still maintain that his voice would/could have fitted. To my ears at least it almost sounds like Perry and D'Arby shared some of the same musical influences, Sam Cooke for instance.
Ah, for an alternate reality where this may well have happened, afterall who could have percieved that a JSS fronted Journey would work as well as it evidently has?
Hey Jeremey, do you cover Terence Trent D'Arby in your solo act?
Jeremey wrote:finalfight wrote:I forgot he performed with INXS.
Maybe its wishful thinking on my part but I would have loved to have seen how Terence would have panned out with Journey and still maintain that his voice would/could have fitted. To my ears at least it almost sounds like Perry and D'Arby shared some of the same musical influences, Sam Cooke for instance.
Ah, for an alternate reality where this may well have happened, afterall who could have percieved that a JSS fronted Journey would work as well as it evidently has?
Hey Jeremey, do you cover Terence Trent D'Arby in your solo act?
No TTD, I don't really have the voice for it anymore. However, one of the first times I performed in front of more than 15 people or so was at a college band-jam type thing my freshman year & I came out on stage and did "As Yet Untitled," which really confused people....I know that TTD considered Perry an influence though, and I believe he did thank Perry in the liner notes of "Neither Fish Nor Flesh," plus TTD basically channels Sam Cooke on many songs.
NoMoreTails wrote:Matthew wrote:Do you know why Journey haven't sacked Azoff and brought HH back? Or has HH retired now?
From what I've read and seen discussed here before, Herbie is retired from managing but still runs Nocturne and washed his hands of Journey after Neal and Jon agreed to Perry's demanding he be let go in favor of Azoff as a condition of Perry's returning for TBF. I think he also said Azoff wanted him to work for him with Journey post Perry, a slap in the face, asking him to work for him and Journey, his having been founder and partner in Journey. There was talk of Herbie working with Soul Sirkus at one point, probably wishful thinking on Neal's part.
Enigma869 wrote:[While I have zero problem with you, or anyone else responding to mine or anyone else's post on a public message board, your "holier than thou" attitude is fucking ridiculous!
You are more full of yourself than any jackass I've ever come across on a message board (and I can assure you that I met a whole lot of them on BT over the past 6 years!).
First of all...If you actually read my post, you would have seen that I was thinking out loud
and unlike you, was certainly not passing off any of my thoughts as gospel (the word "seemingly" should have been your first tip that it was my OPINION)!
Journey isn't my life, dude!
Do me a favor, and please make a concerted effort to skip over my postings, and I will do the same with yours!
Matthew wrote:
HH loathes Jonathan Cain too, doesn't he? Probably another reason why he wouldn't want to return.
What are Sy Klopps like?
NoMoreTails wrote:Matthew wrote:
HH loathes Jonathan Cain too, doesn't he? Probably another reason why he wouldn't want to return.
What are Sy Klopps like?
Yes, he seems to think barely more of him than he does of Perry.
I have the second album, Ole Blue Eye is Back, haven't listened to it in quite a while but liked it quite well. I think its the only one on which Neal plays on every song, great playing from him and Herbie does a pretty good job on vocals.
Monker wrote:Obviously not...Anybody who read any of Steve Smith's interviews, or followed him at all, would know he has shown no special loyalty towards Perry and was in the reunion only for the 'reunion'.
Matthew wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:Matthew wrote:
HH loathes Jonathan Cain too, doesn't he? Probably another reason why he wouldn't want to return.
What are Sy Klopps like?
Yes, he seems to think barely more of him than he does of Perry.
I have the second album, Ole Blue Eye is Back, haven't listened to it in quite a while but liked it quite well. I think its the only one on which Neal plays on every song, great playing from him and Herbie does a pretty good job on vocals.
I'll try to track that one down....
NoMoreTails wrote:Matthew wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:Matthew wrote:
HH loathes Jonathan Cain too, doesn't he? Probably another reason why he wouldn't want to return.
What are Sy Klopps like?
Yes, he seems to think barely more of him than he does of Perry.
I have the second album, Ole Blue Eye is Back, haven't listened to it in quite a while but liked it quite well. I think its the only one on which Neal plays on every song, great playing from him and Herbie does a pretty good job on vocals.
I'll try to track that one down....
You might try RossValory.com
Matthew wrote:Monker wrote:Obviously not...Anybody who read any of Steve Smith's interviews, or followed him at all, would know he has shown no special loyalty towards Perry and was in the reunion only for the 'reunion'.
Well, I followed the BTM documentary and Smith definitely gave the impression that Perry absence was a deciding factor in leaving the band.
NoMoreTails wrote:Matthew wrote:Monker wrote:Obviously not...Anybody who read any of Steve Smith's interviews, or followed him at all, would know he has shown no special loyalty towards Perry and was in the reunion only for the 'reunion'.
Well, I followed the BTM documentary and Smith definitely gave the impression that Perry absence was a deciding factor in leaving the band.
I haven't seen BTM in a while, but the context or editing could play a part in that impression
Matthew wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:Matthew wrote:Monker wrote:Obviously not...Anybody who read any of Steve Smith's interviews, or followed him at all, would know he has shown no special loyalty towards Perry and was in the reunion only for the 'reunion'.
Well, I followed the BTM documentary and Smith definitely gave the impression that Perry absence was a deciding factor in leaving the band.
I haven't seen BTM in a while, but the context or editing could play a part in that impression
Yes - and the fact that Steve Perry had editorial control of the documentary.
NoMoreTails wrote:Matthew wrote:NoMoreTails wrote:Matthew wrote:Monker wrote:Obviously not...Anybody who read any of Steve Smith's interviews, or followed him at all, would know he has shown no special loyalty towards Perry and was in the reunion only for the 'reunion'.
Well, I followed the BTM documentary and Smith definitely gave the impression that Perry absence was a deciding factor in leaving the band.
I haven't seen BTM in a while, but the context or editing could play a part in that impression
Yes - and the fact that Steve Perry had editorial control of the documentary.
Yep, he's apparently drove some hard bargains in letting Neal and Jon continue without him, if he'd been holding a hostage for ranson, he'd have gotten away with the money and the bait.
He must have had some great lawyers, I don't understand how they had to give away so much to a member who, imo, didn't even want to be in the band any longer. Maybe they really should have waited for him a couple more years, with a signed agreement that if he didn't come back at that point he was out and got nothing in return, having no say or no share other than the royalities he'd be due anyway.
Matthew wrote:The desperate need to tour constantly...the shameful gigs on cruiseships and corporate parties...the support slots....ANYTHING to keep money flowing in...no matter how much it distracts them from recording a first-rate album...
Matthew wrote:Yes - I agree - they should have given Perry two more years followed by a serious ultimatum. Either it would have led to a new album with Perry or it would have bought time to prepare for the next phase of the band in a less hurried and cack-handed way.
NoMoreTails wrote:Cruises/corporate parties I agree with you, but in fairness, the "supporting slot" is officially a co-headline, though I know that it is widely viewed as them being the opener. In fact, the show I went to in VA Beach, one of the radio stations plays like two hours of music before the show from the band thats in town that night and one hour after the show, that night all three of those hours were Def Leppard tunes. That not perceiving the show as co-headliners for sure.
Ihad never before thought they should have given Perry a second more time than they did, but perhaps that would have been smarter and they wouldn't be working the streets for Perry, paraphrasing Herbie.
My only real problem with the recorded works of the Augeri era is that there wasn't enough of them. I would have liked to have seen 4 albums
Touring (money) has come at the expense of art and growth as a band.
Matthew wrote:Monker wrote:Obviously not...Anybody who read any of Steve Smith's interviews, or followed him at all, would know he has shown no special loyalty towards Perry and was in the reunion only for the 'reunion'.
Well, I followed the BTM documentary and Smith definitely gave the impression that Perry absence was a deciding factor in leaving the band.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests